Adaptive Social Robot for Sustaining Social Engagement during Long-Term Children–Robot Interaction

References

• Abe, K., Hieida, C., Attamimi, M., Nagai, T., Shimotomai, T., Omori, T., & Oka, N. (2014, October). Toward playmate robots that can play with children considering personality. In Proceedings of the second international conference on human-agent interaction (pp. 165–168), Tsukuba, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad, M. I., Mubin, O., & Orlando, J. (2016, October). Understanding behaviours and roles for social and adaptive robots in education: Teacher’s perspective. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on human agent interaction (pp. 297–304), Biopolis, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad, M. I., & Shahid, S. (2015). Design and evaluation of mobile learning applications for autistic children in Pakistan. In Abascal J., Barbosa S., Fetter M., Gross T., Palanque P., Winckler M. (Eds.), Human-computer interaction – INTERACT 2015. INTERACT 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 9296 (pp. 436–444). Bamberg, Germany: Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, P. A., & Guerrero, L. K. (1998). Principles of communication and emotion in social interaction. In A. Anderson & L. K. Guerrero (Eds.), Handbook of communication and emotion: Research, theory, applications, and contexts (pp. 49–96). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Argyle, M., & Dean, J. (1965). Eye-contact, distance and affiliation. Sociometry, 28, 289–304.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bartneck, C., Kanda, T., Mubin, O., & Al Mahmud, A. (2007). The perception of animacy and intelligence based on a robot’s embodiment. Presented at 2007 7th IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots (pp. 300–305), Pittsburgh, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, P., & Belpaeme, T. (2014). Pervasive memory: The future of long-term social HRI lies in the past. Presented at Third international symposium on new frontiers in human-robot interaction at AISB 2014, Canterbury, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Buche, C., Querrec, R., De Loor, P., & Chevaillier, P. (2003). Mascaret: Pedagogical multi-agents systems for virtual environment for training. Presented at Cyberworlds, 2003. (pp. 423–430), Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, D., Fernando, S., Collins, E., Millings, A., Moore, R., Sharkey, A., … Prescott, T. (2015). Presence of life-like robot expressions influences children’s enjoyment of human: Robot interactions in the field. In Proceedings of the AISB convention 2015, Canterbury, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Castellano, G., Pereira, A., Leite, I., Paiva, A., & McOwan, P. W. (2009, November). Detecting user engagement with a robot companion using task and social interaction-based features. In Proceedings of the 2009 international conference on multimodal in- terfaces (pp. 119–126), Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C.-W., Lee, J.-H., Chao, P.-Y., Wang, C.-Y., Chen, G.-D. (2010). Exploring the possibility of using humanoid robots as instructional tools for teaching a second language in primary school. Educational Technology & Society, 13 (2), 13–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, L.-P., Liang, H.-S., Wu, C.-Y., & Chen, M. Y. (2013). iGrasp: Grasp-based adaptive keyboard for mobile devices. In Proceedings of chi conference (pp. 3037–3046), Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Conati, C. (2002). Probabilistic assessment of user’s emotions in educational games. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 16 (7–8), 555–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coninx, A., Baxter, P., Oleari, E., Bellini, S., Bierman, B., Henkemans, O. B., … Belpaeme, T. (2016). Towards long-term social child-robot interaction: Using multi-activity switching to engage young users. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 5 (1), 32–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuadrado, L.-E. I., Riesco, Á. M., & López, F. D. L. P. (2016). ARTIE: An integrated environment for the development of affective robot tutors. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 10, 77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dautenhahn, K., & Werry, I. (2002). A quantitative technique for analysing robot-human interactions. Presented at Intelligent robots and systems, 2002. ieee/rsj international conference on (Vol. 2, pp. 1132–1138), EPFL, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• dos Santos, C. T., & Osório, F. S. (2004, May). An intelligent and adaptive virtual environment and its application in distance learning. In Proceedings of the working conference on advanced visual interfaces (pp. 362–365), Gallipoli, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Druin, A. (2002). The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour and Information Technology, 21 (1), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EVP, U. (2015). Emotion detection algorithm based on opencv. Retrieved from https://github.com/liy9393/emotion-detection
   Google Scholar
• Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., & Dautenhahn, K. (2003). A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42 (3), 143–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häring, M., Bee, N., & André, E. (2011, July-August). Creation and evaluation of emotion expression with body movement, sound and eye color for humanoid robots Presented at 2011 ro-man (pp. 204–209), Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Hassani, K., Nahvi, A., & Ahmadi, A. (2016). Design and implementation of an intelligent virtual environment for improving speaking and listening skills. Interactive Learning Environments, 24 (1), 252–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie, H., Lim, M. Y., Janarthanam, S., Deshmukh, A., Aylett, R., Foster, M. E., & Hall, L. (2016, May). I remember you! Interaction with memory for an empathic virtual robotic tutor. In Proceedings of the 2016 international conference on autonomous agents & multiagent systems (pp. 931–939), Singapore, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Indico. (2016). Facial emotion recognition. Retrieved from https://indico.io/docs
   Google Scholar
• Jimenez, F., Yoshikawa, T., Furuhashi, T., & Kanoh, M. (2015). An emotional expression model for educational-support robots. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing Research, 5 (1), 51–57.
   Google Scholar
• Kachouie, R., Sedighadeli, S., Khosla, R., & Chu, M.-T. (2014). Socially assistive robots in elderly care: A mixed-method systematic literature review. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30 (5), 369–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanda, T., Hirano, T., Eaton, D., & Ishiguro, H. (2004). Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: A field trial. Human-Computer Interaction, 19 (1–2), 61–84. doi:10.1080/07370024.2004.9667340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanda, T., Sato, R., Saiwaki, N., & Ishiguro, H. (2007). A two-month field trial in an elementary school for long-term human–robot interaction. Robotics, IEEE Transactions On, 23 (5), 962–971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karapanos, E. (2013). Modeling users’ experiences with interactive systems. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Khosla, R., Nguyen, K., & Chu, M.-T. (2016). Human robot engagement and acceptability in residential aged care. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Advance online publication.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, M. A., & Yuille, J. C. (1987). “Suggestibility and the child witness.” In S. J. Ceci, M. P. Toglia, & D. F. Ross (Eds.), Children’s Eyewitness Memory (pp. 24–35). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Komatsubara, T., Shiomi, M., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., & Hagita, N. (2014, October). Can a social robot help children’s understanding of science in classrooms? In Proceedings of the second international conference on human-agent interaction (pp. 83–90), Tsukuba, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Kozima, H., Michalowski, M. P., & Nakagawa, C. (2009). Keepon. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1 (1), 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, O.-H., Koo, S.-Y., Kim, Y.-G., & Kwon, D.-S. (2010). Telepresence robot system for English tutoring. Presented at 2010 IEEE workshop on advanced robotics and its social impacts (pp. 152–155), Seoul, South Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Leite, I., Castellano, G., Pereira, A., Martinho, C., & Paiva, A. (2014). Empathic robots for long-term interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6 (3), 329–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leite, I., Martinho, C., & Paiva, A. (2013). Social robots for long- term interaction: A survey. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5 (2), 291–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyra, O., Karapanos, E., Gouveia, R., Nisi, V., & Nunes, N. J. (2013, June). Engaging children in longitudinal behavioral studies through playful technologies. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on interaction design and children (pp. 396–399), New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, X., Yang, X., Zhao, S., Fu, C.-W., Lan, Z., & Pu, Y. (2014). Using social media platforms for human-robot interaction in domestic environment. International Journal of Human- Computer Interaction, 30 (8), 627–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitrović, A., & Djordjević-Kajan, S. (1995). Interactive reconstructive student modeling: A machine-learning approach. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 7 (4), 385–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mordvintsev, A., & Abid, K. (2013). Opencv-python tutorials. Retrieved from http://opencv-python-tutroals.readthedocs.io
   Google Scholar
• Mubin, O., Stevens, C. J., Shahid, S., Al Mahmud, A., & Dong, -J.-J. (2013). A review of the applicability of robots in education. Journal of Technology in Education and Learning, 1, 209–215.
   Google Scholar
• Okita, S. Y., Ng-Thow-Hing, V., & Sarvadevabhatla, R. K. (2011). Multimodal approach to affective human-robot interaction design with children. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (Tiis), 1 (1), 5.
   Google Scholar
• Pasch, M. (2010, June). Improving children’s self-report in user-centered evaluations. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on interaction design and children (pp. 331–334), Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Prain, V., Cox, P., Deed, C., Dorman, J., Edwards, D., Farrelly, C. (2013). Personalised learning: Lessons to be learnt. British Educational Research Journal, 39 (4), 654–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajagopalan, S. S., Murthy, O. R., Goecke, R., & Rozga, A. (2015, May). Play with me-measuring a child’s engagement in a social interaction. Presented at Automatic face and gesture recognition (fg), 2015 11th IEEE international conference and workshops on (Vol. 1, pp. 1–8), Ljubljana, Slovenia.
   Google Scholar
• Salter, T., Dautenhahn, K., & Bockhorst, R. (2004). Robots moving out of the laboratory-detecting interaction levels and human contact in noisy school environments. Presented at Robot and human interactive communication, 2004. Roman 2004. 13th IEEE international workshop on (pp. 563–568), Tokyo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Salter, T., Michaud, F., & Letourneau, D. (2009, March). What are the benefits of adaptation when applied in the domain of child-robot interaction? In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on human robot interaction (pp. 237–238), La Jolla, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Serholt, S., & Barendregt, W. (2016, October). Robots tutoring children: Longitudinal evaluation of social engagement in child-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 9th nordic conference on human-computer interaction (pp. 64), Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Shahid, S., Krahmer, E., & Swerts, M. (2014). Child–robot interaction across cultures: How does playing a game with a social robot compare to playing a game alone or with a friend? Computers in Human Behavior, 40, 86–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidner, C., Kidd, C., Lee, C., & Lesh, N. (2004, January). Where to look: A study of human-robot interaction. Presented at Intelligent user interfaces conference (pp. 78–84), Funchal, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Sidner, C. L., & Dzikovska, M. (2002). Human-robot interaction: Engagement between humans and robots for hosting activities. In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE international conference on multimodal interfaces (pp. 123), Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Sidner, C. L., Lee, C., Kidd, C. D., Lesh, N., & Rich, C. (2005). Explorations in engagement for humans and robots. Artificial Intelligence, 166 (1), 140–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tielman, M., Neerincx, M., Meyer, -J.-J., & Looije, R. (2014, March). Adaptive emotional expression in robot-child interaction. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 407–414), Bielefeld, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Vollmer, C., Pötsch, F., & Randler, C. (2013). Morningness is associated with better gradings and higher attention in class. Learning and Individual Differences, 27, 167–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittrock, M. C. (1974). Learning as a generative process 1. Educational Psychologist, 11 (2), 87–95.
   Google Scholar