Review of Semantic-Free Utterances in Social Human–Robot Interaction

REFERENCES

• Abelin, Å., & Allwood, J. (2000). Cross linguistic interpretation of emotional prosody. ISCA tutorial and research workshop on speech and emotion, 110–113.
   Google Scholar
• Alty, J. L., Rigas, D., & Vickers, P. (2005). Music and speech in auditory interfaces: When is one mode more appropriate than another? International Conference on Auditory Display, 351–357.
   Google Scholar
• Arslan, L. M., & Talkin, D. (1998). Speaker transformation using sentence HMM based alignments and detailed prosody modification. Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing, 289–292.
   Google Scholar
• Ayesh, A. (2006, September). Structured sound based language for emotional robotic communicative interaction. The 15th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, 135–140.
   Google Scholar
• Ayesh, A. (2009). Emotionally expressive music based interaction language for social robots. ICGST International Journal on Automation, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 9, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Banse, R., & Scherer, K. (1996). Acoustic profiles in vocal emotion expression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 614–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, J., & Cooke, M. (1999). Is the sine-wave speech cocktail party worth attending? Speech Communication, 27(3), 159–174.
   Google Scholar
• Bartneck, C., & Michio, O. (2001). eMuu-An emotional robot. Proceedings of 2001 Robofesta.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A., Canamero, L., Hiolle, A., Damiano, L., Cosi, P., Tesser, F., & Sommavilla, G. (2013). Interpretation of emotional body language displayed by a humanoid robot: A case study with children. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5, 325–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker-Asano, C., & Ishiguro, H. (2009). Laughter in social robotics—no laughing matter. International workshop on social intelligence design, 287–300.
   Google Scholar
• Becker-Asano, C., Kanda, T., Ishi, C., & Ishiguro, H. (2011). Studying laughter in combination with two humanoid robots. AI & Society, 26, 291–300.
   Google Scholar
• Belpaeme, T., Baxter, P., Greeff, J., Kennedy, J., Read, R., Looije, R., … Zelati, M. C. (2013). Child–robot interaction: Perspectives and challenges. In G. Herrmann, J. Pearson Martin, A. Lenz, P. Bremner, A. Spiers, & U. Leonards (Eds.), Social robotics (Vol. 8239, pp. 452–459). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Belpaeme, T., Baxter, P., Read, R., Wood, R., Cuayáhuitl, H., Kiefer, B., … Humbert, R. (2012). Multimodal child–robot interaction: Building social bonds. Journal of Human–Robot Interaction, 1, 33–53. doi:10.5898/JHRI.1.2.Belpaeme
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, K. (2004). Linguistic steganography: Survey, analysis, and robustness concerns for hiding information in text (Tech. Rep.). Purdue University.
   Google Scholar
• Blattner, M. M., Sumikawa, D. A., & Greenberg, R. M. (1989). Earcons and icons: Their structure and common design principles. Human–Computer Interaction, 4, 11–44.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 49–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bramas, B., Kim, Y.-M., & Kwon, D.-S. (2008). Design of a sound system to increase emotional expression impact in human-robot interaction. International conference on control, automation and systems, 2732–2737.
   Google Scholar
• Breazeal, C. (2000). Sociable machines: Expressive social exchange between humans and robots ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Breazeal, C. (2002). Designing sociable robots. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breazeal, C., Depalma, N., Orkin, J., & Chernova, S. (2013). Crowdsourcing human–robot interaction: New methods and system evaluation in a public environment. Journal of Human–Robot Interaction, 2, 82–111. doi:10.5898/JHRI.2.1.Breazeal
   Google Scholar
• Broekens, J., & Brinkman, W.-P. (2013). Affect Button: a method for reliable and valid affective self-report. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 71, 641–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, A., & Arkin, R. (2007). Behavioral overlays for non-verbal communication expression on a humanoid robot. Autonomous Robots, 22, 55–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. (2000). The “musilanguage” model of music evolution. In N. L. Wallin & B. Merker (Eds.), The origins of music (271–300). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burkhardt, F., & Sendlmeier, W. (2000). Verification of acoustical correlates of emotional speech using formant-synthesis. ISCA tutorial and research workshop on speech and emotion, 151–156.
   Google Scholar
• Cahn, J. (1990). The generation of affect in synthesized speech. Journal of the American Voice I/O Society, 8, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Chao, C., & Thomaz, A. (2013). Controlling social dynamics with a parametrized model of floor regulation. Journal of Human–Robot Interaction, 2, 4–29. doi:10.5898/JHRI.2.1.Chao
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1956). Three models for the description of language. IRE Transactions on Information Theory 2, 113–124.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, J. H. (2014). Extensible grounding of speech for robot instruction. In J. Markowitz (Ed.), Robots that Talk and Listen (pp. 175–199). Berlin/Boston/Munich: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Cowie, R., & Cornelius, R. (2003). Describing the emotional states that are expressed in speech. Speech Communication, 40, 5–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deits, R., Tellex, S., Thaker, P., Simeonov, D., Kollar, T., & Roy, N. (2013). Clarifying commands with information-theoretic human–robot dialog. Journal of Human–Robot Interaction, 2, 58–79.
   Google Scholar
• Delaunay, F., de Greeff, J., & Belpaeme, T. (2010). A study of a retro-projected robotic face and its effectiveness for gaze reading by humans. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on human–robot interaction, 39–44.
   Google Scholar
• Dingler, T., Lindsay, J., & Walker, B. N. (2008). Learnability of sound cues for environmental features: Auditory icons, earcons, spearcons, and speech. Proceedings of the 14th international conference on auditory display, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• D’Mello, S., McCauley, L., & Markham, J. (2005). A mechanism for human–robot interaction through informal voice commands. Robot and human Interactive communication, IEEE International Workshop on 184–189.
   Google Scholar
• Dombois, F., & Eckel, G. (2011). Audification. In T. Hermann, A. Hunt, & J. G. Neuhoff (Eds.), The Sonification Handbook (pp. 301–324). Berlin: Logos.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, B. R. (2003, March). Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 177–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, B. R., & Zawieska, K. (2012). Suspension of disbelief in social robotics. Proceedings of the 21st international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, 484–489.
   Google Scholar
• Dutoit, T., & Leich, H. (1993). MBR-PSOLA: Text-To-Speech synthesis based on an {MBE} re-synthesis of the segments database. Speech Communication, 13, 435–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. (1971). Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 124–129. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/psp/17/2/124/
   Google Scholar
• Embgen, S., Luber, M., Becker-Asano, C., Ragni, M., Evers, V., & Arras, K. (2012). Robot-specific social cues in emotional body language. Proceedings of the 21st international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, 1019–1025. doi:10.1109/ROMAN.2012.6343883
   Google Scholar
• Esnaola, U., & Smithers, T. (2005, June). MiReLa: A musical robot. Proceedings of IEEE international symposium on computational intelligence in robotics and automation, 67–72.
   Google Scholar
• Fridin, M., & Belokopytov, M. (2014). Embodied robot versus virtual agent: Involvement of preschool children in motor task performance. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 30, 459–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friend, M. (2000). Developmental changes in sensitivity to vocal paralanguage. Developmental Science, 3, 148–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabsdil, M. (2003). Clarification in spoken dialogue systems. Proceedings of the 2003 AAAI spring symposium. workshop on natural language generation in spoken and written dialogue, 28–35.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, M. (1984). Codes, ciphers and secret writing. Mineola, NY: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Gaver, W. (1986). Auditory icons: Using sound in computer interfaces. Human–Computer Interaction, 2, 167–177.
   Google Scholar
• Goodrich, M. A., & Schultz, A. C. (2007). Human–robot interaction: A survey. Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 203–275.
   Google Scholar
• Gorostiza, J. F., & Salichs, M. A. (2011). End-user programming of a social robot by dialog. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 59, 1102–1114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haring, M., Bee, N., & André, E. (2011). Creation and evaluation of emotion expression with body movement, sound and eye color for humanoid robots. 2011 IEEE Ro-man, 204–209.
   Google Scholar
• Hermann, T., Hunt, A., & Neuhoff, J. G. (Eds.). (2011). The Sonification handbook. Berlin: Logos Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Holzapfel, H., & Gieselmann, P. (2004). A way out of dead–end situations in dialogue systems for human–robot interaction. Humanoid robots, fourth IEEE/RAS international conference on, 184–195.
   Google Scholar
• Imai, M., Hiraki, K., Miyasato, T., Nakatsu, R., & Anzai, Y. (2003). Interaction with robots: Physical constraints on the interpretation of demonstrative pronouns. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 16, 367–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jee, E., Jeong, Y., Kim, C., & Kobayashi, H. (2010). Sound design for emotion and intention expression of socially interactive robots. Intelligent Service Robotics, 3, 199–206.
   Google Scholar
• Jee, E.-S., Kim, C. H., Park, S.-Y., & Lee, K.-W. (2007, August). Composition of musical sound expressing an emotion of robot based on musical factors. In Proceedings of the 16th international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, 637–641.
   Google Scholar
• Jee, E.-S., Park, S.-Y., Kim, C. H., & Kobayashi, H. (2009, September). Composition of musical sound to express robot’s emotion with intensity and synchronized expression with robot’s behavior. Proceedings of the 18th international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, 369–374.
   Google Scholar
• Johannsen, G. (2001). Auditory displays in human–machine interfaces of mobile robots for non-linguistic speech communication with humans. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, 32, 161–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannsen, G. (2002). Auditory display of directions and states for mobile systems. Proceedings of the international conference on auditory display, 98–103.
   Google Scholar
• Johannsen, G. (2004, Apr). Auditory displays in human–machine interfaces. Proceedings of the IEEE, 92, 742–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, W. F., Emde, R. N., Scherer, K. R., & Klinnert, M. D. (1986). Recognition of emotion from vocal cues. Archives of General Psychiatry, 43, 280–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, H., Seon, C.-N., Kim, J. H., Sohn, J. C., Sung, W.-K., & Park, D.-I. (2005). Information extraction for users utterance processing on ubiquitous robot companion. In Natural language processing and information systems (pp. 337–340). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Juslin, P. N., & Laukka, P. (2003, September). Communication of emotions in vocal expression and music performance: Different channels, same code? Psychological Bulletin, 129, 770–814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoll, M., Uther, M., & Costall, A. (2009). Effects of low-pass filtering on the judgment of vocal affect in speech directed to infants, adults and foreigners. Speech Communication, 51, 210–216. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2008.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, T., & Fujie, S. (2013). Conversational robots: An approach to conversation protocol issues that utilizes the paralinguistic information available in a robot-human setting. Acoustical Science and Technology, 34, 64–72.
   Google Scholar
• Komatsu, T. (2005). Toward making humans empathize with artificial agents by means of subtle expressions. First international conference on affective computing and intelligent interaction, 458–465.
   Google Scholar
• Komatsu, T., & Kobayashi, K. (2012). Can users live with overconfident or unconfident systems? A comparison of artificial subtle expressions with human-like expression. Proceedings of conference on human factors in computing systems, 1595–1600.
   Google Scholar
• Komatsu, T., & Yamada, S. (2007). How appearance of robotic agents affects how people interpret the agents’ attitudes. Proceedings of the international conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology – ACE’ 07, 123.
   Google Scholar
• Komatsu, T., & Yamada, S. (2008). How does appearance of agents affect how people interpret the agents’ attitudes: An experimental investigation on expressing the same information from agents having different appearance. IEEE congress on evolutionary computation, 1935–1940.
