The Assessment Scale for Creative Collaboration (ASCC) Validation and Reliability Study

References

• Acar, S., & Runco, M. A. (2014). Assessing associative distance among ideas elicited by tests of divergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 26(2), 229–238. doi:10.1080/10400419.2014.901095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alomar, N., Almobarak, N., Alkoblan, S., Alhozaimy, S., & Alharbi, S. (2016). Usability engineering of agile software project management tools. International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability (pp. 197–208), Springer. doi:10.1177/1753193415616957
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., Hadley, C. N., & Kramer, S. J. (2002). Creativity under the gun. Harvard Business Review, 80, 52–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., & Pillemer, J. (2012). Perspectives on the social psychology of creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 3–15. doi:10.1002/jocb.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amitani, S., & Hori, K. (2002). Supporting musical composition by externalizing the composer’s mental space. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Creativity & Cognition (pp. 165–172), Loughborough, UK. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Baer, M., & Oldham, G. R. (2006). The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: Moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 963–970. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S., & Koefoed Hansen, L. (2015). Immodest proposals: Research through design and knowledge. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2093–2102), Seoul, Republic of Korea. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Barlett, J. E., Kotrlik, J. W., & Higgins, C. C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19(1), 43.
   Google Scholar
• Batey, M. (2012). The measurement of creativity: From definitional consensus to the introduction of a new heuristic framework. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 55–65. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.649181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckhaus, S. (2006, March 23–24). Seven factors to foster creativity in university HCI projects. Inventivity: Teaching Theory, Design and Innovation in HCI, Proceedings of of HCIEd2006-1 First Joint BCS/IFIP WG13. 1/ICS/EU CONVIVIO HCI Educators’ Workshop (pp. 91–95), Limerick, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatnagar, T., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2017). Design thinking and creative problem solving for undergraduate engineering education in India: The need and relevance. International Conference on Research into Design (pp. 953–967), India: Springer. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2016.09.010
   Google Scholar
• Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17–66). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Botma, Y., Van Rensburg, G. H., Coetzee, I. M., & Heyns, T. (2015). A conceptual framework for educational design at modular level to promote transfer of learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(5), 499–509. doi:10.1080/14703297.2013.866051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, S. R., & Cheek, J. M. (1986). The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality, 54(1), 106–148. doi:10.1111/jopy.1986.54.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britton, B. K., & Tesser, A. (1991). Effects of time-management practices on college grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 405. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.83.3.405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Creativity versus structure: A useful tension. (cover story). MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(4), 93–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1962). The conditions of creativity. In Contemporary approaches to creative thinking: A symposium held at the University of Colorado (pp. 1–30). Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en≈sdt=0%2C5&q=bruner+1962+creativity&btnG=&oq=Bruner+1962
   Google Scholar
• Candy, L. (2013). Evaluating creativity. In Creativity and rationale (pp. 57–84). San Diego, CA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chadli, S. Y., Idri, A., Ros, J. N., Fernández-Alemán, J. L., de Gea, J. M. C., & Toval, A. (2016). Software project management tools in global software development: A systematic mapping study. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 2006. doi:10.1186/s40064-016-3670-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cherry, E., & Latulipe, C. (2014). Quantifying the creativity support of digital tools through the creativity support index. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 21(4), 21. doi:10.1145/2633907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilana, P. K., Ko, A. J., & Wobbrock, J. (2015, April). From user-centered to adoption-centered design: A case study of an HCI research innovation becoming a product. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1749–1758), ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, M. M. (2008). Effects of argumentation on group micro-creativity: Statistical discourse analyses of algebra students’ collaborative problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(3), 382–402. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crilly, N., & Cardoso, C. (2017). Where next for research on fixation, inspiration and creativity in design? Design Studies, 50, 1–38. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2017.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropley, D. H. (2015). Promoting creativity and innovation in engineering education. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(2), 161. doi:10.1037/aca0000008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Hunter, J. (2003). Happiness in everyday life: The uses of experience sampling. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4(2), 185–199. doi:10.1023/A:1024409732742
   Google Scholar
• Culén, A. L. (2015). HCI education: Innovation, creativity and design thinking. International Conferences on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions (pp. 125–130), Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• D’souza, N., & Dastmalchi, M. R. (2016). Creativity on the move: Exploring little-c (p) and big-C (p) creative events within a multidisciplinary design team process. Design Studies, 46, 6–37. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2016.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darini, M., Pazhouhesh, H., & Moshiri, F. (2011). Relationship between employee’s innovation (creativity) and time management. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 25, 201–213. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.541
   Google Scholar
• deChambeau, A. (2017). The practice of being a student: CoPs and graduate student success. In J. McDonald, & A. Cater-Steel, (Eds.), Implementing communities of practice in higher education (pp. 395–422), Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Deterding, S. (2012). Gamification: Designing for motivation. Interactions, 19(4), 14–17. doi:10.1145/2212877
   Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2009). The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning. In Technology-enhanced learning (pp. 3–19). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dym, C. L., Agogino, A., Eris, O., Frey, D., & Leifer, L. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education -washington-, 94, 103–120. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dziuban, C. D., & Shirkey, E. C. (1974). When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules. Psychological Bulletin, 81(6), 358. doi:10.1037/h0036316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors: Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches. San Francisco, CA: Free man.
   Google Scholar
• Farh, J.-L., Lee, C., & Farh, C. I. (2010). Task conflict and team creativity: A question of how much and when. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1173. doi:10.1037/a0020015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finken, S., Culén, A. L., & Gasparini, A. (2014). Nurturing creativity: Assemblages in HCI design practices. Umeå, Sweden: Umeå Institute of Design, Umeå University.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. doi:10.2307/3151312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frich, J., Biskjaer, M. M., & Dalsgaard, P. (2018). Why HCI and creativity research must collaborate to develop new creativity support tools. Proceedings of the Technology, Mind, and Society (pp. 10), ACM, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., Batey, M., Booth, T. W., Patel, V., & Lozinskaya, D. (2011). Individual difference predictors of creativity in art and science students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(2), 114–121. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2011.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, D. G., & Cummings, L. L. (1988). Activation theory and job. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 81–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehlbach, H., Brown, S. W., Ioannou, A., Boyer, M. A., Hudson, N., Niv-Solomon, A., … Janik, L. (2008). Increasing interest in social studies: Social perspective taking and self-efficacy in stimulating simulations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 894–914. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gero, J., & Kan, J. (2016). Empirical results from measuring design creativity: Use of an augmented coding scheme in protocol analysis. DS86: Proceedings of The Fourth International Conference on Design Creativity, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Glăveanu, V. P., Ness, I. J., Wasson, B., & Lubart, T. (2019). Sociocultural perspectives on creativity, learning, and technology. In Creativity under duress in education? (pp. 63–82). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hadwin, D. H., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2011). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp 83–106). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, S. (2014). Creative synthesis: Exploring the process of extraordinary group creativity. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 324–343. doi:10.5465/amr.2012.0224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M. (2004). The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Human-Computer Interaction, 19(4), 319–349. doi:10.1207/s15327051hci1904_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuer, T., & Stein, J. (2019). From HCI to HRI: About users, acceptance and emotions. In International Conference on Human Systems Engineering and Design: Future Trends and Applications (pp. 149–153), Munich, Germany. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hirst, G., Van Knippenberg, D., & Zhou, J. (2009). A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), 280–293. doi:10.5465/amj.2009.37308035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, O. (2016). On modeling human-computer co-creativity. In Knowledge, information and creativity support systems (pp. 37–48). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, D., & Salvendy, G. (2006). Product creativity: Conceptual model, measurement and characteristics. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 7(4), 395–412. doi:10.1080/14639220500078195
   Google Scholar
• Hoskins, S. L., & Van Hooff, J. C. (2005). Motivation and ability: Which students use online learning and what influence does it have on their achievement? British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 177–192. doi:10.1111/bjet.2005.36.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, S.-W., Wang, M.-F., & Chen, C.-W. (2017). Time pressure and creativity in industrial design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(2), 271–289. doi:10.1007/s10798-015-9343-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C. S., Yang, S. J., Chiang, T. H., & Su, A. Y. (2016). Effects of situated mobile learning approach on learning motivation and performance of EFL students. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaarsveld, S., Lachmann, T., & van Leeuwen, C. (2012). Creative reasoning across developmental levels: Convergence and divergence in problem creation. Intelligence, 40(2), 172–188. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2012.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon, M., Fiebrink, R., Edmonds, E. A., & Herath, D. (2019). From rituals to magic: Interactive art and HCI of the past, present, and future. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 131, 108–119. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141–151. doi:10.1177/001316446002000116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantosalo, A., & Toivonen, H. (2016). Modes for creative human-computer collaboration: Alternating and task-divided co-creativity (pp. 8), Paris, France: Sony CSL.
   Google Scholar
• Karakaya, A. F., & Demirkan, H. (2015). Collaborative digital environments to enhance the creativity of designers. Computers in Human Behavior, 42, 176–186. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2005). Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse. New Jersey, NJ: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. A., & Russell, C. M. (2012). Identifying and assessing creativity as a component of giftedness. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(1), 60–73. doi:10.1177/0734282911428196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H. (2006). Can we trust creativity tests? A review of the torrance tests of creative thinking (TTCT). Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krapp, A. (1999). Interest, motivation and learning: An educational-psychological perspective. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(1), 23–40. doi:10.1007/BF03173109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtzberg, T. R., & Amabile, T. M. (2001). From Guilford to creative synergy: Opening the black box of team-level creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 285–294. doi:10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lance, C. E., Butts, M. M., & Michels, L. C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say? Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 202–220. doi:10.1177/1094428105284919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lew, K. H., Park, J., Lee, K., & Kang, S. (2013). The relationship among creativity thinking ability, creative personality and creative product. Advanced Science and Technology Letters, 36, 58–62.
   Google Scholar
• Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Pugh, K. J., Koskey, K. L., & Stewart, V. C. (2012). Developing conceptual understanding of natural selection: The role of interest, efficacy, and basic prior knowledge. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(1), 45–68. doi:10.1080/00220973.2011.559491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loiacono, E. T., Watson, R. T., & Goodhue, D. L. (2002). WebQual: A measure of website quality. Marketing Theory and Applications, 13(3), 432–438.
   Google Scholar
• Losada, M. (1999). The complex dynamics of high performance teams. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 30(9–10), 179–192. doi:10.1016/S0895-7177(99)00189-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamykina, L., Candy, L., & Edmonds, E. (2002). Collaborative creativity. Communications of the ACM, 45(10), 96–99. doi:10.1145/570907.570940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrickard, D. S., Wahid, S., Branham, S. M., & Harrison, S. (2013). Achieving both creativity and rationale: Reuse in design with images and claims. In Creativity and rationale (pp. 105–119). London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69(3), 220. doi:10.1037/h0048850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meneely, J., & Portillo, M. (2005). The adaptable mind in design: Relating personality, cognitive style, and creative performance. Creativity Research Journal, 17(2–3), 155–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2–3), 107–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Niazi, M., Mahmood, S., Alshayeb, M., Riaz, M. R., Faisal, K., & Cerpa, N. (2013). Challenges of project management in global software development: Initial results. 2013 Science and Information Conference (pp. 202–206), London, UK. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• O’connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32(3), 396–402. doi:10.3758/BF03200807
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ohly, S., & Fritz, C. (2010). Work characteristics, challenge appraisal, creativity, and proactive behavior: A multi-level study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), 543–565. doi:10.1002/job.633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onsman, A. (2016). Assessing creativity in a ‘New Generation’architecture degree. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 210–218. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2015.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oulasvirta, A., & Hornbæk, K. (2016). HCI research as problem-solving. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 4956–4967), San Jose, CA. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Paulus, P. B., & Baruah, J. (2018). Enhancing creativity in E-Planning: recommendations from a collaborative creativity perspective. In New approaches, methods, and tools in urban E-Planning (pp. 192–222). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Paulus, P. B., & Nijstad, B. A. (2003). Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, R. H., & Mundform, D. J. (2010). Recommended sample size for conducting exploratory factor analysis on dichotomous data. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 9(2), 359–368. doi:10.22237/jmasm/1288584240
   Google Scholar
• Peters, D., Calvo, R. A., & Ryan, R. M. (2018). Designing for motivation, engagement and wellbeing in digital experience. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 797. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pett, M. A., Lackey, N. R., & Sullivan, J. J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, J., Sengers, P., Hirsch, T., Jenkins, T., Gaver, W., & DiSalvo, C. (2015). Expanding and refining design and criticality in HCI. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2083–2092), Seoul, Republic of Korea. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407. doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83–96. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prem, R., Ohly, S., Kubicek, B., & Korunka, C. (2017). Thriving on challenge stressors? Exploring time pressure and learning demands as antecedents of thriving at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(1), 108–123. doi:10.1002/job.2115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reise, S. P., Waller, N. G., & Comrey, A. L. (2000). Factor analysis and scale revision. Psychological Assessment, 12(3), 287. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.12.3.287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S., Krapp, A., & Renninger, A. (2014). The role of interest in learning and development. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero, M., & Barberà, E. (2012). Computer-based creative collaboration in online learning. International Conference on Web-Based Learning (pp. 330–336), Sinaia, Romania. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (2007). A hierarchical framework for the study of creativity. New Horizons in Education, 55(3), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., Walczyk, J. J., Acar, S., Cowger, E. L., Simundson, M., & Tripp, S. (2014). The incremental validity of a short form of the ideational behavior scale and usefulness of distractor, contraindicative, and lie scales. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 48(3), 185–197. doi:10.1002/jocb.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanches, P., Janson, A., Karpashevich, P., Nadal, C., Qu, C., Daudén Roquet, C., … Höök, K. (2019). HCI and affective health: Taking stock of a decade of studies and charting future research directions. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 245), Glasgow, UK. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K., & DeZutter, S. (2009). Distributed creativity: How collective creations emerge from collaboration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(2), 81. doi:10.1037/a0013282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, T. J. (2015). Distributed affect as a framework for understanding creative collaboration. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (pp. 335–336). doi:10.1145/2757226.2764768
   Google Scholar
• Shneiderman, B. (2007). Creativity support tools: Accelerating discovery and innovation. Communications of the ACM, 50(12), 20–32. doi:10.1145/1323688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shneiderman, B., Fischer, G., Czerwinski, M., Resnick, M., Myers, B., Candy, L., … Terry, M. (2006). Creativity support tools: report from a U.S. national science foundation sponsored workshop. International Journal of Human-computer Interaction, 20(2), 61–77. doi:10.1207/s15327590ijhc2002_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephanidis, C. C., Salvendy, G., Antona, M., Chen, J. Y. C., Dong, J., Duffy, V. G., … Zhou, J. (2019). Seven HCI grand challenges. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(14), 1229–1269. doi:10.1080/10447318.2019.1619259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2005). Creativity or creativities? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63(4), 370–382. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoeger, H., & Ziegler, A. (2008). Evaluation of a classroom based training to improve self-regulation in time management tasks during homework activities with fourth graders. Metacognition and Learning, 3(3), 207–230. doi:10.1007/s11409-008-9027-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talone, A. B., Basavaraj, P., & Wisniewski, P. J. (2017). Enhancing human-computer interaction and user experience education through a hybrid approach to experiential learning. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education (pp. 83–88), Omaha, NE. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Normstechnical manual: Research Ed. : Verbal tests, forms A and B : Figural tests, Forms A and B. Flere materialer. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.cy/books?id=_4dUYAAACAAJ
   Google Scholar
• Valiente, C., Swanson, J., & Eisenberg, N. (2012). Linking students’ emotions and academic achievement: When and why emotions matter. Child Development Perspectives, 6(2), 129–135. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00192.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vyas, D., Heylen, D., Nijholt, A., & Van Der Veer, G. (2009). Collaborative practices that support creativity in design. In ECSCW 2009 (pp. 151–170). London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the Development of Children, 23(3), 34–41.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, D. L. (2017). Mixing methods: Creative collaboration in mobile moviemaking. International Journal of Innovation, 3(2), 13.
   Google Scholar
• WEF. (2016). New vision for education: Fostering social and emotional learning through technology. Geneva, CH: World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Wentzel, K. R., & Miele, D. B. (2009). Handbook of motivation at school. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–Value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wishart, J., & Eagle, S. (2012). The development of a scale to assess creative collaboration via online tools. New Horizons in Web Based Learning, 320–329. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-43454-3_33
   Google Scholar
• Wishart, J., Eagle, S., Romero, M., Barberà, E., Järvelä, S., Hyvönen, P., & Vuopala, E. (2011). CoCreat research plan. Internal report of the CoCreat project. Bristol, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Wolters, C. A., Won, S., & Hussain, M. (2017). Examining the relations of time management and procrastination within a model of self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 12(3), 381–399. doi:10.1007/s11409-017-9174-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, W., Kotze, P., Read, J., Bannon, L., & Hvannberg, E. (2007). Inventivity in HCI education: Lessons from limerick. Creativity: Experiencing to Educate and Design-Proceedings of the HCI Educators 2007 (pp. 29–30), Limerick.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, N. D., Akloubou Gnonhosou, D. C., & Bowling, J. W. (2015). Combining parallel and exploratory factor analysis in identifying relationship scales in secondary data. Marriage & Family Review, 51(5), 385–395. doi:10.1080/01494929.2015.1059785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, F., & Zhou, J. (2015). Effects of cultural power distance on group creativity and individual group member creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(7), 990–1007. doi:10.1002/job.v36.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaharias, P. (2009). Usability in the context of e-learning: A framework augmenting ‘traditional’usability constructs with instructional design and motivation to learn. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI), 5(4), 37–59. doi:10.4018/IJTHI
   Google Scholar
• Zampetakis, L. A., Bouranta, N., & Moustakis, V. S. (2010). On the relationship between individual creativity and time management. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5(1), 23–32. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2009.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, L., Salvendy, G., & Zhang, M. (2009). Factor structure of web site creativity. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 568–577. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. (1997). The nature of external representations in problem solving. Cognitive Science, 21(2), 179–217. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2102_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, J., & Forlizzi, J. (2014). Research through design in HCI. In Ways of knowing in HCI (pp. 167–189). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zurita, G., Baloian, N., Pino, J. A., & Boghosian, M. (2016). Introducing a collaborative tool supporting a learning activity involving creativity with rotation of group members. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 22(10), 1360–1379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar