A Comparative Study of Map Exploration Interfaces for Multi-Touch Tabletops

References

• Accot, J., & Zhai, S. (1997). Beyond Fitts’ law: Models for trajectory-based HCI tasks. Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (pp. 295–302), Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Albinsson, P., & Zhai, S. (2003). High precision touch screen interaction. Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 105–112), Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Arif, A. S., & Stuerzlinger, W. (2010). Predicting the cost of error correction in character-based text entry technologies. Presented at Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 5–14), Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Beheshti, E., Devender, A. V., & Horn, M. (2012). Touch, click, navigate: Comparing tabletop and desktop interaction for map navigation tasks. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM international conference on Interactive tabletops and surfaces (pp. 205–214), Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• BEST-GIS European Commission. (1998). Guidelines for best practice in user interface for GIS. ESPRIT/ESSI project (p. 21580).
   Google Scholar
• Bortolaso, C., Oskamp, M., Graham, T. C., & Brown, D. (2013, October). OrMiS: A tabletop interface for simulation-based training. Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international conference on Interactive tabletops and surfaces (pp. 145–154), St. Andrews, Scotland, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Bruun, A., Jensen, K. E., Kristensen, D. H., & Kjeldskov, J. (2016). Escaping the trough: Towards real-world impact of tabletop research. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Advance online publication.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, P. R., Johnston, M., McGee, D., Oviatt, S., Pittman, J., Smith, I., … Clow, J. (1997). QuickSet: Multimodal interaction for distributed applications. Proceedings of ACM International Multimedia Conference (pp. 31–40), Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Corradini, A. (2004, June). Collaborative integration of speech and 3D gesture for map-based applications. Presented at International Conference on Computational Science (pp. 913–920), Berlin Heidelberg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Forlines, C., & Shen, C. (2005). DTLens: Multi-user tabletop spatial data exploration. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 119–122), Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Forlines, C., Wigdor, D., Shen, C., & Balakrishnan, R. (2007). Direct-touch vs. mouse input for tabletop displays. Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 647–656), San Jose, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, C. W., Goh, W. B., & Ng, J. A. (2010). Multi-touch techniques for exploring large-scale 3D astrophysical simulations. Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2213-2222), Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Furnas, G. W., & Bederson, B. B. (1995). Space-scale diagrams: Understanding multiscale interfaces. Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 234–241), Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Gaver, W., Bowers, J., Boucher, A., Law, A., Pennington, S., & Walker, B. (2007). Electronic furniture for the Curious Home: Assessing ludic designs in the field. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 22 (1–2), 119–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grudin, J. (1989). The case against user interface consistency. Communications of the ACM, 32 (10), 1164–1173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haklay, M., & Zafiri, A. (2008). Usability engineering for GIS: Learning from snapshot. Cartographic Journal, 45 (2), 87–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haller, M., Leitner, J., Seifried, T., Wallace, J. R., Scott, S. D., Richter, C., … Hunter, S. (2010). The nice discussion room: Integrating paper and digital media to support co-located group meetings. Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 609–618), Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Harrower, M., & Sheesley, B. (2005). Designing better map interfaces: A framework for panning and zooming. Transactions in GIS, 9 (2), 77–89.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Park, J., Kim, H. K., & Lee, C. (2007). HCI (human computer interaction) using multi-touch tabletop display. Presented at Proceedings of IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communications, Computers and Signal Processing (pp. 391–394), Victoria, B.C., Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Kraak, M. J. (2001). Setting and needs for web cartography. In M.- J. Kraak & A. Brown (Eds.), Web cartography: Developments and prospects (pp. 1–7) London, England and New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Lepreux, S., Kubicki, S., Kolski, C., & Caelen, J. (2012). From centralized interactive tabletops to distributed surfaces: The tangiget concept. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28 (11), 709–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, Y., & Rogers, Y. (2008). A framework and an environment for collaborative analysis of user experience. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24 (6), 529–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H. X., Choong, Y. Y., & Salvendy, G. (1997). A proposed index of usability: A method for comparing the relative usability of different software systems. Behaviour & Information Technology, 16 (4–5), 267–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, I. S. (1992). Fitts’ Law as a research and design tool in human–computer interaction. Human Computer Interaction, 7, 91–139.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, I. S., & Buxton, W. (1992). Extending Fitts’ law to two-dimensional tasks. Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 219–226), Monterey, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Matejka, J., Grossman, T., Lo, J., & Fitzmaurice, G. (2009). The design and evaluation of multi-finger mouse emulation techniques. Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1073–1082), Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Nacenta, M. A., Baudisch, P., Benko, H., & Wilson, A. (2009). Separability of spatial manipulations in multi-touch interfaces. Proceedings of Graphics interface (pp. 175–182), Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A., & Nielsen, J. (2010). Gestural interfaces: A step backward in usability. Interactions, 17 (5), 46–49.
   Google Scholar
• Ryall, K., Forlines, C., Shen, C., & Morris, M. R. (2004). Exploring the effects of group size and table size on interactions with tabletop shared-display groupware. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 284–293), Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Ryall, K., Morris, M. R., Everitt, K., Forlines, C., & Shen, C. (2006). Experiences with and observations of direct-touch tabletops. Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human-Computer Systems (pp. 8–15), Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, A. W., & White, S. H. (1975). The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 10, 9–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skarlatidou, A., & Haklay, M. (2005). Public web mapping: Preliminary usability evaluation. GIS Research UK (pp. 5–7).
   Google Scholar
• Tan, D. S., Gergle, D., Scupelli, P., & Pausch, R. (2003). With similar visual angles, larger displays improve spatial performance. Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 217–224), Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Tse, E., Greenberg, S., & Shen, C. (2006). GSI demo: Multiuser gesture/speech interaction over digital tables by wrapping single user applications. Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (pp. 76–83), Banff, Alberta, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, F., & Ren, X., (2009). Empirical evaluation for finger input properties in multi-touch interaction. Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1063–1072), Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• You, M., Chen, C., Liu, H., & Lin, H. (2007). A usability evaluation of web map zoom and pan functions. International Journal of Design, 1 (1), 15–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar