References
- Abdullah, F., & Ward, R. (2016). Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 238–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.036
- Abdullah, F., Ward, R., & Ahmed, E. (2016). Investigating the influence of the most commonly used external variables of TAM on students’ Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) and Perceived Usefulness (PU) of e-portfolios. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 75-90. doi:doi.10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.014
- Al Ghamdi, A., Samarji, A., & Watt, A. (2016). Essential considerations in distance education in KSA: Teacher immediacy in a virtual teaching and learning environment. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.651
- Al-Balushi, S. M., & Al-Abdali, N. S. (2015). Using a Moodle-based professional development program to train science teachers to teach for creativity and its effectiveness on their teaching practices. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(4), 461–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9530-8
- Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2017, May). Digital learning compass: Distance education enrollment report 2017. https://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/digtiallearningcompassenrollment2017.pdf
- Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B., & Tanaka, F. (2018). Social robots for education: A review. Science Robotics, 3(21), eaat5954. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aat5954
- Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York: David McKay Company.
- Brown, L., Kerwin, R., & Howard, A. M. (2013). Applying behavioral strategies for student engagement using a robotic education agent. In Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC), 2013 IEEE international conference on IEEE (pp. 4360–4365). https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2013.744.
- Castellano, G., Paiva, A., Kappas, A., Aylett, R., Hastie, H., & Bull, S. (2013, July). Towards empathic virtual and robotic tutors. In International conference on artificial intelligence in education (pp. 733–736). Springer.
- Choi, G., & Chung, H. (2013). Applying the technology acceptance model to social networking sites (SNS): Impact of subjective norm and social capital on the acceptance of SNS. International Journal of Human-computer Interaction, 29(10), 619–628. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2012.756333
- Choi, J. K., & Ji, Y. G. (2015). Investigating the importance of trust on adopting an autonomous vehicle. International Journal of Human-computer Interaction, 31(10), 692–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1070549
- Chollet, M., Wortwein, T., Morency, L. P., Shapiro, A., & Sherer, S. (2015, September). Exploring feedback strategies to improving public speaking: An interactive virtual audience framework. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing ACM (pp. 1143–1154). https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2806060
- Cruz-Benito, J., Sánchez-Prieto, J. C., Therón, R., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2019). Measuring students’ acceptance to AI-driven assessment in eLearning: Proposing a first TAM-based research model. In P. Zaphiris & A. Ioannou (Eds.), Learning and collaboration technologies. Design, experiences. 6th international conference, LCT 2019, held as part of the 21st HCI international conference, HCII 2019, Orlando, FL, USA, July 26-31, 2019. Proceedings, part I (pp. 15–25). Springer Nature.
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
- Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International journal of man-machine studies, 38(3), 475–487. doi:10.1006/imms.1993.1022
- Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
- Department of Education. (2018, May). The condition of education: A letter from the commissioner. Institute of Education Sciences National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cha.asp
- Department of Education. (2019, May). Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), Spring 2017 and Spring 2018, Fall Enrollment component. Institute of Education Sciences National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d18/tables/dt18_311.15.asp
- Double Robotics. (2017). Blended learning/hybrid classroom. Double. https://www.doublerobotics.com/education/
- Edwards, A., & Edwards, C. (2017). The machines are coming: Future directions in instructional communication research. Communication Education, 66(4), 487–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2017.1349915
- Edwards, A., Edwards, C., Spence, P. R., Harris, C., & Gambino, A. (2016). Robots in the classroom: Differences in students’ perceptions of credibility and learning between “teacher as robot” and “robot as teacher”. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 627–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.005
- Edwards, C., Edwards, A., Spence, P. R., & Lin, X. (2018). I, teacher: Using artificial intelligence and social robots in communication and instruction. Communication Education, 67(4), 473–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2018.1502459
- Edwards, C., Edwards, A., Stoll, B., Lin, X., & Massey, N. (2019). Evaluations of an artificial intelligence instructor’s voice: Social theory in human-robot interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 357–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.027
- Fischer, G. (1990). Communication requirements for cooperative problem solving systems. Information Systems, 15(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4379(90)90014-G
- Gockley, R., Forlizzi, J., & Simmons, R. (2007, March). Natural person-following behavior for social robots. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction (pp. 17–24). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1228716.1228720
- Guthrie, S. E. (1993). Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion. Oxford Univ Press.
