994
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

“Human” Problems in Semi-Autonomous Vehicles: Understanding Drivers’ Reactions to Off-Nominal Scenarios

ORCID Icon, &

References

  • Blanco, M., Atwood, J., Vasquez, H. M., Trimble, T. E., Fitchett, V. L., Radlbeck, J., … Morgan, J. F. (2015). Human factors evaluation of level 2 and level 3 automated driving concepts (No. DOT HS 812 182).
  • Blommer, M., Curry, R., Swaminathan, R., Tijerina, L., Talamonti, W., & Kochhar, D. (2017). Driver brake vs. steer response to sudden forward collision scenario in manual and automated driving modes. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 45, 93–101. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2016.11.006
  • California Department of Motor Vehicles. (2017a). Article 3.7 – Autonomous Vehicles Testing. Title 13, Division 1, par. 227.02 (b).
  • California Department of Motor Vehicles. (2017b). Article 3.8 – Autonomous Vehicles Deployment. Title 13, Division 1, par. 228.06 (a).
  • California Department of Motor Vehicles. Reports of Traffic Accidents Involving an Autonomous Vehicle (OL316). https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/dmv/detail/vr/autonomous/autonomousveh_ol316
  • California Department of Motor Vehicles Archive. Autonomous vehicles disengagement reports archive. https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/dmv/detail/vr/autonomous/testing
  • Davies, A. (2017, January 1). The very human problem blocking the path to self-driving cars. Wired. Retrieved from: https://www.wired.com/2017/01/human-problem-blocking-path-self-driving-cars/
  • De Winter, J. C., Happee, R., Martens, M. H., & Stanton, N. A. (2014). Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: A review of the empirical evidence. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 27, 196–217. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2014.06.016
  • Dixit, V. V., Chand, S., & Nair, D. J. (2016). Autonomous vehicles: Disengagements, accidents and reaction times. PloS one, 11(12), e0168054. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0168054
  • Dogan, E., Rahal, M. C., Deborne, R., Delhomme, P., Kemeny, A., & Perrin, J. (2017). Transition of control in a partially automated vehicle: Effects of anticipation and non-driving-related task involvement. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 46, 205–215. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2017.01.012
  • Eriksson, A., Banks, V. A., & Stanton, N. A. (2017). Transition to manual: Comparing simulator with on-road control transitions. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 102, 227–234. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2017.03.011
  • Fagnant, D. J., & Kockelman, K. (2015). Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 77, 167–181.
  • Favarò, F. M., Eurich, S., & Nader, N. (2018). Autonomous vehicles disengagements: trends, triggers, and regulatory limitations. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 110, 136–148. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2017.11.001
  • Favarò, F. M., Nader, N., Eurich, S., Tripp, M., & Varadaraju, N. (2017a). Analysis of autonomous vehicle accidents and considerations on human-machine interactions. PSAM Topical. Presented at PSAM Topical Conference on Human Reliability, Munich, June 2017.
  • Favarò, F. M., Nader, N., Eurich, S., Tripp, M., & Varadaraju, N. (2017b). Examining accident reports involving autonomous vehicles in california. PloS one, 12(9), e0184952. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0184952
  • Forster, Y., Naujoks, F., Neukum, A., & Huestegge, L. (2017). Driver compliance to takeover requests with different auditory outputs in conditional automation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 109, 18–28. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.019
  • Gao, P., Hensley, R., & Zielke, A. (2014, October). A road map to the future for the auto industry. McKinsey quarterly, Oct.
  • Gold, C., Körber, M., Lechner, D., & Bengler, K. (2016). Taking over control from highly automated vehicles in complex traffic situations: The role of traffic density. Human Factors, 58(4), 642–652. doi:10.1177/0018720816634226
  • Melcher, V., Rauh, S., Diederichs, F., Widlroither, H., & Bauer, W. (2015). Takeover requests for automated driving. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 2867–2873. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.788
  • Mok, B. K. J., Johns, M., Lee, K. J., Ive, H. P., Miller, D., & Ju, W. (2015). Timing of unstructured transitions of control in automated driving. In 26th Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2015 IEEE (pp. 1167–1172). Seoul, South Korea: IEEE.
  • NCSL – National Conference of State Legislatures, database on Autonomous Vehicles Legislation. (2017). Retreived from http://www.ncsl.org/research/transportation/autonomous-vehicles-legislative-database.aspx.
  • Payre, W., Cestac, J., & Delhomme, P. (2016). Fully automated driving: Impact of trust and practice on manual control recovery. Human Factors, 58(2), 229–241. doi:10.1177/0018720815612319
  • Petermeijer, S., Bazilinskyy, P., Bengler, K., & de Winter, J. (2017). Takeover again: Investigating multimodal and directional TORs to get the driver back into the loop. Applied Ergonomics, 62, 204–215. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2017.02.023
  • SAE On-Road Automated Vehicle Standards Committee. (2014). Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems. SAE International.
  • Shen, S., & Neyens, D. M. (2017). Assessing drivers’ response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks. Journal of Safety Research, 61, 149–155. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2017.02.009
  • Singh, S. (2015). Critical reasons for crashes investigated in the national motor vehicle crash causation survey (NO. DOT HS 812 506).
  • Wickens, C. D., Gordon, S. E., Liu, Y., & Lee, J. (1998). An introduction to human factors engineering. London, England: Pearson.
  • Zeeb, K., Buchner, A., & Schrauf, M. (2015). What determines the takeover time? An integrated model approach of driver takeover after automated driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 78, 212–221. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2015.02.023
  • Zeeb, K., Buchner, A., & Schrauf, M. (2016). Is takeover time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver takeover quality after conditionally automated driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 92, 230–239. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2016.04.002

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.