References
- BeamPro. (2018, July 31). Retrieved from https://suitabletech.com
- Berisha, A., Kölle, R., & Griesbaum, J. (2015). Acceptance of telepresence robots during group work. In Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium of Information Science (pp. 350–356), Zadar, Croatia.
- Boll, S. (2017). Multimedia at CHI: Telepresence at work for remote conference participation. IEEE MultiMedia, 24(3), 5–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/MMUL.2017.3051516
- Cesta, A., Cortellessa, G., Orlandini, A., & Tiberio, L. (2016). Long-term evaluation of a telepresence robot for the elderly: Methodology and ecological case study. International Journal of Social Robotics, 8(3), 421–441. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0337-z
- Cha, E., Chen, S., & Mataric, M. J. (2017). Designing telepresence robots for K-12 education. In IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 683–688). doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193417711594
- Chen, J. Y., Haas, E. C., & Barnes, M. J. (2007). Human performance issues and user interface design for teleoperated robots. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and reviews), 37(6), 1231–1245. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2007.905819
- Dong, Y., Pei, M., Zhang, L., Xu, B., Wu, Y., & Jia, Y. (2019). Stitching videos from a fisheye lens camera and a wide-angle lens camera for telepresence robots. arXiv:1903.06319.
- Double2. (2018, July 31). Retrieved from http://www.doublerobotics.com
- Giraff. (2018, July 31). Retrieved from http://www.giraff.org/
- Heshmat, Y., Jones, B., Xiong, X., Neustaedter, C., Tang, A., Riecke, B. E., & Yang, L. (2018). Geocaching with a Beam: Shared outdoor activities through a telepresence robot with 360 degree viewing. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 359: 1–359:13). Montreal, QC, Canada: ACM.
- Hestand, D., & Yanco, H. A. (2004). Layered sensor modalities for improved human-robot interaction. In 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37583) (Vol. 3, pp. 2966–2970), The Hague, Netherlands.
- Jia, Y., Xu, B., Shen, J., Pei, M., Dong, Z., Hou, J., & Yang, M. (2015). Telepresence interaction by touching live video images. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.04334.
- Johnson, S., Rae, I., Mutlu, B., & Takayama, L. (2015). Can you see me now? how field of view affects collaboration in robotic telepresence. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2397–2406). Seoul, Republic of Korea: ACM.
- Keyes, B., Casey, R., Yanco, H. A., Maxwell, B. A., & Georgiev, Y. (2006). Camera placement and multi-camera fusion for remote robot operation. IEEE International Workshop on Safety Security & Rescue Robotics. Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
- Kiselev, A., Kristoffersson, A., & Loutfi, A. (2014). The effect of field of view on social interaction in mobile robotic telepresence systems. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 214–215). Bielefeld, Germany: ACM.
- Koceski, S., & Koceska, N. (2016). Evaluation of an assistive telepresence robot for elderly healthcare. Journal of Medical Systems, 40(5), 121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-016-0481-x
- Kristoffersson, A., Coradeschi, S., & Loutfi, A. (2013). A review of mobile robotic telepresence. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2013, 3.
- Lazewatsky, D. A., & Smart, W. D. (2011). A panorama interface for telepresence robots. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-robot Interaction (pp. 177–178). ACM. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193411427832
- MacKenzie, I. S. (2012). Human-computer interaction: An empirical research perspective. Waltham, MA, USA: Newnes.
- Neustaedter, C., Venolia, G., Procyk, J., & Hawkins, D. (2016). To beam or not to beam: A study of remote telepresence attendance at an academic conference. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 418–431). ACM. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2016.53
- Nielsen, C. W., Goodrich, M. A., & Ricks, R. W. (2007). Ecological interfaces for improving mobile robot teleoperation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 23(5), 927–941. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2007.907479
- QB. (2018, July 31). Retrieved from https://www.anybots.com
- Rae, I., Mutlu, B., & Takayama, L. (2014). Bodies in motion: Mobility, presence, and task awareness in telepresence. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2153–2162), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
- Rae, I., & Neustaedter, C. (2017). Robotic telepresence at scale. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 313–324). Denver, CO, USA: ACM.
- Rae, I., Venolia, G., Tang, J. C., & Molnar, D. (2015). A framework for understanding and designing telepresence. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 1552–1566). ACM. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8796
- Rebola, C. B., & Eden, G. (2017). Remote robotic disability: Are we ready for robots? Interactions, 24(3), 48–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3086450
- Rudolph, A., Vaughn, J., Crego, N., Hueckel, R., Kuszajewski, M., Molloy, M., & Shaw, R. J. (2017). Integrating telepresence robots into nursing simulation. Nurse Educator, 42(2), E1–E4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000329
- Schubert, T., Friedmann, F., & Regenbrecht, H. (2001). The experience of presence: Factor analytic insights. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 10(3), 266–281. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/105474601300343603
- Shen, J., Xu, B., Pei, M., & Jia, Y. (2016). A low-cost tele-presence wheelchair system. In 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (pp. 2452–2457), Daejeon, Korea.
- Shiroma, N., Sato, N., Chiu, Y., & Matsuno, F. (2004). Study on effective camera images for mobile robot teleoperation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 107–112). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcohol.2004.06.001
- Song, H., Kim, J., & Park, N. (2019). I know my professor: Teacher self-disclosure in online education and a mediating role of social presence. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(6), 448–455. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1455126
- Thomas, L. C., & Wickens, C. D. (2000). Effects of display frames of reference on spatial judgments and change detection (Tech. Rep.). Illinois Univ at Urbana-Champaign Savoyaviation Research Lab.
- Tsui, K. M., Dlphond, J. M., Brooks, D. J., Medvedev, M. S., McCann, E., Allspaw, J., … Yanco, H. A. (2015). Accessible human-robot interaction for telepresence robots: A case study. Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 6(1), 1–29.
- Tsui, K. M., & Yanco, H. A. (2013). Design challenges and guidelines for social interaction using mobile telepresence robots. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 9(1), 227–301. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1557234X13502462
- VGO. (2018, July 31). Retrieved from http://www.vgocom.com
- Voshell, M., Woods, D. D., & Phillips, F. (2005). Overcoming the keyhole in human-robot coordination: Simulation and evaluation. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings, 49(3), 442–446. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120504900348
- Woods, D. D., Tittle, J., Feil, M., & Roesler, A. (2004). Envisioning human-robot coordination in future operations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part C: Applications and Reviews, 34(2), 210–218. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2004.826272
- Yanco, H. A., & Drury, J. (2004). “Where Am I?” Acquiring situation awareness using a remote robot platform. In 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37583) (Vol. 3, pp. 2835–2840), The Hague, Netherlands.
- Yang, L., Jones, B., Neustaedter, C., & Singhal, S. (2018). Shopping over distance through a telepresence robot. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2 (CSCW), 191:1–191: 18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3274460