178
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Toward More Comprehensive Chinese Internet Users’ Studies: Translation and Validation of the Chinese–Mandarin Version of the 8-Item Information Retrieval on the Web Self-Efficacy Scale (Ch-IROWSE)

&

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
  • Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 665–683.
  • Babbie, E. (1998). The practice of social research (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
  • Bandura. A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
  • Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 21–41.
  • Bandura, A. (2002). Growing primacy of human agency in adaptation and change in the electronic era. European Psychologist, 7, 2–16.
  • Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (Vol. 5, pp. 307–337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  • Birnbaum, M. H. (1999). Psychological experiments on the Internet. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. L. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137–164). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Browne, M.W. (1982). Covariance structures. In D.M. Hawkins (Ed.), Topics in multivariate analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Buchanan, T., & Smith, J. L. (1999). Using the internet for psychological research: Personality testing on the world wide web. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 125–144.
  • Cai, H., Lin, Y., Wu, Q., Yan, L., & Huang, X. (2008). Examining the measurement invariance between paper-and-pencil and internet-administered tests in China. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 40 (2), 228–239.
  • Carlbring, P., Brunt, S., Bohman, S., Austin, D., Richards, J., Öst, L., & Andersson, G. (2006). Internet vs. paper and pencil administration of questionnaires commonly used in panic/agoraphobia research. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1421–1434.
  • Chen, A. N., Downey, J. P., McGaughey, R. E., & Jin, K. (2016). Seniors and information technology in China. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 32(2), 132–142.
  • Chevalier, A., Dommes, A., & Marquié, J.-C. (2015). Strategy and accuracy during information search on the Web: Effects of age and complexity of the search questions. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 305–315.
  • Chu, J., & Tsai, C. (2009). Self-directed learning readiness, internet self-efficacy, and preferences toward constructivist Internet-based learning environments among adult learners. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 489–501.
  • Chuah, S. C., Drasgow, F., & Roberts, B. W. (2006). Personality assessment: Does the medium matter? No. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(4), 359–376.
  • Cooper, C. A., McCord, D. M. & Socha, A. (2011). Evaluating the college sophomore problem: The case of personality and politics. Journal of Psychology, 145, 23–37.
  • Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment,Research & Evaluation, 10 (7), 1–9.
  • Couper, M. P. (2000). Web-based surveys: A review of issues and approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 464–494.
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16 (3), 297–334.
  • Druckman S J. & Kam, C. (2011). Students as experimental participants: A defense of the ‘Narrow Data Base’. In J. N. Druckman, D. P. Green, J. H. Kuklinski, & A. Lupia (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of experimental political science. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Eachus, P., & Cassidy, S. (2004, September 13th–14th). Development of the web users aelf-efficacy scale (WUSE). Proceedings of Conference for Education in a Changing Environment.
  • Eastin, M. S., & LaRose, R. (2000). Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 6(1). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue1/eastin.html
  • Flaherty, J. A., Gaviria, M., Pathak, D., Mitchell, T., Wintrob, R., Richman, J., & Birz, S. (1988). Developing instruments for cross-cultural psychiatric research. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 176, 257–263.
  • Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P., & Spielberger, C. (Eds.). (2005). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence S. Erlbaum Publishers.
  • Hasan, B. (2003). The influence of specific computer experiences on computer self-efficacy beliefs. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(4), 443–450.
  • Heeren, A., Douilliez, C., Peschard, V., Debrauwere, L., & Philippot, P. (2011). Cross-cultural validity of the five facets mindfulness questionnaire: Adaptation and validation in a French-speaking sample. Revue Européenne De Psychologie Appliquée/European Review of Applied Psychology, 61(3), 147–151.
  • Heggestad, E. D., & Kanfer, R. (2005). The predictive validity of self-efficacy in training performance: Little more than past performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 84–97.
  • Herrero, J., & Meneses, J. (2006). Short web-based versions of the perceived stress (PSS) and Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CESD) scales: A comparison to pencil and paper responses among Internet users. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 830–846.
  • Hsu, M. H., & Chiu, C. M. (2004). Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance. Decision Support Systems, 38, 369–381.
  • Huang, F., Zhu, Z., Wang, W., & Zhang, J. (2010). Psychometric equivalence between mobile phone based and paper-and-pencil tests: A case with children’s revised impact of event scale. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 18(1), 31–33.
  • Huang, H. M. (2006). Do print and web surveys provide the same results? Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 334–350.
  • Huang, M., & Liaw, S. (2005). Exploring users’ attitudes and intentions toward the web as a survey tool. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 729–743.
