Comfort or Not? Automated Driving Style and User Characteristics Causing Human Discomfort in Automated Driving

References

• Beggiato, M., Hartwich, F., & Krems, J. F. (2017). Der Einfluss von Fahrermerkmalen auf den erlebten Fahrkomfort im hochautomatisierten Fahren. At - Automatisierungstechnik, 65(7). https://doi.org/10.1515/auto-2016-0130
   Google Scholar
• Beggiato, M., Hartwich, F., & Krems, J. F. (2018). Using smartbands, pupillometry and body motion to detect discomfort in automated driving. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 338. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beggiato, M., Hartwich, F., & Krems, J. F. (2019). Physiological correlates of discomfort in automated driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 66(7), 445–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beggiato, M., Hartwich, F., Roßner, P., Dettmann, A., Enhuber, S., Pech, T., Gesmann-Nuissl, D., Mößner, K., Bullinger, A. C., & Krems, J. F. (2020). KomfoPilot - Comfortable automated driving. In G. Meixner (Ed.), Smart automotive mobility . Human–computer interaction series (pp. 71–154). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45131-8_2
   Google Scholar
• Bellem, H., Thiel, B., Schrauf, M., & Krems, J. F. (2018). Comfort in automated driving: An analysis of preferences for different automated driving styles and their dependence on personality traits. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 55(4), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.02.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, N., Murphy, M., Lamping, D., Mckee, M., Sanderson, C., Askham, J., & Marteau, T. (1999). Consensus development methods: A review of best practice in creating clinical guidelines. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 4(4), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/135581969900400410
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bocklisch, F. (2011). Context effects on the interpretation expressions of speed expressions [Poster presentation]. Subjective Probability, Utility, and Decision Making, London, UK. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.26324.22401.
   Google Scholar
• Bocklisch, F. (2012). Die Analyse und Bewertung vager linguistischer Terme mittels fuzzy Methodik [ doctoral dissertation]. Chemnitz University of Technology. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:ch1-qucosa-83410
   Google Scholar
• Bocklisch, F., Bocklisch, F. S., & Krems, J. F. (2010). How to translate words into numbers? A fuzzy approach for the numerical translation of verbal probabilities. In E. Hüllermeier, R. Kruse, & F. Hoffmann (Eds.), Computational intelligence for knowledge-based systems design. IPMU 2010. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 6178, pp. 614–623). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14049-5_63
   Google Scholar
• Bubb, H., Bengler, K., Grünen, R. E., & Vollrath, M. (2015). Automobilergonomie. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
   Google Scholar
• Drewitz, U., Ihme, K., Oehl, M., Schrödel, F., Voßwinkel, R., & Hartwich, F. (2019). Automation ohne Unsicherheit: Vorstellung des Förderprojekts AutoAkzept zur Erhöhung der Akzeptanz des automatisierten Fahrens. In VDI (Eds.), 10. VDI-Tagung Mensch-Maschine-Mobilität 2019. Der (Mit-) Fahrer im 21. Jahrhundert!? VDI-Berichte 2360 (pp. 1–19). VDI Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Elbanhawi, M., Simic, M., & Jazar, R. (2015). In the passenger seat: Investigating ride comfort measures in autonomous cars. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 7(3), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITS.2015.2405571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellinghaus, D., & Schlag, B. (2001). Beifahrer – Eine Untersuchung über die psychologischen und soziologischen Aspekte des Zusammenspiels von Fahrer und Beifahrer (Uniroyal Verkehrsuntersuchung Band 26). Uniroyal.
   Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37(1), 32–64. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelbrecht, A. (2013). Fahrkomfort und Fahrspaß bei Einsatz von Fahrerassistenzsystemen [ Dissertation]. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Gasser, T. M. (2013). Herausforderung automatischen Fahrens und Forschungsschwerpunkte (p. 6). Tagung Fahrerassistenz.
   Google Scholar
• Hartjen, L., Philipp, R., Schuldt, F., Howar, F., & Friedrich, B. (2019). Classification of driving maneuvers in urban traffic for parametrization of test scenarios. in 9. Tagung Automatisiertes Fahren, 2019. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339528099_Classification_of_Driving_Maneuvers_in_Urban_Traffic_for_Parametrization_of_Test_Scenarios
   Google Scholar
• Hartwich, F., Beggiato, M., Dettmann, A., & Krems, J. F. (2015). Drive me comfortable: Individual customized automated driving styles for younger and older drivers. In VDI (Eds.), Der Fahrer im 21. Jahrhundert. VDI-Berichte 2264 (pp. 271–283). VDI-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hartwich, F., Beggiato, M., & Krems, J. F. (2018). Driving comfort, enjoyment and acceptance of automated driving – Effects of drivers’ age and driving style familiarity. Ergonomics, 61(8), 1017–1032. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2018.1441448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartwich, F., Pech, T., Schubert, D., Scherer, S., Dettmann, A., Beggiato, M., Wanielik, G., Bullinger, A. C., & Krems, J. F. (2016). Fahrstilmodellierung im hochautomatisierten Fahren auf Basis der Fahrer-Fahrzeuginteraktion. Abschlussbericht “DriveMe”. https://doi.org/10.2314/GBV:870302329
   Google Scholar
• Hartwich, F., Schmidt, C., Gräfing, D., & Krems, J. F. (2020). In the passenger seat: Differences in the perception of human vs. automated vehicle control and resulting HMI demands of ssers. In H. Krömker (Ed.), HCI in mobility, transport, and automotive systems. Automated driving and in-vehicle experience design. HCII 2020. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 12212, pp. 31–45). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50523-3_3
   Google Scholar
• Hartwich, F., Witzlack, C., Beggiato, M., & Krems, J. F. (2019). The first impression counts - A combined driving simulator and test track study on the development of trust and acceptance of highly automated driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 65(6), 522–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jian, J.-Y., Bisantz, A. M., & Drury, C. G. (2000). Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 4(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327566IJCE0401_04
   Google Scholar
• Rimini-Döring, M., Keinath, A., Nodari, E., Palma, F., Toffetti, A., Floudas, N., Bekiaris, E., Portouli, V., & Panou, M. (2004). Considerations on test scenarios. Evaluation and Assessment Methodology. Deliverable 2.1.3 (Project deliverables).: aide - adaptive integrated driver-vehicle interface. http://www.aide-eu.org/pdf/sp2_deliv_new/aide_d2_1_3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Roßner, P., & Bullinger, A. C. (2018). Hochautomatisiertes Fahren - Welche Fahrmanöver- und Umgebungsmerkmale beeinflussen erlebten Diskomfort? In VDI Wissensforum GmbH - VDI Berichte 2235 ( Hrsg.), 34. VDI/VW Gemeinschaftstagung Fahrerassistenzsysteme und automatisiertes Fahren (pp. 331–344). VDI Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Roßner, P., & Bullinger, A. C. (2019). Do you shift or not? Influence of trajectory behaviour on perceived safety during automated driving on rural roads. In H. Krömker (Ed.), HCI in mobility, transport, and automotive systems. HCII 2019. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 11596, pp. 245–254). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Roßner, P., & Bullinger, A. C. (2020a). How do you want to be driven? Investigation of different highly automated driving styles on a highway scenario. In N. Stanton (Ed.), Advances in human factors of transportation. AHFE 2019. Advances in intelligent systems and computing (Vol. 964, pp. 36–43). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Roßner, P., & Bullinger, A. C. (2020b). Does driving experience matter? Influence of trajectory behaviour on drivers’ trust, acceptance and perceived safety in automated driving. understanding human behaviour in complex systems. In D. de Waard, A. Toffetti, L. Pietrantoni, T. Franke, J.-F. Petiot, C. Dumas, A. Botzer, L. Onnasch, I. Milleville, & F. Mars (Eds.), Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society Europe chapter 2019 annual conference (pp. 73–84). http://hfes-europe.org
   Google Scholar
• Roßner, P., Dittrich, F., & Bullinger, A. C. (2019). Diskomfort im hochautomatisierten Fahren - Eine Untersuchung unterschiedlicher Fahrstile im Fahrsimulator. In Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft e.V. (Eds.), Arbeit interdisziplinär analysieren - bewerten - gestalten, 65. Frühjahrskongress der Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft. GfA-Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, S., Schubert, D., Dettmann, A., Hartwich, F., & Bullinger, A. C. (2016). Wie will der “Fahrer” automatisiert gefahren werden? Überprüfung verschiedener Fahrstile hinsichtlich des Komforterlebens. Proceedings 32. VDI/VW-Gemeinschaftstagung Fahrerassistenzsysteme und automatisiertes Fahren, Düsseldorf: VDI-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, P., Donmez, B., & Jamieson, G. (2013). Anticipatory driving competence: Motivation, definition & modeling. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 286–291. https://doi.org/10.1145/2516540.2516579
   Google Scholar
• Stephanidis, C., Salvendy, G., Chen, J. Y. C., Dong, J., Duffy, V. G., Fang, X., Fidopiastis, C., Fragomeni, G., Fu, L. P., Guo, Y., Harris, D., Ioannou, A., Jeong, K., Konomi, S., Krömker, H., Kurosu, M., Lewis, J. R., Marcus, A., Meiselwitz, G., Moallem, A., … Zhou, J. (2019). Seven HCI grand challenges. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(14), 1229–1269. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1619259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Laan, J. D., Heino, A., & de Waard, D. (1997). A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of advanced transport telematics. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-090X(96)00025-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voß, G., & Schwalm, M. (2017). Bedeutung kompensativer Fahrerstrategien im Kontext automatisierter Fahrfunktionen. Berichte der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen, Fahrzeugtechnik Heft F, 118.
   Google Scholar
• Waytz, A., Heafner, J., & Epley, N. (2014). The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52(3), 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar