Investigating the Effect of System Reliability, Risk, and Role on Users' Emotions and Attitudes toward a Safety-Critical Drone System

References

• Antifakos, S., Kern, N., Schiele, B., & Schwaninger, A. (2005). Towards improving trust in context-aware systems by displaying system confidence. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on human computer interaction with mobile devices & services (9–14).
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, R., Maglio, P. P., Kandogan, E., & Bailey, J. 2004. Usable autonomic computing systems: the administrator's perspective. In Autonomic Computing, 2004. Proceedings. International Conference (pp. 18–25).
   Google Scholar
• Beggiato, M., Hartwich, F., Schleinitz, K., Krems, J., Othersen, I., & Petermann-Stock, I. (2015).What would drivers like to know during automated driving? Information needs at different levels of automation. In Proceedings of the 7th conference on driver assistance.
   Google Scholar
• Bubb-Lewis, C., & Scerbo, M. (1997). Getting to know you: Human-computer communication in adaptive automation. In M. Mouloua & J. M. Koonce, Human–Automation interaction: Research and practice (pp. 92–99), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, R. (2014). Emotion: A biosocial synthesis. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri, A., & Buck, R. (1997). Communication, cognition and involvement: A theoretical framework for advertising. Journal of Marketing Communications, 3(2), 111–125. doi:10.1080/135272697345998
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J. K., & Ji, Y. G. (2015). Investigating the importance of trust on adopting an autonomous vehicle. International Journal of Human-computer Interaction, 31(10), 692–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzindolet, M. T., Peterson, S. A., Pomranky, R. A., Pierce, L. G., & Beck, H. P. (2003). The role of trust in automation reliance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(6), 697–718. doi:10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00038-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagan, M., Khan, M. M. H., & Buck, R. (2015). A study of users’ experiences and beliefs about software update messages. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 504–519. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedy, A., DeVisser, E., Weltman, G., & Coeyman, N. (2007). Measurement of trust in human-robot collaboration. In Collaborative technologies and systems, 2007. cts 2007. international symposium on (pp 106–114).
   Google Scholar
• Horvitz, E., & Barry, M. (1995). Display of information for time-critical decision making. In Proceedings of the Eleventh conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence (pp 296–305).
   Google Scholar
• Itoh, M, & Inagaki, T. (2004). A microworld approach to identifying issues of human-automation systems design for supporting operator's situation awareness. International Journal Of Human-computer Interaction, 17(1), 3–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 263–291. doi:10.2307/1914185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, J. C. (2002). Safety critical systems: Challenges and directions. In Software engineering, 2002. icse 2002. proceedings of the 24rd international conference on (pp 547–550). doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2002/er01)
   Google Scholar
• Koo, J., Kwac, J., Ju, W., Steinert, M., Leifer, L., & Nass, C. (2015). Why did my car just do that? Explaining semi-autonomous driving actions to improve driver understanding, trust, and performance. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (Ijidem), 9(4), 269–275. doi:10.1007/s12008-014-0227-2
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46(1), 50–80. doi:10.1518/hfes.46.3.385.50404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz, R. R., & Mikulski, I. C. (2003). Operational anomalies as a cause of safety-critical requirements evolution. Journal of Systems and Software, 65(2), 155–161. doi:10.1016/S0164-1212(02)00057-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinley, R. K., Manku-Scott, T., Hastings, A. M., French, D. P., & Baker, R. (1997). Reliability and validity of a new measure of patient satisfaction with out of hours primary medical care in the united kingdom: Development of a patient questionnaire. Bmj, 314(7075), 193. doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7075.193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molloy, R., & Parasuraman, R. (1996). Monitoring an automated system for a single failure: Vigilance and task complexity effects. Human Factors, 38(2), 311–322. doi:10.1177/001872089606380211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muir, B. M. (1994). Trust in automation: Part i. Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems. Ergonomics, 37(11), 1905–1922. doi:10.1080/00140139408963681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nass, C., Steuer, J., & Tauber, E. R. (1994). Computers are social actors. In Proceedings of the sigchi conference on human factors in computing systems (pp 72–78).doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77044-2
   Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., & Miller, C. A. (2004). Trust and etiquette in high-criticality automated systems. Communications of the ACM, 47(4), 51–55. doi:10.1145/975817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39(2), 230–253. doi:10.1518/001872097778543886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parnas, D. L., Van Schouwen, A. J., & Kwan, S. P. (1990). Evaluation of safety-critical software. Communications of the ACM, 33(6), 636–648. doi:10.1145/78973.78974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redmill, F., & Rajan, J. (1996). Human factors in safety-critical systems. Newton, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. New York, NY: CSLI Publications and Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Satchell, P. M. (2016). Cockpit monitoring and alerting systems. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, T. B. (1992). Telerobotics, automation, and human supervisory control. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, A. L., Tiwari, T., & Singh, I. L. (2009). Effects of automation reliability and training on automation-induced complacency and perceived mental workload. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 35(2009), 9–22.
   Google Scholar
• Vaniea, K., & Rashidi, Y. (2016). Tales of software updates: the process of updating software. In Proceedings of the 2016 chi conference on human factors in computing systems (pp 3215–3226).
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, E. L. (1988). Cockpit automation. In Earl L. W. & David C. N (Eds.), Human Factors in Aviation. 433–461. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.   ISBN: 978-0-08-057090-7
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., Marinov, D., Sanders, W., Zilles, C., d' Amorim, M., Lauterburg, S., Lefever, R. M., & Tucek, J. (2007). Delta execution for software reliability. In Proceedings of the 3rd workshop on Hot Topics in System Dependability 16. USENIX Association http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1323140.1323156.
   Google Scholar