- Guzman, A. (2018). Human-machine communication: Rethinking communication, technology, and ourselves. Peter Lang Publishing.
- Javaheri, A., Moghadamnejad, N., Keshavarz, H., Javaheri, E., Dobbins, C., Momeni, E., & Rawassizadeh, R. (2019). Public vs Media Opinion on Robots. arXiv Preprint. Retrieved from arXiv:1905.01615
- Johal, W., Castellano, G., Tanaka, F., & Okita, S. (2018). Robots for learning. International Journal of Social Robotics, 10(3), 293–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-018-0481-8
- Kaufmann, R., Sellnow, D. D., & Frisby, B. N. (2016). The development and validation of the online learning climate scale. Communication Education, 65(3), 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2015.1101778
- Kelly, S. E., & Westerman, D. K. (2016). New technologies and distributed learning systems. In P. L. Witt (Ed.), Communication and learning (pp. 455-477). Walter de Gruyter Inc.
- Kim, J., Song, H., & Luo, W. (2016). Broadening the understanding of social presence: Implications and contributions to the mediated communication and online education. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 672–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.009
- Li, J. (2015). The benefit of being physically present: A survey of experimental works comparing copresent robots, telepresence robots, and virtual agents. International Journal of Human-computer Studies, 77, 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.01.001
- Li, J., Kizilcec, R., Bailenson, J., & Ju, W. (2015). Social robots and virtual agents as lecturers for video instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1222–1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.005
- Lin, P. H., & Yeh, S. C. (2019). How motion-control influences a VR-supported technology for mental rotation learning: From the perspectives of playfulness, gender difference and technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(18), 1736–1746. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1571784
- Liu, M., Navarrete, C. C., Scordino, R., Kang, J., Ko, Y., & Lim, M. (2016). Examining teachers’ use of iPads: Comfort level, perception, and use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1175853
- Liu, X. (2010). Empirical testing of a theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: An exploratory study of educational wikis. Communication Education, 59(1), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903431745
- Lu, J., Yu, C. S., Liu, C., & Yao, J. E. (2003). Technology acceptance model for wireless Internet. Internet Research, 13(3), 206–222. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240310478222
- Mazman, S. G., & Usluel, Y. K. (2010). Modeling educational usage of Facebook. Computers & Education, 55(2), 444–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.008
- McDowell, Z. J., & Gunkel, D. J. (2016). Introduction to “machine communication”. Communication +1, 5(1), 1–5. http://scholarworks.umass.edu/cpo/vol5/iss1/1
- McPherson, S. S. (2009). Tim Berners-Lee: Inventor of the world wide web. Twenty-First Century Books.
- Mubin, O., Stevens, C. J., Shahid, S., Al Mahmud, A., & Dong, J. J. (2013). A review of the applicability of robots in education. Journal of Technology in Education and Learning, 1(209–0015), 13. https://doi.org/10.2316/Journal.209.2013.1.209-0015
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
- Nass, C., Steuer, J., & Tauber, E. R. (1994). Computers are social actors. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 72-78). doi:10.1145/191666.191703
- Online Learning Consortium. (2015). 2015 online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. Online Learning Consortium. http://onlinelearningconsortuim.org/read/online-report-card-tracking-online-educaiton-united-states-2015/
- Park, E., Kim, K. J., & Del Pobil, A. P. (2011, November). The effects of a robot instructor’s positive vs. negative feedbacks on attraction and acceptance towards the robot in classroom. In International conference on social robotics (pp. 135–141). Springer.
- Park, N., Lee, K. M., & Cheong, P. H. (2007). University instructors’ acceptance of electronic courseware: An application of the technology acceptance model. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00391.x
- Park, Y., & Chen, J. V. (2007). Acceptance and adoption of the innovative use of smartphone. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(9), 1349–1365. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570710834009
- Pfeifer, R., & Scheier, C. (1999). Understanding intelligence. The MIT Press.
- Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., Mena, J., & Rodríguez-Arroyo, J. A. (2017). In-service teachers’ self-perceptions of digital competence and OER use as determined by a xMOOC training course. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 356–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.010
- Reynolds, M., Deanna, S., Head, K., & Anthony, K. E. (2014). Exploring the educational value of the undergraduate teaching apprentice (UTA) experience. Journal of the Association of Communication Administration, 33(1), 17–34. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/58dbe18c03596e2e942115e9/t/5906336720099e963751fbde/1493578640472/JACA_33.1.pdf
- Sagnier, C., Loup-Escande, E., Lourdeaux, D., Thouvenin, I., & Valléry, G. (2020). User acceptance of virtual reality: An extended technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(11), 993–1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1708612
- Sánchez-Prieto, J. C., Cruz-Benito, J., Therón, R., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2019). How to measure teachers’ acceptance of AI-driven assessment in eLearning: A TAM-based proposal. In M. Á. Conde-González, F. J. Rodríguez-Sedano, C. Fernández-Llamas, & F. J. García-Peñalvo (Eds.), TEEM’19 proceedings of the seventh international conference on technological ecosystems for enhancing multiculturality (Leon, Spain, October 16th-18th, 2019) (pp. 181–186). ACM.
- Sellnow, D. D., & Kaufmann, R. (2018). Instructional communication and the online learning environment: Then, now, and next. In M. L. Houser & A. M. Hosek (Eds.), Handbook of instructional communication: Relational and rhetorical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 195–206). Routledge.
- Sellnow-Richmond, D., Strawser, M. G., & Sellnow, D. D. (2019). Student perceptions of teaching effectiveness and learning achievement: A comparative examination of online and hybrid delivery format. Communication Teacher, 34(3), 248–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2019.173456
- Sharkey, A. J. C. (2016). Should we welcome robot teachers? Ethics and Information Technology, 18(4), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-016-9387-z
- Shea, P., Li, C. S., & Pickett, A. (2006). A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(3), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.06.005
- Song, H., Kim, J., & Luo, W. (2016). Teacher – Student relationship in online classes: A role of teacher self-disclosure. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 436–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.037
- Song, H., Kim, J., & Park, N. (2019). I know my professor: Teacher self-disclosure in online education and a mediating role of social presence. International Journal of Human-computer Interaction, 35(6), 448–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1455126
- Statista. (2019, February). Number of voice assistants in use worldwide 2019-2023. https://www.statista.com/statistics/973815/worldwide-digital-voice-assistant-in-use/
- Stenerson, J., Blanchard, L., Fassiotto, M., Hernandez, M., & Muth, A. (2010). The role of adjuncts in the professoriate. Peer Review, 12(3), 23–26. https://login.lp.hscl.ufl.edu/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/758939374?accountid=10920
- Sung, E., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). Five facets of social presence in online distance education. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1738–1747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.014
- Tarhan, O. (2015). The state of in-service training of teachers and teacher training in National Education Councils. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.152
- Tichavsky, L. P., Hunt, A. N., Driscoll, A., & Jicha, K. (2015). “It’s just nice having a real teacher”: Student perceptions of online versus face-to-face instruction. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2015.090202
- Walther, J. B. (2011). Visual cues in computer-mediated communication: Cometimes less is more. In A. Kappa & N. Kramer (Eds.), Face-to-face communication over the Internet: Emotions in a web of culture, language, and technology (pp. 17–38). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977589.003
- Willingham, J. (2019, September 14). U.S. News 2020: Dept rank vs academic rep vs overall rank plus social mobility. Public University Honors.com. Retrieved October 20, 2019, from https://publicuniversityhonors.com/category/stats-and-surveys/
- Wu, H. K., Lee, S. W., Chang, H. Y., & Liang, J. C. (2012). Current status, opportunities, and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.02