Investigating the Combination of Adaptive UIs and Adaptable UIs for Improving Usability and User Performance of Complex UIs

References

• Albers, M., & Still, B. (2010). Usability of complex information systems: Evaluation of user interaction. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allanic, M., Durupt, A., Joliot, M., Eynard, B., & Boutinaud, P. (2014). Towards a data model for plm application in bio-medical imaging. In 10th international symposium on tools and methods of competitive engineering (tmce 2014) (Vol.2, pp. 365–376). The Hague, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Omar, K., & Rigas, D. (2009). Comparison of adaptive, adaptable and mixed-initiative menus. In Cyberworlds, 2009. cw’09. international conference on (pp. 292–297). Bradford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Alotaibi, M. B. (2013). Adaptable and adaptive e-commerce interfaces: An empirical investigation of user acceptance. Journal of Computers, 8(8), 1923–1933. doi:10.4304/jcp.8.8.1923-1933
   Google Scholar
• Alpert, S. R., Karat, J., Karat, C.-M., Brodie, C., & Vergo, J. G. (2003). User attitudes regarding a user-adaptive ecommerce web site. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 13(4), 373–396. doi:10.1023/A:1026201108015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, N. R., Scerbo, M. W., Freeman, F. G., Mikulka, P. J., & Scott, L. A. (2006). Comparison of a brain-based adaptive system and a manual adaptable system for invoking automation. Human Factors: the Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 48(4), 693–709. doi:10.1518/001872006779166280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bihanic, D., & Polacsek, T. (2012). Models for visualisation of complex information systems. In Information visualisation (iv), 2012 16th international conference on (pp. 130–135). Montpellier, France. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-11-11-0999-PDN
   Google Scholar
• Blom, J. (2000). Personalization: A taxonomy. In CHI’00 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 313–314). Hague, Netherlands: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Bunt, A., Conati, C., & McGrenere, J. (2007). Supporting interface customization using a mixed-initiative approach. Proceedings of the 12th international conference on intelligent user interfaces (pp. 92–101). Honolulu, Hawaii. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-91-4-0467B
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, B., & Mocko, G. M. (2008). Product data management in undergraduate education. Asme 2008 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference (pp. 433–441). Brooklyn, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Cerny, T., & Donahoo, M. J. (2015). On separation of platform-independent particles in user interfaces. Cluster Computing, 18(3), 1215–1228. doi:10.1007/s10586-015-0471-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran, W. G., & Cox, G. M. (1957). Experimental designs. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, A., Reimann, R., Cronin, D., & Noessel, C. (2014). About face: The essentials of interaction design. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Coskun, E., & Grabowski, M. (2005). Impacts of user interface complexity on user acceptance and performance in safety-critical systems. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 2(1), 1–29. doi:10.2202/1547-7355.1109
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J., Tierney, A., & Chang, E. (2005). A user adaptable user interface model to support ubiquitous user access to eis style applications. Computer software and applications conference, 2005. compsac 2005. 29th annual international (Vol.1, pp. 351–358). Edinburgh, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, L., Ball, A., Matthews, J., McMahon, C. A., & Patel, M. (2007). Product representation in lightweight formats for product lifecycle management (plm). 4th international conference on digital enterprise technology. Bath, UK. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-91-4-0467B
   Google Scholar
• Fan, H., & Poole, M. S. (2006). What is personalization? perspectives on the design and implementation of personalization in information systems. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 16(3–4), 179–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigh, K. M., Dorneich, M. C., & Hayes, C. C. (2012). Toward a characterization of adaptive systems: A framework for researchers and system designers. Human Factors: the Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 54(6), 1008–1024. doi:10.1177/0018720812443983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findlater, L., & McGrenere, J. (2004). A comparison of static, adaptive, and adaptable menus. Proceedings of the sigchi conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 89–96). Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Gajos, K. Z., Czerwinski, M., Tan, D. S., & Weld, D. S. (2006). Exploring the design space for adaptive graphical user interfaces. Proceedings of the working conference on advanced visual interfaces (pp. 201–208). Venezia, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, J., Aziz, H., Maropoulos, P., & Cheung, W. (2003). Application of product data management technologies for enterprise integration. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 16(7–8), 491–500. doi:10.1080/0951192031000115813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, J. H., & Wichansky, A. M. (2003). Eye tracking in usability evaluation: A practitioner’s guide. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach & H. Deubel (Eds.), The Mind’s Eye (pp. 493–516). North Holland, Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Gong, Q., & Salvendy, G. (1995). An approach to the design of a skill adaptive interface. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 7(4), 365–383. doi:10.1080/10447319509526131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamade, R. F., Ammouri, A., & Artail, H. (2012). Toward predicting the performance of novice cad users based on their profiled technical attributes. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 25(3), 628–639. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2012.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamade, R. F., Artail, H. A., & Jaber, M. Y. (2007). Evaluating the learning process of mechanical cad students. Computers & Education, 49(3), 640–661. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höök, K. (1998). Evaluating the utility and usability of an adaptive hypermedia system. Knowledge-Based Systems, 10(5), 311–319. doi:10.1016/S0950-7051(97)00034-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höök, K. (2000). Steps to take before intelligent user interfaces become real. Interacting with Computers, 12(4), 409–426. doi:10.1016/S0953-5438(99)00006-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, S. E. (1994). User interface specification using an enhanced spreadsheet model. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 13(3), 209–239. doi:10.1145/195784.195787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui, S. L. T., & See, S. L. (2015). Enhancing user experience through customisation of ui design. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 1932–1937. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.237
   Google Scholar
• Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Sokolov, B. (2012). Applicability of optimal control theory to adaptive supply chain planning and scheduling. Annual Reviews in Control, 36(1), 73–84. doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2012.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, R. J., & Karn, K. S. (2003). Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: Ready to deliver the promises. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach & H. Deubel (Eds.), The Mind’s Eye (pp. 573–605). North Holland, Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, A. D. (2009). Understanding and dealing with usability side effects of intelligent processing. AI Magazine, 30(4), 23. doi:10.1609/aimag.v30i4.2274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao, J., & Tseng, M. M. (2004). Customizability analysis in design for mass customization. Computer-Aided Design, 36(8), 745–757. doi:10.1016/j.cad.2003.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao, J., Tseng, M. M., Duffy, V. G., & Lin, F. (1998). Product family modeling for mass customization. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 35(3–4), 495–498. doi:10.1016/S0360-8352(98)00142-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennard, R., & Leaney, J. (2010). Towards a general purpose architecture for ui generation. Journal of Systems and Software, 83(10), 1896–1906. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2010.05.079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolski, C., & Le Strugeon, E. (1998). A review of intelligent human-machine interfaces in the light of the arch model. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 10(3), 193–231. doi:10.1207/s15327590ijhc1003_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, J., Noronha, S., & Vergo, J. (2000). A user-centered design approach to personalization. Communications of the ACM, 43(8), 44–48. doi:10.1145/345124.345139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonidis, A., Antona, M., & Stephanidis, C. (2012). Rapid prototyping of adaptable user interfaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28(4), 213–235. doi:10.1080/10447318.2011.581891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, D. T., & Xu, X. W. (2001). A review of web-based product data management systems. Computers in Industry, 44(3), 251–262. doi:10.1016/S0166-3615(01)00072-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, X., & Wan, J. (2007). Model driven development of complex user interface. In Workshop on model driven development of advanced user interfaces (pp. 1–4). Nashville, TN. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-91-4-0467B
   Google Scholar
• Lund, A. M. (2001). Measuring usability with the use questionnaire. Usability Interface, 8(2), 3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Makris, N. (2016). Creating adaptable and adaptive user interface implementations in model driven developed software (Master Thesis). Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Maranzana, N., Segonds, F., Lesage, F., & Nelson, J. (2012). Collaborative design tools: A comparison between free software and plm solutions in engineering education. Ifip international conference on product lifecycle management (pp. 547–558). Berlin, Heidelberg. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-11-11-0999-PDN
   Google Scholar
• Marsic, I., & Dorohonceanu, B. (2003). Flexible user interfaces for group collaboration. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 15(3), 337–360. doi:10.1207/S15327590IJHC1503_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrenere, J., Baecker, R. M., & Booth, K. S. (2002). An evaluation of a multiple interface design solution for bloated software. Proceedings of the sigchi conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 164–170). Minneapolis, MN.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J., & Shneiderman, B. (1989). Dynamic versus static menus: An exploratory comparison. Acm SigCHI Bulletin, 20(4), 33–37. doi:10.1145/67243
   Google Scholar
• Müsseler, J. (1994). Using predictors to partition menu selection times. Behaviour & Information Technology, 13(6), 362–372. doi:10.1080/01449299408914617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, M. I., Mochon, D., & Ariely, D. (2011). The’ikea effect’: When labor leads to love. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 453–460. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2011.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppermann, R. (1994). Adaptive user support: Ergonomic design of manually and automatically adaptable software. Routledge, NY: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Park, B., Song, S., Kim, J., Park, W., & Jang, H. (2007). User customization methods based on mental models: modular UI optimized for customizing in handheld device. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 445–451). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J., & Han, S. H. (2011). Complementary menus: Combining adaptable and adaptive approaches for menu interface. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 41(3), 305–316. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2011.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partarakis, N., Antona, M., Zidianakis, E., & Stephanidis, C. (2016). Adaptation and content personalization in the context of multi user museum exhibits. In Workshop on advanced visual interfaces for cultural heritage (pp. 5–10). Bari, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Pascal, C., Blanchet, C., & Ollivier, J.-M. (2007). The value of modern decision-making support services to fusion projects. Fusion Engineering and Design, 82(15–24), 2713–2721. doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2007.06.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philpotts, M. (1996). An introduction to the concepts, benefits and terminology of product data management. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 96(4), 11–17. doi:10.1108/02635579610117467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pleuss, A., Botterweck, G., & Dhungana, D. (2010). Integrating automated product derivation and individual user interface design. In Fourth International Workshop on Variability Modelling of Software-Intensive Systems (pp. 69–76). Pohang, South Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Poole, A., & Ball, L. J. (2006). Eye tracking in hci and usability research. In C. Ghaoui (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human computer interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 211–219). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Qu, Q. X., Zhang, L., Chao, W. Y., & Duffy, V. (2017). User experience design based on eye-tracking technology: a case study on smartphone apps. In Duffy V. (Ed.), Advances in Applied Digital Human Modeling and Simulation. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 481, pp. 303–315). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Qu, Q.-X., Guo, F., & Duffy, V. G. (2017). Effective use of human physiological metrics to evaluate website usability: An empirical investigation from china. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 69(4), 370–388. doi:10.1108/AJIM-09-2016-0155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinecke, K., & Bernstein, A. (2011). Improving performance, perceived usability, and aesthetics with culturally adaptive user interfaces. Acm Transactions On Computer-Human Interaction (Tochi), 18(1–29), 8. doi:10.1145/1970378.1970382
   Google Scholar
• Ristic, S., Rakic-Skokovic, M., & Ali, A.-D. (2011). An overview of the approaches for a plm application’s customization. Xv international scientific conference on industrial systems (is’11) (pp. 14–16). Novi Sad, Serbia.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera, D. (2005). The effect of content customization on learnability and perceived workload. In Chi’05 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1749–1752). Portland, OR.
   Google Scholar
• Rosén, J. (2006). Federated through-life support, enabling online integration of systems within the plm domain. In proceedings of the 1st nordic conference on product lifecycle management. Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider-Hufschmidt, M., Malinowski, U., & Kuhme, T. (1993). Adaptive user interfaces: Principles and practice. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, C., & Dubey, S. K. (2014). Analysis of eye tracking techniques in usability and hci perspective. In Computing for sustainable global development (indiacom), 2014 international conference on (pp. 607–612). New Delhi, India.
   Google Scholar
• Stark J. (2015) Product Lifecycle Management. In Product Lifecycle Management (Vol. 1). Decision Engineering. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., & Marathe, S. S. (2010). Personalization versus customization: The importance of agency, privacy, and power usage. Human Communication Research, 36(3), 298–322. doi:10.1111/hcre.2010.36.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsandilas, T., & Schraefel, M. C. (2005, April). An empirical assessment of adaptation techniques. In CHI'05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2009–2012). Portland, OR: ACM
   Google Scholar
• Van Velsen, L., Van Der Geest, T., Klaassen, R., & Steehouder, M. (2008). User-centered evaluation of adaptive and adaptable systems: A literature review. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 23(3), 261–281. doi:10.1017/S0269888908001379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicente, K. J. (2002). Ecological interface design: Progress and challenges. Human Factors: the Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 44(1), 62–78. doi:10.1518/0018720024494829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Qu, Q.-X., Chao, W.-Y., & Duffy, V. G. (2017). Object-oriented user interface customization: Reduce complexity and improve usability and adaptation. In International conference on digital human modeling and applications in health, safety, ergonomics and risk management (pp. 404–417). Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar