The Crowd is the Territory: Assessing Quality in Peer-Produced Spatial Data During Disasters

References

• Anderka, M., & Stein, B. (2012) A breakdown of quality flaws in wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2nd Joint WICOW/AIRWeb Workshop on Web Quality (WebQuality ‘12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J., Soden, R., Anderson, K. M., Kogan, M., & Palen, L. (2016) EPIC-OSM : A software framework for openstreetmap data analytics. In Proceedings of the 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2016), 5468–5477.
   Google Scholar
• Arsanjani, J. J., Barron, C., Bakillah, M., & Helbich, M. (2013) Assessing the quality of openstreetmap contributors together with their contributions. In 16th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science. (p. 14.-17).
   Google Scholar
• Barron, C., Neis, P., & Zipf, A. (2014). A comprehensive framework for intrinsic openstreetmap quality analysis. Transactions in GIS, 18(6), 877–895. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benkler, B. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blumenstock, J. E. (2008) Size matters: Word count as a measure of quality on wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web (WWW ‘08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1095–1096.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. R. (2011). Wikipedia as a data source for political scientists: Accuracy and completeness of coverage. PS: Political Science and Politics, 44(2), 339–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciepłuch, B., Mooney, P., & Winstanley, A. C. (2011). Building generic quality indicators for openstreetmap. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual GISRUK Conference, Portsmouth, England.
   Google Scholar
• Dittus, M., Quattrone, G., & Capra, L. (2016). Analysing volunteer engagement in humanitarian mapping: Building contributor communities at large scale. In Proceedings of Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ’16), 108–118.
   Google Scholar
• Dittus, M., Quattrone, G., & Capra, L., 2017, February. Mass participation during emergency response: Event-centric crowdsourcing in humanitarian mapping. In Proceedings of Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ’17), 1290–1303.
   Google Scholar
• Eckle, M., & Albuquerque, J. P. (2015) Quality assessment of remote mapping in openstreetmap for disaster management purposes. Proceedings of the ISCRAM 2015 Conference - Kristiansand, May 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, U. (1995). How to travel with a Salmon & other essays. San Diego, California: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. 95–106. ISBN 978-0-547-54043-6.
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, R. S., & Halfaker, A. (2011) When the Levee breaks: Without Bots, what happens to wikipedia’s quality control processes? In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Open Collaboration (p. 6: 1–6:6). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, R. S., & Halfaker, A. (2013). Using edit sessions to measure participation in wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ’13), 861–869.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, J. (2005). Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature, 438, 900–901. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/438900a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haklay, M. (2010). How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of openstreetmap and ordnance survey datasets. Environ Plann B, 37(4), 682–703. doi:https://doi.org/10.1068/b35097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haklay, M., Basiouka, S., Antoniou, V., & Aamar, A. (2010). How many volunteers does it take to map an area well? The validity of Linus’ law to volunteered geographic information. The Cartographic Journal, 47(4), 315–322. doi:https://doi.org/10.1179/000870410X12911304958827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halavais, A., & Lackaff, D. (2008). An analysis of topical coverage of wikipedia. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(2), 429–440. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmc.2008.13.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halfaker, A. R., Geiger, S., Morgan, J., & Riedl, J. (2013). The rise and decline of an open collaboration system how wikipedia’s reaction to popularity is causing its decline. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(5), 664–688. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212469365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holman, R. L. (2008). Comparison of wikipedia and other encyclopedias for accuracy, breadth, and depth in historical articles. Reference Services Review, 36(1), 7–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/00907320810851998
   Google Scholar
• Kane, G. C. (2011). A multimethod study of information quality in wiki collaboration. ACM Transactions Manage Information Systems, 2(1) Article 4 (March 2011), 16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1929916.1929920
   Google Scholar
• Kittur, A., Bongwon, S., & Chi, E. H. (2008) Can you ever trust a wiki?: Impacting perceived trustworthiness in wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW ‘08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 477–480.
   Google Scholar
• Kogan, M., Anderson, J., Palen, L., Anderson, K. M., & Soden, R. (2016) Finding the Way to OSM mapping practices: Bounding large crisis datasets for qualitative investigation. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2783–2795.
   Google Scholar
• Korzybski, A. (1958). Science and Sanity: An introduction to non-aristotelian systems and general semantics. Englewood, New Jersey: Institute of General Semantics.
   Google Scholar
• Laniado, D., & Tasso, R. (2011) Co-authorship 2.0: Patterns of collaboration in wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia (HT ‘11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 201–210.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. W., Strong, D. M., Kahn, B. K., & Wang, R. Y. (2002). AIMQ: A methodology for information quality assessment. Information & Management, 40(2), 133–146. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00043-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig, T., Kotthaus, C., Reuter, C., Van Dongen, S., & Pipek, V. (2017). Situated crowdsourcing during disasters: Managing the tasks of spontaneous volunteers through public displays. International Journal on Human-Computer Studies (IJHCS), 102, no. C, 103–121. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig, T., Reuter, C., & Pipek, V. (2015). Social haystack: Dynamic quality assessment of citizen-generated content during emergencies. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 21(4), Article 17.
   Google Scholar
• Luyt, B., & Tan, D. (2010). Improving wikipedia’s credibility: References and citations in a sample of history articles. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 61, 715–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashhadi, A., Quattrone, G., & Capra, L. (2013) Putting ubiquitous crowd-sourcing into context. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW ‘13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 611–622.
   Google Scholar
• McConchie, A. (2013) Introducing “map gardening”. Retrieved September 15, 2016 from http://mappingmashups.net/2013/05/25/introducing-map-gardening/
   Google Scholar
• Mooney, P., & Corcoran, P. (2012) How social is openstreetmap? In Proceedings of the AGILE 2012 Conference on Geographic Information Science, 282–287.
   Google Scholar
• Neis, P., & Zipf, A. (2012). Analyzing the contributor activity of a volunteered geographic information project — the case of openstreetmap. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 1, 146–165. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi1020146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palen, L., Soden, R., Anderson, T. J., & Barrenechea, M. (2015) Success & scale in a data-producing organization: The socio-technical evolution of openstreetmap in response to humanitarian events. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4113–4122.
   Google Scholar
• Poiani, T. H., Rocha, R. S., Degrossi, L. C., & Albuquerque, J. P. (2016) Potential of collaborative mapping for disaster relief: A case study of openstreetmap in the Nepal earthquake 2015. In 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 188–197). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Reuter, C., Kaufhold, M.-A., & Ludwig, T. (2017). End-user development and social big data – towards tailorable situation assessment with social media. In F. Paternò & V. Wulf (Eds.), New Perspectives in End-User Development (pp. 307–332). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Royal, C., & Kapila, D. (2009). What’s on wikipedia, and what’s not? assessing completeness of information. Social Science Computer Review, 27(1), 138–148. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439308321890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samoilenko, A., & Yasseri, T. (2014). The distorted mirror of wikipedia: A quantitative analysis of wikipedia coverage of academics. EPJ Data Science, 3(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds20
   Google Scholar
• Sehra, S., Singh, J., & Rai, H. (2017). Assessing openstreetmap data using intrinsic quality indicators: An extension to the QGIS processing toolbox. Future Internet, 9(2), 15. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/fi9020015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soden, R., & Palen, L. (2014) From crowdsourced mapping to community mapping: The post-earthquake work of openstreetmap Haiti. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems (COOP ’14), 311–326.
   Google Scholar
• Soden, R., & Palen, L. (2016, May). Infrastructure in the wild: What mapping in post-earthquake Nepal reveals about infrastructural emergence. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2796–2807). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Stvilia, B., Gasser, L., Twidale, M. B., & Smith, L. C. (2007). A framework for information quality assessment. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 58, 1720–1733. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stvilia, B., Twidale, M. B., Smith, L. C., & Gasser, L. (2008). Information quality work organization in wikipedia. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 59, 983–1001. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towne, W. B., Kittur, A., Kinnaird, P., & Herbsleb, J. (2013) Your process is showing: Controversy management and perceived quality in wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW ‘13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1059–1068.
   Google Scholar
• Vandecasteele, A., & Devillers, R. (2015). Improving volunteered geographic information quality using a tag recommender system: The case of openstreetmap. In J. J. Arsanjani, A. Zipf, P. Mooney, & M. Helbich (eds.), OpenStreetMap in GIScience. Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wand, Y., & Wang, R. Y. (1996). Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations. Communicable ACM, 39(11) (November 1996), 86–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/240455.240479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warncke-Wang, M., Ranjan, V., Terveen, L., & Hecht, B. (2015) Misalignment between supply and demand of quality content in peer production communities. In Proceedings of ICWSM 2015: Ninth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.
   Google Scholar
• Yaari, E., Baruchson-Arbib, S., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2011). Information quality assessment of community-generated content – A user study of wikipedia. Journal of Information Science, 37(5), 487–498. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551511416065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zielstra, D., & Zipf, A. (2010) A comparative study of proprietary geodata and volunteered geographic information for Germany. In AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science. Guimarães, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Zook, M., Graham, M., Shelton, T., & Gorman, S. (2010). Volunteered geographic information and crowdsourcing disaster relief: A case study of the Haitian earthquake. World Medical & Health Policy, 2(2), 7–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.2202/1948-4682.1069
   Google Scholar