References
- Bueno, M., Dogan, E., Selem, F. H., Monacelli, E., Boverie, S., & Guillaume, A. (2016). How different mental workload levels affect the take-over control after automated driving. IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Proceedings, ITSC, 2040–2045. Los Angeles, California. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2016.7795886
- Clark, H., McLaughlin, A. C., Williams, B., & Feng, J. (2017). Performance in takeover and characteristics of non-driving related tasks during highly automated driving in younger and older drivers. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 61(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601504
- Dingus, T. A., Hanowski, R. J., & Klauer, S. G. (2011). Estimating crash risk. Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications, 19(4), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1064804611423736
- Engström, J., Johansson, E., & Östlund, J. (2005). Effects of visual and cognitive load in real and simulated motorway driving. Transportation Research. Part F, 8(2 SPEC. ISS), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2005.04.012
- Eriksson, A., & Stanton, N. A. (2017). Takeover time in highly automated vehicles: Noncritical transitions to and from manual control. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 59(4), 689–705. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816685832
- FakhrHosseini, S. M., & Jeon, M. (2019). How do angry drivers respond to emotional music? A comprehensive perspective on assessing emotion. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 13(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-019-00300-3
- Favarò, F. M. (2020). Impact of Smart Phones’ Interaction Modality on Driving Performance for Conventional and Autonomous Vehicles. (Issue January). https://trid.trb.org/view/1549846
- Favarò, F. M., Seewald, P., Scholtes, M., & Eurich, S. (2019). Quality of control takeover following disengagements in semi-automated vehicles. Transportation Research. Part F, 64, 196–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.05.004
- Forster, Y., Naujoks, F., Neukum, A., & Huestegge, L. (2017). Driver compliance to take-over requests with different auditory outputs in conditional automation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 109, 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.019
- Frison, A., Wintersberger, P., Schartmüller, C., & Riener, A. (2019). The real T(h)OR: Evaluation of emergency take-over on a test track. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications Adjunct Proceedings - AutomotiveUI ’19, 478–482. Utrecht, Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1145/3349263.3349602
- Gold, C., Happee, R., & Bengler, K. (2018). Modeling take-over performance in level 3 conditionally automated vehicles. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 116, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.11.009
- Gold, C., Körber, M., Lechner, D., & Bengler, K. (2016). Taking over control from highly automated vehicles in complex traffic situations. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 58(4), 642–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816634226
- Hancock, P. A., Lesch, M., & Simmons, L. (2003). The distraction effects of phone use during a crucial driving maneuver. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35(4), 501–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00028-3
- Harms, L., & Patten, C. (2003). Peripheral detection as a measure of driver distraction. A study of memory-based versus system-based navigation in a built-up area. Transportation Research. Part F, 6(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8478(02)00044-X
- Horrey, W. J., & Lesch, M. F. (2009). Driver-initiated distractions: Examining strategic adaptation for in-vehicle task initiation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 41(1), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2008.10.008
- Jahn, G., Oehme, A., Krems, J. F., & Gelau, C. (2005). Peripheral detection as a workload measure in driving: Effects of traffic complexity and route guidance system use in a driving study. Transportation Research. Part F, 8(3), 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2005.04.009
- Jamson, A. H., & Merat, N. (2005). Surrogate in-vehicle information systems and driver behaviour: Effects of visual and cognitive load in simulated rural driving. Transportation Research. Part F, 8(2 SPEC. ISSuppl.), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2005.04.002
- Jamson, A. H., Merat, N., Carsten, O. M. J., & Lai, F. C. H. (2013). Behavioural changes in drivers experiencing highly-automated vehicle control in varying traffic conditions. Transportation Research Part C, 30, 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2013.02.008
- Jarosch, O., Kuhnt, M., Paradies, S., & Bengler, K. (2017). It’s out of our hands now! Effects of non-driving related tasks during highly automated driving on drivers’ fatigue. Proceedings of the Ninth International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, 319–325. Manchester Village, Vermont. https://doi.org/10.17077/drivingassessment.1653
- Jeon, M. (2019). Multimodal displays for take-over in level 3 automated vehicles while playing a game. Extended abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, LBW0229. Glasgow, Scotland. https://doi.org/org/10.1145/3290607.3313056
- Jeon, M., Gable, T. M., Davison, B. K., Nees, M. A., Wilson, J., & Walker, B. N. (2015). Menu navigation with in-vehicle technologies: Auditory menu cues improve dual task performance, preference, and workload. International Journal of Human-computer Interaction, 31(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2014.925774
- Jeong, H., & Liu, Y. (2019). Effects of non-driving-related-task modality and road geometry on eye movements, lane-keeping performance, and workload while driving. Transportation Research. Part F, 60, 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.10.015
- Kim, H. J., & Yang, J. H. (2017). Takeover requests in simulated partially autonomous vehicles considering human factors. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 47(5), 735–740. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2017.2674998
- Kim, J., Jeong, M., & Lee, S. C. (2019). Why did this voice agent not understand me? error recovery strategy for in-vehicle voice user interface. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings – AutomotiveUI’ 19, 146–150. Utrecht, Netherlands.
- Ko, S., Zhang, Y., & Jeon, M. (2019). Modeling the effects of auditory display takeover requests on drivers’ behavior in autonomous vehicles. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications Adjunct Proceedings - AutomotiveUI ’19, 392–398. Utrecht, Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1145/3349263.3351508
- Ko, S. M., & Ji, Y. G. (2018). How we can measure the non-driving-task engagement in automated driving: Comparing flow experience and workload. Applied Ergonomics, 67, 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.10.009
- Körber, M., Prasch, L., & Bengler, K. (2018). Why do i have to drive now? Post Hoc explanations of takeover requests. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 60(3), 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720817747730
- Kutchek, K., & Jeon, M. (2019). Takeover and handover requests using non-speech auditory displays in semi-automated vehicles. Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, LBW0228. Glasgow, Scotland. https://doi.org/org/10.1145/3290607.3313078
- Lee, S. C., Kim, Y. W., & Ji, Y. G. (2019). Effects of visual complexity of in-vehicle information display: Age-related differences in visual search task in the driving context. Applied Ergonomics, 81, 102888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102888
- Lee, S. C., Yoon, S. H., & Ji, Y. G. (2019). Modeling task completion time of in-vehicle information systems while driving with keystroke level modeling. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 72, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2019.06.001
- Llaneras, R. E., Salinger, J., & Green, C. A. (2013). Human factors issues associated with limited ability autonomous driving systems: Drivers’ allocation of visual attention to the forward roadway. Proceedings of the 7th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design: Driving Assessment 2013, 92–98. Bolton Landing, New York. https://doi.org/10.17077/drivingassessment.1472
- Mehler, B., Kidd, D., Reimer, B., Reagan, I., Dobres, J., & McCartt, A. (2016). Multi-modal assessment of on-road demand of voice and manual phone calling and voice navigation entry across two embedded vehicle systems. Ergonomics, 59(3), 344–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1081412
- Merat, N., Jamson, A. H., Lai, F. C. H., Daly, M., & Carsten, O. M. J. (2014). Transition to manual: Driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle. Transportation Research. Part F, 27(PB), 274–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.09.005
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2013). Preliminary statement of policy concerning automated vehicles. In Washington DC. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483346526.n340
- Naujoks, F., Befelein, D., Wiedemann, K., & Neukum, A. (2017). A review of non-driving-related tasks used in studies on automated driving. International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, 525–537. Los Angeles, California.https://doi.org/10.1201/b12321
- Naujoks, F., Purucker, C., Wiedemann, K., & Marberger, C. (2019). Noncritical state transitions during conditionally automated driving on german freeways: effects of non–driving related tasks on takeover time and takeover quality. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 61(4), 596–613. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720818824002
- Neubauer, C., Matthews, G., & Saxby, D. (2012). The effects of cell phone use and automation on driver performance and subjective state in simulated driving. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 56(1), 1987–1991. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181312561415
- Niezgoda, M., Tarnowski, A., Kruszewski, M., & Kamiński, T. (2015). Towards testing auditory-vocal interfaces and detecting distraction while driving: A comparison of eye-movement measures in the assessment of cognitive workload. Transportation Research. Part F, 32, 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.012
- Ogbanufe, O., & Gerhart, N. (2018). Watch it! Factors driving continued feature use of the smartwatch. International Journal of Human-computer Interaction, 34(11), 999–1014. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1404779
- Owen, A. M., McMillan, K. M., Laird, A. R., & Bullmore, E. (2005). N-back working memory paradigm: A meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 25(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20131
- Petermeijer, S., Bazilinskyy, P., Bengler, K., & de Winter, J. (2017). Take-over again: Investigating multimodal and directional TORs to get the driver back into the loop. Applied Ergonomics, 62(February), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.02.023
- Petermeijer, S., Doubek, F., & De Winter, J. (2017). Driver response times to auditory, visual, and tactile take-over requests: A simulator study with 101 participants. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC 2017, 2017-Janua, 1505–1510. Banff, AB. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2017.8122827
- Roche, F., Somieski, A., & Brandenburg, S. (2019). Behavioral changes to repeated takeovers in highly automated driving: effects of the takeover-request design and the nondriving-related task modality. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 61(5), 839–849. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720818814963
- Rodrick, D., Bhise, V., & Jothi, V. (2013). Effects of driver and secondary task characteristics on lane change test performance. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 23(6), 560–572. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20342
- Rumschlag, G., Palumbo, T., Martin, A., Head, D., George, R., & Commissaris, R. L. (2015). The effects of texting on driving performance in a driving simulator: The influence of driver age. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 74, 145–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.10.009
- Wandtner, B., Schömig, N., & Schmidt, G. (2018). Effects of non-driving related task modalities on takeover performance in highly automated driving. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 60(6), 870–881. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720818768199
- Wobbrock, J. O., Findlater, L., Gergle, D., & Higgins, J. J. (2011). The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only anova procedures. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 143–146).
- Yoon, S. H., & Ji, Y. G. (2019). Non-driving-related tasks, workload, and takeover performance in highly automated driving contexts. Transportation Research. Part F, 60, 620–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.11.015
- Yoon, S. H., Kim, Y. W., & Ji, Y. G. (2019). The effects of takeover request modalities on highly automated car control transitions. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 123, 150–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.11.018
- Zeeb, K., Buchner, A., & Schrauf, M. (2015). What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 78, 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.02.023
- Zeeb, K., Buchner, A., & Schrauf, M. (2016). Is take-over time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 92, 230–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.04.002