A Glance into Social and Evolutionary Aspects of an Artifact Ecology for Collaborative Learning through the Lens of Distributed Cognition

References

• Adu-Oppong, F., Gardiner, C. K., Kapadia, A., & Tsang, P. P. (2008, July). Social circles: Tackling privacy in social networks. Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS), Pittsburgh, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior: Privacy, personal space, territory, and crowding. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405.
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, H., & Holtzblatt, K. (1998). Contextual design: Defining customer-centered systems. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Blandford, A., & Furniss, D. (2005, July). DiCoT: A methodology for applying distributed cognition to the design of teamworking systems. In S. Gilroy & M. Harrison (Eds.), International workshop on design, specification, and verification of interactive systems (pp. 26–38). Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bly, S. (1997). Field work: Is it product work? Interactions, 4(1), 25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Bødker, S., & Bannon, L. (1991). Beyond the interface: Encountering artifacts in use. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Designing interaction: Psychological theory of the human–computer interface (pp. 227–253). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bødker, S., & Klokmose, C. N. (2012, October). Dynamics in artifact ecologies. In T. Pederson, L. Malmborg, G. Jaccuci & K. Hornbaek (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human–Computer Interaction: Making Sense through Design (pp. 448–457). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Button, G., & Dourish, P. (1996, April). Technomethodology: Paradoxes and possibilities. In R. Bilger, S. Guest, & M. J. Tauber (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 19–26). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, A., Crabtree, A., Rodden, T., Jones, M., & Rogers, Y. (2012, June). Research in the wild: Understanding’in the wild’approaches to design and development. In P. Oliver, P. Wright, E. Blevis, & E. Giaccardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (pp. 795–796). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, A., Wang, H., Zhu, L., Xu, B., & Wang, H. (2011, September). Connecting people through physical resources in an office environment. In D. J. Patterson, Y. Rogers, X. Xie, J. Landay, & Y. Shi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 475–476). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Comber, R., Hoonhout, J., Van Halteren, A., Moynihan, P., & Olivier, P. (2013, April). Food practices as situated action: Exploring and designing for everyday food practices with households. In W. E. Mackay, S. Brewster & S. Bødker (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2457–2466). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Coughlan, T., Collins, T. D., Adams, A., Rogers, Y., Haya, P. A., & Martín, E. (2012). The conceptual framing, design and evaluation of device ecologies for collaborative activities. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 70(10), 765–779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crabtree, A., Benford, S., Greenhalgh, C., Tennent, P., Chalmers, M., & Brown, B. (2006, June). Supporting ethnographic studies of ubiquitous computing in the wild. In J. M. Carroll, S. Bødker, & J. Coughlin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 60–69). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Díaz, P., Sicilia, M. Á., & Aedo, I. (2002, December). Evaluation of hypermedia educational systems: Criteria and imperfect measures. In Computers in Education, 2002. Proceedings. International Conference on (pp. 621–626). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Dror, I. E., & Harnad, S. (2008). Offloading cognition onto cognitive technology. Cognition Distributed: How Cognitive Technology Extends Our Minds, 16, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1990). Learning, working and imagining: Twelve studies in activity theory. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-konsultit.
   Google Scholar
• FitzGerald, E. (2012). Analysing video and audio data: Existing approaches and new innovations. In Surface learning workshop 2012. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Furniss, D., & Blandford, A. (2010, April). DiCoT modeling: From analysis to design. In T. Judge, C. Neustaedter, A. Tang & S. Harrison Proceedings of CHI 2010 Workshop on Bridging the Gap: Moving from Contextual Analysis to Design. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Furniss, D., Blandford, A. E., Rajkomar, A., Vincent, C., & Mayer, A. (2011). The visible and the invisible: Distributed cognition for medical devices. In A. Blandford, G. De Pietro, L. Gallo, A. Gimblett, P. Oladimeji, & H. Thimbleby (Eds.), Proceedings of 1st International Workshop on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems for Medicine and Heath Care (EICS4Med) (pp. 1–6). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Furniss, D., Masci, P., Curzon, P., Mayer, A., & Blandford, A. (2015). Exploring medical device design and use through layers of distributed cognition: How a glucometer is coupled with its context. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 53, 330–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human–computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction (TOCHI), 7(2), 174–196.
   Google Scholar
• Houben, S., Marquardt, N., Vermeulen, J., Schöning, J., Klokmose, C., Reiterer, H., … Schreiner, M. (2016, May). Cross-surface: Challenges and opportunities for ‘bring your own device’ in the wild. In J. Kaye, A. Druin, C. Lampe, D. Morris, & J. P. Hourcade (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3366–3372). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Houben, S., Vermeulen, J., Klokmose, C., Marquardt, N., Schöning, J., & Reiterer, H. (2015, November). Cross-surface: Workshop on interacting with multi-device ecologies in the wild. In N. Nunes, E. Constanza, P. Olivier, & J. Schöning (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Interactive Tabletops & Surfaces (pp. 485–489). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, J. A., O’Brien, J., Rodden, T., Rouncefield, M., & Blythin, S. (1997, August). Designing with ethnography: A presentation framework for design. In I. McClelland, G. Olson, G. van der Veer, A. Henderson, & S. Coles (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (pp. 147–158). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. (1987). Metaphors for interface design. (ICS Report 8703). La Jolla, CA: University of California, San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ioannou, A., Vasiliou, C., Zaphiris, P., Arh, T., Klobučar, T., & Pipan, M. (2015). Creative multimodal learning environments and blended interaction for problem-based activity in HCI education. TechTrends, 59(2), 47–56.
   Google Scholar
• Jornet, A. (2014). The bodily and contextual foundations of conceptual coherence and continuity. Oslo, Norway: Akademikia Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. A. (1997, March). Activity theory: Basic concepts and applications. In A. Edwards & S. Pemberton (Eds.), CHI’97 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 158–159). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kaptelinin, V., Nardi, B. A., & Macaulay, C. (1999). Methods & tools: The activity checklist: A tool for representing the “space” of context. Interactions, 6(4), 27–39.
   Google Scholar
• Komis, V., Avouris, N., & Fidas, C. (2002). Computer-supported collaborative concept mapping: Study of synchronous peer interaction. Education and Information Technologies, 7(2), 169–188.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H. R., & Šabanović, S. (2013, September). Weiser’s dream in the Korean home: Collaborative study of domestic roles, relationships, and ideal technologies. In F. Mattern, S. Santini, J. F. Canny, M.Langheinrich, & J. Rekimoto (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 637–646). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Marti, S., & Schmandt, C. (2005, October). Physical embodiments for mobile communication agents. In P. Baudisch, M. Czerwinski, & D. Olsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 231–240). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Peña-Ayala, A., Sossa, H., & Méndez, I. (2014). Activity theory as a framework for building adaptive e-learning systems: A case to provide empirical evidence. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 131–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, M., O’Hara, K., Spinelli, G., & Sharpe, B. (2003, July). The role of space in socially distributed cognition: Some issues for cognitive engineering. In R. Alterman & D. Kirsh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 916–921). Boston, MA: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Poole, E. S., Miller, A. D., Xu, Y., Eiriksdottir, E., Catrambone, R., & Mynatt, E. D. (2011, September). The place for ubiquitous computing in schools: Lessons learned from a school-based intervention for youth physical activity. In J. Landay, Y. Shi, D. J. Patterson, Y. Rogers, & X. Xie (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 395–404). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Rajkomar, A. (2010). Extending distributed cognition analysis for complex work settings: A case study of infusion pumps in the intensive care unit. London, UK: UCL.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, J., & Vicente, K. J. (1990). Ecological interfaces: A technological imperative in high‐tech systems? International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 2 (2), 93–110.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Y. (2004). New theoretical approaches for HCI. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 38(1), 87–143.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Y. (2011). Interaction design gone wild: Striving for wild theory. Interactions, 18(4), 58–62.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Y. (2012). HCI theory: Classical, modern, and contemporary. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics, 5 (2), 1–129.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Y., & Ellis, J. (1994). Distributed cognition: An alternative framework for analysing and explaining collaborative working. Journal of Information Technology, 9(2), 119–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. L., & Martin, T. (2006). Distributed learning and mutual adaptation. Pragmatics & Cognition, 14(2), 313–332.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, H., Robinson, H., Segal, J., & Furniss, D. (2006, July). The role of story cards and the wall in XP teams: A distributed cognition perspective. In J. Chao, M. Cohn, F. Maurer, H. Sharp, & J. Shore (Eds.), AGILE 2006 (AGILE’06) (pp. 11-pp). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, D. H. (2016). Cross-platform users’ experiences toward designing interusable systems. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 32(7), 503–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squicciarini, A., Karumanchi, S., Lin, D., & DeSisto, N. (2014). Identifying hidden social circles for advanced privacy configuration. Computers & Security, 41, 40–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human–machine communication. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toseland, R. W., & Rivas, R. F. (2005). Introduction to group work practice, An. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Vasiliou, C., Ioannou, A., & Zaphiris, P. (2013, September). Technology enhanced PBL in HCI education: A case study. In P. Kotze, G. Marsden, G. Lindgaard, J. Wesson, & M. Winckler (Eds.), IFIP Conference on Human–Computer Interaction (pp. 643–650). Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vasiliou, C., Ioannou, A., & Zaphiris, P. (2014). Understanding collaborative learning activities in an information ecology: A distributed cognition account. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 544–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasiliou, C., Ioannou, A., & Zaphiris, P. (2015, September). An artifact ecology in a nutshell: A distributed cognition perspective for collaboration and coordination. In J. Abascal, S. Barbosa, M. Fetter, T. Gross, P. Palanque, & M. Winckler (Eds.), Human–computer interaction (pp. 55–72). New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Weiser, M. (1991). The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American, 265(3), 94–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S., Galliers, J., & Fone, J. (2007). Cognitive artifacts in support of medical shift handover: An in use, in situ evaluation. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 22(1–2), 59–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., & Norman, D. A. (1994). Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 18(1), 87–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar