Evaluation of Three Tablet Computers at Two Levels of Ambient Illumination

REFERENCES

• Acosta, M. C., Gallar, J., & Belmonte, C. (1999). The influence of eye solutions on blinking and ocular comfort at rest and during work at video display terminals. Experimental Eye Research, 68(6), 663–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blehm, C., Vishnu, S., Khattak, A., Mitra, S., & Yee, R. W. (2005). Computer vision syndrome: A review. Survey of Ophthalmology, 50(3), 253–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullough, J. D., Akashi, Y., Fay, C. R., & Figueiro, M. G. (2006). Impact of surrounding illumination on visual fatigue and eyestrain while viewing television. Journal of Applied Sciences, 6(8), 1664–1670.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. M., Wang, H., Tang, Y., & Zhang, X. (2013). Visual Fatigue Caused by Tablet PC Based on Critical Fusion Frequency and Eye Blink Frequency. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 401(1), 544–547.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M. T., & Lin, C. C. (2004). Comparison of TFT-LCD and CRT on visual recognition and subjective preference. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 34(3), 167–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, W. C., & Chao, C. F. (2006). Minimization for LED-backlit TFT-LCDs. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Design Automation Conference (pp. 608–611). San Francisco, CA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, C. F., & Lin, F. T. (1998). A comparison of seven visual fatigue assessment techniques in three data-acquisition VDT tasks. Human Factors, 40(4), 577–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, H. P., Tu, C. N., Wu, S. K., & Liu, C. H. (2015). Muscle activity and comfort perception on neck, shoulder, and forearm while using a tablet computer at various tilt angles. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 31(11), 769–776. doi:10.1080/10447318.2015.1064639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiLaura, D. L., Houser, K. W., Mistrick, R. G., & Steffy, G. R. (2011). The Lighting Handbook.
   Google Scholar
• Dundar, H., & Akcayir, M. (2012). Tablet vs. paper: The effect on learners’ reading performance. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(3), 441–450.
   Google Scholar
• Huand, D. L., Rau, P. L., & Liu, Y. (2009). Effects of font size, display resolution and task type on reading Chinese fonts from mobile devices. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39(1), 81–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iranli, A., & Pedram, M. (2005). DTM: Dynamic tone mapping for backlight scaling. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Design Automation Conference (pp. 612–617). Anaheim, CA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Iwasaki, T., & Akiya, S. (1991). The significance of changes in CFF values during performance on a VDT-based visual task. In Megaw (Ed.), Towards Human Work: Solutions to Problems in Occupational Health and Safety (pp. 352–357). London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Jaschinski, W., Heuer, H., & Kylian, H. (1999). A procedure to determine the individually comfortable position of visual displays relative to the eyes. Ergonomics, 42(4), 535–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. J., Luo, M. R., Choe, W., Kim, H. S., Park, S. O., Baek, Y., … Kim, C. Y. (2008). Factors affecting the psychophysical image quality evaluation of mobile phone displays: The case of transmissive liquid-crystal displays. Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science, 25(9), 2215–2222.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. J., Luo, M. R., Rhodes, P., Choe, W., Lee, S., & Kim, C. (2006). Affective attributes in image quality of a mobile LCD. In Conference on Colour in Graphics, Imaging, and Vision (pp. 494–498). Leeds, UK: Society for Imaging Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Kortum, P., & Sorber, M. (2015). Measuring the usability of mobile applications for phones and tablets. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 31(8), 518–529. doi:10.1080/10447318.2015.1064658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D. S., Ko, Y. H., Shen, I. H., & Chao, C. Y. (2011). Effect of light source, ambient illumination, character size and interline spacing on visual performance and visual fatigue with electronic paper displays. Displays, 32(1), 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.displa.2010.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E. C., Park, K. R., Whang, M., & Min, K. (2009). Measuring the degree of eyestrain caused by watching LCD and PDP devices. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39(5), 798–806. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2009.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C. C., & Chen, M. T. (2006). Effects of color combination on visual acuity and display quality with TFT-LCD. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, 23(2), 91–99.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C. C., & Huang, K. C. (2009). Effects of color combination and ambient illumination on visual perception time with TFT-LCD. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 109(2), 607–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, P. H., & Kuo, W. H. (2011). Image Quality of a Mobile Display under Different Illuminations 1, 2. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 113(1), 215–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. T., Lin, P. H., Hwang, S. L., Jeng, S. C., & Liao, C. C. (2009). Investigation of legibility and visual fatigue for simulated flexible electronic paper under various surface treatments and ambient illumination conditions. Applied Ergonomics, 40, 922–928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyake-Kashima, M., Dogru, M., Nojima, T., Murase, M., Matsumoto, Y., & Tsubota, K. (2005). The effect of antireflection film use on blink rate and asthenopic symptoms during visual display terminal work. Cornea, 24(5), 567–570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozok, A. A., Benson, D., Chakraborty, J., & Norcio, A. F. (2008). A comparative study between tablet and laptop PCs: User satisfaction and preferences. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24(3), 329–352. doi:10.1080/10447310801920524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, I. H., Shieh, H. K., Cha, C. Y., & Lee, D. S. (2009). Lighting, font style, and polarity on visual performance and visual fatigue with electronic paper displays. Displays, 30, 53–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shieh, K. K., & Chen, M. T. (1997). Effects of screen color combination, work-break schedule, and workplace on VDT viewing distance. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 20(1), 11–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shieh, K. K., & Lin, C. C. (2000). Effects of screen type, ambient illuminance, and color combination on VDT visual performance and subjective preference. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 26, 527–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegenthaler, E., Bochud, Y., Bergamin, P., & Wurtz, P. (2012). Reading on LCD vs e‐Ink displays: Effects on fatigue and visual strain. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 32(5), 367–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, A., & Hoggart, B. (2005). Pain: A review of three commonly used pain rating scales. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 14(7), 798–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H. C., Lee, C. L., & Lin, C. T. (2007). Ergonomic evaluation of three popular Chinese e-book displays for prolonged reading. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 37, 761–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standard CIE. (2001). R.O.C. Patent No. ISO 8995-1:2002/Cor 1:2005. CIE S: B. ISO.
   Google Scholar