   Google Scholar
• Komatsu, T., & Yamada, S. (2011, February). How does the agents’ appearance affect users’ interpretation of the agents’ attitudes: Experimental investigation on expressing the same artificial sounds from agents with different appearances. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 27, 260–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komatsu, T., Yamada, S., Kobayashi, K., Funakoshi, K., & Nakano, M. (2010). Artificial subtle expressions: Intuitive notification methodology of artifacts. Proceedings of the 28th international conference on human factors in computing systems, 1941–1944.
   Google Scholar
• Kozima, H., Michalowski, M. P., & Nakagawa, C. (2009, November). Keepon: A playful robot for research, therapy, and entertainment. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1, 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A., Holbrook, A. L., Berent, M. K., Carson, R. T., Hanemann, W. M., Kopp, R. J., … Conaway, M. (2002). The impact of “No Opinion” response options on data quality: Non-attitude reduction or an invitation to satisfice? Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 371–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laukka, P. (2005, September). Categorical perception of vocal emotion expressions. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 5, 277–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. K., Kiesler, S., Forlizzi, J., Srinivasa, S., & Rybski, P. (2010, March). Gracefully mitigating breakdowns in robotic services. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on human–robot interaction, 203–210.
   Google Scholar
• Leite, I., Pereira, A., Martinho, C., & Paiva, A. (2008). Are emotional robots more fun to play with? Robot and human interactive communication, the 17th IEEE international symposium on 77–82.
   Google Scholar
• Libin, A., & Libin, E. (2004, Nov). Person–robot interactions from the robopsychologists’ point of view: The robotic psychology and robotherapy approach. Proceedings of the IEEE, 92, 1789–1803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lison, P., & Kruiff, G.-J. (2009, September). Robust processing of situated spoken dialogue. Proceedings of the 32nd annual german conference on advances in artificial intelligence, 241–248.
   Google Scholar
• Lohse, M., Rohlfing, K. J., Wrede, B., & Sagerer, G. (2008, May). “Try something else!” When users change their discursive behaviour in human–robot interaction. Proceedings of the international conference on robotics and automation, 3481–3486.
   Google Scholar
• McCartney, J. (2002). Rethinking the computer music language: SuperCollider. Computer Music Journal, 26(4), 61–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, R.K. (2014). Spoken language processing: Time to look outside? In L. Besacier, A.-H. Dediu, & C. Martin-Vide (Eds.), Statistical language and speech processing (pp. 21–36). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mozos, O. M., Jensfelt, P., Zender, H., Kruijff, G.-J. M., & Burgard, W. (2007). From labels to semantics: An integrated system for conceptual spatial representations of indoor environments for mobile robots. ICRA workshop: Semantic information in robotics, 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Mubin, O., Bartneck, C., & Feijs, L. (2009). What you say is not what you get: Arguing for artificial languages instead of natural languages in human robot speech interaction. The spoken dialogue and human--robot interaction workshop.
   Google Scholar
• Mubin, O., Bartneck, C., & Feijs, L. (2010). Towards the design and evaluation of ROILA: a speech recognition friendly artificial language. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on advances in natural language processing, 250–256.
   Google Scholar
• Mumm, J., & Mutlu, B. (2011). Human–robot proxemics: Physical and psychological distancing in human–robot interaction. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on human–robot interaction, 331–338.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, I. R., & Arnott, J. L. (1995). Implementation and testing of a system for producing emotion-by-rule in synthetic speech. Speech Communication, 16, 369–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, I. R., & Arnott, J. L. (1996). Synthesizing emotions in speech: is it time to get excited? Proceeding of fourth international conference on spoken language processing, 1816–1819.
   Google Scholar
• Németh, G., Olaszy, G., & Csapó, T. G. (2011). Spemoticons: Text-to-speech based emotional auditory cues. International conference on auditory display, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Niewiadomski, R., Hofmann, J., Urbain, J., Platt, T., Wagner, J., & Piot, B. (2013). Laugh-aware virtual agent and its impact on user amusement. Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on autonomous agents and multi-agent systems, 619–626.
   Google Scholar
• Olaszy, G., NÃmeth, G., Olaszi, P., Kiss, G., Zainkó, C., & Gordos, G. (2000). Profivox — A hungarian text-to-speech system for telecommunications applications. International Journal of Speech Technology, 3, 201–215.
   Google Scholar
• Oudeyer, P.-Y. (2003). The production and recognition of emotions in speech: features and algorithms. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 59, 157–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paepcke, S., & Takayama, L. (2010, March). Judging a bot by its cover: An experiment on expectation setting for personal robots. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on human–robot interaction, 45–52.
   Google Scholar
• Palladino, D. K., & Walker, B. N. (2007). Learning rates for auditory menus enhanced with spearcons versus earcons. Proceedings of the 13th international conference on auditory display, 274–279.
   Google Scholar
• Paulmann, S., & Pell, M. (2011). Is there an advantage for recognizing multimodal emotional stimuli? Motivation and Emotion, 35, 192–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pell, M. D., Paulmann, S., Dara, C., Alasseri, A., & Kotz, S. A. (2009). Factors in the recognition of vocally expressed emotions: A comparison of four languages. Journal of Phonetics, 37, 417–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picard, R. W. (1997). Affective computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prendinger, H., Becker, C., & Ishizuka, M. (2006). A study in users’ physiological response to an empathic interface agent. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 3, 371–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rae, I., Takayama, L., & Mutlu, B. (2013, March). The influence of height in robot-mediated communication. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on human–robot interaction, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., Harrington, J., & Coltheart, M. (2002). 358,534 nonwords: The ARC nonword database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 55, 1339–1362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, R., & Belpaeme, T. (2010, October). Interpreting non-linguistic utterances by robots: Studying the influence of physical appearance. Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on affective interaction in natural environments, 65–70.
   Google Scholar
• Read, R., & Belpaeme, T. (2012, March). How to use non-linguistic utterances to convey emotion in child-robot interaction. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on human-robot interaction, 219–220.
   Google Scholar
• Read, R., & Belpaeme, T. (2013, March). People interpret robotic non-linguistic utterances categorically. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on human-robot interaction, 209–210.
   Google Scholar
• Read, R., & Belpaeme, T. (2014). Situational context directs how people affectively interpret robotic non-linguistic utterances. Proceedings of the 9th international conference on human–robot interaction, 41–48.
   Google Scholar
• Remez, R., & Rubin, P. (1993). On the intonation of sinusoidal sentences: Contour and pitch height. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94, 1983–1988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remez, R., Rubin, P., Pisoni, D., & Carrell, T. (1981). Speech perception without traditional speech cues. Science, 212, 947–950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, T., & Paiva, A. (2012). The illusion of robotic Life. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on human–robot interaction, 383–390.
   Google Scholar
• Robins, B., Dickerson, P., Stribling, P., & Dautenhahn, K. (2004). Robotmediated joint attention in children with autism: A case study in robothuman interaction. Interaction Studies, 5, 161–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ros Espinoza, R., Nalin, M., Wood, R., Baxter, P., Looije, R., Demiris, Y., & Belpaeme, T. (2011, November). Child–robot interaction in the wild: Advice to the aspiring experimenter. Proceedings of the 13th international conference on multimodal interfaces, 335–342.
   Google Scholar
• Saerbeck, M., & Bartneck, C. (2010). Perception of affect elicited by robot motion. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on human–robot interaction, 53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Saldien, J., Goris, K., Yilmazyildiz, S., Verhelst, W., & Lefeber, D. (2008). On the design of the huggable robot Probo. Journal of Physical Agents, 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, K. (1971). Randomized splicing: A note on a simple technique for masking speech content. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 5, 155–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, K. (1985). Vocal affect signalling: A comparative approach. In J. Rosenblatt, C. Beer, M.-C. Busnel, & P. Slater (Eds.), Advances in the study of behavior (pp. 189–244). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, K. (1986, March). Vocal affect expression: a review and a model for future research. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 143–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, K. R. (1994). Affect bursts. In S. van Goozen, N. E. van de Poll, & J. A. Sergeant (Eds.), Emotions: Essays on emotion theory (ed., pp. 161–196). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, K. (1995, October). Expression of emotion in voice and music. Journal of Voice, 9, 235–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, K. (2003). Vocal communication of emotion: A review of research paradigms. Speech Communication, 40, 227–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, K., & Ekman, P. (1982). Methods of research on vocal communication: Paradigms and parameters. In K. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.), Handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research (pp. 136–198). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, K., Koivumaki, J., & Rosenthal, R. (1972). Minimal cues in the vocal communication of affect: Judging emotions from content-masked speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1, 269–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, K., & Oshinsky, J. (1977). Cue utilization in emotion attribution from auditory stimuli. Motivation and Emotion, 1, 331–346.
   Google Scholar
• Schröder, M. (2001). Emotional speech synthesis: A review. Proceedings of the 7th european conference on speech communication and technology, 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Schröder, M. (2003a). Experimental study of affect bursts. Speech Communication, 40, 99–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröder, M. (2003b). Speech and emotion research: An overview of research frameworks and a dimensional approach to emotional speech synthesis ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Institute of Phonetics, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Schröder, M., Bevacqua, E., Cowie, R., Eyben, F., Gunes, H., Heylen, D., … Wollmer, M. (2012). Building autonomous sensitive artificial listeners. Transactions on Affective Computing, 3, 165–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröder, M., Burkhardt, F., & Krstulovic, S. (2010). Synthesis of emotional speech. In K. R. Scherer, T. Bänziger, & E. Roesch (Eds.), Blueprint for affective computing (pp. 222–231). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schuller, B., & Batliner, A. (2014). Computational paralinguistics: Emotion, affect and personality in speech and language processing. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Schwent, M., & Arras, K. (2014). R2-D2 reloaded: A flexible sound synthesis system for sonic human–robot interaction design. Proceedings of the 23rd international symposium on robot and human interaction communiation, 161–167.
   Google Scholar
• Seo, S. H., Geiskkovitch, D., Nakane, M., King, C., & Young, J. E. (2015). Poor thing! Would you feel sorry for a simulated robot?: A comparison of empathy toward a physical and a simulated robot. Proceedings of the tenth annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, 125–132.
   Google Scholar
• Shiwa, T., Kanda, T., Imai, M., Ishiguro, H., & Hagita, N. (2009, February). How quickly should a communication robot respond? Delaying strategies and habituation effects. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1, 141–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva-Pereyra, J., Conboy, B. T., Klarman, L., & Kuhl, P. K. (2007). Grammatical processing without semantics? An event-related brain potential study of preschoolers using jabberwocky sentences. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 19, 1050–1065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, A., & Young, J. (2012). Animal-inspired human–robot interaction: A robotic tail for communicating state. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on human–robot interactinon, 237–238.
   Google Scholar
• Snel, J., & Cullen, C. (2013). Judging emotion from low-pass filtered naturalistic emotional speech. Affective computing and intelligent interaction, 336–342.
   Google Scholar
• Steels, L. (2003). Evolving grounded communication for robots. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 308–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steels, L., Kaplan, F., McIntyre, A., & Van Looveren, J. (2002). Crucial factors in the origins of word-meaning. In A. Wray (Ed.), The transition to language (pp. 252–271). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://groups.lis.illinois.edu/amag/langev/paper/steels02crucialFactors.html
   Google Scholar
• Takayama, L., & Pantofaru, C. (2009, Oct). Influences on proxemic behaviors in human–robot interaction. Proceedings of the international conference on intelligent robots and systems, 5495–5502.
   Google Scholar
• Teshigawara, M., Amir, N., Amir, O., Wlosko, E. M., & Avivi, M. (2007). Effects of random splicing on listeners perceptions. 16th international congress of phonetic sciences, 2101–2104.
   Google Scholar
• Theobalt, C., Bos, J., Chapman, T., Espinosa-Romero, A., Fraser, M., Hayes, G., … Reeve, R. (2002). Talking to Godot: Dialogue with a mobile robot. Ieee/rsj international conference on intelligent robots and systems, 1338–1343.
   Google Scholar
• Tickle, A. (2000). English and Japanese speaker’s emotion vocalizations and recognition: a comparison highlighting vowel quality. ISCA workshop on speech and emotion, 157–183.
   Google Scholar
• Trouvain, J., & Schröder, M. (2004). How (not) to add laughter to synthetic speech. In E. André, L. Dybkjaer, W. Minker, & P. Heisterkamp (Eds.), Affective dialogue systems (Vol. 3068, pp. 229–232). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Trovato, G., Zecca, M., Kishi, T., Endo, N., Hashimoto, K., & Takanishi, A. (2013). Generation of humanoid robot’s facial expressions for context-aware communication. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 10, 1350013-1–1350013-23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Tassel, D. (1969). Cryptographic techniques for computers. Proceedings of the may 14–16, 1969, spring joint computer conference, 367–372.
   Google Scholar
• Vatsa, A., Mohan, T., & Vatsa, S. (2012). Novel cipher technique using substitution method. International Journal of Information and Network Security, 1, 313–320.
   Google Scholar
• Vazquez, M., Steinfeld, A., Hudson, S. E., & Forlizzi, J. (2014). Spatial and other social engagement cues in a child–robot interaction: Effects of a sidekick. Proceedings of the 9th international conference on human–robot interaction, 391–398.
   Google Scholar
• Vickers, P., & Alty, J. L. (2002). Using music to communicate computing information. Interacting with Computers, 14, 435–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, B. N., Nance, A., & Lindsay, J. (2006). Spearcons: Speech-based earcons improve navigation performance in auditory menus. Proceedings of the international conference on auditory display, 63–68.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, M. L., Syrdal, D. S., Dautenhahn, K., te Boekhorst, R., & Koay, K. L. (2007). Avoiding the uncanny valley: Robot appearance, personality and consistency of behaviour in an attention-seeking home scenario for a robot companion. Autonomous Robots, 24, 159–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W., Athanasopoulos, G., Yilmazyildiz, S., Patsis, G., Enescu, V., Sahli, H., … Canamero, L. (2014, September). Natural emotion elicitation for emotion modeling in child–robot interactions. 4th workshop on child–computer interaction.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, N. (1996). Using prosodic clues to decide when to produce back-channel utterances. Fourth international conference on Spoken language, 1728–1731.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmazyildiz, S. (2006). Communication of emotions for e-creatures ( Unpublished master’s thesis). Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmazyildiz, S., Athanasopoulos, G., Patsis, G., Wang, W., Oveneke, M. C., Latacz, L., … Lefeber, D. (2013). Voice modification for wizard-of-oz experiments in robot–child interaction. Proceedings of the workshop on affective social speech signals.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmazyildiz, S., Henderickx, D., Vanderborght, B., Verhelst, W., Soetens, E., & Lefeber, D. (2011, October). EMOGIB: Emotional gibberish speech database for affective human–robot interaction. Proceedings of the international conference on affective computing and intelligent interaction, 163–172.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmazyildiz, S., Henderickx, D., Vanderborght, B., Verhelst, W., Soetens, E., & Lefeber, D. (2013). Multi-modal emotion expression for affective human–robot interaction. Proceedings of the workshop on affective social speech signals.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmazyildiz, S., Latacz, L., Mattheyses, W., & Verhelst, W. (2010, September). Expressive gibberish speech synthesis for affective human–computer interaction. Proceedings of the 13th international conference on text, speech and dialogue, 584–590.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmazyildiz, S., Mattheyses, W., Patsis, Y., & Verhelst, W. (2006). Expressive speech recognition and synthesis as enabling technologies for affective robot–child communication. Advances in Multimedia Information Processing—PCM 2006, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4261, 1–8.
   Google Scholar