419
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

How to Help Older Adults Move the Focus on a Smart TV? Exploring the Effects of Arrow Hints and Element Size Consistency

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Albert, W., & Tullis, T. (2013). Measuring the user experience: Collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics (1rt ed.): Issues-Based Metrics (pp. 117–121). San Francisco, MA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
  • And, W. A. J., & Dark, V. J. (1986). Selective attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 37(1), 43–75. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.37.020186.000355
  • Bangor, A., Kortum, P., & Miller, J. (2009). Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. Journal of Usability Studies, 4(3), 114–123.
  • Barrero, A., Melendi, D., Pañeda, X. G., García, R., & Pozueco, L. (2016). Evaluation of text entry methods for interactive digital television applications with devices alternative to conventional remote controls. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 32(10), 765–776. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2016.1195586.
  • Baunstrup, M., & Larsen, L. B. (2013). Elderly’s barriers and requirements for interactive TV. International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, Part II. LNCS, 8010, pp. 13–22. Las Vegas, NV, USA.
  • Bernhaupt, R., Obrist, M., & Tscheligi, M. (2007). Usability and usage of iTV services: Lessons learned in an Austrian field trial. Computers in Entertainment, 5(2), 6. doi:10.1145/1279540
  • Bernhaupt, R., & Pirker, M. M. (2014). User interface guidelines for the control of interactive television systems via smart phone applications. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(8), 784–799. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2013.810782
  • Bertin, J. (1983). Semiology of graphics: Diagrams, networks, maps, trans (pp. 104-105). WJ Berg. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press, Ltd, 24.
  • Carmichael, A. (1999). Style guide for the design of interactive television services for elderly viewers (pp. 81–90.) Winchester, UK: Independent Television Commission.
  • Choi, S., Han, J., Lee, G., Lee, N., & Lee, W. (2011). RemoteTouch: Touch-screen-like interaction in the TV viewing environment. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp. 393–402. Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Dezfuli, N., Khalilbeigi, M., Huber, J., Özkorkmaz, M., & Mühlhäuser, M. (2014). PalmRC: Leveraging the palm surface as an imaginary eyes-free television remote control. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(8), 829–843. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2013.810781
  • Fisk, A. D., Rogers, W. A., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., & Sharit, J. (2009). Designing for older adults: Principles and creative human factors approaches (2nd ed.): Design of input and output devices (pp. 61–72). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Fruhling, A. L., & Sang, M. L. (2005). Assessing the reliability, validity and adaptability of PSSUQ. A Conference on A Human Scale. Americas Conference on Information Systems, Amcis 2005, p 378. Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
  • Garlandini, S., & Fabrikant, S. I. (2009). Evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of visual variables for geographic information visualization. International Conference on Spatial Information Theory, pp. 195–211. Aber Wrac'h, France.
  • Graham, L. (2008). Gestalt theory in interactive media design. Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2(1), 1–12.
  • Han, S., Humphreys, G. W., & Chen, L. (1999). Uniform connectedness and classical Gestalt principles of perceptual grouping. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(4), 661–674. doi:10.3758/BF03205537
  • Hangkong, Z. (2016). The current status and changes of the education level of older adults in China [in Chinese]. Chinese Journal of Gerontology, 36(5), 1215–1216.
  • Helander, N. K. (2012). Smart TV - a more interactive way of watching TV (Master’s thesis). Umea University, Umea, Sweden.
  • Hong, J., Kim, H., Lee, W., & Lee, G. (2016). TouchRoller: A touch-sensitive cylindrical input device for GUI manipulation of interactive TVs. Interacting with Computers, 1848(3), 634–642. doi: 10.1093/iwc/iwv006.
  • Iatrino, A., & Modeo, S. (2007). Text editing in digital terrestrial television: A comparison of three interfaces. In G. Lekakos, K. Chorianopoulos, & G. Doukidis (Eds.), Interactive digital television: Technologies and applications (pp. 224–241). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  • Ingrosso, A., Volpi, V., Opromolla, A., Sciarretta, E., & Medaglia, C. M. (2015). UX and usability on smart TV: A case study on a T-commerce application. In F. Fui-Hoon Nah, & CH. Tan (Eds.), Paper presented at the HCI in Business. HCIB 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9191, pp. 312–323. Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Jacobsen, N. E. (1999). Usability Evaluation Methods–The Reliability and Usage of Cognitive Walkthrough and Usability Test (Ph.D thesis). Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Lewis, J. R. (1995). IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: Psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. International Journal of Human‐Computer Interaction, 7(1), 57–78. doi:10.1080/10447319509526110
  • Logan, R. J., Augaitis, S., Miller, R. H., & Wehmeyer, K. (1995). Living room culture—An anthropological study of television usage behaviors. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 39( 5), pp. 326–330. Los Angeles, CA.
  • Lou, X., Peng, R., Hansen, P., & Li, X. A. (2018). Effects of user’s hand orientation and spatial movements on free hand interactions with large displays. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 34(6), 519–532. doi:10.1080/10447318.2017.1370811
  • Mo, F., & Zhou, J. (2018). The influence of menu structure and layout on usability of smartwatches. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction, 10(1), 1–22. doi:10.4018/ijmhci.2018010101
  • National Bureau of Statistics PRC. (2016). China Statistical Yearbook 2016 [Chinese-English Edition]. Beijing, China: China Statistics Press.
  • Neider, M. B., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2008). Exploring set size effects in scenes: Identifying the objects of search. Visual Cognition, 16(1), 1–10. doi:10.1080/13506280701381691
  • Nielsen Group. (2015). The Nielsen Global Generational Lifestyles Survey. Retrieved from http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports/2015/global-generational-lifestyles.html
  • Nielsen, J. (2004). Remote control anarchy. Retrieved from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/remote-control-anarchy/
  • Nielsen, J., & Landauer, T. K. (1993). A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. Proceedings of INTERACT ‘93 and CHI ‘93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 206–213. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Pak, R., & McLaughlin, A. (2011). Designing displays for older adults: Integrative example: Set-top box (pp. 145–155). Boca Raton, FL: CRC press.
  • Palmer, S., & Rock, I. (1994). Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(1), 29–55. doi:10.3758/BF03200760
  • Pemberton, L., & Griffiths, R. N. (2003). Usability evaluation techniques for interactive television. Paper presented at the Proceedings of HCI International, 4, pp. 882–886. Las Vegas, NV, USA.
  • Pereira, L., Abreu, J., & Alvelos, H. (2013). The focus behavior in iTV interfaces versus its users’ expectations: A complex dialectic for elders. In A. A. Fernandes, R. M. Natal Jorge, L. Patrício, & A. Medeiros (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of Integration of Design, Engineering & Management for Innovation. Porto, Portugal.
  • Perrinet, J., Pañeda, X. G., Cabrero, S., Melendi, D., García, R., & García, V. (2011). Evaluation of virtual keyboards for interactive digital television applications. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 27(8), 703–728. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2011.555305.
  • Pirker, M., Bernhaupt, R., & Mirlacher, T. (2010). Investigating usability and user experience as possible entry barriers for touch interaction in the living room. Proceedings of the 8th international interactive conference on Interactive TV&Video, pp. 145–154. Tampere, Finland.
  • Poláček, O., Pavlík, T., & Sporka, A. J. (2013). Efficiency of multi-tap text entry method on interactive television. Paper presented at the International Conference on Text, Speech and Dialogue, pp. 217–224. Pilsen, Czech Republic.
  • Poonsak, T., & Teeravarunyou, S. (2007). Accessibility design guideline for the elderly: A case study of TV remote control. Paper presented at the Eighth Pan-Pacific Conference on Occupational Ergonomics (PPCOE 2007). Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Portet, F., Vacher, M., Golanski, C., Roux, C., & Meillon, B. (2013). Design and evaluation of a smart home voice interface for the elderly: Acceptability and objection aspects. Personal & Ubiquitous Computing, 17(1), 127–144. doi:10.1007/s00779-011-0470-5
  • Rice, M., & Alm, N. (2008). Designing new interfaces for digital interactive television usable by older adults. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 6(1), 6. doi:10.1145/1350843.1350849.
  • Rice, M., & Springett, M. (2016). Handbook of digital games and entertainment technologies: Digital interactive television and the older generation. In R. Nakatsu, M. Rauterberg & P. Ciancarini (Eds.), pp. 1–26. Singapore: Springer Singapore.
  • Sauro, J., & Dumas, J. S. (2009). Comparison of three one-question, post-task usability questionnaires. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp. 1599–1608. Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Shin, D., Hwang, Y., & Choo, H. (2013). Smart TV: Are they really smart in interacting with people? Understanding the interactivity of Korean smart TV. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(2), 156–172. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2011.603360
  • Tao, Y., Chang, J., & Rau, P. L. P. (2014). When China encounters smart TV: Exploring factors influencing the user adoption in China. Paper presented at the International Conference on Cross-Cultural Design, 8528, pp. 696–706. Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
  • Taveira, A. D., & Sang, D. C. (2009). Review study of computer input devices and older users. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 25(5), 455–474. doi:10.1080/10447310902865040
  • Tedesco, D. P., & Tullis, T. S. (2006). A comparison of methods for eliciting post-task subjective ratings in usability testing. Paper presented at the Usability Professionals Association (UPA), pp. 1–9. Denver, Colorado, USA.
  • Zheng, M. C., Shimizu, T., & Sato, K. (2007). A study on an information sign system related to users’ wayfinding behavior in interchanging above-ground stations. In International Association of Societies of Design Research (IASDR) Conference. Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
  • Zhou, J., Rau, P. L. P., & Salvendy, G. (2012). Use and design of handheld computers for older adults: A review and appraisal. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28(12), 799–826. doi:10.1080/10447318.2012.668129
  • Zhou, J., Rau, P. L. P., & Salvendy, G. (2014). Older adults’ text entry on smartphones and tablets: Investigating effects of display size and input method on acceptance and performance. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30(9), 727–739. doi:10.1080/10447318.2014.924348
  • Zhou, J., Zhang, J., Xie, B., Liu, N., Jiang, M., Wang, H., & Gan, Q. (2014). First-time user experience with smart phone new gesture control features. Paper presented at the International Conference on Cross-Cultural Design, pp. 262–271. Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
  • Ziefle, M. (2002). The influence of user expertise and phone complexity on performance, ease of use and learnability of different mobile phones. Behaviour & Information Technology, 21(5), 303–311. doi:10.1080/0144929021000048538
  • Ziefle, M., Bay, S., & Schwade, A. (2006). On keys’ meanings and modes: The impact of different key solutions on children’s efficiency using a mobile phone. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(5), 413–431. doi:10.1080/01449290500197086

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.