594
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A Cross-organizational Ecology for Virtual Communities of Practice in Higher Education

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Abras, C., Maloney-Krichmar, D., & Preece, J. (2004). User-centered design. Bainbridge, W. Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 37(4), 445–456.
  • Adobe Dreamweaver (Version 12). (2012). Adobe systems.
  • Albats, E. (2018). Facilitating university-industry collaboration with a multi-level stakeholder perspective (Research Series Number 798). Acta Universitatis Lappeenrantaensis.
  • Amin, A., & Roberts, J. (2008). Knowing in action: Beyond communities of practice. Research Policy, 37(2), 353–369. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.11.003
  • Baek, E.-O., Cagiltay, K., Boling, E., & Frick, T. (2008). User-centered design and development. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 1, 660–668.
  • Behance. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.behance.net/
  • Bhatnagar, T., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2017). Design thinking and creative problem solving for undergraduate engineering education in India: The need and relevance. International Conference on Research into Design (pp. 953–967). India: Springer.
  • Bloor, M. (2001). Focus groups in social research. Great Britain: Sage.
  • Boylan, M. (2010). Ecologies of participation in school classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(1), 61–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.08.005
  • Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., & Terry, G. (2019). Thematic Analysis. In P. Liamputtong (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in health social sciences (pp. 843–860). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_103
  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1176008
  • Brown, P. (2015). Communities of practice: A heuristic for workplace reflection in higher education. Rapport: the International Journal for Recording Achievement, Planning and Portfolios, 1, 180–197.
  • Buy Adobe Illustrator CC | Vector graphic design software. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.adobe.com/cy_en/products/illustrator.html
  • Buy Adobe Photoshop CC | Best photo, image, and design editing software. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.adobe.com/cy_en/products/photoshop.html
  • Carvalho, L., & Goodyear, P. (2014). Framing the analysis of learning network architectures. In L. Carvalho & P. Goodyear (Eds.), The architecture of productive learning networks (pp. 66–88). Routledge.
  • Cherry, E., & Latulipe, C. (2014). Quantifying the creativity support of digital tools through the creativity support index. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 21(4), 21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/2617588
  • Chi, M. T. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271–315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0603_1
  • Clarke, L. (2009). The POD model: Using communities of practice theory to conceptualise student teachers’ professional learning online. Computers & Education, 52(3), 521–529. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.006
  • Conceptboard Virtual Collaboration Workplace for Teams. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://conceptboard.com/
  • Conte, T., Massollar, J., Mendes, E., & Travassos, G. H. (2007). Usability evaluation based on web design perspectives. First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007) (pp. 146–155). doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ESEM.2007.30
  • Crossouard, B., & Pryor, J. (2008). Becoming researchers: A sociocultural perspective on assessment, learning and the construction of identity in a professional doctorate. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 16(3), 221–237. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360802346614
  • Data Transfer Project. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://datatransferproject.dev
  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  • deChambeau, A. (2017). The practice of being a student: CoPs and graduate student success. Implementing Communities of Practice in Higher Education: Dreamers and Schemers, 395–422.
  • Dolmans, D., Michaelsen, L., Van Merrienboer, J., & van der Vleuten, C. (2015). Should we choose between problem-based learning and team-based learning? No, combine the best of both worlds! Medical Teacher, 37(4), 354–359. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.948828
  • Duch, B. J., Groh, S. E., & Allen, D. E. (2001). The power of problem-based learning: A practical” how to” for teaching undergraduate courses in any discipline. USA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.
  • Dym, C. L., Agogino, A., Eris, O., Frey, D., & Leifer, L. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education Washington, 94, 103–120. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x
  • Eggleton, K., Fortier, R., Fishman, T., Hawken, S. J., & Goodyear-Smith, F. (2019). Legitimate participation of medical students in community attachments. Education for Primary Care, 30(1), 35–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2018.1563503
  • Forghani, A., Venolia, G., & Inkpen, K. (2014). Media2gether: Sharing media during a call. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Supporting Group Work (pp. 142–151). Sanibel Island, FL: ACM.
  • G Suite: Collaboration & Productivity Apps for Business. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://gsuite.google.com/
  • Gabriel, A., Monticolo, D., Camargo, M., & Bourgault, M. (2016). Creativity support systems: A systematic mapping study. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 109–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.009
  • Goodyear, P., & Carvalho, L. (2016). Activity centred analysis and design in the evolution of learning networks. Tenth International Conference on Networked Learning. UK: Lancaster University Lancaster.
  • Google Drive Cloud Storage & File Backup for Photos, Docs & More. (n.d.). Retrieved from www.google.com/drive/
  • Gunawardena, C. N., Hermans, M. B., Sanchez, D., Richmond, C., Bohley, M., & Tuttle, R. (2009). A theoretical framework for building online communities of practice with social networking tools. Educational Media International, 46(1), 3–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980802588626
  • Gutwin, C., Greenberg, S., & Roseman, M. (1996). Workspace awareness in real-time distributed groupware: Framework, widgets, and evaluation. In People and computers XI (pp. 281–298). Springer.
  • Hafeez, K., Alghatas, F. M., Foroudi, P., Nguyen, B., & Gupta, S. (2019). Knowledge sharing by entrepreneurs in a virtual community of practice (VCoP). Information Technology & People, 32(2), 405–429. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-09-2016-0202
  • Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C., & Oliver, R. (2014). Authentic learning environments. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 401–412). Springer.
  • Huang, H.-C., & Perng, Y.-H. (2017). Factors influencing the success of communities of practice in the interior decoration industry. 2017 International Conference on Organizational Innovation (ICOI 2017). Netherlands: Atlantis Press.
  • Hypothesis – The Internet, peer reviewed. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://web.hypothes.is/
  • Ishii, H., & Kobayashi, M. (1992). ClearBoard: A seamless medium for shared drawing and conversation with eye contact. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’92 (pp. 525–532). doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/142750.142977
  • Iskanius, P., & Pohjola, I. (2016). Leveraging communities of practice in university-industry collaboration: A case study on Arctic research. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 10(2–3), 283–299. doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2016.074830
  • Ivascu, L., Cirjaliu, B., & Draghici, A. (2016). Business model for the university-industry collaboration in open innovation. Procedia Economics and Finance, 39, 674–678. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30288-X
  • Jeffs, L., McShane, J., Flintoft, V., White, P., Indar, A., Maione, M., … Scavuzzo, L. (2016). Contextualizing learning to improve care using collaborative communities of practices. BMC Health Services Research, 16(1), 464. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1566-4
  • Johnston, D. H. (2016). ‘Sitting alone in the staffroom contemplating my future’: Communities of practice, legitimate peripheral participation and student teachers’ experiences of problematic school placements as guests. Cambridge Journal of Education, 46(4), 533–551. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2015.1069793
  • Khalid, M. S., & Strange, M. H. (2016). School teacher professional development in online communities of practice: A systematic literature review. ECEL 2016: 15th European Conference on e-LearningEuropean Conference on e-Learning (pp. 605–614). Prague, Czech Republic: Academic Conferences and Publishing International.
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. USA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1999). Legitimate peripheral participation. In P. Murphy (Ed.), Learners, learning and assessment (pp. 83–89). London, UK: The Open University.
  • Lazar, J., Preece, J., Gasen, J., Winograd, T., & Winograd, T. (2002). New issues in teaching HCI: Pinning a tail on a moving donkey. CHI’02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 696–697). Minneapolis, MN: ACM.
  • Lombardi, M. M. (2007). Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overview. Educause Learning Initiative, 1(2007), 1–12.
  • Lowdermilk, T. (2013). User-centered design: A developer’s guide to building user-friendly applications. USA: O’Reilly Media, Inc.
  • Lowe, D., & Eklund, J. (2002). Client needs and the design process in web projects. Journal of Web Engineering, 1(1), 23–36.
  • Maranzana, N., Segonds, F., Lesage, F., & Nelson, J. (2012). Collaborative design tools: A comparison between free software and PLM solutions in engineering education. In L. Rivest, A. Bouras, & B. Louhichi (Eds.), Product lifecycle management. towards knowledge-rich enterprises (Vol. 388., pp. 547–558). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35758-9_49
  • Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (Vol. 41). USA: Sage publications.
  • McLoughlin, C., Patel, K. D., O’Callaghan, T., & Reeves, S. (2018). The use of virtual communities of practice to improve interprofessional collaboration and education: Findings from an integrated review. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 32(2), 136–142. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2018.1433135
  • Moodle Open-source learning platform | Moodle.org. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://moodle.org/
  • Morton, J. (2012). Communities of practice in higher education: A challenge from the discipline of architecture. Linguistics and Education, 23(1), 100–111. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2011.04.002
  • Mulgan, G., Townsley, O., & Price, A. (2016). The challenge-driven university: How real-life problems can fuel learning. In Nesta.
  • Nguyen, V., Dang, H. H., Do, N.-K., & Tran, D.-T. (2016). Enhancing team collaboration through integrating social interactions in a Web-based development environment. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 24(4), 529–545. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.v24.4
  • Norman, D. A. (1986). Cognitive engineering. User Centered System Design, 31, 61.
  • Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordance, conventions, and design. Interactions, 6(3), 38–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/301153.301168
  • Pattinson, S., & Preece, D. (2014). Communities of practice, knowledge acquisition and innovation: A case study of science-based SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(1), 107–120. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2013-0168
  • Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. In Book qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Pharo, E., Davison, A., McGregor, H., Warr, K., & Brown, P. (2014). Using communities of practice to enhance interdisciplinary teaching: Lessons from four Australian institutions. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(2), 341–354. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.832168
  • Poole, M. S., & Holmes, M. E. (1995). Decision development in computer-assisted group decision making. Human Communication Research, 22(1), 90–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.1995.22.issue-1
  • Prototypes, Specifications, and Diagrams in One Tool | Axure Software. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.axure.com/
  • Rauniar, R., Rawski, G., Yang, J., & Johnson, B. (2014). Technology acceptance model (TAM) and social media usage: An empirical study on Facebook. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 27(1), 6–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-04-2012-0011
  • Renaud, K., & Van Biljon, J. (2008). Predicting technology acceptance and adoption by the elderly: A qualitative study. Proceedings of the 2008 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on IT Research in Developing Countries: Riding the Wave of Technology (pp. 210–219). New York, NY: ACM.
  • Rourke, A., & Mendelssohn, J. (2017). Facilitating a Community of Practice (CoP) in the arts: Connecting online university learning to ‘real-world’Experience. In J. McDonald & A. Cater-Steel (Eds.), Implementing communities of practice in higher education (pp. 475–499). Springer.
  • Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. USA: Arizona State University.
  • Savery, J. R. (2015). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Essential Readings in Problem-Based Learning: Exploring and Extending the Legacy of Howard S. Barrows, 9, 5–15.
  • Scandura, A. (2016). University–Industry collaboration and firms’ R&D effort. Research Policy, 45(9), 1907–1922. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.009
  • Shneiderman, B. (2000). Creating creativity: User interfaces for supporting innovation. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 7(1), 114–138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/344949.345077
  • Smith, S. U., Hayes, S., & Shea, P. (2017). A critical review of the use of Wenger’s Community of Practice (CoP) theoretical framework in online and blended learning research, 2000–2014. Online Learning, 21(1), 209–237. doi:https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i1.963
  • Spagnoletti, P., Resca, A., & Lee, G. (2015). A design theory for digital platforms supporting online communities: A multiple case study. Journal of Information Technology, 30(4), 364–380. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.37
  • Stone, S., Doyle, P., Donlon, E., Gormley, C., Walsh, E., O’Keeffe, N., … Ferguson, P. B. (2017). Meitheal: An Irish case study in building a virtual community of practice in transitional times. In J. McDonald (Ed.), Implementing communities of practice in higher education (pp. 449–474). Australia: Springer.
  • Tseng, F.-C., & Kuo, F.-Y. (2014). A study of social participation and knowledge sharing in the teachers’ online professional community of practice. Computers & Education, 72, 37–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.005
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425–478. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  • Vredenburg, K., Mao, J.-Y., Smith, P. W., & Carey, T. (2002). A survey of user-centered design practice. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 471–478). Minneapolis, MN: ACM.
  • W3C Launches for Social Web Application Interoperability. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/2014/06/social.html.en
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
  • Wenger, E., White, N., & Smith, J. D. (2009). Digital habitats: Stewarding technology for communities. Portland, OR: CPsquare.
  • Wikipedia contributors. (2018). Apache subversion — Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Apache_Subversion&oldid=86949325

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.