Complexity of In-Vehicle Controllers and Their Effect on Task Performance

References

• Colle, H., & Hiszem, K. (2004). Standing at a kiosk: Effects of key size and spacing on touch screen numeric keypad performance and user preference. Ergonomics, 47(13), 1406–1423. doi:10.1080/00140130410001724228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, M. L., Sasangohar, F., & Thornburg, K. M., Xing, J., & D’Agostino, A. (2010). Human-system interface complexity and opacity part I : Literature review. Cambridge, MA: Massachusettes Institute of Technology
   Google Scholar
• De Angeli, A., Sutcliffe, A., & Hartmann, J. (2006). Interaction, usability and aesthetics: What influences users’ preferences? Proceedings of the 6th conference on designing interactive systems, (November), 271–280. doi:10.1145/1142405.1142446
   Google Scholar
• dos Santos, I. J. A. L., Teixeira, D. V., Ferraz, F. T., & Carvalho, P. V. R. (2008). The use of a simulator to include human factors issues in the interface design of a nuclear power plant control room. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 21(3), 227–238. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2007.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dukic, T., Hanson, L., & Falkmer, T. (2006). Effect of drivers’ age and push button locations on visual time off road, steering wheel deviation and safety perception. Ergonomics, 49(1), 78–92. doi:10.1080/00207540500422320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dukic, T., Hanson, L., Holmqvist, K., & Wartenberg, C. (2005). Effect of button location on driver’s visual behaviour and safety perception. Ergonomics, 48(4), 399–410. doi:10.1080/00140130400029092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geissler, G. L., Zinkhan, G. M., & Watson, R. T. (2006). The influence of home page complexity on consumer attention, attitudes, and purchase intent. Journal of Advertising, 35(2), 69–80. doi:10.1080/00913367.2006.10639232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gero, J. S. (1990). Design prototypes: A knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine, 11(4), 26. doi:10.1609/aimag.v11i4.854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gero, J. S., & Kannengiesser, U. (2004). The situated function–Behaviour–Structure framework. Design Studies, 25(4), 373–391. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2003.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, P. (1999). The 15-second rule for driver information systems. In Proceedings of the ITS America Ninth Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Intelligent Transportation Society of America. Retrieved from http://www.umich.edu/~driving/publications/ITSA-Green1999.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ham, D.-H., Park, J., & Jung, W. (2011). A framework-based approach to identifying and organizing the complexity factors of human-system interaction. IEEE Systems Journal, 5(2), 213–222. doi:10.1109/JSYST.2010.2102574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ham, D.-H., Park, J., & Jung, W. (2012). Model-based identification and use of task complexity factors of human integrated systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 100, 33–47. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2011.12.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., Sawyer, B. D., & Stafford, S. (2015). The effects of display size on performance. Ergonomics, 58(3), 337–354. doi:10.1080/00140139.2014.973914
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, C., Stanton, N. A., Pickering, C. A., McDonald, M., & Zheng, P. (2011). A usability evaluation toolkit for In-Vehicle Information Systems (IVISs). Applied Ergonomics, 42(4), 563–574. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2010.09.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M., & Monk, A. (2010). The inference of perceived usability from beauty. Human-Computer Interaction, 25(3), 37–41. doi:10.1080/073700242010500139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henneman, R. L., & Rouse, W. B. (1986). On measuring the complexity of monitoring and controlling large-scale systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 16(2), 193–207. doi:10.1109/TSMC.1986.4308940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heo, J., Ham, D. H., Park, S., Song, C., & Yoon, W. C. (2009). A framework for evaluating the usability of mobile phones based on multi-level, hierarchical model of usability factors. Interacting with Computers, 21(4), 263–275. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2009.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwangbo, H., Lee, S. C., & Ji, Y. G. (2016, October). Complexity Overloaded in Smart Car: How to Measure Complexity of In-vehicle Displays and Controls?. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications Adjunct (pp. 81–86). ACM
   Google Scholar
• Hwangbo, H., Yoon, S. H., Jin, B. S., Han, Y. S., & Ji, Y. G. (2013). A study of pointing performance of elderly users on smartphones. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29(9), 604–618. doi:10.1080/10447318.2012.729996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, B. S., & Ji, Y. G. (2010). Usability risk level evaluation for physical user interface of mobile phone. Computers in Industry, 61(4), 350–363. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2009.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, H. G., & Seong, P. H. (1998). An information theory-based approach for quantitative evaluation of user interface complexity. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 45(6PART 3), 3165–3174. doi:10.1109/23.736195
   Google Scholar
• Kemps, E. (1999). Effects of complexity on visuo-spatial working memory. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11(3), 335–356. doi:10.1080/713752320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoshgoftaar, T. M., & Munson, J. C. (1990). Predicting software development errors using software complexity metrics. Selected Areas in Communications, IEEE Journal On, 8(2), 253–261. doi:10.1109/49.46879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H., Kwon, S., Heo, J., Lee, H., & Chung, M. K. (2014). The effect of touch-key size on the usability of In-Vehicle Information Systems and driving safety during simulated driving. Applied Ergonomics, 45(3), 379–388. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2013.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Large, D. R., Crundall, E., Burnett, G., Harvey, C., Konstantopoulos, P., Factors, H., & Land, J. (2016). Driving without wings : The effect of different digital mirror locations on the visual behaviour, performance and opinions of drivers. Applied Ergonomics, 55, 1–17. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2016.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. D., Roberts, S. C., Hoffman, J. D., & Angell, L. S. (2012). Scrolling and driving: How an MP3 player and its aftermarket controller affect driving performance and visual behavior. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 54(2), 250–263. doi:10.1177/0018720811429562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. C., Cha, M. C., Hwangbo, H., Mo, S., & Ji, Y. G. (2018). Smartphone form factors: Effects of width and bottom bezel on touch performance, workload, and physical demand. Applied Ergonomics, 67, 142–150. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2017.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. C., Hwangbo, H., & Ji, Y. G. (2016). Perceived Visual complexity of In-Vehicle information display and its effects on glance behavior and preferences. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32(8), 654–664. doi:10.1080/10447318.2016.1184546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, K., & Wieringa, P. A. (2000). Understanding perceived complexity in human supervisory control. Cognition, Technology & Work, 2(2), 75–88. doi:10.1007/s101110050029
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Y., & Zhang, W. J. (2005). A function-behavior-state approach to designing human-machine interface for nuclear power plant operators. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 52(1), 430–439. doi:10.1109/TNS.2004.842728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, C., Lopez, M., & Shehab, R. (2013). Complexity questionnaires of visual displays: A validation study of two information complexity questionnaires of visual displays. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 23(5), 391–411. doi:10.1002/hfm.20327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, P., & Li, Z. (2012). Task complexity: A review and conceptualization framework. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 42(6), 553–568. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2012.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michailidou, E., Harper, S., & Bechhofer, S. (2008). Visual complexity and aesthetic perception of web pages. Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM International Conference on Design of Communication SIGDOC 08, 215. doi:10.1145/1456536.1456581
   Google Scholar
• Mitsopoulos-Rubens, E., Trotter, M. J., & Lenné, M. G. (2011). Effects on driving performance of interacting with an in-vehicle music player: A comparison of three interface layout concepts for information presentation. Applied Ergonomics, 42(4), 583–591. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2010.08.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murata, A., Yamada, K., & Moriwaka, M. (2009). Design method of Cockpit module in consideration of switch type, location of switch and display information for older drivers.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, H. J., Ko, S. M., & Ji, Y. G. (2016). Effects of superimposition of a head-up display on driving performance and glance behavior in the elderly. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32(2), 143–154. doi:10.1080/10447318.2015.1104155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J., Ebert, S. M., Reed, M. P., & Hallman, J. J. (2015). A statistical model including age to predict passenger postures in the rear seats of automobiles. Ergonomics, 139(April 2016), 1–10. doi:10.1080/00140139.2015.1088076
   Google Scholar
• Park, J., Ebert, S. M., Reed, M. P., & Hallman, J. J. (2016). Statistical models for predicting automobile driving postures for men and women including effects of age. Human Factors, 58(2), 261–278. doi:10.1177/0018720815610249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfleging, B., Schneegass, S., & Schmidt, A. (2012). Multimodal interaction in the car - combining speech and gestures on the steering wheel. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, (c), 155–162. doi:10.1145/2390256.2390282
   Google Scholar
• Power, J. D. (2015). Automakers Spending Billions on Technologies That Many Consumers Don’t Use. Retrieved from http://www.jdpower.com/press-releases/2015-driver-interactive-vehicle-experience-drive-report
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, J. (1985). The role of hierarchical knowledge representation in decisionmaking and system management. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-15(2), 234–243. doi:10.1109/TSMC.1985.6313353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, M. P., & Green, P. A. (1999). Comparison of driving performance on-road and in a low-cost simulator using a concurrent telephone dialling task. Ergonomics, 42(8), 1015–1037. doi:10.1080/001401399185117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, M. P., Manary, M. A., Flannagan, C. A. C., & Schneider, L. W. (2002). A statistical method for predicting automobile driving posture. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 44(4), 557–568. doi:10.1518/0018720024496917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinecke, K., Yeh, T., Miratrix, L., Mardiko, R., Zhao, Y., Liu, J., & Gajos, K. Z. (2013). Predicting users’ first impressions of website aesthetics with a quantification of perceived visual complexity and colorfulness. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’13, 2049–2058. doi:10.1145/2470654.2481281
   Google Scholar
• Robins, D., & Holmes, J. (2008). Aesthetics and credibility in web site design. Information Processing and Management, 44(1), 386–399. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2007.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuch, A. N., Bargas-Avila, J. A., Opwis, K., & Wilhelm, F. H. (2009). Visual complexity of websites: Effects on users’ experience, physiology, performance, and memory. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 67(9), 703–715. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitense, H. S., Jacko, J. A., & Emery, V. K. (2003). Multimodal feedback: An assessment of performance and mental workload. Ergonomics, 46(1–3), 68–87. doi:10.1080/00140130303534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittmann, M., Kiss, M., Gugg, P., Steffen, A., Fink, M., Pöppel, E., & Kamiya, H. (2006). Effects of display position of a visual in-vehicle task on simulated driving. Applied Ergonomics, 37(2), 187–199. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2005.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing, J. (2007). Information complexity in air traffic control displays. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, LNCS, 4553(September), 797–806. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73111-5_89
   Google Scholar
• Xing, J. (2008). Designing questionnaires for controlling and managing information complexity in visual displays. Faa, (August).
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, S. H., Lim, J., & Ji, Y. G. (2015b). Assessment model for perceived visual complexity of automotive instrument cluster. Applied Ergonomics, 46(PA), 76–83. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2014.07.005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoon, S. H., Lim, J. H., & Ji, Y. G. (2015a). Perceived visual complexity and visual search performance of automotive instrument cluster: A quantitative measurement study. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(12), 890–900. doi:10.1080/10447318.2015.1069661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You, H., Ryu, T., Oh, K., Yun, M. H., & Kim, K. J. (2006). Development of customer satisfaction models for automotive interior materials. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 36(4), 323–330. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2005.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, K. L., & Salmon, P. M. (2012). Examining the relationship between driver distraction and driving errors: A discussion of theory, studies and methods. Safety Science, 50(2), 165–174. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2011.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Fernando, T., Xiao, H., & Travis, A. (2006). Evaluation of auditory and visual feedback on task performance in a virtual assembly environment. Presence, 15(6), 613–626. doi:10.1162/pres.15.6.613
   Google Scholar