Announcing Automated Lane Changes: Active Vehicle Roll Motions as Feedback for the Driver

References

• Albert, M., Lange, A., Schmidt, A., Wimmer, M., & Bengler, K. (2015). Automated driving – assessment of interaction concepts under real driving conditions. In 6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2015) and the Affiliated Conferences, AHFE 2015 (pp. 2832–2839). Las Vegas, USA. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.767
   Google Scholar
• Bär, M. (2014). Vorausschauende Fahrwerkregelung zur Reduktion der auf die Insassen wirkenden Querbeschleunigung ( Doctoral thesis). RWTH Aachen.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, A., Rohlfs, M., Hammel, S., Saust, F., & Klauske, L. K. (2016). Lateral Guidance Assistance. In H. Winner, S. Hakuli, F. Lotz, & C. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of driver assistance systems (pp. 1207–1233). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Beggiato, M., Witzlack, C., & Krems, J. F. (2017). Gap acceptance and time-to- arrival estimates as basis for informal communication between pedestrians and vehicles. In S. Boll, B. Pfleging, & B. Donmez (Eds.), AutomotiveUI 2017 (pp. 50–57). New York, New York: As- sociation for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/3122986.3122995
   Google Scholar
• Beggiato, M., Hartwich, F., Schleinitz, K., Krems, J., Othersen, I., & Petermann- Stock, I. (2015). What would drivers like to know during automated driving? Information needs at different levels of automation. Tagung Fahrerassistenz. Retrieved from https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/node?id=1285216
   Google Scholar
• Boer, E. R., & Hoedemaeker, M. (1998). Modeling driver behavior with different degrees of automation: A hierarchical decision framework of interacting mental models. Human Decision Making and Manual Control, 63, 63–72.
   Google Scholar
• Bubb, H., Bengler, K., Breuninger, J., Gold, C., & Helmbrecht, M. (2015). Systemergonomie des Fahrzeugs. In H. Bubb, K. Bengler, R. E. Grünen, & M. Vollrath (Eds.), Automobilergonomie (pp. 259–344). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
   Google Scholar
• Carsten, O., Lai, F. C. H., Barnard, Y., Jamson, A. H., & Merat, N. (2012). Control task substitution in semi automated driving: does it matter what aspects are automated? Human Factors: the Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 54(5), 747–761. doi:10.1177/0018720812460246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. K., & Ji, Y. G. (2015). Investigating the importance of trust on adopting an autonomous vehicle. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(10), 692–702. doi:10.1080/10447318.2015.1070549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer, S., Lange, A., Bültjes, S., & Klohr, J. (2017). Design possibilities for vehicle roll motions as feedback for the driver during automated driving. In A. Löcken. et al. (Ed.), 9th international ACM conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications (pp. 152–157). Oldenburg, Germany. doi:10.1145/3131726.3131746
   Google Scholar
• Cramer, S., Miller, B., Siedersberger, K.-H., & Bengler, K. (2017). Perceive the difference: Vehicle pitch motions as feedback for the driver. In IEEE international conference on systems, Man, and cybernetics (pp. 1699–1704). Banff, Canada. doi: 10.1109/SMC.2017.8122860
   Google Scholar
• Cramer, S., Siedersberger, K.-H., & Bengler, K. (2017). Active vehicle pitch motions as feedback-channel for the driver during partially automated driving. In E. V. Uni-DAS (Ed.), 11. Workshop Fahrerassistenz und automatisiertes Fahren (pp. 74–83). Walting im Altmühltal, Germany: Uni-DAS e. V. Retrieved from http://www.uni-das.de/images/pdf/fas-workshop/2017/FAS2017Tagungsband.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Damböck, D., Weißgerber, T., Kienle, M., & Bengler, K. (2012). Evaluation of a contact analog head-up display for highly automated driving. In 4th International conference on applied human factors and ergonomics. San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors: the Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37(1), 32–64. doi:10.1518/001872095779049543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R., & Kiris, E. O. (1995). The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Human Factors: the Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37(2), 381–394. doi:10.1518/001872095779064555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (1998). European statement of principles on human machine interface for in-vehicle information and communication systems. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2012). Discovering statistics using SPSS: (and sex and drugs and rock’n’roll) (3 ed.). Los Angeles, USA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D. L., Lohrenz, M., Moore, D., Nadler, E. D., & Pollard, J. K. (2016). Humans and intelligent vehicles: The hope, the help, and the harm. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 1(1), 56–67. doi:10.1109/TIV.2016.2555626
   Google Scholar
• Flemisch, F. O., Bengler, K., Bubb, H., Winner, H., & Bruder, R. (2014). Towards cooperative guidance and control of highly automated vehicles: H-mode and conduct by wire. Ergonomics, 57(3), 343–360. doi:10.1080/00140139.2013.869355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasser, T. M., Seeck, A., & Smith, B. W. (2016). Framework conditions for the development of driver assistance systems. In H. Winner, S. Hakuli, F. Lotz, & C. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of driver assistance systems (pp. 35–68). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Gold, C., Damböck, D., Bengler, K., & Lorenz, L. (2013). Partially automated driving as a fallback level of high automation. In TÜV (Ed.). 6. Tagung Fahrerassistenz. Retrieved from https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/1187201
   Google Scholar
• Gold, C., Damböck, D., Lorenz, L., & Bengler, K. (2013). Take over! How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 57(1), 1938–1942. doi:10.1177/1541931213571433
   Google Scholar
• Gold, C., Happee, R., & Bengler, K. (2017). Modeling take-over performance in level 3 conditionally automated vehicles. Accident; Analysis and Prevention. doi:10.16/j.aap.2017.11.009
   Google Scholar
• Grondin, S. (2016). Psychology of Perception. New York, USA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, C., Stanton, N. A., Pickering, C. A., McDonald, M., & Zheng, P. (2011). In- vehicle information systems to meet the needs of drivers. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 27(6), 505–522. doi:10.1080/10447318.2011.555296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heil, T., Lange, A., & Cramer, S. (2016). Adaptive and efficient lane change path planning for automated vehicles. In IEEE intelligent transportation systems society (Ed.), 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) (pp. 479–484). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• IBM Corp. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics for windows (version 24.0) ( Computer soft- ware). Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
   Google Scholar
• iMAR. (2012). Datenblatt iTraceRT- F400-E. Retrieved 08 January 2017, from http://imar-navigation.de/downloads/TraceRT-F400de.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Itoh, M., & Inagaki, T. (2004). A microworld approach to identifying issues of human- automation systems design for supporting operator’s situation awareness. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 17(1), 3–24. doi:10.1207/s15327590ijhc1701_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, J., Lund, A., & Wixon, D. (2011). The future of natural user interfaces. In D. Tan, S. Amershi, B. Begole, W. A. Kellogg, & M. Tungare (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems - CHI EA ‘11 (pp. 211). New York, USA: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1979742.1979527
   Google Scholar
• Kauffmann, N., Winkler, F., & Vollrath, M. (2018). What makes an automated vehicle a good driver? In R. Mandryk, M. Hancock, M. Perry, & A. Cox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems - CHI ‘18 (pp. 1–9). New York, USA: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/3173574.3173742
   Google Scholar
• Knoll, P. M. (2016). Information Visualization for DAS. In H. Winner, S. Hakuli, F. Lotz, & C. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of driver assistance systems (pp. 829–856). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Kondzior, M. (n.d.). Akzeptanzskala Methode zur Erfassung der Akzeptanz eines Systems. Retrieved 07 May 2017, from http://www.hfes-europeorg/accept/acceptde.htm
   Google Scholar
• König, W. (2016). Guidelines for user-centered development of DAS. In H. Winner, S. Hakuli, F. Lotz, & C. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of driver assistance systems (pp. 781–796). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Körber, M., Baseler, E., & Bengler, K. (2018). Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving. Applied Ergonomics, 66, 18–31. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2017.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, A., Albert, M., Siedersberger, K.-H., & Bengler, K. (2015). Ergonomic design of the vehicle motion in an automated driving car. In 6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2015) and the Affiliated Conferences, AHFE 2015 (pp. 2761–2768). Las Vegas, USA. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.710
   Google Scholar
• Lange, A., Maas, M., Albert, M., Siedersberger, K.-H., & Bengler, K. (2014). Automatisiertes Fahren - So komfortabel wie möglich, so dynamisch wie nötig. In VDI Wissensforum GmbH (Ed.), 30. VDI-VW-Gemeinschaftstagung Fahrerassistenz und Integrierte Sicherheit (pp. 215–228). Düsseldorf, Germany: VDI Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lavrakas, P. (2008). Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Thousand Oaks CA, USA: Sage Publications, Inc. doi:10.4135/9781412963947
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. C., Hwangbo, H., & Ji, Y. G. (2016). Perceived visual complexity of in-vehicle information display and its effects on glance behavior and preferences. International Journal of Human-computer Interaction, 32(8), 654–664. doi:10.1080/10447318.2016.1184546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löcken, A., Heuten, W., & Boll, S. (2016). AutoAmbiCar. In P. Green, B. Pfleging, A. L. Kun, Y. Liang, A. Meschtscherjakov, & P. Fröhlich (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications adjunct - automotive’UI 16 (pp. 57–62). New York, USA: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/3004323.3004329
   Google Scholar
• Lüke, S., Fochler, O., Schaller, T., & Regensburger, U. (2016). Traffic jam assistance and automation. In H. Winner, S. Hakuli, F. Lotz, & C. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of driver assistance systems (pp. 1287–1302). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Merat, N., Jamson, A. H., Lai, F. C. H., & Carsten, O. (2012). Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state. Human Factors: the Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 54(5), 762–771. doi:10.1177/0018720812442087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, C., Siedersberger, K.-H., Färber, B., & Popp, M. (2017). Active roll motion as feedback for decoupled steering interventions in Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS). Forschung im Ingenieurwesen, 81(1), 41–55. doi:10.1007/s10010-017-0212-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Münster, M., Mair, U., Gilsdorf, H.-J., Thomä, A., Müller, C., Hippe, M., & Hoffmann, J. (2009). Electromechanical active body control. ATZ Worldwide, 111(9), 44–48.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (1990). The ‘problem’ with automation: Inappropriate feedback and interaction, not ‘over-automation’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B.
   Google Scholar
• Normark, C. J. (2015). Design and evaluation of a touch-based personalizable in-vehicle user interface. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(11), 731–745. doi:10.1080/10447318.2015.1045240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Othersen, I. (2016). Vom Fahrer zum Denker und Teilzeitlenker: Einflussfaktoren und Gestaltungsmerkmale nutzerorientierter Interaktionskonzepte für dieü berwachungsaufgabe des Fahrers im teilautomatisierten Modus ( Doctoral thesis, Technische Universita¨t Braunschweig). doi: 10.1007/978-3-658-15087-7
   Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors: the Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 39(2), 230–253. doi:10.1518/001872097778543886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., & Wickens, C. D. (2008). Humans: Still vital after all these years of automation. Human Factors: the Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 50(3), 511–520. doi:10.1518/001872008X312198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petermeijer, S. M., Abbink, D. A., & de Winter, J. C. F. (2015). Should drivers be operating within an automation-free bandwidth? Evaluating haptic steering support systems with different levels of authority. Human Factors: the Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 57(1), 5–20. doi:10.1177/0018720814563602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petermeijer, S. M., Cieler, S., & de Winter, J. C. F. (2017). Comparing spatially static and dynamic vibrotactile take-over requests in the driver seat. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 99(Pt A), 218–227. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2016.12.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pfannmüller, L., Kramer, M., Senner, B., & Bengler, K. (2015). A comparison of display concepts for a navigation system in an automotive contact analog head-up dis- play. In 6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2015) and the Affiliated Conferences, AHFE 2015 (pp. 2722–2729). Las Vegas, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Rhiu, I., Kwon, S., Bahn, S., Yun, M. H., & Yu, W. (2015). Research issues in smart vehicles and elderly drivers: A literature review. International Journal of Human- Computer Interaction, 31(10), 635–666. doi:10.1080/10447318.2015.1070540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAE. (2016). Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles (2016-09 ed.) (No. J3016).
   Google Scholar
• Saffarian, M., de Winter, J. C. F., & Happee, R. (2012). Automated driving: Human-factors issues and design solutions. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 56(1), 2296–2300. doi:10.1177/1071181312561483
   Google Scholar
• Sarter, N. B., & Woods, D. D. (1995). How in the world did we ever get into that mode? Mode error and awareness in supervisory control. Human Factors, 37(1), 5–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivak, M., & Schoettle, B. (2015). Motion sickness in self-driving vehicles: UMTRI- 2015-12 (Bericht). Ann Arbor, USA: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• The MathWorks, Inc. (2015). MATLAB R2015b ( [Computer software]). Natick, Massachusetts, Unites States: The MathWorks, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Beukel, A. P., van der Voort, M. C., & Eger, A. O. (2016). Supporting the changing driver’s task: Exploration of interface designs for supervision and intervention in automated driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 43, 279–301. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2016.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Laan, J. D., Heino, A., & de Waard, D. (1997). A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of advanced transport telematics. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 5(1), 1–10. doi:10.1016/S0968-090X(96)00025-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, J., & Wu, C. (2017). The effects of vibration patterns of take-over request and non-driving tasks on taking- over control of automated vehicles. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 41(1), 1–12. doi:10.1080/10447318.2017.1404778
   Google Scholar
• Warm, J. S., Dember, W. N., & Hancock, P. A. (1996). Vigilance and workload in automated systems. In R. Parasuraman & M. Mouloua (Eds.), Human factors in transportation. Automation and human performance: Theory and applications (pp. 183–200). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., Hollands, J. G., & Parasuraman, R. (ed.). (2013). Engineering psychology and human performance (4). London, New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Wigdor, D., & Wixon, D. (2011). Brave NUI world: Designing natural user interfaces for touch and gesture. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Morgan Kaufmann/Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Winner, H., & Schopper, M. (2016). Adaptive cruise control. In H. Winner, S. Hakuli, F. Lotz, & C. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of driver assistance systems (pp. 1093–1148). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, I. (2016). The interaction between humans and autonomous agents. In M. Maurer, J. C. Gerdes, B. Lenz, & H. Winner (Eds.), Autonomous driving (pp. 103–124). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Open.
   Google Scholar