  • International Test Commission. (2010). International test commission guidelines for translating and adapting tests. Retreived from http://www.intestcom.org
  • Joyce, M., & Kirakowski, J. (2015). Measuring attitudes towards the Internet: The general Internet attitude scale. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 31(8), 506–517. doi:10.1080/10447318.2015.1064657
  • Kammerer, Y., & Gerjets, P. (2014). The role of search result position and source trustworthiness in the selection of web search results when using a list or a grid interface. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 30(3), 177–191.
  • Kao, P., & Tsai, C. (2009). Teachers’ attitudes toward Web-based professional development, with relation to Internet self-efficacy and beliefs about Web-based learning. Computers & Education, 53 (1), 66–73.
  • Klassen, R. M. (2004). Optimism and realism: A review of self-efficacy from a cross-cultural perspective. International Journal of Psychology, 39, 205–230. doi:10.1080/00207590344000330
  • Kuo, F. Y., Chu, T. H., Hsu, M. H., & Hsieh, H. S. (2004). An investigation of effort–accuracy trade-off and the impact of self-efficacy on web searching behaviours. Decision Support Systems, 37, 331–342.
  • Liang, C., & Tsai, C. (2008). Internet self-efficacy and preferences toward constructivist Internet-based learning environments: A study of pre-school teachers in Taiwan. Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 226–237.
  • Lubke, G., & Muthén, B. (2004). Factor-analyzing Likert scale data under the assumption of multivariate normality complicates a meaningful comparison of observed groups or latent classes. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 514–534.
  • Maddux, J. E. (1995). Self-efficacy theory: An introduction. In J. E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application (pp. 3–33). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • Meyer, T. & Rodon, C. (2004). Trouver sur Internet une réponse à une question: auto-efficacité et illusion de compétence [Responding to a question on the Internet: self-efficacy and illusory competence]. Revue HERMES – Cognition, communication, politique : Pour une critique de la raison numérique. [HERMES Review – Cognition, communication, politics : Critics of numeric Reason.]. Directed by J. Perriault & A. Trognon. N°39, CNRS Editions, 27-34. http://w1p.fr/70863
  • Miniwatts Marketing Group. (2014). Internet users in Asia. Retrieved from http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats3.htm#asia
  • Miniwatts Marketing Group. (2016). Internet world users by language: Top 10 Languages. Retrieved from http://www.Internetworldstats.com/stats7.htm
  • Monchaux, S., Amadieu, F., Chevalier, A., & Mariné, C. (2015). Query strategies during information searching: Effects of prior domain knowledge and complexity of the information problems to be solved. Information Processing & Management, 51(5), 557–569.
  • Monoi, S., O’Hanlon, N., & Diaz, R. (2005). Online searching skills: Development of an inventory to assess self-efficacy. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(2), 98–105.
  • Nicholls, II, W. L., Baker, R. P., & Martin, J. (1997). The effect of new data collection technology in survey data quality. In L. Lyberg, P. Biemer, M. Collins, E. deLeeuw, C. Dippo, N. Schwarz, & D. Trewin (Eds.), Survey measurement and process quality (pp. 221–248). Hoboken, NJ: john Wiley & Sons.
  • Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Harvesting implicit group attitude and beliefs from a demonstration web site. Group Dynamics, 6, 101–115.
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1970). Introduction to psychological measurement. New York, NY: MAcGRaw-Hill.
  • O’Cass, A., & Fenech, T. (2003). Web-retailing adoption: Exploring the nature of internet users. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 10, 81–94.
  • O’Malley, M., & Kelleher, T. (2002). Papayas and pedagogy: Geographically dispersed teams and Internet self-efficacy. Public Relations Review, 28, 175–184.
  • Oettingen, G. (1995). Cross-cultural perspectives on self-efficacy. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 149–176). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pajares, F. (1997). Current directions in self-efficacy research. In M. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.). Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 1–49). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achievement. In R. Riding, & S. Rayner (Eds.), Perception (pp. 239–266). London: Ablex Publishing.
  • Peng, H., Tsai, C., & Wu, T. (2006). University students’ self-efficacy and their attitudes toward the Internet: The role of students’ perceptions of the Internet. Educational Studies, 32, 73–86.
  • Ren, W. H. (2000). Library instruction and college student self- efficacy in electronic information searching. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 26 (5), 323–328.
  • Rodon, C. (2008). Rechercher des informations sur le Web: Anticipations exagérément optimistes pour trouver les informations et exagérément pessimistes pour estimer les temps de recherche. [Information retrieval on the Web: Exaggerated optimism for success and exaggerated pessimism for search duration] ( Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). University Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense, Nanterre, France. Available on Researchgate.net
  • Rodon, C., Chevalier, A., & Meyer, T. (2008, July). Peut-on définir des niveaux d’expérience en recherche d’informations sur le web à partir des stratégies des internautes? [Can levels of information retrieval on the web’s Experience be defined from internet user’s strategies?] Oral presentation. 14th JETCSIC [Day of Study on the Cognitive Treatment of the Complex Information systems], Toulouse, France.
  • Rodon, C., & Meyer, T. (2012). Searching information on the web and planning fallacy: A pilot study of pessimistic forecasts. European Review of Applied Psychology, 62(2), 103–109.
  • Rodon, C., & Meyer, T. (2017, under review since September 2016). The Eight-item information retrieval on the Web self-efficacy scale (IROWSE): First development and validation in French and its translation into English. Computers in Human Behavior.
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 31–51.
  • Schwarzer, R. (1992). Self-efficacy: Thought control of action. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
  • Schwarzer, R. (1993). Measurement of perceived self-efficacy. Psychometric scales for cross-cultural research. Berlin, Germany: Frei Universität Berlin.
  • Schwarzer, R. (1994). Optimism, vulnerability, and self-beliefs as health related cognitions: A systematic overview. Psychology and Health: An International Journal, 9, 161–180.
  • Schwarzer, R., & Born, A. (1997). Optimistic self-beliefs: Assessment of general perceived self-efficacy in thirteen cultures. World Psychology, 3 (1–2), 177–190.
  • Schwarzer, R., & Scholz, U. (2000). Cross-cultural assessment of coping resources: The general perceived self-efficacy scale. Paper presented at the First Asian Congress of Health Psychology: Health Psychology and Culture, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Şendurur, E., & Yildirim, Z. (2015). Students’ web search strategies with different task types: An eye-tracking study. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 31(2), 101–111.
  • Shi, J., Chen, Z., & Tian, M. (2011). Internet self-efficacy, the need for cognition, and sensation seeking as predictors of problematic use of the Internet. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(4), 231–234.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Torkzadeh, G., & Van Dyke, P. (2001). Development and validation of an Internet Self-efficacy Scale. Behaviour & Information Technology, 20, 275–280.
  • Tsai, C., Chuang, C., Liang, C., & Tsai, J. (2011). Self-efficacy in Internet-based learning environments: A literature review. Educational Technology & Society, 14 (4), 222–240.
  • Tsai, C., & Lin, C. (2004). Taiwanese adolescents’ perceptions and attitudes regarding the Internet: Exploring gender differences. Adolescence, 39, 725–734.
  • Tsai, G., & Tsai, C. (2010). Junior high school students’ Internet usage and self-efficacy: A re-examination of the gender gap. Computers & Education, 54, 1182–1192.
  • Tsai, J., & Tsai, C. (2003). Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: The role of Internet self-efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40, 43–50.
  • Turner, J. (2012). Memorable encounters: Ideology, information acquisition, and television news. The Social Science Journal, 49(1), 9–19.
  • Vosylis, R., Žukauskienė, R., & Malinauskienė, O. (2012). Comparison of Internet based versus paper-and-pencil administered assessment of positive development indicators in adolescent’s sample. Psichologija, 45, 7–21.
  • White, R. W., & Drucker, S. M. (2007). Investigating behavioral variability in web search. Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, Banff, Canada, 21–30.
  • Wiecko, F. M. (2010). Assessing the validity of college samples: Are students really that different? Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 1186–1190
  • Witmer, D. F., Colman, R. W., & Katzman, S. L. (1999). From paper-and-pencil to screen-and-keyboard. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Wu, T., & Tsai, C. (2006). University students’ Internet attitudes and Internet self-efficacy: A study at three universities in Taiwan. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 9, 441–450.
  • Yi, M. Y., & Hwang, Y. (2003). Predicting the use of web-based information systems: Self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 59, 431–449.
  • Zhang, Q., Shao, P., & Fang, J. (2008). Bibliometric analysis of current web survey research in China. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 13(3), 420–424.
  • Zhao, L., Lu, Y., Huang, W., & Wang, Q. (2010). Internet inequality: The relationship between high school students’ Internet use in different locations and their Internet self-efficacy. Computers & Education, 55, 1405–1423.
  • Zhao, L., Lu, Y., Wang, B., & Huang, W. (2011). What makes them happy and curious online? An empirical study on high school students’ Internet use from a self-determination theory perspective. Computers & Education, 576, 346–356.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.