A Systematic Review of a Virtual Reality System from the Perspective of User Experience

References

• Ahn, S. J., Fox, J., Dale, K. R., & Avant, J. A. (2015). Framing virtual experiences: Effects on environmental efficacy and behavior over time. Communication Research, 42, 839–863. doi:10.1177/0093650214534973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aïm, F., Lonjon, G., Hannouche, D., & Nizard, R. (2016). Effectiveness of virtual reality training in orthopaedic surgery. Arthroscopy. The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 32(1), 224–232. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2015.07.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves Fernandes, L. M., Cruz Matos, G., Azevedo, D., Rodrigues Nunes, R., Paredes, H., Morgado, L., … Cardoso, B. (2016). Exploring educational immersive videogames: An empirical study with a 3D multimodal interaction prototype. Behaviour & Information Technology, 35, 907–918. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2016.1232754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthes, C., García-Hernández, R. J., Wiedemann, M., & Kranzlmüller, D. (2016). State of the art of virtual reality technology. Paper presented at the Aerospace Conference, 2016 IEEE, Big Sky, MT.
   Google Scholar
• Anton, D., Kurillo, G., & Bajcsy, R. (2018). User experience and interaction performance in 2D/3D telecollaboration. Future Generation Computer Systems, 82, 77–88. doi:10.1016/j.future.2017.12.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baños, R. M., Botella, C., Alcañiz, M., Liaño, V., Guerrero, B., & Rey, B. (2004). Immersion and emotion: Their impact on the sense of presence. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(6), 734–741. doi:10.1089/cpb.2004.7.734
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baus, O., & Bouchard, S. (2017). Exposure to an unpleasant odour increases the sense of presence in virtual reality. Virtual Reality, 21, 59–74. doi:10.1007/s10055-016-0299-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhagat, K. K., Liou, W.-K., & Chang, C.-Y. (2016). A cost-effective interactive 3D virtual reality system applied to military live firing training. Virtual Reality, 20(2), 127–140. doi:10.1007/s10055-016-0284-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bian, Y., Yang, C., Gao, F., Li, H., Zhou, S., Li, H., … Meng, X. (2016). A framework for physiological indicators of flow in VR games: Construction and preliminary evaluation. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 20, 821–832. doi:10.1007/s00779-016-0953-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boletsis, C. (2017). The new era of virtual reality locomotion: A systematic literature review of techniques and a proposed typology. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 1(4), 24. doi:10.3390/mti1040024
   Google Scholar
• Botella, C., Serrano, B., Baños, R. M., & Garcia-Palacios, A. (2015). Virtual reality exposure-based therapy for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder: A review of its efficacy, the adequacy of the treatment protocol, and its acceptability. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 11, 2533. doi:10.2147/NDT
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, D. A., & Hodges, L. F. (1999). Formalizing the design, evaluation, and application of interaction techniques for immersive virtual environments. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 10(1), 37–53. doi:10.1006/jvlc.1998.0111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, D. A., Kruijff, E., LaViola, J. J., Jr, & Poupyrev, I. (2001). An introduction to 3-D user interface design. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 10(1), 96–108. doi:10.1162/105474601750182342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brade, J., Lorenz, M., Busch, M., Hammer, N., Tscheligi, M., & Klimant, P. (2017). Being there again – Presence in real and virtual environments and its relation to usability and user experience using a mobile navigation task. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 101, 76–87. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooke, J. (1996). SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry, 189(194), 4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Bulu, S. T. (2012). Place presence, social presence, co-presence, and satisfaction in virtual worlds. Computers & Education, 58(1), 154–161. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdea, G. C., & Coiffet, P. (2003). Virtual reality technology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Camporesi, C., & Kallmann, M. (2016). The effects of avatars, stereo vision and display size on reaching and motion reproduction. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 22, 1592–1604. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2015.2440231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, S. V., Nichols, S., Ramsey, A., & Wilson, J. R. (1999). Virtual reality-induced symptoms and effects (VRISE). Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 8(2), 169–186. doi:10.1162/105474699566152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz-Neira, C., Sandin, D. J., DeFanti, T. A., Kenyon, R. V., & Hart, J. C. (1992). The CAVE: Audio visual experience automatic virtual environment. Communications of the ACM, 35(6), 64–73. doi:10.1145/129888.129892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culbertson, H., & Kuchenbecker, K. J. (2017). Importance of matching physical friction, hardness, and texture in creating realistic haptic virtual surfaces. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 10, 63–74. doi:10.1109/TOH.2016.2598751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jesus Oliveira, V. A., Nedel, L., & Maciel, A. (2018). Assessment of an articulatory interface for tactile intercommunication in immersive virtual environments. Computers & Graphics, 76, 18–28. doi:10.1016/j.cag.2018.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pick, S., Weyers, B., Hentschel, B., & Kuhlen, T. W. (2016). Design and evaluation of data annotation workflows for CAVE-like virtual environments. IEEE Computer Society 22, 1452–1461.
   Google Scholar
• Erfanian, A., Hu, Y., & Zeng, T. (2017). Framework of multiuser satisfaction for assessing interaction models within collaborative virtual environments. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 47, 1052–1065. doi:10.1109/THMS.2017.2700431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forlizzi, J., & Battarbee, K. (2004). Understanding experience in interactive systems. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 5th conference on designing interactive systems: Processes, practices, methods, and techniques, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Georgiou, T., & Demiris, Y. (2017). Adaptive user modelling in car racing games using behavioural and physiological data. User Modeling and User-adapted Interaction, 27, 267–311. doi:10.1007/s11257-017-9192-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girod, S., Schvartzman, S. C., Gaudilliere, D., Salisbury, K., & Silva, R. (2016). Haptic feedback improves surgeons’ user experience and fracture reduction in facial trauma simulation. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 53(5), 561–570. doi:10.1682/JRRD.2015.03.0043
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harish, P., & Narayanan, P. J. (2013). Designing perspectively correct multiplanar displays. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19, 407–419. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2012.135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartson, R., & Pyla, P. S. (2012). The UX book: Process and guidelines for ensuring a quality user experience. San Francisco, CA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M., & Tractinsky, N. (2006). User experience-a research agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(2), 91–97. doi:10.1080/01449290500330331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, A., Korner-Bitensky, N., & Levin, M. (2007). Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review of its effectiveness for upper limb motor recovery. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 14(2), 52–61. doi:10.1310/tsr1402-52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, M. C. (2017). A meta-analysis and systematic literature review of virtual reality rehabilitation programs. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 317–327. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaram, S., Connacher, H. I., & Lyons, K. W. (1997). Virtual assembly using virtual reality techniques. Computer-aided Design, 29(8), 575–584. doi:10.1016/S0010-4485(96)00094-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerald, J. (2015). The VR book: Human-centered design for virtual reality. New York, NY: Morgan & Claypool.
   Google Scholar
• Jerald, J. (2018). Human-centered VR design: Five essentials every engineer needs to know. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 38(2), 15–21. doi:10.1109/MCG.2018.021951628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, S.-A.-A. (2013). The moderating role of sensation seeking tendency in robotic haptic interfaces. Behaviour and Information Technology, 32, 862–873. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2012.687769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsdottir, J., Bertoni, R., Lawo, M., Montesano, A., Bowman, T., & Gabrielli, S. (2018). Serious games for arm rehabilitation of persons with multiple sclerosis. A randomized controlled pilot study. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, 19, 25–29. doi:10.1016/j.msard.2017.10.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kageyama, A., & Tomiyama, A. (2016). Visualization framework for CAVE virtual reality systems. International Journal of Modeling, Simulation, and Scientific Computing, 7(04), 1643001.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, R. S., Lane, N. E., Berbaum, K. S., & Lilienthal, M. G. (1993). Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(3), 203–220. doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3
   Google Scholar
• Kmet, L. M., Cook, L. S., & Lee, R. C. (2004). Standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers from a variety of fields. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kober, S. E., & Neuper, C. (2013). Personality and presence in virtual reality: Does their relationship depend on the used presence measure? International Journal of Human-computer Interaction, 29(1), 13–25. doi:10.1080/10447318.2012.668131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutsabasis, P., & Vosinakis, S. (2018). Kinesthetic interactions in museums: Conveying cultural heritage by making use of ancient tools and (re-) constructing artworks. Virtual Reality, 22(2), 103–118. doi:10.1007/s10055-017-0325-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozhevnikov, M., & Gurlitt, J. (2013). Immersive and non-immersive virtual reality system to learn relative motion concepts. Paper presented at the 3rd Interdisciplinary Engineering Design Education Conference (IEDEC), Santa Clara, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Koźlak, M., Kurzeja, A., & Nawrat, A. (2013). Virtual reality technology for military and industry training programs. In A. Nawrat & Z. Kuś (Eds.), Vision based systems for UAV applications (pp. 327–334). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakou, M., Pan, X., & Chrysanthou, Y. (2017). Interaction with virtual crowd in immersive and semi-immersive virtual reality systems. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds, 28, e1729. doi:10.1002/cav.1729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, K. W., & Lee, P. Y. (2015). The use of virtual reality for creating unusual environmental stimulation to motivate students to explore creative ideas. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(1), 3–18. doi:10.1080/10494820.2012.745426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lele, A. (2013). Virtual reality and its military utility. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 4(1), 17–26. doi:10.1007/s12652-011-0052-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardis, D., Frisoli, A., Barsotti, M., Carrozzino, M., & Bergamasco, M. (2014). Multisensory feedback can enhance embodiment within an enriched virtual walking scenario. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 23(3), 253–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessiter, J., Freeman, J., Keogh, E., & Davidoff, J. (2001). A cross-media presence questionnaire: The ITC-sense of presence inventory. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 10(3), 282–297. doi:10.12968/bjon.2001.10.5.12353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., Yi, W., Chi, H.-L., Wang, X., & Chan, A. P. (2018). A critical review of virtual and augmented reality (VR/AR) applications in construction safety. Automation in Construction, 86, 150–162. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2017.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., … Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000100. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y., Breugelmans, J., Iversen, M., & Schmidt, D. (2017). An Adaptive Interface Design (AID) for enhanced computer accessibility and rehabilitation. International Journal of Human-computer Studies, 98, 14–23. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loup-Escande, E., Jamet, E., Ragot, M., Erhel, S., & Michinov, N. (2017). Effects of stereoscopic display on learning and user experience in an educational virtual environment. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 33(2), 115–122. doi:10.1080/10447318.2016.1220105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, M., & Zheng, H. (2011). Virtual reality and serious games in healthcare. In S. Brahnam & L. C. Jain (Eds.), Advanced computational intelligence paradigms in healthcare 6. Virtual reality in psychotherapy, rehabilitation, and assessment (pp. 169–192). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Manjrekar, S., Sandilya, S., Bhosale, D., Kanchi, S., Pitkar, A., & Gondhalekar, M. (2014). CAVE: An emerging immersive technology–A review. Paper presented at the Computer Modelling and Simulation (UKSim), 2014 UKSim-AMSS 16th International Conference on, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• McComas, J., MacKay, M., & Pivik, J. (2002). Effectiveness of virtual reality for teaching pedestrian safety. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5(3), 185–190. doi:10.1089/109493102760147150
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mikropoulos, T. A., & Natsis, A. (2011). Educational virtual environments: A ten-year review of empirical research (1999–2009). Computers & Education, 56(3), 769–780. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteiro, P., Carvalho, D., Melo, M., Branco, F., & Bessa, M. (2018). Application of the steering law to virtual reality walking navigation interfaces. Computers & Graphics, 77, 80–87. doi:10.1016/j.cag.2018.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morán, A., Ramírez-Fernández, C., Meza-Kubo, V., Orihuela-Espina, F., García-Canseco, E., Grimaldo, A. I., & Sucar, E. (2015). On the effect of previous technological experience on the usability of a virtual rehabilitation tool for the physical activation and cognitive stimulation of elders. Journal of Medical Systems, 39, 104. doi:10.1007/s10916-015-0297-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moro, S. B., Bisconti, S., Muthalib, M., Spezialetti, M., Cutini, S., Ferrari, M., … Quaresima, V. (2014). A semi-immersive virtual reality incremental swing balance task activates prefrontal cortex: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study. Neuroimage, 85, 451–460. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhanna, M. A. (2015). Virtual reality and the CAVE: Taxonomy, interaction challenges and research directions. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 27(3), 344–361. doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2014.03.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narciso, D., Bessa, M., Melo, M., Coelho, A., & Vasconcelos-Raposo, J. (2017). Immersive 360∘ video user experience: Impact of different variables in the sense of presence and cybersickness. Universal Access in the Information Society, 1–11. doi:10.1007/s10209-017-0581-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naya, V. B., & Ibáñez, L. A. H. (2015). Evaluating user experience in joint activities between schools and museums in virtual worlds. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(3), 389–398. doi:10.1007/s10209-014-0367-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newe, A., Becker, L., & Schenk, A. (2014). Application and evaluation of interactive 3D PDF for presenting and sharing planning results for liver surgery in clinical routine. PloS One, 9. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, S., & Patel, H. (2002). Health and safety implications of virtual reality: A review of empirical evidence. Applied Ergonomics, 33(3), 251–271. doi:10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00020-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oprean, D., Simpson, M., & Klippel, A. (2018). Collaborating remotely: An evaluation of immersive capabilities on spatial experiences and team membership. International Journal of Digital Earth, 11(4), 420–436. doi:10.1080/17538947.2017.1381191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallavicini, F., Argenton, L., Toniazzi, N., Aceti, L., & Mantovani, F. (2016). Virtual reality applications for stress management training in the military. Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance, 87(12), 1021–1030. doi:10.3357/AMHP.4596.2016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantelidis, V. S. (1993). Virtual reality in the classroom. Educational Technology, 33(4), 23–27.
   Google Scholar
• Pedroli, E., Greci, L., Colombo, D., Serino, S., Cipresso, P., Arlati, S., … Goulene, K. (2018). Characteristics, usability, and users experience of a system combining cognitive and physical therapy in a virtual environment: Positive bike. Sensors, 18(7), 2343. doi:10.3390/s18072343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers, J. C., Bieliaieva, K., Wu, S., & Nam, C. S. (2015). The human factors and ergonomics of P300-based brain-computer interfaces. Brain Sciences, 5(3), 318–356. doi:10.3390/brainsci5030318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, D. R., Zyda, M., & Kelleher, K. (1995). Virtual reality: In the mind of the beholder. Computer, 28, 17–19.
   Google Scholar
• Rajeshkumar, S., Omar, R., & Mahmud, M. (2013). Taxonomies of user experience (UX) evaluation methods. Paper presented at the Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS), 2013 International Conference on, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, D. T. (2002). Benefits of a virtual play rehabilitation environment for children with cerebral palsy on perceptions of self-efficacy: A pilot study. Pediatric Rehabilitation, 5(3), 141–148. doi:10.1080/1363849021000039344
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reyes-Lecuona, A., & Diaz-Estrella, A. (2006). New interaction paradigms in virtual environments. Paper presented at the electrotechnical conference. MELECON 2006. IEEE Mediterranean, Malaga, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Riecke, B. E., Schulte-Pelkum, J., Caniard, F., & Bulthoff, H. H. (2005). Towards lean and elegant self-motion simulation in virtual reality. Paper presented at the Virtual Reality, 2005. Proceedings. VR 2005. IEEE, Arles, Camargue-Provence, France.
   Google Scholar
• Rieuf, V., & Bouchard, C. (2017). Emotional activity in early immersive design: Sketches and moodboards in virtual reality. Design Studies, 48, 43–75. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2016.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roto, V., Law, E., Vermeeren, A., & Hoonhout, J. (2011). Bringing clarity to the concept of user experience. Retrieved from www.allaboutux.org/files/UX-WhitePaper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Santos, B. S., Dias, P., Pimentel, A., Baggerman, J.-W., Ferreira, C., Silva, S., & Madeira, J. (2009). Head-mounted display versus desktop for 3D navigation in virtual reality: A user study. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 41(1), 161. doi:10.1007/s11042-008-0223-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saposnik, G., & Levin, M., & Group, S. O. R. C. W. (2011). Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: A meta-analysis and implications for clinicians. Stroke, Strokeaha, 42, 1380–1386. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.605451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuemie, M. J., Van Der Straaten, P., Krijn, M., & Van Der Mast, C. A. (2001). Research on presence in virtual reality: A survey. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4(2), 183–201. doi:10.1089/109493101300117884
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schulze, K., & Krömker, H. (2010). A framework to measure user experience of interactive online products. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 7th international conference on methods and techniques in behavioral research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Schvartzman, S. C., Silva, R., Salisbury, K., Gaudilliere, D., & Girod, S. (2014). Computer-aided trauma simulation system with haptic feedback is easy and fast for oral-maxillofacial surgeons to learn and use. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 72, 1984–1993. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2014.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwenk, M., Grewal, G. S., Honarvar, B., Schwenk, S., Mohler, J., Khalsa, D. S., & Najafi, B. (2014). Interactive balance training integrating sensor-based visual feedback of movement performance: A pilot study in older adults. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 11, 164. doi:10.1186/1743-0003-11-164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M., & Wilbur, S. (1997). A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 6(6), 603–616. doi:10.1162/pres.1997.6.6.603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son, H., Shin, S., Choi, S., Kim, S.-Y., & Kim, J. R. (2018). Interacting automultiscopic 3D with haptic paint brush in immersive room. IEEE Access, 6, 76464–76474. doi:10.1109/Access.6287639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanney, K., & Salvendy, G. (1998). Aftereffects and sense of presence in virtual environments: Formulation of a research and development agenda. International Journal of Human-computer Interaction, 10(2), 135–187. doi:10.1207/s15327590ijhc1002_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanney, K. M., Mollaghasemi, M., Reeves, L., Breaux, R., & Graeber, D. A. (2003). Usability engineering of virtual environments (VEs): Identifying multiple criteria that drive effective VE system design. International Journal of Human-computer Studies, 58(4), 447–481. doi:10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00015-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe, A., & Alrayes, A. (2012). Investigating user experience in second life for collaborative learning. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 70, 508–525. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, I. E. (1965). The ultimate display. In Multimedia: From Wagner to virtual reality (pp. 506–508). London: Macmillan and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Takatalo, J., Nyman, G., & Laaksonen, L. (2008). Components of human experience in virtual environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(1), 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tergas, A. I., Sheth, S. B., Green, I. C., Giuntoli, R. L., II, Winder, A. D., & Fader, A. N. (2013). A pilot study of surgical training using a virtual robotic surgery simulator. JSLS-Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 17, 219–226. doi:10.4293/108680813X13654754535872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thüring, M., & Mahlke, S. (2007). Usability, aesthetics and emotions in human–Technology interaction. International Journal of Psychology, 42(4), 253–264. doi:10.1080/00207590701396674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tidoni, E., Abu-Alqumsan, M., Leonardis, D., Kapeller, C., Fusco, G., Guger, C., … Aglioti, S. M. (2017). Local and remote cooperation with virtual and robotic agents: A P300 BCI study in healthy and people living with spinal cord injury. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 25, 1622–1632. doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2626391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turchet, L., Burelli, P., & Serafin, S. (2013). Haptic feedback for enhancing realism of walking simulations. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 6, 35–45. doi:10.1109/TOH.2012.51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Cutsem, J., Marcora, S., De Pauw, K., Bailey, S., Meeusen, R., & Roelands, B. J. S. M. (2017). The effects of mental fatigue on physical performance: A systematic review. Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 47(8), 1569–1588. doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0672-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeeren, A. P., Law, E. L.-C., Roto, V., Obrist, M., Hoonhout, J., & Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K. (2010). User experience evaluation methods: Current state and development needs. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 6th Nordic conference on human-computer interaction: Extending boundaries, Reykjavik, Iceland.
   Google Scholar
• Vinnikov, M., Allison, R. S., & Fernandes, S. (2017). Gaze-contingent auditory displays for improved spatial attention in virtual reality. ACM Transactions On Computer-Human Interaction, 24, 1–38. doi:10.1145/3067822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosinakis, S., Anastassakis, G., & Koutsabasis, P. (2018). Teaching and learning logic programming in virtual worlds using interactive microworld representations. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 30–44. doi:10.1111/bjet.2018.49.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vourvopoulos, A., & Liarokapis, F. (2014). Evaluation of commercial brain-computer interfaces in real and virtual world environment: A pilot study. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 40, 714–729. Elsevier Ltd.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., & Lindeman, R. (2015). Coordinated hybrid virtual environments: Seamless interaction contexts for effective virtual reality. Computers & Graphics, 48, 71–83. doi:10.1016/j.cag.2015.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence, 7(3), 225–240. doi:10.1162/105474698565686
   Google Scholar
• Xiong, W., Wang, Q.-H., Huang, Z.-D., & Xu, Z.-J. (2016). A framework for interactive assembly task simulation in virtual environment. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 85, 955–969. doi:10.1007/s00170-015-7976-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. (2017). Head-mounted display-based intuitive virtual reality training system for the mining industry. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 27(4), 717–722. doi:10.1016/j.ijmst.2017.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar