Chinese System Usability Scale: Translation, Revision, Psychological Measurement

References

• Alghannam, B. A., Albustan, S. A., Al-Hassan, A. A., & Albustan, L. A. (2018). Towards a standard arabic system usability scale: Psychometric evaluation using communication disorder app. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(9), 799–804. doi:10.1080/10447318.2017.1388099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arendasy, M. E., & Sommer, M. (2017). Reducing the effect size of the retest effect: Examining different approaches. Intelligence, 62, 89–98. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2017.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, H. J., & Feldman, D. C. (1981). Social desirability response bias in self-report choice situations. The Academy of Management Journal, 24(2), 377–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assila, A., De Oliveira, K. M., & Ezzedine, H. (2016). Standardized usability questionnaires: Features and quality focus. Electronic Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology, 6(1), 15–31.
   Google Scholar
• Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., & Miller, J. T. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the System Usability Scale. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24, 574–594. doi:10.1080/10447310802205776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blažica, B., & Lewis, J. R. (2015). A slovene translation of the system usability scale: The sus-si. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(2), 112–117. doi:10.1080/10447318.2014.986634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borkowska, A., & Jach, K. (2017). Pre-testing of polish translation of System Usability Scale (SUS). In Information systems architecture and technology: Proceedings of 37th international conference on information systems architecture and technology – ISAT 2016, Karpacz, Poland – Part I (pp. 143–153). Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Borsci, S., Federici, S., Bacci, S., Gnaldi, M., & Bartolucci, F. (2015). Assessing user satisfaction in the era of user experience: Comparison of the sus, umux, and umux-lite as a function of product experience. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(8), 484–495. doi:10.1080/10447318.2015.1064648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsci, S., Federici, S., & Lauriola, M. (2009). On the dimensionality of the system usability scale: A test of alternative measurement models. Cogn Process, 10(3), 193–197. doi:10.1007/s10339-009-0268-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsci, S., Federici, S., Mele, M. L., & Conti, M. (2015). Short scales of satisfaction assessment: A proxy to involve disabled users in the usability testing of websites. Human-Computer interaction: Users and contexts (pp. 35–42). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A “quick and dirty” usability scale. In P. Jordan, B. Thomas, & B. Weerdmeester (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Brooke, J. (2013). SUS: A retrospective. Usability Professionals’ Association, 8(2), 29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, S., Cao, J., Li, S., Wang, W., Qian, Q., & Ding, Y. (2018). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the simplified chinese version of copenhagen hip and groin outcome score (hagos) for total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 13(1), 278. doi:10.1186/s13018-018-0971-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cardoso, M. H., & Capellini, S. A. (2018). Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the detailed assessment of speed of handwriting 17+ to brazilian portuguese: Conceptual, item and semantic equivalence. Codas, 30(1), e20170041. doi:10.1590/2317-1782/20182017041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, R., Hao, Y., Feng, L., Zhang, Y., & Huang, Z. (2011). The Chinese version of the pediatric quality of life inventory™ (pedsql™) family impact module: Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation. Health & Quality of Life Outcomes, 9(1), 16. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-9-16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dianat, I., Ghanbari, Z., & Asgharijafarabadi, M. (2014). Psychometric properties of the persian language version of the system usability scale. Health Promotion Perspectives, 4(1), 82–89. doi:10.5681/hpp.2014.011
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Erdinç, O., & Lewis, J. R. (2013). Psychometric evaluation of the t-csuq: The turkish version of the computer system usability questionnaire. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29(5), 319–326. doi:10.1080/10447318.2012.711702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finstad, K. (2006). The system usability scale and non-native english speakers. Journal of Usability Studies, 1(4), 185–188.
   Google Scholar
• Flavián, C., Guinalíu, M., & Gurrea, R. (2006). The role played by perceived usability, satisfaction and consumer trust on website loyalty. Information and Management, 43(1), 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.im.2005.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, Q., Zhu, B., Rau, P. L. P., Vyas, S., Chen, C., & Li, H. (2013). User experience with chinese handwriting input on touch-screen mobile phones. Cross-Cultural design. Methods, practice, and case studies (pp. 384–392). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, L. (1996). Towards effective usability evaluation in Asia: Cross-Cultural differences. In Proceedings of the 6th Australian Conference on Computer–Human Interaction (OZCHI'96), Sydney, Australia (pp. 135–136). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Hilton, A., & Skrutkowski, M. (2002). Translating instruments into other languages: Development and testing processes. Cancer Nursing, 25(1), 1–7. doi:10.1097/00002820-200202000-00001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia, G., Zhou, J., Yang, P., Lin, C., Cao, X., Hu, H., Ning, G. (2013). Integration of user centered design in the development of health monitoring system for elderly. 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).(pp. 1748–1751). Osaka, Japan: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Konstantina, O., Nikolaos, T., & Christos, K. (2015). Perceived usability evaluation of learning management systems: Empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(2), 227–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kortum, P., & Sorber, M. (2015). Measuring the usability of mobile applications for phones and tablets. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(8), 518–529. doi:10.1080/10447318.2015.1064658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kortum, P. T., & Bangor, A. (2013). Usability ratings for everyday products measured with the system usability scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29(2), 67–76. doi:10.1080/10447318.2012.681221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, J., Xu, L., Meng, Q., Zhang, J., & Gong, Y. (2014). The current status of usability studies of information technologies in china: A systematic study. BioMed Research International, 2014, 568303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. (2006). Usability testing. In: G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (pp. 1275–1316). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J., Utesch, B., & Maher, D. (2013). UMUX-LITE – When there’s no time for the SUS. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paris, France (pp. 2099–2102).
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. R. (2018a). Measuring perceived usability: The csuq, sus, and umux. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(12), 1148–1156. doi:10.1080/10447318.2017.1418805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. R. (2018b). The system usability scale: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(7), 577–590. doi:10.1080/10447318.2018.1455307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. R., & Sauro, J. (2017a). Can I leave this one out? The effect of dropping an item from the sus. Journal of Usability Studies, 13(1), 38–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. R., & Sauro, J. (2017b). Revisiting the factor structure of system usability scale. Journal of Usability Studies, 12(4), 183–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. R., Utesch, B. S., & Maher, D. E. (2015). Investigating the correspondence between umux-lite and sus scores. International conference of design, user experience, and usability (pp. 204–211). Los Angeles, CA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Li, F., & Li, Y. (2011). Usability evaluation of e-commerce on b2c websites in china. Procedia Engineering, 15, 5299–5304. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2011.08.982
   Google Scholar
• Li, R., Chen, Y. V., Sha, C., & Lu, Z. (2017). Effects of interface layout on the usability of in-vehicle information systems and driving safety. Displays, 49, 124–132. doi:10.1016/j.displa.2017.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z. (2014). User experience in asia. Journal of Usability Studies, 9(2), 42–50.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., Zhang, J., Zhang, H., & Chen, J. (2011). Usability in China. In I. Douglas & Z. Liu (Eds.), Global usability (pp. 111–135). London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Martinsa, A. I., Rosa, A. F., Queirós, A., & Silva, A. (2015). European Portuguese validation of the System Usability Scale. Procedia Computer Science, 67, 293–300. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.273
   Google Scholar
• Mcgee, M., Rich, A., & Dumas, J. (2004). Understanding the usability construct: User-perceived usbility. Human Factors & Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings, 48(5), 907–911. doi:10.1177/154193120404800535
   Google Scholar
• Mohamad, M. M., Yaacob, N. A., & Yaacob, N. M. (2018). Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the malay version of the system usability scale questionnaire for the assessment of mobile apps. Jmir Human Factors, 5(2), e10308. doi:10.2196/10308
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noiwan, J., & Norcio, A. F. (2006). Cultural differences on attention and perceived usability: Investigating color combinations of animated graphics. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(2), 103–122. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J., Han, S. H., Kim, H. K., Cho, Y., & Park, W. (2013). Developing elements of user experience for mobile phones and services: Survey, interview, and observation approaches. Human Factors in Ergonomics & Manufacturing, 23(4), 279–293. doi:10.1002/hfm.20316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pei, L., Xia, J., & Yan, J. (2010). Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the chinese version of the fear avoidance beliefs questionnaire. Journal of International Medical Research, 38(6), 1985–1996. doi:10.1177/147323001003800612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajanen, D., Clemmensen, T., Iivari, N., Inal, Y., Rızvanoğlu, K., Sivaji, A., … Boison, D. (2017). Ux professionals’ definitions of usability and ux – A comparison between turkey, finland, denmark, france and malaysia. INTERACT 2017: Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2017, Mumbai, India (pp 218–239).
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, A. F., Martins, A. I., Costa, V., Queirós, A., Silva, A., & Rocha, N. P. (2015). European Portuguese validation of the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ). 2015 10th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI) (pp. 17–20). Aveiro, Portugal: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, J., & Chisnell, D. (2008). Handbook of usability testing: How to plan, design, and conduct effective tests. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sauro, J. (2010). Does better usability increase customer loyalty? Retrieved from http://www.measuringusability.com/usability-loyalty.php
   Google Scholar
• Sauro, J., & Lewis, J. R. (2009, April 4–9). Correlations among prototypical usability metrics: Evidence for the construct of usability. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2009, Boston, MA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Sauro, J., & Lewis, J. R. (2011). When designing usability questionnaires, does it hurt to be positive? Proceedings of CHI 2011 (pp. 2215–2223). Vancouver, Canada: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Sauro, J., & Lewis, J. R. (2014). Quantifying the user experience. Beijing, China: China Machine Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharfina, Z., & Santoso, H. B. (2017). An Indonesian adaptation of the System Usability Scale (SUS). International Conference on Advanced Computer Science & Information Systems (pp. 145–148). Malang: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. A., Camilli, G., & Averill, M. (1981). Comparison of procedures for detecting test-item bias with both internal and external ability criteria. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6(4), 317–375.
   Google Scholar
• Sheu, F., Fu, H., & Shih, M. (2017). Pre-Testing the Chinese version of the System Usability Scale (C-SUS). Workshop Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 28–34). New Zealand: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Tullis, T., & Albert, W. (2008). Measuring the user experience: Collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics (2nd ed.). Beijing, China: Publishing House of Electronics Industry.
   Google Scholar
• Tullis, T. S., & Stetson, J. N. (2004). A comparison of questionnaires for assessing website usability. Paper presented at the Usability Professionals Association Annual Conference (pp. 7–11). Minneapolis, MN: UPA.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Vijver, A. J. R., & Rothmann, S. (2004). Assessment in multicultural groups: The South African case. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 30(4), 1–7. doi:10.4102/sajip.v30i4.169
   Google Scholar
• Van de vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis of comparative research. In J. W. Berry, Y. H. Poortinga, & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 1, 2nd ed., pp. 257–300). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Van de vijver, F. J. R., & Poortinga, Y. H. (1997). Towards an integrated analysis of bias in cross-cultural assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 13, 29–37. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.13.1.29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verduyn, P., & Lavrijsen, S. (2015). Which emotions last longest and why: The role of event importance and rumination. Motivation and Emotion, 39(1), 119–127. doi:10.1007/s11031-014-9445-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeeren, A. P. O. S., Law, L. C., Roto, V., Obrist, M., Hoonhout, J., & VäänänenVainioMattila, K. (2010). User experience evaluation methods: Current state and development needs. Nordic conference on human-computer interaction (pp. 521–530), Reykjavik, Iceland. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Vijver, F. V. D., & Tanzer, N. K. (2004). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: An overview. Revue Européenne De Psychologie Appliquée/european Review of Applied Psychology, 54(2), 119–135. doi:10.1016/j.erap.2003.12.004
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J. (2003). Human-computer interaction research and practice in china. Interactions, 10(2), 88–96. doi:10.1145/637848
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., & Lv, F. (2017). Usability testing of ATM machines interface based on eye tracking data. Chinese Journal of Ergonomics, 23(1), 48–54.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, Y., Wang, G., Liu, S., & Wu, H. (2012). Usability evaluation of infusion pump based on system usability scale. China Medical Devices, 27(10), 25–27.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, T., Linder, J., & Bolchini, D. (2012). Deep: Design-oriented evaluation of perceived usability. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28(5), 308–346. doi:10.1080/10447318.2011.586320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar