The Stroop and Reverse Stroop Effects as Measured by an Interactive Tabletop

REFERENCES

• Adams, N. C., & Jarrold, C. (2009). Inhibition and the validity of the Stroop task for children with autism. Journal of Autism Development Disorder, 39(8), 1112–1121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudisch, P., Becker, T., & Rudeck, F. (2010). Lumino: Tangible blocks for tabletop computers based on glass fiber bundles. In E. D. Mynatt, D. Schoner, G. Fitzpatrick, S. E. Hudson, W. K. Edwards, & T. Rodden (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘10) (pp. 1165–1174). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Beal, D. J., Weiss, H. M., Barros, E., & MacDermid, S. M. (2005). An episodic process model of affective influences on performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1054–1068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, C., & Besner, D. (2006). Reverse Stroop effects with untranslated responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(6), 1345–1353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, C., & Besner, D. (2007). A reverse Stroop effect without translation or reading difficulty. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(3), 466–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutcher, Y. N., & Boutcher, S. H. (2006). Cardiovascular response to Stroop: Effect of verbal response and task difficulty. Biological Psychology, 73(3), 235–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buetti, S., & Kerzel, D. (2009). Conflicts during response selection affect response programming: Reactions towards the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(3), 816–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar, K., & MacLeod, C. M. (1984). A horse race of a difference color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 622–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durgin, F. H. (2000). The reverse Stroop effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 121–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durgin, F. H. (2003). Translation and competition among internal representations in a reverse Stroop effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 367–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, S. H., & Houston, K. (2004). A metabolic measure of mental effort. Biological Psychology, 66(2), 177–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Duque, D., & Knight, M. (2008). Cognitive control: Dynamic, sustained, and voluntary influences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(2), 340–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkbeiner, M., Song, J., Nakayama, K., & Caramazza, A. (2008). Engaging the motor system with masked orthographic primes: A kinematic analysis. Visual Cognition, 16(1), 11–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkenzeller, K. (2003). RFID Handbook: Fundamentals and Applications in Contactless Smart Cards and Identification. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzmaurice, G. W., Ishii, H., & Buxton, W. (1995). Bricks: Laying the foundations for graspable user interfaces. In I. R. Katz, R. L. Mack, L. Marks, M. B. Rosson, & J. Nielsen (Eds.), Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ‘95 Conference Proceedings (pp. 442–449). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Flowers, J. H. (1975). “Sensory” interference in a word-color matching task. Perception & Psychophysics, 18(11), 37–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowers, J. H., & Blair, B. (1976). Verbal interference with visual classification: Optimal processing and experimental design. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 7, 260–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, G. (2012). The psychology of replication and replication in psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 585–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, W. R., & Glaser, M. O. (1989). Context effects in Stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 13–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendolla, G. H., Wright, R. A., & Richter, M. (2012). Effort intensity: Some insights from the cardiovascular system. In R.M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Human Motivation (pp. 420–438). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hapeshi, K., & Jones, D. (1992). Interactive multimedia for instruction: A cognitive analysis of the role of audition and vision. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 4(1), 79–100.
   Google Scholar
• Ishii, I., & Ullmer, B. (1997). Tangible bits: Towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In S. Pemberton (Ed.), Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ‘97 Conference Proceedings (pp. 234–241). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 9241-143. (2012). ISO 9241-143:2012, Ergonomics of human–system interaction – Part 143: Forms.
   Google Scholar
• Jetter, H. C, Zöllner, M., Gerken, J., & Reiterer, H. (2012). Design and Implementation of post-WIMP distributed user interfaces with ZOIL. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 28(11), 737–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordà, S., Geiger, G., Alonso, M., & Kaltenbrunner, M. (2007). The reacTable: Exploring the synergy between live music performance and tabletop tangible interfaces. In B. Ullmer & A. Schmidt (Eds.), Proc. of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (TEI ‘07) (pp. 139–146). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kolski, C., Garbay, C., Lebrun, Y., Badeig, F., Lepreux, S., Mandiau, R., & Adam, E. (2014). Interactive surfaces, tangible interaction: Perspectives for risk management. In P. Millot (Ed.), Risk Management in Life Critical Systems (pp. 351–373). London: ISTE-Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kubicki, S., Lepreux, S., Lebrun, Y., Dos Santos, P., Kolski, C., & Caelen, J. (2009). New human–computer interactions using tangible objects: Application on a digital tabletop with RFID technology. In J. A. Jacko (Ed.), Human–Computer Interaction, 13th International Conference, HCI International 2009 (San Diego, CA, USA, July 19–24, 2009), Proceedings, Part III, LNCS 5612 (pp. 446–455). Berlin/Heidelberg:Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kubicki, S., Lepreux, S., & Kolski, C. (2011). Evaluation of an interactive table with tangible objects: Application with children in a classroom. Proc. 2nd Workshop on Child Computer Interaction “UI Technologies and Educational Pedagogy,” at CHI’2011, Vancouver, May.
   Google Scholar
• Kubicki, S., Lepreux, S., & Kolski, C. (2012). RFID-driven situation awareness on TangiSense, a table interacting with tangible objects. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16(8), 1079–1094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubicki, S., Lebrun, Y., Lepreux, S., Adam, E., Kolski, C., & Mandiau, R. (2013). Simulation in contexts involving an interactive table and tangible objects. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 31, 116–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubicki, S., Wolff, M., Lepreux, S., & Kolski C. (2015). RFID interactive tabletop application with tangible objects: Exploratory study to observe young children’ behaviors. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 19(8), 1259–1274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukla, A. (1972). Foundations of an attributional theory of performance. Psychological Review, 79(6), 454–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebrun, Y., Adam, E., Kubicki, S., & Mandiau, R. (2010). A multi-agent system approach for interactive table using RFID. In Y. Demazeau, F. Dignum, J.M. Corchado, & J.B. Perez (Eds.), 8th International Conference on Practical Applications of Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, PAAMS 2010 (pp. 125–134). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lebrun, Y., Adam, E., Mandiau, R., & Kolski, C. (2015). A model for managing interactions between tangible and virtual agents on an RFID interactive tabletop: Case study in traffic simulation. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 81, 585–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepreux, S., Kubicki, S., Kolski, C., & Caelen, J. (2012). From centralized interactive tabletops to distributed surfaces: The Tangiget concept. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 28(11), 709–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D., & Zbrodoff, N. J. (1998). Stroop-type interference: Congruity effects in color naming with typewritten responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), 978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, C. M., & MacDonald, P. A. (2000). Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: Uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(10), 383–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manches, A., O’Malley, C., & Benford, S. (2009). Physical manipulation: Evaluating the potential for tangible designs. In N. Villar, S. Izadi, M. Fraser, & S. Benford (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, TEI’2009 (pp. 77–84). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Mangos, P. M., & Steele-Johnson, D. (2001). The role of subjective task complexity in goal orientation, self-efficacy, and performance relations. Human Performance, 14(2), 169–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, D. C., & Hakel, M. D. (1997). Effects of objective and subjective task complexity on performance. Human Performance, 10(4), 303–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melara, R. D., & Mounts, J. R. (1993). Selective attention to Stroop dimensions: Effects of baseline discriminability, response mode, and practice. Memory & Cognition, 21, 627–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, J. D., & Proctor, R. W. (2011). Colour correspondence effects between controlled objects and targets. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(10), 2044–2064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obeso, I., Wilkinson, L., Casabona, E., Bringas, M. L., Álvarez, M., Álvarez, L., Pavón, N., Rodríguez-Oroz, M. C., Macías, R., Obeso, J. A., & Jahanshani, M. (2011). Deficits in inhibitory control and conflict resolution on cognitive and motor tasks in Parkinson’s disease. Experimental Brain Research, 212(3), 371–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagulayan, R. J., Keefer, K., Wixon, D., Romero, R. L., & Fuller, T. (2003). User-centered design in games. In J. A. Jacko, & A. Sears (Eds.), The Human--Computer Interaction Handbook. Fundamentals, Evolving, Technologies and Emerging Applications (pp. 883–906). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Ruff, C. C., Woodward, T. S., Laurens, K. R., & Liddle, P. F. (2001). The role of the anterior cingulate cortex in conflict processing: Evidence from reverse Stroop interference. Neuroimage, 14(5), 1150–1158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sichel, J. L., & Chandler, K. A. (1969). The color-word interference test: The effects of varied color-word combinations upon verbal response latency. Journal of Psychology, 72, 219–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spivey, M. J., Grosjean, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(29),10393–10398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Y., & Hakoda, Y. (2015). An fMRI study of the functional mechanisms of Stroop/reverse-Stroop effects. Behavioural Brain Research, 290,187–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.
   Google Scholar
• Sugg, M. J., & McDonald, J. E. (1994). Time course inhibition in color-response and word-response versions of the Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20,647–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washburn, D. A. (2003). The games psychologists play (and the data they provide). Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(2), 185–193.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18, 459–482.
   Google Scholar