Gender Differences in Mouse and Cursor Movements

REFERENCES

• Accot, J., & Zhai, S. (1997). Beyond Fitts’ law: Models for trajectory-based HCI tasks. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 295–302.
   Google Scholar
• Accot, J., & Zhai, S. (1999). Performance evaluation of input devices in trajectory-based tasks: An application of the steering law. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 466–472.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, G. M., & Peterson, B. S. (2004). Testing the prenatal hormone hypothesis of tic-related disorders: Gender identity and gender role behavior. Development and Psychopathology, 16, 407–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, G. M., Wilcox, T., & Farmer, M. E. (2009). Hormone–behavior associations in early infancy. Hormones and Behavior, 56, 498–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Hashem, F. H., & Khalid, M. (2008). The effect of long-term use of computer mouse devices on median nerve entrapment. Neurosciences, 13, 131–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreano, J. M., & Cahill, L. (2009). Sex influences on the neurobiology of learning and memory. Learning & Memory, 16, 248–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azcarraga, J., & Suarez, M. T. (2012). Predicting academic emotions based on brainwaves, mouse behaviour and personality profile. Proceedings of the PRICAI 2012: Trends in Artificial Intelligence, 728–733.
   Google Scholar
• Bamac, B., Colak, S., Dundar, G., Selekler, H. M., Taskiran, Y., Colak, T., & Balci, E. (2014). Influence of the long term use of a computer on median, ulnar and radial sensory nerves in the wrist region. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 27, 1026–1035. doi:10.2478/s13382-014-0335-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blatter, B. M., & Bongers, P. M. (2002). Duration of computer use and mouse use in relation to musculoskeletal disorders of neck or upper limb. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 30, 295–306. doi:10.1016/s0169-8141(02)00132-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2007). The International Affective Picture Systems (IAPS) in the study of emotion and attention. In J. A. Coan & J. J. B. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment ( pp. 29–46). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cahill, L. (2006). Why sex matters for neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 477–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Card, S. K., English, W. K., & Burr, B. J. (1978). Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys for text selection on a CRT. Ergonomics, 21, 601–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castelli, L., Corazzini, L. L., & Geminiani, G. C. (2008). Spatial navigation in large-scale virtual environments: Gender differences in survey tasks. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1643–1667. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H. M., & Leung, C. T. (2007). The effect on forearm and shoulder muscle activity in using different slanted computer mice. Clinical Biomechanics, 22, 518–523. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cote, J. N. (2012). A critical review on physical factors and functional characteristics that may explain a sex/gender difference in work-related neck/shoulder disorders. Ergonomics, 55, 173–182. doi:10.1080/00140139.2011.586061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47, 448–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyr, D., & Head, M. (2013). Website design in an international context: The role of gender in masculine versus feminine oriented countries. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1358–1367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.050
   Google Scholar
• Dale, R., Kehoe, C., & Spivey, M. (2007). Graded motor responses in the time course of categorizing atypical exemplars. Memory & Cognition, 35, 15–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eich, E., Ng, J. T. W., Macaulay, N. D., Percy, A. D., Grebneva, I., & Watson, D. (2007). Combing music with thought to change mood. In J. A. Coan & J. J. B. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment (pp. 124–136). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381–391.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fitts, P. M., & Peterson, J. R. (1964). Information capacity of discrete motor responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 103–112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fitts, P. M., & Radford, B. K. (1966). Information capacity of discrete motor responses under different cognitive sets. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 475–482.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freeman, J. B., Pauker, K., Apfelbaum, E. P., & Ambady, N. (2009). Continuous dynamics in the real-time perception of race. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 179–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, B., & Nissenbaum, H. (1996). Bias in computer systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 14, 330–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Q., & Agichtein, E. (2008). Exploring mouse movements for inferring query intent. Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 707–708.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, U., & Ramscar, M. (2001). Similarity and categorization. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hertzum, M., & Hornbaek, K. (2010). How age affects pointing with mouse and touchpad: A comparison of young adult, and elderly users. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 26, 703–734. doi:10.1080/10447318.2010.487198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hines, M. (2011). Gender development and the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 34, 69–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hines, M., Fane, B. A., Pasterski, V. L., Mathews, G. A., Conway, G. S., & Brook, C. (2003). Spatial abilities following prenatal androgen abnormality: Targeting and mental rotations performance in individuals with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 28, 1010–1026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde, J. S. (2014). Gender similarities and differences. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 373–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A. B., & Williams, C. C. (2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321, 494–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imhof, M., Vollmeyer, R., & Beierlein, C. (2007). Computer use and the gender gap: The issue of access, use, motivation, and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2823–2837. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, C., Finsen, L., Sogaard, K., & Christensen, H. (2002). Musculoskeletal symptoms and duration of computer and mouse use. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 30, 265–275. doi:10.1016/s0169-8141(02)00130-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapoor, A., Burleson, W., & Picard, R. W. (2007). Automatic prediction of frustration. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 65, 724–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesici, S., Sahin, I., & Akturk, A. O. (2009). Analysis of cognitive learning strategies and computer attitudes, according to college students’ gender and locus of control. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 529–534. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.11.004
   Google Scholar
• Kimchi, R., & Palmer, S. E. (1982). Form and texture in hierarchically constructed patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 521–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura, D. (1999). Sex and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, B., & Whishaw, I. Q. (2009). Fundamentals of human neuropsychology. New York, NY: Worth.
   Google Scholar
• Lassen, C. F., Mikkelsen, S., Kryger, A. I., Brandt, L. P. A., Overgaard, E., Thomsen, J. F., … Andersen, J. H. (2004). Elbow and wrist/hand symptoms among 6,943 computer operators: A 1-year follow-up study (The NUDATA study). American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 46, 521–533. doi:10.1002/ajim.20081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, I. S. (1992). Fitts’ law as a research and design tool in human–computer interaction. Human–Computer Interaction, 7, 91–139.
   Google Scholar
• Martens, J., & Antonenko, P. D. (2012). Narrowing gender-based performance gaps in virtual environment navigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 809–819. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.008
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, F., & Lockerd, A. (2001, 2001). Cheese: tracking mouse movement activity on websites, a tool for user modeling. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 279–280.
   Google Scholar
• Nordander, C., Ohlsson, K., Balogh, I., Hansson, G.-Å., Axmon, A., Persson, R., & Skerfving, S. (2008). Gender differences in workers with identical repetitive industrial tasks: Exposure and musculoskeletal disorders. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 81, 939–947. doi:10.1007/s00420-007-0286-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passig, D., & Levin, H. (1999). Gender interest differences with multimedia learning interfaces. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 173–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puts, D. A., McDaniel, M. A., Jordan, C. L., & Breedlove, S. M. (2008). Spatial ability and prenatal androgens: Meta-analyses of congenital adrenal hyperplasia and digit ratio (2D: 4D) studies. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 100–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh, S. S., Fuortes, L., Vaughn, T., & Bauer, E. P. (2001). Epidemiology of occupational injuries and illnesses in a university population: A focus on age and gender differences. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 39, 581–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheirer, J., Fernandez, R., Klein, J., & Picard, R. W. (2002). Frustrating the user on purpose: A step toward building an affective computer. Interacting with Computers, 14, 93–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher, P., & Morahan-Martin, J. (2001).Gender, Internet and computer attitudes and experiences. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 95–110. doi:10.1016/s0747-5632(00)00032-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sillanpaa, J., Nyberg, M., Uitti, J., Takala, E.-P., Kivi, P., Kilpikari, I., & Laippala, P. (2010). Muscular activity in relation to support of the upper extremity in work with a computer mouse. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 15, 391–406. doi:10.1207/S15327590IJHC1503_05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, I., Choi, J., & Peters, M. (2007). The hunter–gatherer theory of sex differences in spatial abilities: Data from 40 countries. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 261–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spivey, M. J., Grosjean, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 10393–10398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sussman, N. M., & Tyson, D. H. (2000). Sex and power: Gender differences in computer-mediated interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 381–394. doi:10.1016/s0747-5632(00)00020-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay, B., Jung, Y., & Park, T. (2014). When stereotypes meet robots: The double-edge sword of robot gender and personality in human–robot interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 75–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.014
   Google Scholar
• Todman, J., & Day, K. (2006). Computer anxiety: The role of psychological gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 856–869. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treaster, D., & Burr, D. (2004). Gender differences in prevalence of upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Ergonomics, 47, 495–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlström, J. (2005).Ergonomics, musculoskeletal disorders and computer work. Occupational Medicine, 55, 168–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlstrom, J., Svensson, J., Hagberg, M., & Johnson, P. W. (2000). Differences between work methods and gender in computer mouse use. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health, 26, 390–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1999). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule–Expanded form. University of Iowa: Department of Psychology Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, K., & Yamauchi, T. (2014). Semantic priming revealed by mouse movement trajectories. Consciousness and Cognition, 27, 42–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamauchi, T. (2013). Mouse trajectories and state anxiety: Feature selection with random forest. Proceedings of the Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, 399–404.
   Google Scholar
• Yamauchi, T., & Bowman, C. (2014). Mining cursor motions to find the gender, experience and feelings of computer users. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2014): Workshop on Domain Driven Data Mining, 221–230.
   Google Scholar
• Yamauchi, T., Kohn, N., & Yu, N. (2007). Tracking mouse movement in feature inference: Category labels are different from feature labels. Memory & Cognition, 35, 852–863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, N., Yamauchi, T., Yang, H., Chen, Y., & Gutierrez-Osuna, R. (2010). Feature selection for inductive generalization. Cognitive Science, 34, 1574–1593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zander, T. O., Gaertner, M., Kothe, C., & Vilimek, R. (2010). Combining eye gaze input with a brain–computer interface for touchless human–computer interaction. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 27, 38–51. doi:10.1080/10447318.2011.535752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai, S. (2004). Characterizing computer input with Fitts’ law parameters—The information and non-information aspects of pointing. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 6, 791–809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai, S., Kong, J., & Ren, X. (2004). Speed–accuracy tradeoff in Fitts’ law tasks—on the equivalency of actual and nominal pointing precision. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 61, 823–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar