A Shoe Is a Shoe Is a Shoe: Interpersonalization and Meaning-making in Museums – Research Findings and Design Implications

References

• Ardito, C., Buono, P., Costabile, M. F., Desolda, G., Matera, M., & Piccinno, A. (2018). Towards enabling cultural-heritage experts to create customizable visit experiences. Proceedings of the 2018 AVI-CH workshop on advanced visual interfaces for cultural heritage, Vol. 2091. CEUR-WS.Org. AVI-CH, Castiglione della Pescaia, Grosseto, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Aspers, P. (2009). Empirical phenomenology: A qualitative research approach (The Cologne Seminars). Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, 9(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/20797222.2009.11433992
   Google Scholar
• Back, J., Bedwell, B., Benford, S., Eklund, L., Løvlie, A., Preston, W., Rajkowska, P., Rydin, G., Karin,, Spence, J., Thorn, E., Waern, A., & Wray, T. (2018). GIFT: Hybrid museum experiences through gifting and play. In A. Antoniou & M. Wallace (Eds.), Proceedings of the workshop on cultural informatics (pp. 31–45). Nicosia, Cyprus.
   Google Scholar
• Bannon, L., Benford, S., Bowers, J., & Heath, C. (2005). Hybrid design creates innovative museum experiences. Communications of the ACM, 48(3), 62–65. https://doi.org/10.1145/1047671.1047706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellucci, A., Diaz, P., & Aedo, I. (2015). A see-through display for interactive museum showcases. Proceedings of the 2015 international conference on interactive tabletops & surfaces, Madeira Portugal, 301–306. https://doi.org/10.1145/2817721.2823497
   Google Scholar
• Berg, B. L. (2008). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (7 ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Berkovich, M., Date, J., Keeler, R., Louw, M., & O’ Toole, M. (2003). Discovery point: Enhancing the museum experience with technology. In CHI ’03 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 994–995). CHI EA ’03. Ft. Lauderdale Florida USA. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/765891.766112
   Google Scholar
• Blud, L. M. (1990). Social interaction and learning among family groups visiting a museum. Museum Management and Curatorship, 9(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647779009515193
   Google Scholar
• Calcagno, M., & Biscaro, C. (2012). Designing the interactions in the museum. International Studies of Management & Organization, 42(2), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.2753/IMO0020-8825420203
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2002). The internet galaxy: Reflections on the internet, business, and society. OUP Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. (2018). Exploring design guidelines of using user-centered design in gamification development: A Delphi Study. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(13), 1170–1181. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1514823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciolfi, L., Avram, G., Maye, L., Dulake, N., Marshall, M. T., van Dijk, D., & McDermott, F. (2016). Articulating co-design in museums: Reflections on two participatory processes. Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work & social computing, San Francisco, CA, 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819967
   Google Scholar
• Ciolfi, L., Bannon, L. J., & Fernström, M. (2008). Including visitor contributions in cultural heritage installations: Designing for participation. Museum Management and Curatorship, 23(4), 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770802517399
   Google Scholar
• Ciolfi, L., & McLoughlin, M. (2012). Designing for meaningful visitor engagement at a living history museum. Proceedings of the 7th nordic conference on human-computer interaction: Making sense through design, 69–78. Copenhagen, Denmark. https://doi.org/10.1145/2399016.2399028
   Google Scholar
• Cosley, D., Lewenstein, J., Herman, A., Holloway, J., Baxter, J., Nomura, S., Boehner, K., & Gay, G. (2008). ArtLinks: Fostering social awareness and reflection in museums. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Florence, Italy, 403–412. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357121
   Google Scholar
• Debenedetti, S. (2003). Investigating the role of companions in the art museum experience. International Journal of Arts Management, 5(3), 52–63.
   Google Scholar
• Dourish, P. (2004). Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eklund, L. (2015). Focus group interviews as a way to evaluate and understand game play experiences. In P. Lankoski & S. Björk (Eds.), Game research methods (pp. 133–148). ETC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eklund, L., Sjöblom, B., & Prax, P. (2019). Lost in translation: Video games becoming cultural heritage? Cultural Sociology, 13(4), 444–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975519852501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan, M. (2009). Critical Play: Radical game design. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fosh, L., Benford, S., Reeves, S., & Koleva, B. (2014). Gifting personal interpretations in galleries. Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems - CHI ’14, Toronto Ontario, Canada, 625–634. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557259
   Google Scholar
• Fosh, L., Benford, S., Reeves, S., Koleva, B., & Brundell, P. (2013). See me, feel me, touch me, hear me: Trajectories and interpretation in a sculpture garden. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Paris, France, 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470675
   Google Scholar
• Galani, A., & Chalmers, M. (2004). Production of pace as collaborative activity. In CHI ’04 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, 1417–1420. CHI EA ’04, Vienna Austria, ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/985921.986079
   Google Scholar
• Grimes, S. M., & Feenberg, A. (2009). Rationalizing play: A critical theory of digital gaming. The Information Society, 25(2), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240802701643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, N. (2000). Doing psychological research: Gathering and analysing data. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C., & Vom Lehn, D. (2004). Configuring reception: (Dis-)Regarding the ‘Spectator’ in museums and galleries. Theory, Culture & Society, 21(6), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276404047415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, C., & Vom Lehn, D. (2008). Configuring “Interactivity”: Enhancing engagement in science centres and museums. Social Studies of Science, 38(1), 63–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312707084152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh, J., Heath, C., Vom Lehn, D., & Cleverly, J. (2005). Creating assemblies in public environments: Social interaction, interactive exhibits and CSCW. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 14(1), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-004-1814-8
   Google Scholar
• Hooper-Greenhill, E. (1992). Museums and the shaping of knowledge. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2000). Changing values in the art museum: Rethinking communication and learning. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 6(1), 9–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/135272500363715
   Google Scholar
• Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2006). Studying visitors. In S. Macdonald (Ed.), A companion to museum studies (pp. 362–376). Companion in Cultural Studies. Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Jafari, A., Taheri, B., & Vom Lehn, D. (2013). Cultural consumption, interactive sociality, and the museum. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(15–16), 1729–1752. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2013.811095
   Google Scholar
• Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. (1995). Theorizing Heritage. Ethnomusicology, 39(3), 367–380. https://doi.org/10.2307/924627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ : British Medical Journal, 311(7000), 299–302. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laaksolahti, J., Tholander, J., Lundén, M., Belenguer Solsona, J., Karlsson, A., & Jaensson, T. (2011, January 22). The lega: A device for leaving and finding tactile traces. Proceedings of the 4th international conference on tangible, embedded and embodied interaction. TEI ’11, Funchal, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, D. (2015). The past is a foreign country—revisited (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magnenat-Thalmann, N., & Papagiannakis, G. (2005). Virtual worlds and augmented reality in cultural heritage applications. In M. Baltsavias, A. Gruen, L. van Gool, & M. Pateraki (Eds.), Recording, modeling and visualization of cultural heritage (pp. 419–430). Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• McManus, P. (1989). What people say and how they think in a science museum. In D. L. Uzzell (Ed.), Heritage Interpretation, Vol 2: The visitor experience (pp. 156–165). Bellhaven.
   Google Scholar
• NVivo (Version 11). (2016). [Computer software]. QSR Interenational.
   Google Scholar
• Petrelli, D., & O’Brien, S. (2018). Phone vs. Tangible in museums: A comparative study. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 112, 1–112. CHI’18. Montreal QC Canada: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173686
   Google Scholar
• Petrie, H., Othman, M. K., & Power, C. (2017). Smartphone guide technology in cultural spaces: Measuring visitor experience with an iPhone multimedia guide in shakespeare’s church. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 33(12), 973–983. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1304606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, S., Sakr, M., & Jewitt, C. (2016). Exploring whole-body interaction and design for museums. Interacting with Computers, 28(5), 569–583. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwv032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rounds, J. (2006). Doing identity work in museums. Curator: The Museum Journal, 49(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2006.tb00208.x
   Google Scholar
• Simon, N. (2010). The participatory museum (1st ed.). ( Museum 2.0). Santa Cruz, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Sintas, J. L., Álvarez, E. G., & Rubiales, E. P. (2014). Art museum visitors: Interaction strategies for sharing experiences. Museum Management and Curatorship, 29(3), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2014.919175
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. C., & Iversen, O. S. (2014). Participatory heritage innovation: Designing dialogic sites of engagement. Digital Creativity, 25(3), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2014.904796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soren, B. J. (2009). Museum experiences that change visitors. Museum Management and Curatorship, 24(3), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770903073060
   Google Scholar
• Steier, R., Pierroux, P., & Krange, I. (2015). Embodied interpretation: Gesture, social interaction, and meaning making in a national art museum. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 7, 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szymanski, M. H., Aoki, P. M., Grinter, R. E., Hurst, A., Thornton, J. D., & Woodruff, A. (2008). Sotto voce: Facilitating social learning in a historic house. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 17(1), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-007-9067-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolmie, P., Benford, S., Greenhalgh, C., Rodden, T., & Reeves, S. (2014). Supporting group interactions in museum visiting. Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing, Baltimore, MD, 1049–1059.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. (2012). Alone Together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other (1 ed.). Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Vergo, P. (Ed.). (1989). The New museology. Reaktion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeeren, A. P. O. S., Calvi, L., Sabiescu, A., Trocchianesi, R., Stuedahl, D., & Giaccardi, E. (2016). Involving the crowd in future museum experience design. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, San Jose, CA, 3347–3354. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2856482
   Google Scholar
• Vom Lehn, D., Heath, C., & Hindmarsh, J. (2001). Exhibiting interaction: Conduct and collaboration in museums and galleries. Symbolic Interaction, 24(2), 189–216. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2001.24.2.189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waern, A., Bergström, K., Rosqvist, D., & Månsson, L. (2014, November). Gaming in the crucible of science: Gamifying the science center visit. 11th advances in computer entertainment technology conference (ACE 2014), Funchal, Madeira, Portugal, 11-14 http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-238161
   Google Scholar
• Witcomb, A. (2006). Interactivity: Thinking beyond. In S. Macdonald (Ed.), A companion to museum studies (pp. 353–361). Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Woodruff, A., Aoki, P. M., Hurst, A., & Szymanski, M. H. (2001). The guidebook, the friend, and the room: Visitor experience in a historic house. In CHI ’01 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 273–274). CHI EA ’01. Seattle Washington: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/634067.634229
   Google Scholar
• Woodruff, A., Szymanski, M. H., Aoki, P. M., & Hurst, A. (2001). The conversational role of electronic guidebooks. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on ubiquitous computing (pp. 187–208). UbiComp ’01. Cancun, Quintana Roo, Mexico. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=647987.741321
   Google Scholar