Takeover Transition in Autonomous Vehicles: A YouTube Study

References

• Asghar, M. Z., Ahmad, S., Marwat, A., & Kundi, F. M. (2015). Sentiment analysis on YouTube: A brief survey. MAGNT Research Report, 3(1), 1250–1257.
   Google Scholar
• Bainbridge, L. (1983). Ironies of automation. Automatica, 19, 775–779. doi:10.1016/0005-1098(83)90046-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazilinskyy, P., & de Winter, J. (2015). Auditory interfaces in automated driving: An international survey. PeerJ Computer Science, 1, e13. doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.13
   Google Scholar
• Borojeni, S. S., Meschtscherjakov, A., Mirnig, A. G., Boll, S., Naujoks, F., Politis, I., & Alverez, I. (2017). Control transition workshop: Handover and takeover procedures in highly automated driving. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications Adjunct, Oldenburg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Borojeni, S. S., Wallbaum, T., Heuten, W., & Boll, S. (2017). Comparing shape-changing and vibro-tactile steering wheels for take-over requests in highly automated driving. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Oldenburg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, B., & Laurier, E. (2017). The trouble with autopilots: Assisted and autonomous driving on the social road. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Denver, Colorado, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Casner, S. M., Hutchins, E. L., & Norman, D. (2016). The challenges of partially automated driving. Communications of the ACM, 59(5), 70–77. doi:10.1145/2830565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., & Xie, J. (2008). Online consumer review: Word-of-mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix. Management Science, 54(3), 477–491. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1070.0810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H., & Feng, J. (2015). Semi-autonomous vehicles: Examining driver performance during the take-over. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 59(1), 781–785. doi:10.1177/1541931215591241
   Google Scholar
• de Waard, D., van der Hulst, M., Hoedemaeker, M., & Brookhuis, K. A. (1999). Driver behavior in an emergency situation in the automated highway system. Transportation Human Factors, 1(1), 67–82. doi:10.1207/sthf0101_7
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, A., & Stanton, N. A. (2017). Takeover time in highly automated vehicles: Noncritical transitions to and from manual control. Human Factors, 59(4), 689–705. doi:10.1177/0018720816685832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold, C., Damböck, D., Lorenz, L., & Bengler, K. (2013). “Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 57(1), 1938–1942. doi:10.1177/1541931213571433
   Google Scholar
• Gold, C., Happee, R., & Bengler, K. (2017). Modeling take-over performance in level 3 conditionally automated vehicles. Accident Analysis & Prevention. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2017.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold, C., Körber, M., Lechner, D., & Bengler, K. (2016). Taking over control from highly automated vehicles in complex traffic situations: The role of traffic density. Human Factors, 58(4), 642–652. doi:10.1177/0018720816634226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hock, P., Kraus, J., Walch, M., Lang, N., & Baumann, M. (2016). Elaborating feedback strategies for maintaining automation in highly automated driving. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, D., & Dai, D. (2014). Public perceptions of self-driving cars: The case of Berkeley, California. Paper presented at the 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Hutto, C. J., & Gilbert, E. E. (2014). VADER: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. Paper presented at the Eighth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Ann Arbor, MI.
   Google Scholar
• ISO14198. (2012). Road vehicles - Ergonomic aspects of transport information and control systems - Calibration tasks for methods which assess driver demand due to the use of in-vehicle systems. In ISO/TS 14198:2012(en). Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
   Google Scholar
• Joulin, A., Grave, E., Bojanowski, P., & Mikolov, T. (2017). Bag of tricks for efficient text classification. Paper presented at the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Valencia, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Körber, M., Prasch, L., & Bengler, K. (2018). Why do i have to drive now? Post hoc explanations of takeover requests. Human Factors, 60(3), 305–323. doi:10.1177/0018720817747730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuehn, M., Vogelpohl, T., & Vollrath, M. (2017). Takeover times in highly automated driving (level 3). Paper presented at the 25th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Detroit, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46(1), 50–80. doi:10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, L., Kerschbaum, P., & Schumann, J. (2014). Designing take over scenarios for automated driving:How does augmented reality support the driver to get back into the loop? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 58(1), 1681–1685. doi:10.1177/1541931214581351
   Google Scholar
• McCall, R., McGee, F., Meschtscherjakov, A., Louveton, N., & Engel, T. (2016). Towards a taxonomy of autonomous vehicle handover situations. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Melcher, V., Rauh, S., Diederichs, F., Widlroither, H., & Bauer, W. (2015). Take-over requests for automated driving. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 2867–2873. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.788
   Google Scholar
• Merat, N., Jamson, A. H., Lai, F. C. H., & Carsten, O. (2012). Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state. Human Factors, 54(5), 762–771. doi:10.1177/0018720812442087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mok, B., Johns, M., Lee, K. J., Miller, D., Sirkin, D., Ive, P., & Ju, W. (2015, September 15–18). Emergency, automation off: Unstructured transition timing for distracted drivers of automated vehicles. Paper presented at the 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Mok, B., Johns, M., Miller, D., & Ju, W. (2017). Tunneled in: Drivers with active secondary tasks need more time to transition from automation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Denver, Colorado, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Mok, B. K. J., Johns, M., Lee, K. J., Ive, H. P., Miller, D., & Ju, W. (2015, June 28–July 1). Timing of unstructured transitions of control in automated driving. Paper presented at the 2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Seoul, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Naujoks, F., Mai, C., & Neukum, A. (2014). The effect of urgency of take-over requests during highly automated driving under distraction conditions. Paper presented at the 5th international conference on applied human factors and ergonomics, Kraków, Poland.
   Google Scholar
• Petermeijer, S., Bazilinskyy, P., Bengler, K., & de Winter, J. (2017). Take-over again: Investigating multimodal and directional TORs to get the driver back into the loop. Applied Ergonomics, 62, 204–215. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2017.02.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petermeijer, S. M., Hornberger, P., Ganotis, I., de Winter, J. C. F., & Bengler, K. J. (2017). The design of a vibrotactile seat for conveying take-over requests in automated driving. Paper presented at the International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Cham, Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Politis, I., Brewster, S., & Pollick, F. (2015). Language-based multimodal displays for the handover of control in autonomous cars. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Politis, I., Langdon, P., Adebayo, D., Bradley, M., Clarkson, P. J., Skrypchuk, L., … Stanton, N. (2018). An evaluation of inclusive dialogue-based interfaces for the takeover of control in autonomous cars. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Tokyo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Radlmayr, J., Gold, C., Lorenz, L., Farid, M., & Bengler, K. (2014). How traffic situations and non-driving related tasks affect the take-over quality in highly automated driving. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 58(1), 2063–2067. doi:10.1177/1541931214581434
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, B., Mehler, B., Wang, Y., & Coughlin, J. F. (2010). The impact of systematic variation of cognitive demand on drivers’ visual attention across multiple age groups. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 54(24), 2052–2055. doi:10.1177/154193121005402407
   Google Scholar
• SAE. (2016). SAE on-road automated vehicle standards committee taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems. Technical Report J3016_201609, SAE International. Warrendale, PA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Siersdorfer, S., Chelaru, S., Nejdl, W., & Pedro, J. S. (2010). How useful are your comments? Analyzing and predicting youtube comments and comment ratings. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (Chap. 17,pp. 273–285). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Uryupina, O., Plank, B., Severyn, A., Rotondi, A., & Moschitti, A. (2014). SenTube: A corpus for sentiment analysis on YouTube social media. Paper presented at the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Reykjavik, Iceland.
   Google Scholar
• Vogelpohl, T., Kühn, M., Hummel, T., & Vollrath, M. (2018). Asleep at the automated wheel—Sleepiness and fatigue during highly automated driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, J., & Wu, C. (2017). The effects of vibration patterns of take-over request and non-driving tasks on taking-over control of automated vehicles. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–12. doi:10.1080/10447318.2017.1404778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wandtner, B., Schömig, N., & Schmidt, G. (2018). Effects of non-driving related task modalities on takeover performance in highly automated driving. Human Factors, 60(6), 870–881. doi:10.1177/0018720818768199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberger, K., Dasgupta, A., Langford, J., Smola, A., & Attenberg, J. (2009). Feature hashing for large scale multitask learning. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Wiedemann, K., Naujoks, F., Wörle, J., Kenntner-Mabiala, R., Kaussner, Y., & Neukum, A. (2018). Effect of different alcohol levels on take-over performance in conditionally automated driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 115, 89–97. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, T. J., Agrawal, R., Samuel, S., Wang, Y., Zilberstein, S., & Fisher, D. L. (2017). Effects of alert cue specificity on situation awareness in transfer of control in level 3 automation. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2663, 27–33. doi:10.3141/2663-04
   Google Scholar
• Yang, X. J., Unhelkar, V. V., Li, K., & Shah, J. A. (2017). Evaluating effects of user experience and system transparency on trust in automation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar