Virtual Reality Interfaces for Interacting with Three-Dimensional Graphs

References

• Adhikarla, V. K., Woźniak, P., Barsi, A., Singhal, D., Kovács, P. T., & Balogh, T. (2014). Freehand interaction with large-scale 3D map data. In 3DTV-Conference: The True Vision - Capture, Transmission and Display of 3D Video (3DTV-CON)(pp. 1–4). Budapest.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall College Div.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Musawi, M., Ledesma, A., Nieminen, H., & Korhonen, I. (2016). Implementation and user testing of a system for visualizing continuous health data and events. In 2016 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI) (pp. 156–159). Las Vegas, NV.
   Google Scholar
• Alper, B., Hollerer, T., Kuchera-Morin, J., & Forbes, A. (2011). Stereoscopic Highlighting: 2D Graph visualization on stereo displays. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(12), 2325–2333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreoli, R., Corolla, A., Faggiano, A., Malandrino, D., Pirozzi, D., Ranaldi, M., … Scarano, V. (2016). Immersivity and playability evaluation of a game experience in cultural heritage. In Digital Heritage. Progress in Cultural Heritage: Documentation, Preservation, and Protection - 6th International Conference, EuroMed 2016, Nicosia, Cyprus, 814–824.
   Google Scholar
• Barahimi, F., & Wismath, S. (2014). 3d graph visualization with the oculus rift (Vol. 8871, pp. 519–520). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bassily, D., Georgoulas, C., Guettler, J., Linner, T., & Bock, T. (2014). Intuitive and adaptive robotic arm manipulation using the leap motion controller. In ISR/Robotik 2014; 41st International Symposium on Robotics (pp. 1–7). Messe München, Germany: VDE.
   Google Scholar
• Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Menlo Park, California: AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R., Zielinski, D. J., & Kopper, R. (2014). Comparison of interactive environments for the archaeological exploration of 3d landscape data. In 2014 IEEE VIS International Workshop on 3DVis (3DVis) (pp. 67–71). Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, M.,. L. G. (1997). Data mining techniques: for marketing, sales, and customer relationship management. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Blake, A., Stapleton, G., Rodgers, P., & Howse, J. (2014). How should we use colour in euler diagrams? In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Visual Information Communication and Interaction, 149:149–149:158. Sydney NSW, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, D. A., Coquillart, S., Froehlich, B., Hirose, M., Kitamura, Y., Kiyokawa, K., & Stuerzlinger, W. (2008). 3D User Interfaces: New Directions and Perspectives. IEEE Computation Graph Applications, 28(6), 20–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brath, R. (2014). 3D InfoVis is here to stay: Deal with it. In 2014 IEEE VIS International Workshop on 3DVis (3DVis), 25–31. Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, F. P. (1999). What’s Real About Virtual Reality? IEEE Computation Graph Applications, 19(6), 16–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, S. (1996). Virtual Reality in Scientific Visualization. Communicable ACM, 39(5), 62–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckwald, M., & Holz, D. (2010). The leap motion 3d controller. https://www.leapmotion.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Burdea, G., Richard, P., & Coiffet, P. (1996). Multimodal virtual reality: Inputoutput devices, system integration, and human factors. International Journal of HumanComputer Interaction, 8(1), 5–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso, J. C. S. (2016). Comparison of gesture, gamepad, and gaze-based locomotion for vr worlds. In Proceedings of the 22Nd ACM Conference on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST ’16, 319–320, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Chessa, M., Maiello, G., Borsari, A., & Bex, P. J. (2016). The perceptual quality of the oculus rift for immersive virtual reality. International Journal of HumanComputer Interaction, 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Chiara, R. D., Santo, V. D., Erra, U., & Scarano, V. (2007). Real Positioning in Virtual Environments Using Game Engines. In R. D. Amicis & G. Conti (editors), Eurographics Italian Chapter Conference. Geneva, Switzerland: The Eurographics Association.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dam, A., Forsberg, A. S., Laidlaw, D. H., LaViola, J. J., & Simpson, R. M. (2000). Immersive VR for Scientific Visualization: A Progress Report. IEEE Computation Graph Applications, 20(6), 26–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Carvalho Correia, A. C., De Miranda, L. C., & Hornung, H. (2013). Gesture-based interaction in domotic environments: State of the art and HCI frame work inspired by the diversity. In Human-computer interaction–INTERACT (pp. 300–317). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8118 . Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• De Prisco, R., Lettieri, N., Malandrino, D., Pirozzi, D., Zaccagnino, G., & Zaccagnino, R. (2016a). Visualization of Music Plagiarism: Analysis and evaluation. In 20th International Conference Information Visualisation, IV 2016, Lisbon, Portugal, July 19-22, 177–182.
   Google Scholar
• De Prisco, R., Malandrino, D., Pirozzi, D., Zaccagnino, G., & Zaccagnino, R. (2017). Understanding the structure of musical compositions: Is visualization an effective approach? Information Visualization, 16(2), 139–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Prisco, R., Malandrino, D., Zaccagnino, G., & Zaccagnino, R. (2016). Natural user interfaces to support and enhance real-time music performance. In Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, AVI 2016, Bari, Italy, June 7-10, 2016, 204–211.
   Google Scholar
• Di Battista, G., Eades, P., Tamassia, R., & Tollis, I. G. (1994). Algorithms for Drawing Graphs: An annotated bibliography. Computation Geom Theory Applications, 4(5), 235–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erra, U., & Scanniello, G. (2012). Towards the visualization of software systems as 3d forests: The codetrees environment. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, SAC ’12, 981–988, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Erra, U., Scanniello, G., & Capece, N. (2012). Visualizing the evolution of software systems using the forest metaphor. In 2012 16th International Conference on Information Visualisation, 87–92.Montpellier, France
   Google Scholar
• Fish, A., Gargiulo, C., Malandrino, D., Pirozzi, D., & Scarano, V. (2016). Visual Exploration System in an Industrial Context. IEEE Transaction Industrial Informatics, 12(2), 567–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallo, L., Placitelli, A. P., & Ciampi, M. (2011). Controller-free exploration of medical image data: Experiencing the kinect. In Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS), 2011 24th International Symposium on, 1–6. Bristol, UK: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Greffard, N., Picarougne, F., & Kuntz, P. (2014). Beyond the classical monoscopic 3D in graph analytics: An experimental study of the impact of stereoscopy. In 2014 IEEE VIS International Workshop on 3DVis (3DVis), 19–24. Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Halpin, H., Zielinski, D. J., Brady, R., & Kelly, G. (2008). Exploring semantic social networks using virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on The Semantic Web, ISWC ’08, 599–614, Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hnel, C., Weyers, B., Hentschel, B., & Kuhlen, T. W. (2014). Interactive volume rendering for immersive virtual environments. In 2014 IEEE VIS International Workshop on 3DVis (3DVis), 73–74. Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• HTC and Valve Corporation (2012). HTC Vive. https://www.vive.com/eu/.
   Google Scholar
• Jang, S., Stuerzlinger, W., Ambike, S., & Ramani, K. (2017). Modeling cumulative arm fatigue in mid-air interaction based on perceived exertion and kinetics of arm motion. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’17, 3328–3339, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Jego, J.-F., Paljic, A., & Fuchs, P. (2013). User-defined gestural interaction: A study on gesture memorization. In 2013 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), 7–10. Orlando, FL,
   Google Scholar
• Jum, C., & Nunnally, I. H. B. (1994). Psychometric theory. Pennsylvania Plaza, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• K¨Oltringer, T., Isokoski, P., & Grechenig, T. (2007). TwoStick: Writing with a game controller. In Christopher G. H. & E. Lank (Eds.), Proceedings of graphics interface 2007, GI ’07 (pp. 103–110). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Khundam, C. (2015). First person movement control with palm normal and hand gesture interaction in virtual reality. In 2015 12th International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (JCSSE), 325–330. Songkhla, Thailand.
   Google Scholar
• Kinect, (2010). Microsoft Kinect. http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/kinectforwindows/.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, O. H., Muelder, C., Lee, K., & Ma, K. L. (2016). A study of layout, rendering, and interaction methods for immersive graph visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 22(7), 1802–1815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazar, J., Feng, J. H., & Hochheiser, H. (2010). Research Methods in human-computer interaction. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P.-W., Wang, H.-Y., Y.-C., T., J.-W., L., & Valstar, A. (2015). TranSection: Hand-based interaction for playing a game within a virtual reality game. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA ’15, 73–76, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Leon, P., Ur, B., Shay, R., Wang, Y., Balebako, R., & Cranor, L. (2012). Why Johnny Can’T Opt out: A Usability evaluation of tools to limit online behavioral advertising. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 589–598. Austin, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Luckey, P. (2012). Oculus Rift. https://www.oculus.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Malandrino, D., Manno, I., Palmieri, G., Scarano, V., Tateo, L., Casola, D., … Foresta, F. (2015). A tailorable infrastructure to enhance mobile seamless learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 8(1), 18–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malandrino, D., Scarano, V., & Spinelli, R. (2013). How increased awareness can impact attitudes and behaviors toward online privacy protection. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Social Computing, SOCIALCOM’13, 57–62, Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• McIntire, J. P., & Liggett, K. K. (2014). The (possible) utility of stereoscopic 3D displays for information visualization: The good, the bad, and the ugly. In 2014 IEEE VIS International Workshop on 3DVis (3DVis), 1–9. Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Mirhosseini, K., Sun, Q., Gurijala, K. C., Laha, B., & Kaufman, A. E. (2014). Benefits of 3D immersion for virtual colonoscopy. In 2014 IEEE VIS International Workshop on 3DVis (3DVis), 75–79. Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, J.-W., & Kim, Y.-G. (2001). Extending the {TAM} for a World-Wide-Web context. Information and Management, 38(4), 217–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nancel, M., Wagner, J., Pietriga, E., Chapuis, O., & Mackay, W. (2011a). Mid-air pan-and-zoom on wall-sized displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 177–186. Vancouver, BC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Nancel, M., Wagner, J., Pietriga, E., Chapuis, O., & Mackay, W. (2011b). Mid-air pan-and-zoom on wall-sized displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’11, 177–186. Vancouver, BC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R., & Krosnick, J. (1995). Attitude Strength: Antecedents and consequences. New Jersey, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Rollings, A., & Adams, E. (2003). Andrew rollings and ernest adams on game design. San Francisco, USA: New Riders Games.
   Google Scholar
• Ruppert, G. C. S., Reis, L. O., Amorim, P. H. J., De Moraes, T. F., & Da Silva, J. V. L. (2012). Touchless gesture user interface for interactive image visualization in urological surgery. World Journal of Urology, 30(5), 687–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3/4), 591–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiratuddin, M. F., & Wong, K. W. (2012). Transactions on edutainment viii. chapter game design considerations when using non-touch based natural user interface (pp. 35–45). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, E. S., & Rodrigues, M. A. F. (2015). Gesture interaction and evaluation using the leap motion for medical visualization. In Proceedings of the 2015 XVII Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality, SVR ’15, 160–169, Washington, DC, USA. IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Vatavu, R.-D. (2017a). Beyond features for recognition: Human-readable measures to understand users whole-body gesture performance. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 33(9), 713–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatavu, R.-D. (2017b). Characterizing gesture knowledge transfer across multiple contexts of use. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces. 11(4), 301– 314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware, C., & Mitchell, P. (2005). Reevaluating stereo and motion cues for visualizing graphs in three dimensions. In Proceedings of the 2Nd Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, APGV ’05, 51–58, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Ware, C., & Mitchell, P. (2008). Visualizing graphs in three dimensions. ACM Transactions Applications Percept, 5(1), 2:1–2:15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weichert, F., Bachmann, D., Rudak, B., & Fisseler, D. (2013). Analysis of the accuracy and robustness of the leap motion controller. Sensors, 13:6380–6393. ( Publikation).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar