411
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Analyzing Social Media to Assess User Satisfaction with Transport for London’s Oyster

&

References

  • Agar, M. H. (1986). Speaking of Ethnography. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Alawneh, A., Al-Refai, H., & Batiha, K. (2013). Measuring user satisfaction from e-Government services: Lessons from Jordan. Government Information Quarterly, 30(3), 277–288. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.03.001
  • Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2011). Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 247–271.
  • Bailey, J. E., & Pearson, S. W. (1983). Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Science, 29(5), 530–545. doi:10.1287/mnsc.29.5.530
  • Bergstad, C. J., Gamble, A., Gärling, T., Hagman, O., Polk, M., Ettema, D., & Olsson, L. E. (2011). Subjective well-being related to satisfaction with daily travel. Transportation, 38(1), 1–15. doi:10.1007/s11116-010-9283-z
  • Chew, C., & Eysenbach, G. (2010). Pandemics in the age of Twitter: Content analysis of tweets during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak. Plos one, 5(11), e14118. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014118
  • Chin, W. W., & Lee, M. K. O. (2000). A proposed model and measurement instrument for the formation of IS satisfaction: The case of end-user computing satisfaction. Proceedings of the 21st international Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), 10-13 December, Brisbane, Australia, USA: Association for Information Systems (AIS), pp. 553–563.
  • Davis, M. S. (1971). That’s interesting! towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of Social Sciences, 1(4), 309–344. doi:10.1177/004839317100100211
  • Deng, X., Doll, W., Al-Gahtani, S., Larsen, T., Pearson, J., & Raghunathan, T. (2008). A cross-cultural analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument: A multi-group invariance analysis. Information & Management, 45(4), 211–220. doi:10.1016/j.im.2008.02.002
  • Doll, W. J., Deng, X., Raghunathan, T., Torkzadeh, G., & Xia, W. (2004). The meaning and measurement of user satisfaction: A multigroup invariance analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(1), 227–262. doi:10.1080/07421222.2004.11045789
  • Doll, W. J., & Torkzadeh, G. (1988). The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Quarterly, 12(2), 259–274. doi:10.2307/248851
  • Doll, W. J., & Torkzadeh, G. (1991). The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction: Theoretical and methodological issues. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 5–10. doi:10.2307/249429
  • Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 453–461. doi:10.2307/249524
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. doi:10.2307/3151312
  • Gal-Tzur, A., Grant-Muller, S., Kuflik, T., Minkov, E., Nocera, S., & Shoor, I. (2014). The potential of social media in delivering transport policy goals. Transport Policy, 32, 115–123. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.01.007
  • Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Hall, M., Mazarakis, A., Chorley, M., & Caton, S. (2018). Editorial of the special issue on following user pathways: Key contributions and future directions in cross-platform social media research. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. doi:10.1080/10447318.2018.1471575
  • Harrison, A. W., & Rainer, R. K., Jr. (1996). A general measure of user computing satisfaction. Computer in Human Behavior, 12(1), 79–92. doi:10.1016/0747-5632(95)00020-8
  • Helm, S. F., Chaparro, B. S., & Farmer, S. M. (2005). Using the End-User Computing Satisfaction (EUCS) instrument to measure satisfaction with a web site. Decision Sciences, 36(2), 341–364. doi:10.1111/deci.2005.36.issue-2
  • Horan, T. A., & Abhichandani, T. (2006). Evaluating user satisfaction in an e-Government initiative: Results of structural equation modeling and focus group discussions. Journal of Information Technology Management, XVII(4), 33–44.
  • Hu, N., Liu, L., & Zhang, J. J. (2008). Do online reviews affect product sales? The role of reviewer characteristics and temporal effects. Information Technology and Management, 9(3), 201–214. doi:10.1007/s10799-008-0041-2
  • Ives, B., Olson, M. H., & Baroudi, J. J. (1983). The measurement of user information satisfaction. Communications of the ACM, 26(10), 785–793. doi:10.1145/358413.358430
  • Jansen, B. J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K., & Chowdury, A. (2009). Twitter ower: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(11), 2169–2188. doi:10.1002/asi.v60:11
  • Kim, C., Oh, E., Shin, N., & Chae, M. (2009). An empirical investigation of factors affecting ubiquitous computing use and U-business value. International Journal of Information Management, 29(6), 436–448. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.06.003
  • Koivumäki, T., Ristola, A., & Kesti, M. (2008). The effects of information quality of mobile information services on user satisfaction and service acceptance–Empirical evidence from Finland. Behaviour & Information Technology, 27(5), 375–385. doi:10.1080/01449290601177003
  • Lee, K., Oh, W. Y., & Kim, N. (2013). Social media for socially responsible firms: Analysis of fortune 500’s Twitter profiles and their CSR/CSIR ratings. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(4), 791–806. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1961-2
  • London Councils. (2015). Freedom pass. Retrieved December 10, 2015, from http://www.londoncouncils.gov.uk/services/freedom-pass
  • Maheshwari, B., Kumar, U., Kumar, V., & Sharan, V. (2007). E-Government portal effectiveness: Managerial considerations for design and development. Proceeding of the 5th International Conference of e-Governance (ICEG), Hyderabad, India, Computer Society of India, Special Interest Group on E-governance December 28–30, pp. 258–269.
  • Mamic, L. I., & Almaraz, I. A. (2013). How the larger corporations engage with stakeholders through Twitter. International Journal of Market Research, 55(6), 851–872. doi:10.2501/IJMR-2013-070
  • Marwick, A. E., & Boyd, D. (2010). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133. doi:10.1177/1461444810365313
  • McHaney, R., Hightower, R., & Pearson, J. (2002). A validation of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument in Taiwan. Information & Management, 39(6), 503–511. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00119-7
  • McHaney, R., Hightower, R., & White, D. (1999). EUCS test-retest reliability in representational model decision support systems. Information & Management, 36(2), 109–119. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(99)00010-5
  • Melone, N. P. (1990). A theoretical assessment of the user-satisfaction construct in information systems research. Management Science, 36(1), 76–91. doi:10.1287/mnsc.36.1.76
  • Olsson, L. E., Friman, M., Pareigis, J., & Edvardsson, B. (2012). Measuring service experience: Applying the satisfaction with travel scale in public transport. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 19(4), 413–418. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2012.04.002
  • Oyster Card Briefing. (2009). Retrieved October 15, 2015, from http://www.london.gov.uk/LLDC/Data/Transport%20Committee/20090708/Agenda/3b%20Oyster%20Card%20Briefing%20PDF.pdf
  • Papadomichelaki, X., & Mentzas, G. (2012). e-GovQual: A multiple-item scale for assessing e-Government service quality. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 98–109. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.08.011
  • Pender, B., Currie, G., Delbosc, A., & Shiwakoti, N. (2014). Social media use during unplanned transit network disruptions: A review of literature. Transport Reviews, 34(4), 501–521. doi:10.1080/01441647.2014.915442
  • Pikkarainen, K., Pikkarainen, T., Karjaluoto, H., & Pahnila, S. (2006). The measurement of end‐user computing satisfaction of online banking services: Empirical evidence from Finland. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 24(3), 158–172. doi:10.1108/02652320610659012
  • Savoy, A., & Salvendy, G. (2016). Factors for customer information satisfaction: User approved and empirically evaluated. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 32(9), 695–707. doi:10.1080/10447318.2016.1190137
  • Scheepers, R., Scheepers, H., & Ngwenyama, O. K. (2006). Contextual influences on user satisfaction with mobile computing: Findings from two healthcare organizations. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(3), 261–268. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000615
  • Scholtz, J., & Consolvo, S. (2004). Toward a framework for evaluating ubiquitous computing applications. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 3(2), 82–88. doi:10.1109/MPRV.2004.1316826
  • Seddon, P., & Yip, S. (1992). An empirical evaluation of User Information Satisfaction (UIS) measures for use with general ledger accounting software. Journal of Information Systems, 6(1), 75–92.
  • Somers, T. M., Nelson, K., & Karimi, J. (2003). Confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument: Replication within an ERP domain. Decision Sciences, 34(3), 595–62. doi:10.1111/deci.2003.34.issue-3
  • TFL written submission to the Transport Committee (2011, August). Retrieved October 12, 2015, from http://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/Evidence%20for%20Future%20of%20Ticketing.pdf
  • Thong, J. Y., & Yap, C. (1996). Information systems effectiveness: A user satisfaction approach. Information Processing & Management, 32(5), 601–610. doi:10.1016/0306-4573(96)00004-0
  • Transport Committee. (2011). The future of ticketing, London Assembly. Retrieved October 11, 2015, from https://www.london.gov.uk/moderngov/documents/s7401/The%20Future%20of%20Ticketing%20-%20Appendix%201.pdf
  • Transport for London (TFL) (2013). TfL’s famous Oyster card celebrates ten successful years making journeys easier for customers Retrieved January 17, 2017, from https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/media/press-releases/2013/july/tfls-famous-oyster-card-celebrates-ten-successful-years-making-journeys-easier-for-customers
  • Transport for London (TFL). (2014a). Projects and planning panel, ‘The future of London’s ticketing technology, Agenda Item 4. Retrieved October 15, 2015, from http://content.tfl.gov.uk/ppp-20140226-item04-future-ticketing.pdf
  • Transport for London (TFL). (2014b). Over one million contactless journeys since launch. Retrieved October 12, 2015, from https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/media/press-releases/2014/september/over-one-million-contactless-journeys-since-launch
  • Transport for London (TFL). (2015a). Our role. Retrieved October 11, 2015, from https://tfl.gov.uk/corporate/about-tfl/how-we-work/our-role?intcmp=2670
  • Transport for London (TFL). (2015b). Oyster. Retrieved October 11, 2015, from https://tfl.gov.uk/fares-and-payments/oyster
  • Transport for London (TFL). (2015c). Millions of Londoners choosing contactless. Retrieved September 24, 2015, from https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/media/press-releases/2015/millions-of-londoners-choosing-contactless
  • Transport for London (TFL). (2017). Lost or stolen card. Retrieved December 22, 2017, from https://oyster.tfl.gov.uk/oyster/link/0003.do
  • Weiser, M. (1991). The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American, 265(3), 94–104. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0991-94
  • Weiser, M. (1993). Ubiquitous computing. Computer, 10(26), 71–72. doi:10.1109/2.237456
  • Zviran, M., & Erlich, Z. (2003). Measuring IS user satisfaction: Review and implications. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(5), 81–103.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.