Exploring User Experience of Smartphones in Social Media: A Mixed-Method Analysis

References

• Andersson, E., & Frost, F. (2013). The use values of smartphone apps-a qualitative study (Master thesis in Marketing and Consumption), School of Business, Economics, and Law, University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, S., & Mead, P. (1995). After you open the box: Making smart products more usable, useful, and desirable through interactive technology. Design Management Journal, 6(4), 21–27.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, J. M. (1997). Software agents. Menlo Park, CA: American Association for Artificial Intelligence.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, M., Estève, D., Escriba, C., & Campo, E. (2008). A review of smart homes—Present state and future challenges. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 91(1), 55–81. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2008.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, T. K., Acharjya, D. P., & Patra, M. R. (2014, January). Opinion mining about a product by analyzing public tweets in Twitter. Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI), 2014 International Conference (pp. 1–4). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Dekleva, S., Shim, J. P., Varshney, U., & Knoerzer, G. (2007). Evolution and emerging issues in mobile wireless networks. Communications of the ACM, 50(6), 38–43. doi:10.1145/1247001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhebar, A. (1996). Information technology and product policy: ‘smart’ products. European Management Journal, 14(5), 477-485.
   Google Scholar
• Gable, G. G. (1994). Integrating case study and survey research methods: An example in information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 3(2), 112–126. doi:10.1057/ejis.1994.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grönroos, C. (2008). Service logic revisited: Who creates value? And who co-creates? European Business Review, 20(4), 298–314. doi:10.1108/09555340810886585
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M. (2008, September). User experience (UX): Towards an experiential perspective on product quality. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of the Association Francophone d’Interaction Homme-Machine (pp. 11–15). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, M. B. (1999). Consumer value: A framework for analysis and research. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hyldegård, J. (2006, October). Using diaries in group based information behavior research: A methodological study. Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Information interaction in context (pp. 153–161). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Tomak, K. (2003). Competing in mobile business. In J. N. Luftman (Ed.), Competing in the information age (pp. 137–157).Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Jin, B. S., Yoon, S. H., & Ji, Y. G. (2013). Development of a continuous usage model for the adoption and continuous usage of a smartphone. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29(9), 563–581. doi:10.1080/10447318.2012.729997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, P. W. (1998). Human factors for pleasure in product use. Applied Ergonomics, 29(1), 25–33. doi:10.1016/S0003-6870(97)00022-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, Y. (2014). What a smartphone is to me: Understanding user values in using smartphones. Information Systems Journal, 24(4), 299–321. doi:10.1111/isj.v24.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306(5702), 1776–1780. doi:10.1126/science.1103572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karapanos, E., Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., & Martens, J. (2009). User experience over time: An initial framework. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Kaulio, M. A. (1998). Customer, consumer and user involvement in product development: A framework and a review of selected methods. Total Quality Management, 9(1), 141–149. doi:10.1080/0954412989333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, F. H., Bashir, S., & Qamar, U. (2014). TOM: Twitter opinion mining framework using hybrid classification scheme. Decision Support Systems, 57, 245–257. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2013.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D., & Kim, J. W. (2014). Public opinion mining on social media: A case study of Twitter opinion on nuclear power. Advanced Science and Technology Letters, 51, 224–228.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft, C. (2012). User experience innovation: User centered design that works. Berkeley, CA: Apress.
   Google Scholar
• Kujala, S., & Miron-Shatz, T. (2013, April). Emotions, experiences and usability in real-life mobile phone use. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1061–1070). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kuniavsky, M. (2003). Observing the user experience: A practitioner’s guide to user research. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. (2013). Understanding user experience with computer-based applications with different use purposes. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29(11), 689–701. doi:10.1080/10447318.2013.768138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2007). What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 153–174. doi:10.1257/jep.21.2.153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, K. W., & Buntine, W. (2014, November). Twitter opinion topic model: Extracting product opinions from tweets by leveraging hashtags and sentiment lexicon. Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (pp. 1319–1328). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Maass, W., & Varshney, U. (2008). Preface to the focus theme section: ‘Smart products’. Electronic Markets, 18(3), 211–215. doi:10.1080/10196780802265645
   Google Scholar
• Miche, M., Schreiber, D., & Hartmann, M. (2009). Core services for smart products. Proc AmI-Blocks, 9, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Mühlhäuser, M. (2007, November). Smart products: An introduction. In European Conference on Ambient Intelligence (pp. 158–164). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nascimento, I., Silva, W., Lopes, A., Rivero, L., Gadelha, B., Oliveira, E., & Conte, T. (2016). An empirical study to evaluate the feasibility of a UX and usability inspection technique for mobile applications. 28th International Conference on Software Engineering & Knowledge Engineering, California, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Noordhuis, P., Heijkoop, M., & Lazovik, A. (2010, July). Mining twitter in the cloud: A case study. Cloud Computing (CLOUD), 2010 IEEE 3rd International Conference on (pp. 107–114). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Park, H. J., & Lee, H. S. (2014). Product smartness and use-diffusion of smart products: The mediating roles of consumption values. Asian Social Science, 10(3), 54. doi:10.5539/ass.v10n3p54
   Google Scholar
• Park, J., & Han, S. H. (2013). Defining user value: A case study of a smartphone. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 43(4), 274–282. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2013.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pence, H. E. (2010). Smartphones, smart objects, and augmented reality. The Reference Librarian, 52(1–2), 136–145. doi:10.1080/02763877.2011.528281
   Google Scholar
• Poole, S., & Simon, M. (1997). Technological trends, product design and the environment. Design Studies, 18(3), 237–248. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(97)00003-3
   Google Scholar
• Poushter, J. (2016). Smartphone ownership and internet usage continues to climb in emerging economies. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Rijsdijk, S. A., & Hultink, E. J. (2003). “Honey, have you seen our hamster?” Consumer evaluations of autonomous domestic products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(3), 204–216. doi:10.1111/1540-5885.2003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijsdijk, S. A., & Hultink, E. J. (2009). How today’s consumers perceive tomorrow’s smart products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(1), 24–42. doi:10.1111/jpim.2009.26.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabou, M., Kantorovitch, J., Nikolov, A., Tokmakoff, A., Zhou, X., & Motta, E. (2009). Position paper on realizing smart products: Challenges for semantic web technologies. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 522, 135–147.
   Google Scholar
• Schonfeld, E. (2009). Mining the thought stream. TechCrunch Weblog Article.
   Google Scholar
• Swallow, D., Blythe, M., & Wright, P. (2005, September). Grounding experience: Relating theory and method to evaluate the user experience of smartphones. Proceedings of the 2005 annual conference on European association of cognitive ergonomics (pp. 91–98). University of Athens.
   Google Scholar
• Tam, K. Y., & Ho, S. Y. (2006). Understanding the impact of web personalization on user information processing and decision outcomes. MIS Quarterly, 30, 865–890. doi:10.2307/25148757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. (2005). Smart devices and soft controllers. Internet Computing, IEEE, 9(1), 82–85. doi:10.1109/MIC.2005.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tossell, C. C., Kortum, P., Shepard, C., Rahmati, A., & Zhong, L. (2012). An empirical analysis of Smartphone personalization: Measurement and user variability. Behaviour & Information Technology, 31, 995–1010. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2012.687773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind; a Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy, 59, 433–460. doi:10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433
   Google Scholar
• von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, M., Hassenzahl, M., & Platz, A. (2006). Dynamics of user experience: How the perceived quality of mobile phones changes over time. User experience—Towards a unified view, Workshop at the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 74–78).
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, T., Nurkka, P., & Walsh, R. (2010, December). Cultural differences in smartphone user experience evaluation. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (p. 24). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodruff, R. B. (1997). Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(2), 139–153. doi:10.1007/BF02894350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. The Journal of Marketing, 2–22. doi:10.2307/1251446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar