Predictors of Perceived Learning in a Distance Learning Environment from the Perspective of SIPS Model

References

• Akbulut, Y. (2010). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS uygulamaları: Sık kullanılan istatiksel analizler ve açıklamalı SPSS çözümleri. İstanbul: İdeal Kültür Yayıncılık.
   Google Scholar
• Akcaoglu, M., & Lee, E. (2016). Increasing social presence in online learning through small group discussions. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 1–17. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alavifar, A., Karimimalayer, M., & Anuar, M. K. (2012). Structural equation modeling vs multiple regression. Engineering Science and Technology: An International Journal, 2(2), 326–329.
   Google Scholar
• Albayrak, E., Güngören, Ö. C., & Horzum, M. B. (2014). Algılanan öğrenme ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlaması. Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, D. M. (1974). The relationship between variable selection and data augmentation and a method for prediction. Technometrics, 16(1), 125–127. doi:10.1080/00401706.1974.10489157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Boston: Sloan Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1976). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Barab, A. S., MaKinster, J. G., Moore, J. A., & Cunningham, D. J. (2001). Designing and building an online community: The struggle to support sociability in the inquiry learning forum. Educational Technology Research & Development, 49(4), 71–96. doi:10.1007/BF02504948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardakcı, S. (2010). The validity and reliability study of the scale of the perceived sociability of online learning environments. Egitim Bilimleri Fakultesi Dergisi, 43(1), 17–39. doi:10.1501/Egifak_0000001189
   Google Scholar
• Bardakcı, S., & Çalışkan, E. (2012). Sosyal etkileşim alanı ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 42(42), 84–95.
   Google Scholar
• Batista, I. V. C., & Cornachione, E. B. (2005). Learning styles influences on satisfaction and perceived learning: Analysis of an online business game. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 32, 22–30.
   Google Scholar
• Blunch, N. J. (2008). Introduction to structural equation modelling: Using SPSS and AMOS. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2013). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (15th ed.). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H. H., & Wang, I. C. (2008). An investigation of user communication behavior in computer mediated environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 2336–2356. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve Lisrel uygulamaları (2nd ed.). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
   Google Scholar
• Doğan, N., & Özdamar, K. (2003). CHAİD analizi ve aile planlaması ile ilgili bir uygulama. Türkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Sciences, 23(5), 392–397.
   Google Scholar
• Donath, J. S. (1996). Inhabiting the virtual city: The design of social environments for electronic communities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2785508_Inhabiting_the_Virtual_City_The_design_of_social_environments_for_electronic_communities
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N., & Waterston, S. (1988). Approaches to studying and levels of processing in university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58(3), 258–265. doi:10.1111/bjep.1988.58.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. Akron, OH: University of Akron Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farnham, S., Zaner, M., & Cheng, L. (2001). Supporting sociability in a shared browser. Paper presented at the Interact Conference, Tokyo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with un- observable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 1(18), 39–50. doi:10.1177/002224378101800104
   Google Scholar
• Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., & Shea, P. (2006). Student satisfaction and perceived learning with on-line courses: Principles and examples from the SUNY learning network. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4(2), 2–31.
   Google Scholar
• Gallacher, J., Crossan, B., Field, J., & Merrill, B. (2002). Learning careers and the social space: Exploring the fragile identities of adult returners in the new further education. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 21(6), 493–509. doi:10.1080/0260137022000016172
   Google Scholar
• Galusha, J. M. (1998). Barriers to learning in distance education. Distance Learning Barriers, 5(3), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 5–9. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garwin, D. A. (1993). Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 73–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gülbahar, Y. (2012). E-öğrenme. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
   Google Scholar
• Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer mediated conferencing environment. The American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8–26. doi:10.1080/08923649709526970
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10(3), 301–320. doi:10.1016/0147-1767(86)90015-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyle, R. H. (1995). Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. London, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, N., Hong, Y., & Burtch, G. (2017). Social network integration and user content generation: Evidence from natural experiments. MIS Quarterly, 41(4), 1035–1058. doi:10.25300/MISQ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, S. A. A. (2010). Parasocial interaction with an avatar in second life: A typology of the self and an empirical test of the mediating role of social presence. Presence-Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 19(4), 331–340. doi:10.1162/PRES_a_00001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, M., Choi, H., & Park, S. (2007). Construction and validation of a social presence scale for measuring online learners’ involvement. In C. Montgomerie & J. Seale (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (pp. 1829–1833). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
   Google Scholar
• Ke, F. F. (2010). Examining online teaching, cognitive, and social presence for adult students. Computers and Education, 55(2), 808–820. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kear, K. (2010, May). Social presence in online learning communities. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson, C. Jones, M. de Laat, D. Mc-Connell, & T. Ryberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th international conference on networked learning. (pp. 1–8). Aalborg, Denmark: Aalborg University.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A. (2010). Measuring model fit. Retrieved from http://davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm
   Google Scholar
• Kilmen, S., & Kösterelioğlu, I. (2017). Examination of teachers’ perceptions towards alternative assessment approaches with CHAİD analysis. Elementary Education Online, 16(1), 256–273.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H. Y. (2013). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 38(1), 52–54. doi:10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kreijns, K. (2004). Sociable CSCL environments social affordances, sociability, and social presence. Maastricht, The Netherlands: Datawyse boek-en Grafische Producties. Retrieved from http://dspace.ou.nl/bitstream/1820/1030/1/Dissertation%20Kreijns%202004.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W., & VanBuuren, H. (2004). Measuring perceived quality of social space in distributed learning groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(5), 607–632. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2003.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W., & VanBuuren, H. (2007). Measuring perceived sociability of computer- supported collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, 49, 176–192. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Vermeulen, M. (2013). Social aspects of CSCL environments: A research framework. Educational Psychologist, 48(4), 229–242. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.750225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, L., & Mallick, B. (1998). Variable selection for regression models. Sankhya: the Indian Journal of Statistics, 60(B), 65–81.
   Google Scholar
• Lankton, N. K., McKnight, D. H., & Tripp, J. (2015). Technology, humanness, and trust: Rethinking trust in technology. Journal of the AIS, 16(10), Article 1.
   Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R., Roznowski, M., & Necowitz, L. (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111(3), 490–504. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.3.490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarty, J. A., & Hastak, M. (2007). Segmentation approaches in data-mining: A comparison of RFM, CHAID, and logistic regression. Journal of Business Research, 60(6), 656–662. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.06.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musil, C. M., Jones, S. L., & Warner, C. D. (1998). Structural equation modeling and its relationship to multiple regression and factor analysis. Research in Nursing & Health, 21(3), 271–281. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-240X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Offir, B., Lev, Y., & Bezalel, R. (2008). Surface and deep learning processes in distance education: Synchronous versus asynchronous systems. Computers and Education, 51(3), 1172–1183. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olpak, Y. Z., & Kılıç Çakmak, E. (2009). E-öğrenme ortamları için sosyal bulunuşluk ölçeğinin uyarlama çalışması. Yüzüncü Yil Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(1), 142–160.
   Google Scholar
• Ou, C. X., Pavlou, P. A., & Davison, R. M. (2014). Swift guanxi in online marketplaces: The role of computer‐mediated communication technologies. MIS Quarterly, 38(1), 209–230. doi:10.25300/MISQ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallant, J. (2011). Survival manual. A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. NY: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, E. S., & Hartley, H. (1958). 0. Biometrika Tables for Statisticians, 2, 46–52.
   Google Scholar
• Poquet, O., Kovanovic, V., de Vries, P., Hennis, T., Joksimovic, S., Gasevic, D., & Dawson, S. (2018). Social presence in massive open online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(3), 42–68. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v19i3.3370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preece, J. (2003). Tacit knowledge and social capital: Supporting sociability in online communities of practice. In Proceedings of I-KNOW’03, 3rd International Conference on Knowledge management. In K. Tochtermenn & H. Maurer (Eds.), (pp. 72–78). Graz, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Preece, J. (2007). Sociability and usability in online spaces. In Luncheon Keynote (Eds.), Paper presented at The 2007 International Symposium on Colloborative Technologies and Systems (CTS’07), Orlando, Florida, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. JALN, 7(1), 68–88.
   Google Scholar
• Rienties, B., & Toetenel, L. (2016). The impact of learning design on student behaviour, satisfaction and performance: A cross-institutional comparison across 151 modules. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 333–341. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritzer, G. (2010). Sociological theory (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Rovai, A. P., Wighting, M. J., Baker, J. D., & Grooms, L. D. (2009). Development of an instrument to measure perceived cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning in traditional and virtual higher education classroom settings. Internet and Higher Education, 121(1), 7–13. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Schultze, U., & Brooks, J. A. M. (2018). An interactional view of social presence: Making the virtual other “real”. Information Systems Journal, 29, 707–737. doi:10.1111/isj.12230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (2004). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A. B. (2006). The effect of social presence on teacher technology acceptance, continuance intention, and performance in an online teacher professional development course. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, T. D., Dillow, S. A., & Hoffman, C. M. (2009). Digest of education statistics 2008. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Song, H., Kim, J., & Park, N. (2019). I know my professor: Teacher self-disclosure in online education and a mediating role of social presence. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(6), 448–455. doi:10.1080/10447318.2018.1455126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics solutions. (2019). Advantages of SEM over regression. Retrieved from https://www.statisticssolutions.com/advantages-of-sem-over-regression/at
   Google Scholar
• Stein, D., & Wheaton, J. (2002). Online learning communities and higher education: Factors supporting collaborative knowledge-building (Research Center on Educational Technology).
   Google Scholar
• Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22(2), 306–331. doi:10.1080/0158791010220208
   Google Scholar
• Swan, K., Shea, P., Fredericksen, E., Picket, A., Pelz, W., & Maher, G. (2000). Building knowledge building communities: Consistency, contact and communication in the virtual classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(4), 389–413. doi:10.2190/W4G6-HY52-57P1-PPNE
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). SPSS for Windows workbook to accompany large sample examples of using multivariate statistics. New Yok: HarperCollins College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). London, UK: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Tatlı, Z. (2018). Traditional and digital game preferences of children: A CHAID analysis on middle school students. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(1), 90–110.
   Google Scholar
• Thurlow, C., Lengel, L. B., & Tomic, A. (2004). Computer mediated communication: Social interaction and the internet. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tu, C. H. (2000). On-line learning migration: From social learning theory to social presence theory in a CMC environment. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 23(1), 27–37. doi:10.1006/jnca.1999.0099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu, C. H. (2002). The measurement of social presence in an online learning environment. International Journal on E-Learning, 1(2), 34–45.
   Google Scholar
• Tu, C. H., & McIsaac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131–150. doi:10.1207/S15389286AJDE1603_2
   Google Scholar
• Verduin, J. R., & Clark, T. A. (1991). Distance education: The foundations of effective practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, C. W., Chen, N. S., & Kinshuk. (2012). A model for social presence in online classrooms. Education Technology Research, 60, 529–545. doi:10.1007/s11423-012-9234-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weidlich, J., & Bastiaens, T. J. (2017). Explaining social presence and the quality of online learning with the SIPS model. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 479–487. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinel, M., Bannert, M., Zumbach, J., Hoppe, H. U., & Malzahn, N. (2011). A closer look on social presence as a causing factor in computer-mediated collaboration. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 513–521. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.09.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissberg, R. P., Durlak, J. A., Domitrovich, C. E., & Gullotta, T. P. (2015). Social and emotional learning: Past, present, and future. In J. A. Durlak, C. E. Domitrovich, R. P. Weissberg, & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), Handbook of social and emotional learning: Research and practice (pp. 3–19). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whipp, J. L., & Lorentz, R. A. (2009). Cognitive and social help giving in online teaching: An exploratory study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(2), 169–192. doi:10.1007/s11423-008-9104-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteman, J. A. M. (2002). Interpersonal communication in computer mediated learning. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED465997.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Woo, K., Gosper, M., McNeill, M., Preston, G., Green, D., & Phillips, R. (2008). Web-based lecture technologies: Blurring the boundaries between face-to-face and distance learning. ALT-J, 16(2), 81–93. doi:10.3402/rlt.v16i2.10887
   Google Scholar
• Yang, H. H. (2007). The effect of technology acceptance on undergraduate students’ usage of WebCT as a collaborative tool. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Central Florida, Orlando. doi:10.1094/PDIS-91-4-0467B
   Google Scholar