Adapting the Navigation Interface of Smart Watches to User Movements

References

• Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24 (4), 665–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, E., & Isaksson, I. M. (2007). Exploring alternatives to the hierarchical menu structure used in mobile phones ( Master’s thesis). Department of Computing Science, UMEA University, Umeå, Sweden. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/index
   Google Scholar
• Apple Inc. (2016a). iOS human interface guidelines. Retrieved from https://developer.apple.com/ios/human-interface-guidelines/visual-design/animation/
   Google Scholar
• Apple Inc. (2016b). watchOS human interface guidelines. Retrieved from https://developer.apple.com/watchos/ human-interface-guidelines/animation/
   Google Scholar
• Arning, K., & Ziefle, M. (2009). Effects of age, cognitive, and personal factors on PDA menu navigation performance. Behaviour & Information Technology, 28 (3), 251–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2007). Making instructional animations more effective: A cognitive load approach. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21 (6), 695–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baber, C. (2001). Wearable computers: A human factors review. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 13 (2), 123–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard, L., Yi, J. S., Jacko, J. A., & Sears, A. (2005). An empirical comparison of use-in-motion evaluation scenarios for mobile computing devices. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62 (4), 487–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard, L., Yi, J. S., Jacko, J. A., & Sears, A. (2007). Capturing the effects of context on human performance in mobile computing systems. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11 (2), 81–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayles, M. E. (2002, April). Designing online banner advertisements: Should we animate? Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Bederson, B. B., & Boltman, A. (1999, October). Does animation help users build mental maps of spatial information? Information Visualization, 1999 Proceedings. (Info Vis’ 99). IEEE Symposium, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Bergstrom, J., Oulasvirta, A., & Brewster, S. (2011, August). The effects of walking speed on target acquisition on a touchscreen interface. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Bragdon, A., Nelson, E., Li, Y., & Hinckley, K. (2011, May). Experimental analysis of touch-screen gesture designs in mobile environments. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Brewster, S., Lumsden, J., Bell, M., Hall, M., & Tasker, S. (2003, April). Multimodal ‘eyes-free’ interaction techniques for wearable devices. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1 (3), 185–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bristow, H. W., Baber, C., Cross, J., Knight, J. F., & Woolley, S. I. (2004). Defining and evaluating context for wearable computing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60 (5), 798–819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, M., Hornof, A., Nilsen, E., & Gorman, N. (2005). High-cost banner blindness: Ads increase perceived workload, hinder visual search, and are forgotten. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 12 (4), 423–445.
   Google Scholar
• Buschek, D., Rogers, S., & Murray-Smith, R. (2013, August). User-specific touch models in a cross-device context. Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Chae, M., & Kim, J. (2004). Do size and structure matter to mobile users? An empirical study of the effects of screen size, information structure, and task complexity on user activities with standard web phones. Behaviour & Information Technology, 23 (3), 165–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, A., & Kalawsky, R. (2004, October). A comparative investigation into two pointing systems for use with wearable computers while mobile. Wearable Computers, 2004. ISWC 2004. Eighth International Symposium on, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Clawson, J., Starner, T., Kohlsdorf, D., Quigley, D. P., & Gilliland, S. (2014, September). Texting while walking: An evaluation of mini-qwerty text input while on-the-go. Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices & services, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Conradi, J., & Alexander, T. (2014, June). Analysis of visual performance during the use of mobile devices while walking. International Conference on Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics, Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Conradi, J., Busch, O., & Alexander, T. (2015). Optimal touch button size for the use of mobile devices while walking. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 387–394.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Beyond boredom and anxiety. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Jr, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results ( Doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Fred_Davis2/publication
   Google Scholar
• Dearman, D., MacKay, B., Inkpen, K. M., & Watters, C. (2005). Touch-n-go: Supporting screen navigation on handheld computers (Technical Report CS-2005-08). Retrieved from Halifax, NS, Dalhousie University, Faculty of Computer Science website: https://www.cs.dal.ca/sites/default/files/technical_reports/CS-2005-08.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dessart, C. E., Motti, V. G., & Vanderdonckt, J. (2012, May). Animated transitions between user interface views. Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Dingler, T., Rzayev, R., Schwind, V., & Henze, N. (2016, September). RSVP on the go: Implicit reading support on smart watches through eye tracking. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlop, M., & Brewster, S. (2002). The challenge of mobile devices for human computer interaction. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 6 (4), 235–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogg, B. J., Soohoo, C., Danielson, D. R., Marable, L., Stanford, J., & Tauber, E. R. (2003, June). How do users evaluate the credibility of Web sites?: A study with over 2,500 participants. Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Designing for user experiences, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, G., & Foxcroft, T. (2011, October). Barrel menu: A new mobile phone menu for feature rich devices. Proceedings of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists Conference on Knowledge, Innovation and Leadership in a Diverse, Multidisciplinary Environment, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Goel, M., Findlater, L., & Wobbrock, J. (2012, May). WalkType: Using accelerometer data to accomodate situational impairments in mobile touch screen text entry. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, J. G. (2013, March 8). Animating Anthropomorphism: Giving Minds To Geometric Shapes. Retrieved from https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/thoughtful-animal/animating-anthropomorphism-giving-minds-to-geometric-shapes-video/
   Google Scholar
• Google Inc. (2014). Material design guidelines. Retrieved from https://material.google.com/motion/movement html
   Google Scholar
• Hamborg, K. C., Bruns, M., Ollermann, F., & Kaspar, K. (2012). The effect of banner animation on fixation behavior and recall performance in search tasks. Computers in Human Behavior, 28 (2), 576–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, S. T., Hooten, E. R., & Adams, J. A. (2014, September). Tablet interaction accuracy and precision seated vs. walking. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 58 (1), 432–436. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Head, V. (2016). Designing interface animation: Meaningful motion for user experience. Brooklyn, NY: Rosenfeld Media.
   Google Scholar
• Hussain, I., Chen, L., Mirza, H. T., Wang, L., Chen, G., & Memon, I. (2016). Chinese-based spearcons: improving pedestrian navigation performance in eyes-free environment. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32 (6), 460–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain, I., Chen, L., Mirza, H. T., Xing, K., & Chen, G. (2014). A comparative study of sonification methods to represent distance and forward-direction in pedestrian navigation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30 (9), 740–751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, P. (1998, May). Usability and mobility; interactions on the move. Proceedings of the First Workshop on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices, Glasgow, Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, S. K., Wobbrock, J. O., & Smith, I. E. (2008, September). Getting off the treadmill: Evaluating walking user interfaces for mobile devices in public spaces. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M. J., Yoon, S. K., & Choi, J. H. (2015). A study of menu structure on smartwatch for effective navigation - focused on types menu and color cues. Journal of Digital Design, 15 (3), 395–406.
   Google Scholar
• Komor, N., Gilliland, S., Clawson, J., Bhardwaj, M., Garg, M., Zeagler, C., & Starner, T. (2009, September). Is it gropable?–Assessing the impact of mobility on textile interfaces. 2009 International Symposium on Wearable Computers, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M., & Paas, F. (2007). Attention cueing as a means to enhance learning from an animation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21 (6), 731–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristoffersen, S., & Ljungberg, F. (1999, November). “Making place” to make IT work: Empirical explorations of HCI for mobile CSCW. Proceedings of the international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Lazar, J. (2002, January). The world wide web. In J. A. Jacko & A. Sears (Eds.), The human-computer interaction handbook (pp. 714–730). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Ahn, J.-H. (2012). Attention to banner ads and their effectiveness: An eye-tracking approach. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17 (1), 119–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. R. (2002). Psychometric evaluation of the PSSUQ using data from five years of usability studies. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 14 (3–4), 463–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, K., Huang, G., & Bente, G. (2016). The impacts of banner format and animation speed on banner effectiveness: Evidence from eye movements. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 522–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, J. J., & Feria, C. (2012, September). Visual search on a mobile device while walking. Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, M., Goldman, R., Price, K. J., Sears, A., & Jacko, J. (2007). How do people tap when walking? An empirical investigation of nomadic data entry. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65 (9), 759–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumsden, J., & Brewster, S. (2003, October). A paradigm shift: Alternative interaction techniques for use with mobile & wearable devices. Proceedings of the 2003 conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research, Indianapolis, IN.
   Google Scholar
• MacKay, B., Dearman, D., Inkpen, K., & Watters, C. (2005, September). Walk’n scroll: A comparison of software-based navigation techniques for different levels of mobility. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices & services, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Mizobuchi, S., Chignell, M., & Newton, D. (2005, September). Mobile text entry: Relationship between walking speed and text input task difficulty. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices & services, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Mo, F., & Zhou, J. (in press). The influence of menu structure and layout on usability of smartwatches. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction.
   Google Scholar
• Musić, J., & Murray-Smith, R. (2016). Nomadic input on mobile devices: The influence of touch input technique and walking speed on performance and offset modeling. Human–Computer Interaction, 31(5), 420–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustonen, T., Olkkonen, M., & Hakkinen, J. (2004, April). Examining mobile phone text legibility while walking. Presented at CHI’04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 1243–1246), New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, A., & Brewster, S. (2013, April). The relationship between encumbrance and walking speed on mobile interactions. Presented at CHI’13 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1359–1364), New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, A., Brewster, S. A., & Williamson, J. (2013, September). The impact of encumbrance on mobile interactions. IFIP Conference on Human-Computer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, A., Williamson, J., & Brewster, S. (2015, August). The effects of encumbrance and mobility on touch-based gesture interactions for mobile phones. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, A., Williamson, J. H., & Brewster, S. A. (2014, September). Comparing evaluation methods for encumbrance and walking on interaction with touchscreen mobile devices. Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices & services, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Nielson, J. (2000). Designing web usability. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders.
   Google Scholar
• Noort, F. (2014). Effect of running on throughput in pointing tasks: A Fitts’ law experiment ( master’s thesis). Retrieved from http://www.fabianvannoort.nl/projects/research/fitts/fitts.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oulasvirta, A., Tamminen, S., Roto, V., & Kuorelahti, J. (2005, April). Interaction in 4-second bursts: The fragmented nature of attentional resources in mobile HCI. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, S. R., Hill, M. D., Sisson, N., & Viera, C. (1988). Effects of breadth, depth and number of responses on computer menu search performance. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 28 (6), 683–692.
   Google Scholar
• Pascoe, J., Ryan, N., & Morse, D. (2000). Using while moving: HCI issues in fieldwork environments. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 7 (3), 417–437.
   Google Scholar
• Petrie, H., Furner, S., & Strothotte, T. (1998, May). Design lifecycles and wearable computers for users with disabilities. First Workshop on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices, Glasgow, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Pirhonen, A., Brewster, S., & Holguin, C. (2002, April). Gestural and audio metaphors as a means of control for mobile devices. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Scarr, J., Cockburn, A., & Gutwin, C. (2012). Supporting and exploiting spatial memory in user interfaces. Interaction, 6 (1), 1–84.
   Google Scholar
• Schildbach, B., & Rukzio, E. (2010, September). Investigating selection and reading performance on a mobile phone while walking. Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Trapp, M., & Yasmin, R. (2013, July). Addressing animated transitions already in mobile app storyboards. International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Vadas, K., Patel, N., Lyons, K., Starner, T., & Jacko, J. (2006, September). Reading on-the-go: A comparison of audio and hand-held displays. Proceedings of the 8th conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Weir, D., Rogers, S., Murray-Smith, R., & Löchtefeld, M. (2012, October). A user-specific machine learning approach for improving touch accuracy on mobile devices. Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D. (1991). Processing resources and attention. In D. L. Damos (Ed.), Multiple-task performance (pp. 3–34). London, England & Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Wobbrock, J. O. (2006, April). The future of mobile device research in HCI. CHI 2006 workshop proceedings: what is the next generation of human-computer interaction, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Yun Yoo, C., & Kim, K. (2005). Processing of animation in online banner advertising: The roles of cognitive and emotional responses. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19 (4), 18–34.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, P. (2000). The effects of animation on information seeking performance on the world wide web: Securing attention or interfering with primary tasks? Journal of the AIS, 1 (1es), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Mao, M., Rau, P.-L. P., Choe, P., Bela, L., & Wang, F. (2013). Exploring factors influencing multitasking interaction with multiple smart devices. Computers in Human Behavior, 29 (6), 2579–2588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., & Rau, P.-L. P. (2015). Playing with multiple wearable devices: Exploring the influence of display, motion and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 148–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J., Rau, P.-L. P., & Salvendy, G. (2012). Use and design of handheld computers for older adults: A review and appraisal. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28 (12), 799–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziefle, M. (2008, September). Instruction formats and navigation aids in mobile devices. Symposium of the Austrian HCI and Usability Engineering Group, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Ziefle, M. (2009, August). Spatial cues in small screen devices: benefit or handicap? IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Ziefle, M. (2010). Information presentation in small screen devices: The trade-off between visual density and menu foresight. Applied Ergonomics, 41 (6), 719–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziefle, M., & Bay, S. (2006). How to overcome disorientation in mobile phone menus: A comparison of two different types of navigation aids. Human-Computer Interaction, 21 (4), 393–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar