Multi-Device Classification Model for Game Interaction Techniques

References

• Adams, N. (2012, March 1). Using kinect for high adventure. Retrieved from http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/163515/using_kinect_for_high_adventure.php
   Google Scholar
• Anthropy, A., & Clark, N. (2013). A game design vocabulary: Exploring the foundational principles behind good game design. London, UK: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Baber, C., & Baumann, K. (2001). Alternative interaction techniques. In K. Baumann & B. Thomas (Eds.), User interface design for electronic appliances (pp. 173–189). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, J., & Bowman, N. D. (2016). Emotion, anthropomorphism, realism, control: Validation of a merged metric for player–Avatar interaction (PAX). Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 215–223. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birk, M., & Mandryk, R. L. (2013, April). Control your game-self: Effects of controller type on enjoyment, motivation, and personality in game. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 685–694). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Björk, S., & Holopainen, J. (2004). Game design patterns. Boston, MA: Charles River Media.
   Google Scholar
• Brockmyer, J. H., Fox, C. M., Curtiss, K. A., McBroom, E., Burkhart, K. M., & Pidruzny, J. N. (2009). The development of the Game Engagement Questionnaire: A measure of engagement in video game-playing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 624–634. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairns, P., Li, J., Wang, W., & Nordin, A. I. (2014, April). The influence of controllers on immersion in mobile games. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 371–380). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Calleja, G. (2011). In-Game – From immersion to incorporation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calvillo-Gámez, E. H., Cairns, P., & Cox, A. L. (2010). Assessing the core elements of the gaming experience. In R. Bernhaupt (Ed.), Evaluating user experience in games (pp. 47–71). London, UK: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Choe, P., & Schumacher, D. (2015). Influence of different types of vibrations on technical acceptance of a mobile game aiming for hedonic satisfaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(1), 33–43. doi:10.1080/10447318.2014.959101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, J., & Gardner, H. J. (2012). Temporal presence variation in immersive computer games. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28(8), 511–529. doi:10.1080/10447318.2011.627298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, X., Chan, S., Brzezinski, J., & Nair, C. (2010). Development of an instrument to measure enjoyment of computer game play. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26(9), 868–886. doi:10.1080/10447318.2010.496337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, J. D., Wallace, V. L., & Chan, P. (1984). The human factors of computer graphics interaction techniques. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 4(11), 13–48. doi:10.1109/MCG.1984.6429355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francese, R., Passero, I., & Tortora, G. (2012, May). Wiimote and Kinect: Gestural user interfaces add a natural third dimension to HCI. Proceedings of the international working conference on advanced visual interfaces (pp. 116–123). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Gerling, K. M., Klauser, M., & Niesenhaus, J. (2011, September). Measuring the impact of game controllers on player experience in FPS games. Proceedings of the 15th international academic mindtrek conference: envisioning future media environments (pp. 83–86). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Gregersen, A., & Grodal, T. (2009). Embodiment and interface. In B. Perron & M. J. P. Wolf (Eds.), The video game theory reader 2 (pp. 65–84). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hollander, M., & Wolfe, D. A. (1999). Nonparametric statistical methods. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Jennett, C., Cox, A. L., Cairns, P., Dhoparee, S., Epps, A., Tijs, T., & Walton, A. (2008). Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(9), 641–661. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonker, J., & Pennink, B. (2010). The essence of research methodology: A concise guide for master and PhD students in management science. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Juul, J. (2010). A casual revolution: Reinventing video games and their players. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Laha, B., Bailenson, J. N., Won, A. S., & Bailey, J. O. (2016). Evaluating control schemes for the third arm of an avatar. PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 25(2), 129–147. doi:10.1162/PRES_a_00251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankoski, P. (2016, October). Embodiment in character-based videogames. Proceedings of the 20th international academic mindtrek conference (pp. 358–365). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Li, D. D., Liau, A. K., & Khoo, A. (2013). Player–Avatar Identification in video gaming: Concept and measurement. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 257–263. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limperos, A. M., Schmierbach, M. G., Kegerise, A. D., & Dardis, F. E. (2011). Gaming across different consoles: Exploring the influence of control scheme on game-player enjoyment. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(6), 345–350. doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEwan, M. W., Blackler, A. L., Johnson, D. M., & Wyeth, P. A. (2014, October). Natural mapping and intuitive interaction in videogames. Proceedings of the first ACM SIGCHI annual symposium on Computer-human interaction in play (pp. 191–200). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• McGloin, R., Farrar, K. M., & Krcmar, M. (2011). The impact of controller naturalness on spatial presence, gamer enjoyment, and perceived realism in a tennis simulation video game. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 20(4), 309–324. doi:10.1162/PRES_a_00053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montreal, Ubisoft. (2009). Assassin’s creed 2. Montreuil, France: Ubisoft.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. E. (2011). Basics of game design. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nacke, L. E. (2010, May). Wiimote vs. controller: Electroencephalographic measurement of affective gameplay interaction. Proceedings of the international academic conference on the future of game design and technology (pp. 159–166). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Natapov, D., Castellucci, S. J., & MacKenzie, I. S. (2009, May). ISO 9241-9 evaluation of video game controllers. In A. Gooch & M. Tory. (Eds.), Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2009 (pp. 223–230). Toronto, Canada: Canadian Information Processing Society.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, A. E., Weger, H., Bullinger, C., & Bowers, A. (2014). Quantifying engagement: Measuring player involvement in human–Avatar interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravaja, N., Saari, T., Turpeinen, M., Laarni, J., Salminen, M., & Kivikangas, M. (2006). Spatial presence and emotions during video game playing: Does it matter with whom you play? Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 15(4), 381–392. doi:10.1162/pres.15.4.381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., Bowman, N. D., & Oliver, M. B. (2015). It’s not the model that doesn’t fit, it’s the controller! The role of cognitive skills in understanding the links between natural mapping, performance, and enjoyment of console video games. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 588–596. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, S. (2010). Level up – The guide to great video game design. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, S. (2012). Swipe this! The guide to great touchscreen game design. Wesst Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sauro, J., & Lewis, J. R. (2012). Quantifying the user experience: Practical statistics for user research. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Schell, J. (2015). The art of game design: A book of lenses (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sedig, K., Parsons, P., & Haworth, R. (2017,January). Player–game interaction and cognitive gameplay: A taxonomic framework for the core mechanic of videogames. Informatics, 4(1), 4. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. doi:10.3390/informatics4010004
   Google Scholar
• Shafer, D. M., Carbonara, C. P., & Popova, L. (2014). Controller required? The impact of natural mapping on interactivity, realism, presence, and enjoyment in motion-based video games. Presence, 23(3), 267–286. doi:10.1162/PRES_a_00193
   Google Scholar
• Skalski, P., Tamborini, R., Shelton, A., Buncher, M., & Lindmark, P. (2011). Mapping the road to fun: Natural video game controllers, presence, and game enjoyment. New Media & Society, 13(2), 224–242. doi:10.1177/1461444810370949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K. D. (2014). The effects of dissociation, game controllers, and 3D versus 2D on presence and enjoyment. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 142–150. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee, N. (2006). Motivations for play in online games. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(6), 772–775. doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9.772
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zagal, J. P., Mateas, M., Fernández-Vara, C., Hochhalter, B., & Lichti, N. (2007). Towards an ontological language for game analysis. Worlds in Play: International Perspectives on Digital Games Research, 21, 21.
   Google Scholar