Interactive Persuasive Systems: A Perspective on Theory and Evaluation

REFERENCES

• Abraham, C., & Michie, S. (2008). A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychology, 27, 379–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Albert, W., & Tullis, T. (2013). Measuring the user experience: collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics. Waltham, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Arteaga, S. M., Kudeki, M., Woodworth, A., & Kurniawan, S. (2010). Mobile system to motivate teenagers’ physical activity. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Readings About the Social Animal, 193, 17–26.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997) Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman
   Google Scholar
• Bang, M., & Ragnemalm, E. L. (Eds.). (2012). Persuasive technology: Design for health and safety. 7th International Conference on Persuasive Technology ( LNCS Vol. 7284). London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Barreto, M., Karapanos, E., & Nunes, N. (2013, September). Why don’t families get along with eco-feedback technologies? A longitudinal inquiry. Proceedings of the Biannual Conference of the Italian Chapter of SIGCHI, 16.
   Google Scholar
• Basten, F., Ham, J., Midden, C., Gamberini, L., & Spagnolli, A. (2015). Does trigger location matter? The influence of localization and motivation on the persuasiveness of mobile purchase recommendations. In T. McTavish & S. Basapur (Eds.), Persuasive technology. 10th International Conference (pp. 121–132). London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, M. H. (Ed.). (1974). The health belief model and personal health behavior. Health Education Monographs, 2, 324–508.
   Google Scholar
• Bem, D. J. (1970). Beliefs, attitudes, and human affairs. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Berdichevsky, D., & Neuenschwander, E. (1999). Toward an ethics of persuasive technology. Communications of the ACM, 42(5), 51–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkovsky, S., & Freyne, J. (Eds.). (2013). Persuasive technology: 8th International Conference ( LNCS Vol. 7822). London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., Pinch, T., & Douglas, D. G. (2012). The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blascovich, J. (2002). Social influence within immersive virtual environments. In The social life of avatars (pp. 127–145). London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bogost, I. (2007). Persuasive games: The expressive power of videogames. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bremond, C. (1970). Morphology of the French folktale. Semiotica, 2(3), 247–276.
   Google Scholar
• Brockmyer, J. H., Fox, C. M., Curtiss, K. A., McBroom, E., Burkhart, K. M., & Pidruzny, J. N. (2009). The development of the Game Engagement Questionnaire: A measure of engagement in video game-playing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 624–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brynjarsdottir, H., Håkansson, M., Pierce, J., Baumer, E., DiSalvo, C., & Sengers, P. (2012, May). Sustainably unpersuaded: How persuasion narrows our vision of sustainability. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 947–956). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981) Attention and self-regulation: A control theory to human behavior. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Cavazza, M., Smith, C., Charlton, D., Crook, N., Boye, J., Pulman, S., … Turunen, M. (2010). Persuasive dialogue based on a narrative theory: An ECA implementation. In T. Ploug, P. Hasle, & H. Oinas-Kukkonen (Eds.), Persuasive Technology: 5th International Conference (pp. 250–261). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Celsi, R., & Olson, J. (1988). The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 210–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, S. (Ed.). (2009). Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Chetty, M., Tran, D., & Grinter, R. E. (2008). Getting to green: Understanding resource consumption in the home. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, 242–251.
   Google Scholar
• Chittaro, L. (2012). Passengers’ safety in aircraft evacuations: Employing serious games to educate and persuade. In M. Bang & E. L. Ragnemalm (Eds.), Persuasive technology: Design for health and safety (pp. 215–226). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chittaro, L. (2014). Anxiety induction in virtual environments: An experimental comparison of three general techniques. Interacting with Computers, 26, 528–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chittaro, L. (2015). Designing serious games for safety education: “Learn to brace” vs. traditional pictorials for aircraft passengers. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 99. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2015.2443787
   Google Scholar
• Chittaro, L., Buttussi, F., & Zangrando, N. (2014). Desktop virtual reality for emergency preparedness: User evaluation of an aircraft ditching experience under different fear arousal conditions. In Proceedings of VRST 2014: 20th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (pp. 141–150). New York, NY: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chittaro, L., & Sioni, R. (2012), Turning the classic snake mobile game into a location-based exergame that encourages walking. In M. Bang & E. L. Ragnemalm (Eds.), Persuasive technology: Design for health and safety (pp. 43–54). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chittaro, L. & Sioni, R. (2015) Serious games for emergency preparedness: Evaluation of an interactive vs. a non-interactive simulation of a terror attack. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 508–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chittaro, L., & Zangrando, N. (2010). The persuasive power of virtual reality: Effects of simulated human distress on attitudes towards fire safety. In T. Ploug, P. Hasle, & H. Oinas-Kukkonen (Eds.), Persuasive Technology: 5th International Conference (pp. 58–69). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chittaro, L., & Zuliani, F. (2013). Exploring audio storytelling in mobile exergames to affect the perception of physical exercise. Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare: 7th International Conference, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Comber, R., Thieme, A., Rafiev, A., Taylor, N., Krämer, N., & Olivier, P. (2013). BinCam: Designing for engagement with Facebook for behavior change. In P. Kotzé, G. Marsden, G. Lindgaard, J. Wesson, & M. Winckler (Eds.), Human–computer interaction–INTERACT 2013 (pp. 99–115). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Consolvo, S., McDonald, D. W., & Landay, J. A. (2009). Theory-driven design strategies for technologies that support behavior change in everyday life. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 405–414). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Cornelissen, G., Pandelaere M., & Warlop L. (2006). Cueing common ecological behaviors to increase environmental attitudes. In W. IJsselsteijn, Y. de Kort, C. Midden, B. Eggen, & E. van den Hoven (Eds.), Persuasive Technology: First International Conference on Persuasive Technology for Human Well-Being (pp. 39–44). London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Costanza, E., Ramchurn, S. D., & Jennings, N. R. (2012, September). Understanding domestic energy consumption through interactive visualisation: A field study. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, 216–225.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, M., Bouffard P. R. E., & Gessaroli, M. (1995). Measuring enjoyment in youth sport settings: A confirmatory factor analysis of physical activity enjoyment scale. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 17, 200–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cugelman, B., Thelwall, M., & Dawes, P. (2008). Website credibility, active trust and behavioural intent. In H. Oinas-Kukkonene. P. Hasle, M. Harjumaa, K. Segerståhl, & P. Øhrstrøm (Eds.), Persuasive Technology Third International Conference (pp. 47–57). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cugelman, B., Thelwall, M., & Dawes, P. (2009). Communication-based influence components model. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology (Paper 17). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, C. A., Spence, J. C., Vandelanotte, C., Caperchione, C. M., & Mummery, W. (2012). Meta-analysis of Internet-delivered interventions to increase physical activity levels. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9, 52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. (2009). Design methods for ethical persuasive computing. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology (p. 6). New York, NY: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Debord, G. (1967). The society of the spectacle. New York: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• de Kort, Y., IJsselsteijn, W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., & Fogg, B. J. (Eds.). (2007). Second International Conference on Persuasive Technology, Revised selected papers (LNCS Vol. 4744). London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification.” In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning future media environments (pp. 9–15). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629–636.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Vries, P., & Pruyn, A. (2007). Source salience and the persuasiveness of peer recommendations: The mediating role of social trust. In Y. de Kort, W. IJsselsteijn, C. Midden, B. Eggen, & B. J. Fogg (Eds.), Second International Conference on Persuasive Technology, Revised selected papers (pp. 164–175). New York, NY: Springer
   Google Scholar
• DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880–896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diesbach, P., & Midgley, D. (2008). Embodied agents on commercial websites: Modeling their effects through an affective persuasion route. In In H. Oinas-Kukkonene, P. Hasle, M. Harjumaa, K. Segerståhl, & P. Øhrstrøm (Eds.), Persuasive Technology Third International Conference (pp. 283–286). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Doshi, A., Patrick, K., Sallis, J. F., & Calfas, K. (2003). Evaluation of physical activity web sites for use of behavior change theories. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 25, 105–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar, N. E., Jensen, M. L., Miller, C. H., Bessarabova, E., Straub, S. K., Wilson, S. N., … Scheutzler R. (2014). Mitigating cognitive bias through the use of serious games: Effects of feedback. In A. Spagnolli, L. Chittaro, & L. Gamberini (Eds.), Persuasive technology: 9th International Conference (pp. 92–105). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., & Middleton, D. (1998). Cognition and communication at work. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felfernig, A., Friedrich, G., Gula, B., Hitz, M., Kruggel, T., Leitner, G., … Vitouch, O. (2007). Persuasive recommendation: Serial position effects in knowledge-based recommender systems. In Y. de Kort, W. IJsselsteijn, C. Midden, B. Eggen, & B. J. Fogg (Eds.), Second International Conference on Persuasive Technology, Revised Selected Papers (pp. 283–294). London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ferebee, S. (2007). An examination of the influence of involvement level of web site users on the perceived credibility of web sites. In Y. de Kort, W. IJsselsteijn, C. Midden, B. Eggen, & B. J. Fogg (Eds.), Second International Conference on Persuasive Technology, Revised Selected Papers (pp. 176–186). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ferebee, S. S., & Davis, J. W. (2009). Factors that persuade continued use of Facebook among new members. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology (Paper 35). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleury, J. D. (1991). Empowering potential: a theory of wellness motivation. Nursing Research, 40, 286–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleury, J. D. (1996). Wellness motivation theory: An exploration of theoretical relevance. Nursing Research, 45(5), 277–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogg, B. J. (2003) Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Fogg, B. J. (2009, April). A behavior model for persuasive design. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology ( p. 40). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Fogg, B. J., Marshall, J., Laraki, O., Osipovich, A., Varma, C., Fang, N., … Treinen M. (2001). What makes web sites credible? A report on a large quantitative study. Proceedings of SIGCHI’01, 61–68.
   Google Scholar
• Fokker, J., de Ridder, H., Westendorp, P., & Pouwelse, J. (2008). Exploring the acceptability of delayed reciprocity in peer-to-peer networks. In H. Oinas-Kukkonene, P. Hasle, M. Harjumaa, K. Segerståhl, & P. Øhrstrøm (Eds.), Persuasive Technology Third International Conference (pp. 237–240). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J., & Bailenson, J. N. (2009). Virtual self-modeling: The effects of vicarious reinforcement and identification on exercise behaviors. Media Psychology, 12, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frejus, M., & Martini, D. (2015, April). Taking into account user appropriation and development to design energy consumption feedback. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2193–2198). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Froehlich, J., Findlater, L., & Landay, J. (2010). The design of eco-feedback technology. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer–Human Interaction (pp. 1999–2008). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Gamberini, L., Spagnolli, A., Corradi, N., Jacucci, G., Tusa, G., Mikkola, T., … Hoggan, E. (2012). Tailoring feedback to users’ actions in a persuasive game for household electricity conservation. In M. Bang & E. L. Ragnemalm (Eds.), Persuasive 2012 (pp. 100–111). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1999) Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York, NY: Basic Books
   Google Scholar
• Gaver, W. W. (1991). Technology affordances. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 79–84). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Gaziano, C., & McGrath, K. (1986). Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 63, 451–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibb, J. (1972). TORI theory and practice. Annual handbook for group facilitators. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Girard, B., Turcotte, V., Bouchard, S., & Girard, B. (2009). Crushing virtual cigarettes reduces tobacco addiction and treatment discontinuation. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12, 477–483.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. The American Psychologist, 48, 26–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halko, S., & Kientz, J. A. (2010). Personality and persuasive technology: An exploratory study on health-promoting mobile applications. In T. Ploug, P. Hasle, & H. Oinas-Kukkonen (Eds.), Persuasive Technology: 5th International Conference (pp. 150–161). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, T. (2011). Practice-ing behaviour change: Applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11, 79–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, T., Nye, M., & Burgess, J. (2013). Keeping energy visible? Exploring how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors in the longer term. Energy Policy, 52, 126–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harjumaa, M., Segerståhl, K., & Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (2009). Understanding persuasive software functionality in practice: A field trial of polar FT60. In S. Chatterjee (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology (Paper 2). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, F. M., Li, S. X., Chen, Y., & Konstan, J. A. (2007). Social comparisons to motivate contributions to an online community. In Y. de Kort, W. IJsselsteijn, C. Midden, B. Eggen, & B. J. Fogg (Eds.), Second International Conference on Persuasive Technology, Revised selected papers (pp. 148–159). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hasselqvist, H., Bogdan, C., Romero, M., & Shafqat, O. (2015, April). Supporting energy management as a cooperative amateur activity. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1483–1488). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M., & Tractinsky, N. (2006). User experience: A research agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25, 91–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermawati, S., & Lawson G. (2014). Managing obesity through mobile phone applications: A state-of-the-art review from a user-centred design perspective. Personal Ubiquitous Computing, 18, 2003–2023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsh, J. B., Kang, S. K., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2012) Personalized persuasion: Tailoring persuasive appeals to recipients’ personality traits. Psychological Science, 23, 578–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (1996). Cultures and organisations: Software of the mind. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyt, M. F. (1973). Internal–external control and beliefs about automobile travel. Journal of Research in Personality, 7, 288–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J. L., & Ford, J. K. (2012). Driving locus of control and driving behaviors: Inducing change through driver training. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 15, 358–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IJsselsteijn, W., de Kort, Y., Midden, C., Eggen, B., & van den Hoven, E. (Eds.). (2006). Persuasive Technology: First International Conference on Persuasive Technology for Human Well-Being ( LNCS Vol. 3962). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J. W., & Wuebker, L. J. (1993). Safety locus of control and employees’ accidents. Journal of Business and Psychology, 7, 449–457.
   Google Scholar
• Ju, W., & Sirkin, D. (2010). Animate objects: How physical motion encourages public interaction. In T. Ploug, P. Hasle, & H. Oinas-Kukkonen (Eds.), Persuasive Technology: 5th International Conference (pp. 40–51). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Juan, M. C., & Joele, D. (2011). A comparative study of the sense of presence and anxiety in an invisible marker versus a marker augmented reality system for the treatment of phobia towards small animals. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69, 440–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamal, N., & Fels, S. (2012). Determining the determinants of health behaviour change through an online social network. In M. Bang & E. L. Ragnemalm (Eds.), Persuasive technology: Design for Health and Safety: 7th International Conference on Persuasive Technology (pp. 1–12). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kamal, N., Fels, S., & Ho, K. (2010). Online social networks for personal informatics to promote positive health behavior. In Proceedings of Second ACM SIGMM Workshop on Social Media (pp. 47–52). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kaptain, M., & Eckles, D. (2010). Selecting effective means to any end: Futures and ethics of persuasion profiling. In T. Ploug, P. Hasle, & H. Oinas-Kukkonen (Eds.), Persuasive Technology: 5th International Conference (pp. 82–93). London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kaptein, M., De Ruyter, B., Markopoulos, P., Aarts, E. (2012). Adaptive persuasive systems: A study of tailored persuasive text messages to reduce snacking. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 2,Article 10.
   Google Scholar
• Kaptein, M., Duplinsky, S., & Markopoulos, P. (2011). Means-based adaptive persuasive systems. In Proceedings of the CHI 2011 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 335–344). New York, NY: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. (2012). Activity theory in HCI: Fundamentals and reflections. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool.
   Google Scholar
• Kehr, F., Hassenzahl, M., Laschke, M., & Diefenbach, S. (2012, May). A transformational product to improve self-control strength: the chocolate machine. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 689–694). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kendzierski, D., & DeCarlo, K. J. (1991). Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale: Two validation studies. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 13, 50–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khaled, R., Fischer, R., Noble, J., & Biddle, R. (2008). A qualitative study of culture and persuasion in a smoking cessation game. In H. Oinas-Kukkonene, P. Hasle, M. Harjumaa, K. Segerståhl, & P. Øhrstrøm (Eds.), Persuasive Technology Third International Conference (pp. 224–236). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K., Kim, C., Cha, K., Park, J., Han, K., Kim, Y. K., & Kim, J. (2008). Anxiety provocation and measurement using virtual reality in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 11, 637–641.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kling, R. (1980). Social analyses of computing: Theoretical perspectives in recent empirical research. ACM Computing Surveys, 12, 61–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluger, XXX., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacroix, J., Saini, P., & Goris, A. (2009). Understanding user cognitions to guide the tailoring of persuasive technology-based physical activity interventions. In S. Chatterjee (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology (Paper 9). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Langrial, S., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Lappalainen, P., & Lappalainen, R. (2014). Managing depression through a behavior change support system without face-to-face therapy. In A. Spagnolli, L. Chittaro, & L. Gamberini (Eds.), Persuasive Technology: 9th International Conference (pp. 155–166). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Laschke, M., Hassenzahl, M., & Diefenbach, S. (2011, June). Things with attitude: Transformational products. Create11 Conference, 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D., Helal, S., & Johnson, B. D. (2010). An action-based behavior model for persuasive telehealth. In Z. Z. Bien, M. Mokhtari, J. T. Kim, M. Park, J. Kim, H. Lee, & I. Khalil (Eds.), Aging friendly technology for health and independence (pp. 121–129). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lehto, T., & Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (2015). Explaining and predicting perceived effectiveness and use continuance intention of a behaviour change support system for weight loss. Behaviour & Information Technology, 34, 176–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lévy, P. (1997) Collective intelligence: Mankind’s emerging world in cyberspace. New York, NY: Plenum
   Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lockton, D., Cain, R., Harrison, D. J., Giudice, S., Nicholson, L., & Jennings, P. (2011, November–December). Behaviour change at work: Empowering energy efficiency in the workplace through user-centred design. Paper presented at Behavior, Energy & Climate Change 2011, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Lockton, D., Harrison, D., & Stanton, N. (2008). Design with intent: Persuasive technology in a wider context. In H. Oinas-Kukkonene. P. Hasle, M. Harjumaa, K. Segerståhl, & P. Øhrstrøm (Eds.), Persuasive Technology Third International Conference (pp. 274–278). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lombard, F., Biocca, J., Freeman, W., IJsselsteijn, W., & Schaevitz, R. J. (Eds.). (2015). Immersed in media. London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lucero, A., Zuloaga, R., Mota, S., & Munoz, F. (2006). Persuasive technologies in education: Improving motivation to read and write for children. In W. IJsselsteijn, Y. de Kort, C. Midden, B. Eggen, & E. van den Hoven (Eds.), Persuasive Technology: First International Conference on Persuasive Technology for Human Well-Being (pp. 142– 153). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Luszczynska, A., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). Multidimensional health locus of control: Comments on the construct and its measurement. Journal of Health Psychology, 10, 633–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacTavish, T., & Basapur, S. (Eds.). (2015). Persuasive Technology: 10th International Conference ( LNCS Vol. 9072). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 312–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCalley, T., Kaiser, F., Midden, C., Keser, M., & Teunissen, M. (2006). Persuasive appliances: Goal priming and behavioral response to product-integrated energy feedback. In W. IJsselsteijn, Y. de Kort, C. Midden, B. Eggen, & E. van den Hoven (Eds.), Persuasive Technology: First International Conference on Persuasive Technology for Human Well-Being (pp. 50–54). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• McCalley, L. T., & Midden, C. J. H. (2002). Energy conservation through product-integrated feedback: The roles of goal-setting and social orientation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, 589–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & Teven, J. J. (1999). Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communication Monographs, 66, 90–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLuhan, M. (1994). Understanding media: The extensions of man. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• McMahon, S., Vankipuram, M., Hekler, E. B., & Fleury, J. (2014). Design and evaluation of theory-informed technology to augment a wellness motivation intervention. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 4, 95–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijnders, A., Midden, C., & McCalley, T. (2006). The persuasive power of mediated risk experiences. Proceedings of Persuasive 2006: 1st International Conference on Persuasive Technology (pp. 50–54). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., Eyal, K., Lemus, D. R., & McCann, R. M. (2003). Credibility for the 21st century: Integrating perspectives on source, message, and media credibility in the contemporary media environment. Communication Yearbook, 27, 293–336.
   Google Scholar
• Michie, S., Johnston, M., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., & Eccles, M. (2008). From theory to intervention: mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behaviour change techniques. Applied Psychology, 57, 660–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midden, C., & Ham, J. (2012). The illusion of agency: The influence of the agency of an artificial agent on its persuasive power. In M. Bang & E. L. Ragnemalm (Eds.), Persuasive Technology: Design for Health and Safety: 7th International Conference on Persuasive Technology (pp. 90–99). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Montag, I., & Comrey, A. L. (1987). Internality and externality as correlates of involvement in fatal driving accidents. Journal of Applied Psychology 72, 339–343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullen, S. P., Olson, E. A., Phillips, S. M., Szabo, A. N., Wojcicki, T. R., Mailey, E. L., … McAuley E. (2011). Measuring enjoyment of physical activity in older adults: Invariance of the physical activity enjoyment scale (PACES) across groups and time. Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 8, 1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munson, S. A., Lauterbach, D., Newman, M. W., & Resnick, P. (2010). Happier together: integrating a wellness application into a social network site. In T. Ploug, P. Hasle, & H. Oinas-Kukkonen (Eds.), Persuasive Technology: 5th International Conference (pp. 27–39). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126, 247–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myneni, S., Iyengar, S., Cobb, N. K., & Cohen, T. (2013). Identifying persuasive qualities of decentralized peer-to-peer online social networks in public health. In S. Berkovsky & J. Freyne (Eds.), Persuasive Technology 8th International Conference (pp. 155–160). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. R., Keum, H., & Yaros, R. A. (2004). Advertainment or adcreep game players’ attitudes toward advertising and product placements in computer games. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 5, 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Neustaedter, C., Bartram, L., & Mah, A. (2013, April). Everyday activities and energy consumption: How families understand the relationship. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1183–1192). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H., & Masthoff, J. (2008). Designing persuasive dialogue systems: Using argumentation with care. In H. Oinas-Kukkonen. P. Hasle, M. Harjumaa, K. Segerståhl, & P. Øhrstrøm (Eds.), Persuasive Technology Third International Conference (pp. 201–212). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H., & Masthoff, J. (2009, April). Designing empathic computers: the effect of multimodal empathic feedback using animated agent. In S. Chatterjee (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology (Paper 7). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Norman D. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (1999, May–June). Affordances, conventions, and design. Interactions, pp. 38–42.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, A. J., Alfano, C., & Magnusson, E. (2007). Improving cross-cultural communication through collaborative technologies. In Y. de Kort, W. IJsselsteijn, C. Midden, B. Eggen, & B. J. Fogg (Eds.), Second International Conference on Persuasive Technology, Revised Selected Papers (pp. 125–131). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (2010). Behavior change support systems: A research model and agenda. In T. Ploug, P. Hasle, & H. Oinas-Kukkonen (Eds.), Persuasive Technology: 5th International Conference (pp. 4–14). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Oinas-Kukkonen, H., & Harjumaa, M. (2009). Persuasive systems design: Key issues, process model, and system features. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 24, 28.
   Google Scholar
• Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Hasle, P., Harjumaa, M., Segerståhl, K., & Øhrstrøm, P. (2008). Persuasive Technology Third International Conference ( LNCS Vol. 5033). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, G. A., & Spruijt-Metz, D. (2013). Current mHealth technologies for physical activity assessment and promotion. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 45, 501–507. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2013.05.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orji, R., Mandryk, R. L., & Vassileva, J. (2012). Towards a data-driven approach to intervention design: A predictive path model of healthy eating determinants. In M. Bang & E. L. Ragnemalm (Eds.), Persuasive Technology: Design for Health and Safety: 7th International Conference on Persuasive Technology (pp. 203–214). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2000) Collective action and the evolution of social norms. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 14, 137–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmar, V., Keyson, D., & De Bont, C. (2009). Persuasive technology to shape social beliefs: A case of persuasive health information systems for rural women in India. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 24, 25.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, W. (2008). The mediational role of identification in the relationship between experience mode and self-efficacy: Enactive role-playing versus passive observation. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 649–652.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petkov, P., Köbler, F., Foth, M., Medland, R., & Krcmar, H. (2011). Engaging energy saving through motivation-specific social comparison. In CHI’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1945–1950). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 135–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, J., Strengers, Y., Sengers, P., & Bødker, S. (2013). Introduction to the special issue on practice-oriented approaches to sustainable HCI. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 20, Article 20.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S., Mackley, K. L., Pink, S., Mackley, K. L., Mitchell, V., Hanratty, M., Escobar-Tello, C., Bhamra, T., & Morosanu, R.. (2013). Applying the lens of sensory ethnography to sustainable HCI. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 20, Article 25.
   Google Scholar
• Ploug, T., Hasle, P., & Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (2010). Persuasive Technology: 5th International Conference ( LNCS Vol. 6137). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1986). Toward a comprehensive model of change (pp. 3–27). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Prost, S., Mattheiss, E., & Tscheligi, M. (2015, February). From awareness to empowerment: Using design fiction to explore paths towards a sustainable energy future. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing ( pp. 1649–1658). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Reckwitz A. (2012). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5, 243–263.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
   Google Scholar
• Reitberger, W., Ploderer, B., Obermair, C., & Tscheligi, M. (2007). The PerCues Framework and its application for sustainable mobility. In Y. de Kort, W. IJsselsteijn, C. Midden, B. Eggen, & B. J. Fogg (Eds.), Second International Conference on Persuasive Technology, Revised Selected Papers (pp. 92–95). Berlin, Germany: Springer
   Google Scholar
• Riva, G., Mantovani, F., Capideville, C. S., Preziosa, A., Morganti, F., Villani, D., … Alcaniz, M. (2007). Affective interactions using virtual reality: The link between presence and emotions. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 10, 45–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robillard, G., Bouchard, S., Fournier, T., & Renaud, P. (2003). Anxiety and presence during VR Immersion: A comparative study of the reactions of phobic and non-phobic participants in therapeutic virtual environments derived from computer games. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 6, 467–476.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rogers, R. W. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of Protection Motivation. In J. T. Cacioppo & R. E. Petty (Eds.), Social psychophysiology: A sourcebook (pp. 153–176). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rollnick, S., & Miller, W. R. (1995). What is motivational interviewing?. Behavioural and cognitive Psychotherapy, 23, 325–334.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg-Kima, R. B., Baylor, A. L., Ashby Plant, E., & Doerr, C. E. (2007). The importance of interface agent visual presence: Voice alone is less effective in impacting young women’s attitudes toward engineering. In Y. de Kort, W. IJsselsteijn, C. Midden, B. Eggen, & B. J. Fogg (Eds.), Second International Conference on Persuasive Technology, Revised Selected Papers (pp. 214–222). Berlin, Germany: Springer
   Google Scholar
• Rosenstock, I. M. (1966). Why people use health services. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 44, 94–127.
   Google Scholar
• Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Roubroeks, M., Midden, C., & Ham, J. (2009). Does it make a difference who tells you what to do? Exploring the effect of social agency on psychological reactance. In S. Chatterjee (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology (Paper 15). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez, J. L. G., Vela, F. L. G., Simarro, F. M., & Padilla-Zea, N. (2012). Playability: Analysing user experience in video games. Behaviour & Information Technology, 31, 1033–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T., Knorr-Cetina, K., & von Savigny, E. (Eds.). (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35–37). Windsor, UK: NFER-NELSON.
   Google Scholar
• Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (1995). Intercultural communication. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Seligman, M. E. P., Rashid, T., & Parks, A. (2006). Positive psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 61, 774–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinnett, E. R., Press, A., Bates, R. A., & Harvey, W. M. (1975). Credibility of sources of information about drugs. Psychological Reports, 36, 299–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M., Usoh, M., & Steed, A. (1994). Depth of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 3, 130–144.
   Google Scholar
• Smeaton, A. F., & Doherty, A. R. (2013). Persuading consumers to reduce their consumption of electricity in the home. In S. Berkovsky & J. Freyne (Eds.), Persuasive Technology 8th International Conference (pp. 204–215). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Smids, J. (2012). The voluntariness of persuasive technology. In M. Bang & E. L. Ragnemalm (Eds.), Persuasive technology: Design for health and safety ( LNCS Vol. 7284, pp. 123–132). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. G., Morrow, R. H., & Ross, D. A. (2015). Field trials of health interventions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Southerton, D. (2012). Habits, routines and temporalities of consumption: From individual behaviours to the reproduction of everyday practices. Time and Society, 22, 335–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spagnolli, A., Bracken, C. C., & Orso, V. (2014). The role played by the concept of presence in validating the efficacy of a cybertherapy treatment: A literature review. Virtual Reality, 18, 13–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spagnolli, A., Chittaro, L., & Gamberini, L. (Eds.). (2014). Persuasive Technology: 9th International Conference ( LNCS Vol. 8462), Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Spahn, A. (2012). And lead us (not) into persuasion … ?: Persuasive technology and the ethics of communication. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18, 633–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S. (1999). Exploring receivers’ criteria for perception of print and online news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 76, 373–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takatalo, J., Nyman, G., Hakkinen, J., & Kaistinen, J. (2008). User experience in digital games. INTECH Open Access Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Takayama, C., Lehdonvirta, V., Shiraishi, M., Washio, Y., Kimura, H., & Nakajima, T. (2009, March). Ecoisland: A system for persuading users to reduce CO2 emissions. In 2009 Software Technologies for Future Dependable Distributed Systems ( pp. 59–63). Tokyo, Japan: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism (New Directions in Social Psychology). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, S., & Fogg, B. J. (1999). Credibility and computing technology. Communications of the ACM, 42(5), 39–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Leer, E., & Connor, N. P. (2012). Use of portable digital media players increases patient motivation and practice in voice therapy. Journal of Voice, 26, 447–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verberne, F. M., Ham, J., Ponnada, A., & Midden, C. J. (2013). Trusting digital chameleons: The effect of mimicry by a virtual social agent on user trust. In S. Berkovsky & J. Freyne (Eds.), Persuasive Technology 8th International Conference (pp. 234–245). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Waardenburg, T., Winkel, R., & Lamers, M. H. (2012). Normative social influence in persuasive technology: Intensity versus effectiveness. In M. Bang & E. L. Ragnemalm (Eds.), Persuasive technology: Design for health and safety: 7th International Conference on Persuasive Technology (pp. 145–156). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated communication: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiederhold, B. K., & Wiederhold, M. D. (2004). The future of cybertherapy: Improved options with advanced technologies. In G. Riva, C. Botella, P. Légeron, & G. Optale (Eds.), Cybertherapy Internet and virtual reality as assessment and rehabilitation tools for clinical psychology and neuroscience (pp. 263–270). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wills, T. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 245–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. V. (2015). Understanding how message receivers’ communication goals are applied in online persuasion. In T. McTavish & S. Basapur (Eds.), Persuasive Technology, 10th International Conference (pp. 39–50). London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7, 225–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, K. (1994). Fear control and danger control: A test of the Extended Parallel Process Model. Communication Monographs, 61, 113–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education and Behavior, 27, 591–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2011a). GPAQ Analysis Guide. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/chp/steps/resources/GPAQ_Analysis_Guide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2011b). GPAQ Questionnaire. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/chp/steps/GPAQ_EN.pdf?ua=1
   Google Scholar
• Wuebker, L. J. (1986). Safety locus of control as a predictor of industrial accidents and injuries. Journal of Business and Psychology, 1, 19–30.
   Google Scholar
• Yahaya, W. A. J. W., & Zain, M. Z. M. (2014, February). Abuse of disabled parking: Reforming public’s attitude through persuasive multimedia strategy. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and environmental science (Vol. 18, p. 012073). Philadelphia, PA: IOP Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Yamabe, T., Lehdonvirta, V., Ito, H., Soma, H., Kimura, H., & Nakajima, T. (2010). Activity-based micro-pricing: Realizing sustainable behavior changes through economic incentives. In T. Ploug, P. Hasle, & H. Oinas-Kukkonen (Eds.), Persuasive Technology: 5th International Conference (pp. 193–204). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• You, X., Ji, M., & Han, H. (2013). The effects of risk perception and flight experience on airline pilots’ locus of control with regard to safety operation behaviors. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 57, 131–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaalberg, R., & Midden, C. (2010). Enhancing human responses to climate change risks through simulated flooding experiences. In Proceedings of Persuasive 2010: 5th International Conference on Persuasive Technologies (pp. 205–210). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. (1965, July 16). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar