Theory-based Models of Attention in Visual Workspaces

References

• Attneave, F. (1953). Psychological probability as a function of experienced frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 81–86.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Awh, E., & Pashler, H. (2000). Evidence for split attentional foci. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 834–846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, B. P., & Konstan, J. A. (2006). On the need for attention aware systems: Measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 685–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, N., & Scerbo, M. S. (2007). Automation-induced complacency for monitoring highly reliable systems: The role of task complexity, system experience, and operator trust. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 8, 321–348.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., & Pelz, J. B. (1995). Memory representations in natural tasks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 66–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. London, UK: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97, 523–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundesen, C. (1993). The relationship between independent race models and Luce’s choice axiom. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 37, 446–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundesen, C. (1996) In A. Kramer, G. H. Coles, & G. D Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention, (pp. 1–44). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Carbonell, J. R., Ward, J. L., & Senders, J. W. (1968). A queueing model of visual sampling experimental validation. IEEE Transactions on Man-Machine Systems, MMS-9, 9, 82–87.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, A. H. S., & Courtney, A. J. (1996). Foveal acuity, peripheral acuity, and search performance: A review. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 18, 113–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. J., Ferrell, J. M., & Johnson, N. (2002). What very small numbers mean. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 424–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dawes, R. M. (1979). The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. American Psychologist, 34, 571–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donk, M. (1994). Human monitoring behavior in a multiple-instrument setting: Independent sampling, sequential sampling, or arrangement-dependent sampling. Acta Psychologica, 86, 31–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen, C. W., & St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 225–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030–1044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geisler, W. S., & Chou, K.-L. (1995). Separation of low-level and high-level factors in complex tasks: Visual search. Psychological Review, 102, 356–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helander, M. G. (1987). Design of visual displays. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors (pp. 507–548). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hillstrom, A. P., & Chai, Y.-C. (2006). Factors that guide or disrupt attentive visual processing. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 648–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horrey, W. J., Wickens, C. D., & Consalus, K. P. (2006). Modeling drivers’ visual attention allocation while interacting with in-vehicle technologies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12, 67–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40, 1489–1506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, A., & Proctor, R. W. (2004). Attention: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, R. M., & MacInnes, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10, 346–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, R. Y., Park, T., Wickens, C. D., Ong, L. T., & Chia, S. N. (2011). Differences in attentional strategies by novice and experienced operating theatre scrub nurses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17, 233–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, A. F., & Hahn, S. (1995). Splitting the beam: Distribution of attention over noncontiguous regions of the visual field. Psychological Science, 6, 381–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Mackworth, N. H. (1965). Visual noise causes tunnel vision. Psychonomic Science, 3, 67–68.
   Google Scholar
• McCarley, J. S., Mounts, J. R. W., & Kramer, A. F. (2007). Spatially-mediated capacity limits in attentive visual perception. Acta Psychologica, 126, 98–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarley, J. S., & Steelman, K. S. (2013). Visual displays. In A. Johnson & R. W. Proctor (Eds.), Neuroergonomics: Cognitive neuroscience approaches to human factors and ergonomics (pp. 51–68). New York, NY: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Moray, N. (1986). Monitoring behavior and supervisory control. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 2, pp. 40.41–40.51). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Moray, N. (1993). Designing for attention. In A. Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.), Attention: Selection, awareness, and control (pp. 111–134). Oxford, UK: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Moray, N., & Inagaki, T. (2000). Attention and complacency. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 1, 354–365.
   Google Scholar
• Najemnik, J., & Geisler, W. S. (2005). Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search. Nature, 434, 387–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolic, M. I., Orr, J. M., & Sarter, N. B. (2004). Why pilots miss the green box: How display context undermines attention capture. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 14, 39–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., & Manzey, D. (2010). Complacency and bias in human use of automation: An attentional integration. Human Factors, 52, 381–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., Molloy, R., & Singh, I. L. (1993). Performance consequences of automation-induced “complacency”. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Parkhurst, D., Law, K., & Niebur, E. (2002). Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention. Vision Research, 42, 107–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saalman, Y. B., Pigarev, I. N., & Vidyasagar, T. R. (2007). Neural mechanisms of visual attention: How top-down feedback highlights relevant locations. Science, 316, 1612–1615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, A. F. (1963). The selective process in the functional visual field. Assen, Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, A. F. & Houtmans, M. J. M. (1985). Perceptual processing modes in the functional visual field. Acta Psychologica, 58, 251–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarter, N. B., Mumaw, R., & Wickens, C. D. (2007). Pilots’ monitoring strategies and performance on highly automated glass cockpit aircraft. Human Factors, 49, 347–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebok, A., Wickens, C. D., Sarter, N. B., Quesada, S., Socash, C., & Anthony, B. (2012). The automation design advisor tool (ADAT): Development and validation of a model-based tool to support flight deck automation design for NextGen operations. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 22, 378–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senders, J. W. (1964). The human operator as a monitor and controller of multidegree of freedom systems. IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, HFE-5, 2–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senders, J. W. (1983). Visual sampling processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, T. B. (1970). On how often the supervisor should sample. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Science and Cybernetics, 6, 140–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiffrin, R. M. (1988). Attention. In R. C. Atkinson, R. J. Herrnstein, G. Lindzey, & R. Luce (Eds.), Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology (Vol. 2: Learning and cognition, 2nd ed., pp. 739–811). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Steelman, K. S. & McCarley, J. S. (2012, October). Modeling Violations of Independent Sampling in a Supervisory Monitoring Task. Talk presented at The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Steelman, K. S., McCarley, J. S., & Wickens, C. D. (2011). Modeling the control of attention in visual workspaces. Human Factors, 53, 142–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steelman, K. S., McCarley, J. S., & Wickens, C. D. (2013). Great expectations: Top-down attention modulates the costs of clutter and eccentricity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 19, 403–419. doi:10.1037/a0034546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steelman-Allen, K. S., McCarley, J. S., Wickens, C. D., Sebok, A., & Bzostek, J. (2009). N-SEEV: A computational model of attention and noticing. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 53, 774–778.
   Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J. (1994). Endogenous and exogenous control of visual attention. Perception, 23, 429–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsotsos, J. K. (1990). Analyzing vision at the complexity level. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 423–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, D., & Koch, C. (2006). Modeling attention to salient protoobjects. Neural Networks, 19, 1395–1407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welford, A. T. (1967). Single-channel operation in the brain. Acta Psychologica, 27, 5–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens, C., McCarley, J. S., Steelman-Allen, K. S., Sebok, A., & Bzostek, J. (2009). NT-SEEV: A model of attention capture and noticing on the flight deck. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 53, 769–773.
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D. (1993). Cognitive factors in display design. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 83, 179–201.
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D. (2015). Noticing events in the visual workplace: The SEEV and NSEEV models. In R. R. Hoffman, P. A. Hancock, M. W. Scerbo, R. Parasuraman, & J. L. Szalma (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of applied perception research (pp. 749–768). New York, NY: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., Clegg, B., Vieane, A. Z., & Sebok, A. (2015). Complacency and automation bias in the use of imperfect automation. Human Factors, 57, 728–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., Goh, J., Helleberg, J., Horrey, W. J., & Talleur, D. A. (2003). Attentional models of multitask pilot performance using advanced display technology. Human Factors, 45, 360–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., Hollands, J. G., Banbury, S., & Parasuraman, R. (2012). Engineering psychology and human performance (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., Hooey, B. L., Gore, B. F., Sebok, A., & Koenicke, C. S. (2009). Identifying black swans in NextGen: Predicting human performance in off-nominal conditions. Human Factors, 51, 638–651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., & McCarley, J. S. (2008). Applied attention theory. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., McCarley, J. S., Alexander, A. L., Thomas, L. C., Ambinder, M. S., & Zheng, S. (2008). Attention-situation awareness (A-SA) model of pilot error. In D. C. Foyle & B. L. Hooey (Eds.), Human performance modeling in aviation (pp. 213–239). Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., Sebok, A., Bagnall, T., & Kamienski, J. (2007). Modeling of situation awareness supported by advanced flight deck displays. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 51, 794–798.
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., Sebok, A., Li, H., Sarter, N., & Gacy, A. M. (2015). Using modeling and simulation to predict operator performance and automation-induced complacency with robotic automation: A case study and empirical validation. Human Factors, 57, 959–975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L. J. (1982). Cognitive load and the functional field of view. Human Factors, 24, 683–692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L. J. (1985). Tunnel vision induced by a foveal load manipulation. Human Factors, 27, 221–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 419–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yantis, S. (1998). Attentional control. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 223–256). East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 601–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar