A Review of Exploratory Factor Analysis Decisions and Overview of Current Practices: What We Are Doing and How Can We Improve?

REFERENCES

• Baker, J. R., & Moore, S. M. (2011). Creation and validation of the personal blogging style scale. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 379–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, M. S. (1950). Tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 3, 77–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 289–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Kano, Y. (1990). On the equivalence of factors and components. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 67–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W. (2001). An overview of analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 111–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunz, U. (2004). The computer-email-web (CEW) fluency scale-development and validation. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 17, 479–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, S. E. (2002). Problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being: Development of a theory-based cognitive–behavioral measurement instrument. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 553–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çetin, B., Yaman, E., & Peker, A. (2011). Cyber victim and bullying scale: A study of validity and reliability. Computers & Education, 57, 2261–2271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlton, J. P., & Birkett, P. E. (1995). The development and validation of the Computer Apathy and Anxiety Scale. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13, 41–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cliff, N. (1988). The eigenvalues-greater-than-one rule and the reliability of components. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 276–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comrey, A. L. & Lee H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, J. M., & Huffcutt, A. I. (2003). A review and evaluation of exploratory factor analysis practices in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 6, 147–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Cudeck, R. (2000). Exploratory factor analysis. Handbook of Applied Multivariate Statistics and Mathematical Modeling, pp. 265–296.
   Google Scholar
• Cureton, E. E., & Mulaik, S. A. (1975). The weighted varimax rotation and the promax rotation. Psychometrika, 40, 183–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Winter, J. C., & Dodou, D. (2012). Factor recovery by principal axis factoring and maximum likelihood factor analysis as a function of factor pattern and sample size. Journal of Applied Statistics, 39, 695–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dziuban, C. D., & Harris, C. W. (1973). On the extraction of components and the applicability of the factor model. American Educational Research Journal, 10, 93–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dziuban, C. D., & Shirkey, E. C. (1974). When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 358–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabrigar, L. R., & Wegener, D. T. (2012). Understanding statistics: Exploratory factor analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faiola, A., Ho, C. C., Tarrant, M. D., & MacDorman, K. F. (2011). The aesthetic dimensions of US and South Korean responses to web home pages: A cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 27, 131–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, J. K., MacCallum, R. C., & Tail, M. (1986). The applications of exploratory factor analysis in applied psychology: A critical review and analysis. Personnel Psychology, 39, 291–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furr, M. (2011). Scale construction and psychometrics for social and personality psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gorsuch, R. L. (1988). Exploratory factor analysis. In J. R. Nesselroade & R. B. Cattell (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology ( pp. 231–258). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gorsuch, R. L. (1997). Exploratory factor analysis: Its role in item analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 532–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 6). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hamari, J., & Koivisto, J. (2014). Measuring flow in gamification: Dispositional Flow Scale–2. Computers in Human Behavior, 40, 133–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 191–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 393–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinkin, T. R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21, 967–988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 104–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, M. C. (2014). Creation of a computer self-efficacy measure: Analysis of internal consistency, psychometric properties, and validity. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17, 677–681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, M. C., & Jayne, B. S. (2015). An analysis of more than 1,400 articles, 900 scales, and 17 years of research: The state of scales in cyberpsychology, behavior, and social networking. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18, 181–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennrich, R. I., & Sampson, P. F. (1966). Rotation for simple loadings. Psychometrika, 31, 313–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23, 187–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35, 401–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, P. (2014). An easy guide to factor analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Korobili, S., Togia, A., & Malliari, A. (2010). Computer anxiety and attitudes among undergraduate students in Greece. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 399–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, L. T., & Li, Y. (2013). The validation of the R-victimisation scale (E-VS) and the E-bullying scale (E-BS) for adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 3–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namlu, A. G., & Odabasi, H. F. (2007). Unethical computer using behavior scale: A study of reliability and validity on Turkish university students. Computers & Education, 48, 205–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 396–402.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ozkan, S., & Koseler, R. (2009). Multidimensional students’ evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical investigation. Computers & Education, 53, 1285–1296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil, V. H., Singh, S. N., Mishra, S., & Donavan D. T. (2007). Parallel analysis engine to aid determining number of factors to retain [Computer software]. Available from http://smishra.faculty.ku.edu/parallelengine.htm
   Google Scholar
• Patil, V. H., Singh, S. N., Mishra, S., & Donavan D. T. (2008). Efficient theory development and factor retention criteria: A case for abandoning the ‘eigenvalue greater than one’ criterion. Journal of Business Research, 61, 162–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawlikowski, M., Altstötter-Gleich, C., & Brand, M. (2013). Validation and psychometric properties of a short version of Young’s Internet Addiction Test. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1212–1223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & MacCallum, R. C. (2003). Repairing Tom Swift’s electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics: Statistical Issues in Psychology, Education, and the Social Sciences, 2, 13–43.
   Google Scholar
• Qin, H., Rau, P. L. P., & Salvendy, G. (2009). Measuring player immersion in the computer game narrative. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 25, 107–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainer, R. K., & Miller, M. D. (1996). An assessment of the psychometric properties of the computer attitude scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 12, 93–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Tobias, S., & Carlson, J. E. (1969). Brief report: Bartlett’s test of sphericity and chance findings in factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 4, 375–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Braak, J., & Tearle, P. (2007). The computer attributes for learning scale (CALS) among university students: Scale development and relationship with actual computer use for learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2966–2982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velicer, W. F., & Fava, J. L. (1998). Effects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery. Psychological Methods, 3, 231–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, T., Linder, J., & Bolchini, D. (2012). DEEP: design-oriented evaluation of perceived usability. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 28, 308–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeomans, K. A., & Golder, P. A. (1982). The Guttman-Kaiser criterion as a predictor of the number of common factors. The Statistician, pp. 221–229.
   Google Scholar
• Zoski, K. W., & Jurs, S. (1996). An objective counterpart to the visual scree test for factor analysis: The standard error scree. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 443–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar