Which Tags Do We Remember in Personal Information Management?

References

• Abbasi, R., Chernov, S., Nejdl, W., Paiu, R., & Staab, S. (2009). Exploiting Flickr tags and groups for finding landmark photos. Advances in Information Retrieval, 5478, 654–661.
   Google Scholar
• Ames, M., & Naaman, M. (2007). Why we tag: Motivations for annotation in mobile and online media. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’07 (pp. 971–980). ACM. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1240772
   Google Scholar
• Bar‐Ilan, J., Zhitomirsky‐Geffet, M., Miller, Y., & Shoham, S. (2012). Tag‐based retrieval of images through different interfaces: A user study. Online Information Review, 36(5), 739–757. doi:10.1108/14684521211276019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boström, F. (2006). Personal information organization. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.98.8932
   Google Scholar
• Budiu, R., Pirolli, P., & Hong, L. (2009). Remembrance of things tagged. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’09 (p. 615), New York, NY, USA, ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1518701.1518796
   Google Scholar
• Canfora, G., & Cerulo, L. (2004). A taxonomy of information retrieval models and tools. Journal of Computing and Information Technology, 12(3), 175–194. doi:10.2498/cit.2004.03.01
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, A., & Coleman, A. (2006). Dictionary of psychology (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diaz-Aviles, E., Fisichella, M., & Kawase, R. (2011). Unsupervised auto-tagging for learning object enrichment. Towards Ubiquitous Learning, 6964, 83–96. Retrieved from doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23985-4_8
   Google Scholar
• Dubinko, M., Kumar, R., Magnani, J., Novak, J., Raghavan, P., & Tomkins, A. (2006). Visualizing tags over time. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web - WWW ’06 (p. 193). doi:10.1145/1135777.1135810
   Google Scholar
• Fu, W.-T. (2008). The microstructures of social tagging. Proceedings of the ACM 2008 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW ’08 (p. 229). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1460563.1460600
   Google Scholar
• Gao, Q. (2011). An empirical study of tagging for personal information organization: Performance, workload, memory, and consistency. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 27(9), 821–863. doi:10.1080/10447318.2011.555309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golder, S. A., & Huberman, B. A. (2006). Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science, 32(2), 198–208. doi:10.1177/0165551506062337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, K., Shih, P. C., & Carroll, J. M. (2014). Local news chatter: Augmenting community news by aggregating hyperlocal microblog content in a tag cloud. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 30(12), 1003–1014. doi:10.1080/10447318.2014.925773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hearst, M. A. (2006). Clustering versus faceted categories for information exploration. Communications of the ACM, 49(4), 59. doi:10.1145/1121949.1121983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human–computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction, 7(2), 174–196. http://doi.org/10.1145/353485.353487
   Google Scholar
• Indratmo, J., & Vassileva, J. (2008). A review of organizational structures of personal information management. Journal of Digital Information, 10(5), 1–19. Retrieved from http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/viewArticle/251
   Google Scholar
• Information explosion. (2014). New World Encyclopedia. Retrieved November 24, 2014, from http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Information_explosion#.22Information_overload.22_by_Alvin_Toffler
   Google Scholar
• Information retrieval. (2014). Wikipedia. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Information_retrieval&oldid=635646635
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, B. J. (2006). Search log analysis: What it is, what’s been done, how to do it. Library & Information Science Research, 28(3), 407–432. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2006.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H., & El Saddik, A. (2011). Personalized PageRank vectors for tag recommendations. Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems - RecSys ’11 (p. 45). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/2043932.2043945
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H. L., Scerri, S., Breslin, J. G., Decker, S., & Kim, H. G. (2008). The state of the art in tag Ontologies : A semantic model for tagging and Folksonomies. Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications - DCMI ’08 (pp. 128–137), Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. Retrieved from http://dcpapers.dublincore.org/pubs/article/view/925
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. (2009). The role of tags in information retrieval interaction. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 45(1), 1–3. doi:10.1002/meet.2008.14504503137
   Google Scholar
• Kipp, M. E. I., & Campbell, D. G. (2007). Patterns and inconsistencies in collaborative tagging systems: An examination of tagging practices. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 43(1), 1–18. doi:10.1002/meet.14504301178
   Google Scholar
• Krestel, R., & Chen, L. (2009). The art of tagging : Measuring the quality of tags. Paper presented at the 3rd Asian Semantic Web Conference on The Semantic Web, December 8–11, Bangkok, Thailand. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1484165&CFID=613417720&CFTOKEN=93300188
   Google Scholar
• Lu, K., & Kipp, M. E. I. (2010). An experimental study on the retrieval effectiveness of collaborative tags. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47(1), 1–2. doi:10.1002/meet.14504701379
   Google Scholar
• Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., & Schutze, H. (2008). Introduction to information retrieval. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511809071
   Google Scholar
• Marlow, C., Naaman, M., Boyd, D., & Davis, M. (2006). HT06, tagging paper, taxonomy, Flickr, academic article, to read. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia - HYPERTEXT ’06 (p. 31). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1149941.1149949
   Google Scholar
• Millen, D., & Feinberg, J. (2006). Using social tagging to improve social navigation. Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems -AH ’06. Retrieved from http://www.coulthard.com/library/Files/millen_feinberg_2006.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Peters, I., Schumann, L., Terliesner, J., & Stock, W. G. (2011). Retrieval effectiveness of tagging systems. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 48(1), 1–4. doi:10.1002/meet.2011.14504801338
   Google Scholar
• Ransom, N., & Rafferty, P. (2011). Facets of user‐assigned tags and their effectiveness in image retrieval. Journal of Documentation, 67(6), 1038–1066. doi:10.1108/00220411111183582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seagull, F. J., & Walker, N. (1992). The effects of hierarchical structure and visualization ability on computerized information retrieval. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 4(4), 369–385. doi:10.1080/10447319209526049
   Google Scholar
• Sen, S., Harper, F. M., LaPitz, A., & Riedl, J. (2007). The quest for quality tags. Proceedings of the 2007 International ACM Conference on Conference on Supporting Group Work - GROUP ’07 (p. 361). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1316624.1316678
   Google Scholar
• Sen, S., Lam, S. K., Rashid, A. M., Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Osterhouse, J., & Riedl, J. (2006). Tagging, communities, vocabulary, evolution. Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW ’06 (p. 181). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1180875.1180904
   Google Scholar
• Shiri, A. (2009). An examination of social tagging interface features and functionalities: An analytical comparison. Online Information Review, 33(5), 901–919. doi:10.1108/14684520911001909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigurbjörnsson, B., & Van Zwol, R. (2008). Flickr tag recommendation based on collective knowledge. Proceeding of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web - WWW, 08, 327. doi:10.1145/1367497.1367542
   Google Scholar
• Singla, A., & Weber, I. (2010). Tagging and navigability. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web - WWW ’10 (p. 1185). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1772690.1772866
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, R. (2005). A cognitive analysis of tagging. Retrieved from http://www.rashmisinha.com/archives/05_09/tagging-cognitive.html
   Google Scholar
• SINTEF. (2013). Big Data, for better or worse: 90% of world’s data generated over last two years – ScienceDaily. Retrieved November 24, 2014, from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/05/130522085217.htm
   Google Scholar
• Špiranec, S., & Borovac, M. (2012). Expert vs. Novices dimensions of tagging behaviour in an Bir Akademik Çevrede Uzman ve Deneyimsiz Kullanıcıların Etiketleme Davranışlarının Boyutları Öz. Bilgi Dünyasi, 13(January), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Stefaner, M. (2007). Visual tools for the socio–semantic web. Master's thesis, University of Applied Sciences Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-fhpotsdam/frontdoor/index/index/docId/51
   Google Scholar
• Tag cloud. (2014). Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tag_cloud&oldid=611212945
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, L.-C., Hwang, S.-L., & Tang, K.-H. (2011). Analysis of keyword-based tagging behaviors of experts and novices. Online Information Review, 35(2), 272–290. doi:10.1108/14684521111128041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vander Wal, T. (2007). Folksonomy Coinage and Definition. Retrieved from http://vanderwal.net/folksonomy.html
   Google Scholar
• Vassileva, J. (n.d.). A review of organizational structures of personal information management. Austin, TX: University of Texas Libraries.
   Google Scholar
• Völkel, M., Schaffert, S., & Oren, E. (2008). Personal knowledge management with semantic technologies personal. In J. Rech, B. Decker, and E. Ras (Eds.), Emerging technologies for semantic work environments (pp. 138–153). IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-59904-877-2
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Bai, Y., & Li, Y. (2010). An information retrieval method based on sequential access patterns. 2010 Asia–Pacific Conference on Wearable Computing Systems, 247–250. doi:10.1109/APWCS.2010.69
   Google Scholar
• Yang, C. C., Chen, H., & Hong, K. (2003). Visualization of large category map for Internet browsing. Decision Support Systems, 35(1), 89–102. doi:10.1016/S0167-9236(02)00101-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanakis, S. H., Solomon, A., Wishart, N., & Dublish, S. (1998). Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 107(3), 507–529. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00147-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, S., Farooq, U., & Carroll, J. M. (2009). Enhancing information scent. Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work - GROUP ’09 (p. 1). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1531674.1531676
   Google Scholar