The Role of HCI in the Age of AI

References

• Anscombe, G. E. M. (1957). Intention. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boden, M. A. (1977). Artificial intelligence and natural man. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Boden, M. A. (2016). AI: Its nature and future. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K. (1945). A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley, USA: University of California Press. (reprinted 1969).
   Google Scholar
• Carr, N. (2015). The glass cage: Who needs humans anyway? London, England: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Caruana, R., Lou, Y., Gehrke, J., Koch, P., Sturm, M., & Elhadad, N. (2015). Intelligible models for healthcare: Predicting pneumonia risk and hospital 30 day re-admission. Proc. 12th ACM International conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, (pp 1721–1730). Beijing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness explained. London: The Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farooq, U., & Grudin, J. (2016). Human computer integrations: Implications for design as we enter a new phase in our relationship with technology. ACM Interactions, 23(6), 26–32. doi:10.1145/3012754
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, B., & Flaxman, F. (2017). European union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a “right to explanation”. ICML Workshop on Human Interpretability in Machine Learning, 1606.08813(v3), arXiv, 38.
   Google Scholar
• Grudin, J. (2009). AI and HCI: Two fields divided by a common focus. AI Magazine, 30(4), 48. doi:10.1609/aimag.v30i4.2271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grudin, J. (2017). From tool to partner: The evolution of human-computer interaction. New York, USA: Morgan Claypool.
   Google Scholar
• Grudin, J. (2018). Bridging HCI communities. Interactions, 25(5), 50–53. doi:10.1145/3271652
   Google Scholar
• Guidotti, R., Moreale, A., Ruggieri, S., Turnini, F., Pedreschi, D., & Giannotti, F. (2019). A survey of black box methods. ACM Computing Surveys, 51, 5 January. Article 93, 2–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, R., Banks, R., Gosset, P., Lindley, S., Thereska, E., & Smyth, G. (Forthcoming). Breaching the PC data store: What do graphs tell us about files? (A. Chamberlain, Ed). Springer, London: Research in the Wild.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, R., & Mentis, H. (2013). The mocking gaze: ‘You are a poor controller!’. CSCW2013, San Antonio, Texas: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, R., Palen, L., & Taylor, A. (Eds). (2005). The inside text: Social perspectives on SMS. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, R., Randall, D., & Rouncefield, M. (2005). Fieldwork and ethnography in design - The state of play from the CSCW perspective. Proceedings of EPIC, American Anthropology Association, Redmond, USA (pp. 81–100).
   Google Scholar
• Harper, R., Randall, D., & Sharrock, W. (2016). Choice. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, R., Thereska, E., Lindley, S., Banks, R., Gosset, P., Odom, W., & Smyth, G., (2013). What is a file? CSCW13 ACM Press, San Antonio, Texas, USA; also published as Microsoft Technical Report MSR-TR-2011-109.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, R. H. R. (1998). Inside the IMF: An ethnography of documents, technology and organisational action. London & San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, R. H. R. (2010). Texture: Human expression in the age of communications overload. London and Boston, USA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heehs, P. (2013). Writing the self: Diaries, memoirs, and the history of the self. London, England: Bloomsbury, London.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrant, M. (2006a). Profiling: From data to knowledge. Datenschutz Und Datensicherheit, 30(6),548–552.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrant, M. (2015). Smart technologies and the ends of law. London, England: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Husain, A. (2017). The sentient machine: The coming age of artificial intelligence. London, England: Souvenir Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. (2004). Soft machines: Nanotechnology and life. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, J. (2015). Humans need not apply: A guide to health and work in the age of artificial intelligence. New Haven, USA: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, J. (2016). Artificial intelligence: What everyone needs to know. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitano, H. (2016) Artificial intelligence to win the Nobel Prize, AI Magazine, Spring, pp39–49. Doi:10.1609/aimag.v37i1.2642
   Google Scholar
• Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near. London, England: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, X. (2018). Towards human-engaged AI. In IJCAI (pp. 5682–5686).
   Google Scholar
• Markoff, J. (2015). Machines of loving grace. New York, USA: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Miller. (2019). Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences. Artificial Intelligence, 267, 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Neyland, D. (2019). The everyday life of an algorithm. London, England: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hara, K., Harper, R., Mentis, H., Sellen, A., & Taylor, A. (2013). On the naturalness of touch: Putting the “interaction” back into NUI, ToCHI, ACM transactions on human computer interactions special issue. Embodied Interactions’, 20(1), March, Article No. 5.
   Google Scholar
• Odom, W., Harper, R., Sellen, A., & Thereska, E. (2012) Lost in translation: Understanding the possession of digital things in the cloud. In Proc. CHI 2012, ACM Press, Austin, Texas, USA. (pp. 781–790).
   Google Scholar
• Randall, D., Harper, R., & Rouncefield, M. (2007). Fieldwork for design: Theory and practice. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Ren, X. (2016). Rethinking the relationship between humans and computers. IEEE Computer, 49(8), 104–108. doi:10.1109/MC.2016.253
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016) Why should I trust you? Explaining the predictions of any classifier. Proc. ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA USA .
   Google Scholar
• Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2017). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. Pearson, Boston, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, M., & Regan, N. (2019). Game changer: AlphaZero’s groundbreaking chess strategies and the promise of AI. Amsterdam, Netherlands: New Chess Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Selbst, A., & Barocas, S. (2018). The intuitive appeal of explainable machines (Fordham Law Review 1085).
   Google Scholar
• Selbst, A., Boyd, D., Friedler, S., Venkatasubramanain, S., & Vertesi, J. (2019). Fairness and abstraction in socio-technical systems. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, New York, USA (pp 59–68). Doi:10.1177/1753193418803521
   Google Scholar
• Shanker, S. (1998). Wittgenstein’s remarks on the foundations of AI. London, England: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. C. (1982). The star interface: An overview. In R. Brown & H. Morgan (Eds.), AFIPS’82 (pp. 515–552).
   Google Scholar
• Stanford University. (2016). Artificial Intelligence and life in 2030. https://ai100.Stanford.edu
   Google Scholar
• Stanislaw, U. (1958). Tribute to John Van Neumann. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 64(3), part 2: 5.
   Google Scholar
• Thereska, E., & Harper, R., (2012). Multi-structured redundancy. In HotStorage’12: the 4th Workshop on Hot Topics in Storage and File Systems, Boston: Usenix. June.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. (1953/2009), Philosophical investigations, 4th edition, tr. G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker, & J. Schulte. Eds. Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar