Memoryscapes: Designing Situated Narratives of Place through Heritage Collections

References

• Arts Council England. (2019, March). Interactive map: Our funded organisations, 2018–2022. https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/funding-map-2018-2022
   Google Scholar
• Benford, S., Giannachi, G., Koleva, B., & Rodden, T. (2009). From interaction to trajectories: Designing coherent journeys through user experiences. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 709–718). Boston, MA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518812
   Google Scholar
• Benford, S., Greenhalgh, C., Crabtree, A., Flintham, M., Walker, B., Marshall, J., et al. 2013. Performance-led research in the wild. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 20(3), 14.
   Google Scholar
• Blokland, T. (2009). Celebrating local histories and defining neighbourhood communities: Place-making in a gentrified neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 46(8), 1593–1610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009105499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossen, C., Dindler, C., & Iversen, O. S. (2012). Impediments to user gains: Experiences from a critical participatory design project. In Proceedings of the 12th participatory design Conference: Research papers-volume (Vol. 1, pp. 31–40). Roskilde, Denmark: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2347635.2347641
   Google Scholar
• Bratteteig, T., & Wagner, I. (2012). Spaces for participatory creativity. CoDesign, 8(2–3), 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2012.672576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbooks in psychology®. APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
   Google Scholar
• Brown, B., Chalmers, M., Bell, M., Hall, M., MacColl, I., & Rudman, P. (2005). Sharing the square: Collaborative leisure in the city streets. In Proc. of the ninth conference on European Conference on computer supported cooperative work (ECSCW’05) (pp. 427–447). Paris, France: Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4023-7_22
   Google Scholar
• Carrozzino, M., & Bergamasco, M. (2010). Beyond virtual museums: Experiencing immersive virtual reality in real museums. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 11(4), 452–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2010.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciolfi, L., & McLoughlin, M. (2012). Designing for meaningful visitor engagement at a living history museum. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on human-computer interaction: Making sense through design (pp. 69–78). Copenhagen, Denmark: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2399016.2399028
   Google Scholar
• Claisse, C., Ciolfi, L., & Petrelli, D. (2017). Containers of Stories: Using co-design and digital augmentation to empower the museum community and create novel experiences of heritage at a house museum. The Design Journal, 20(sup1), S2906–S2918. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, M. (2018). The Mendoza review: An independent review of museums in England. London: Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport.
   Google Scholar
• Design Council. (2019) The double diamond 15 years on. Retrieved October 29, 2020, from https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/double-diamond-15-years
   Google Scholar
• Dudley, S. H. (Eds.). (2010). Museum materialities: Objects, engagements, interpretations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Durrant, A., Kirk, D., Benford, S., & Rodden, T. (2012). Pursuing leisure: Reflections on theme park visiting. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 21(1), 43–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-011-9151-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durrant, A., Rowland, D., Kirk, D., Benford, S., Fischer, J., & McAuley, A. (2011). Automics: Souvenir generating photoware for theme parks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ‘11) (pp. 1767–1776). Vancouver, BC: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979199
   Google Scholar
• Eventbrite. (2018). Eventbrite. https://www.eventbrite.co.uk.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, K., Bannon, L., Ciolfi, L., Gallagher, P., Hall, T., & Lennon, M. (2004). Shaping experiences in the hunt museum: A design case study. In Proceedings of the 5th conference on designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques (pp. 205–214). Cambridge, MA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1013115.1013144
   Google Scholar
• Forlano, L. (2016). Decentering the human in the design of collaborative cities. Design Issues, 32(3), p. 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giaccardi, E. (2011). Things we value. Interactions, 18(1), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/1897239.1897245
   Google Scholar
• Halloran, J., Hornecker, E., Fitzpatrick, G., Weal, M., Millard, D., Michaelides, D., Cruickshank, D., & De Roure, D. (2006) Unfolding understandings: Co-designing UbiComp In Situ, over time. In Proceedings of the 6th conference on designing interactive systems (DIS ’06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1145/1142405.1142423
   Google Scholar
• Herzberg, C. (2017). Smart cities, digital nations: Building smart cities in emerging countries and beyond. Roundtree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, I. G., Vines, J., Taylor, N., Jenkins, E., & Marshall, J. (2016). Reflections on deploying distributed consultation technologies with community organisations. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2945–2957). San Jose, CA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858098
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, D., Durrant, A. C., Kosem, J., & Reeves, S. (2018). Spomenik: Resurrecting voices in the woods. Design Issues, 34(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees, A. (2015). The city: A world history. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. (2020). This art was looted 123 years ago. Will it ever be returned? The New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Mattern, S. (2013). Methodolatry and the art of measure: The new wave of urban data science. Places Journal, 2013. https://doi.org/10.22269/131105
   Google Scholar
• Maye, L., Bouchard, D., Avram, G., & Ciolfi, L. (2017). Supporting cultural heritage professionals adopting and shaping interactive technologies in museums. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on designing interactive systems (DIS)(pp. 221–232). Edinburgh, UK: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064753
   Google Scholar
• McGookin, D., Tahiroălu, K., Vaittinen, T., Kytö, M., Monastero, B., & Vasquez, J. C. (2017). Exploring seasonality in mobile cultural heritage. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on human factors in computing systems, Denver, Colorado, USA, 6101–6105. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025803
   Google Scholar
• Millington, S., & Ntounis, N. (2017). Repositioning the high street: Evidence and reflection from the UK. Journal of Place Management and Development, 10(4), p.364–379. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMD-08-2017-0077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W. J. (1995). City of bits. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism. Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Petrelli, D., Whittaker, S., & Brockmeier, J. (2008). AutoTopography: What can physical mementos tell us about digital memories? In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 53–62). Florence, Italy: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357065
   Google Scholar
• Ratti, C., & Claudel, M. (2013). The city of tomorrow: Sensors, networks, hackers, and the future of urban life. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, G. (2019). Who owns history?: Elgin’s loot and the case for returning plundered treasure. Biteback Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, D., Flintham, M., Oppermann, L., Marshall, J., Chamberlain, A., Koleva, B., Benford, S., & Perez, C. (2009). Ubikequitous computing: Designing interactive experiences for cyclists. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services (MobileHCI ‘09)(Article 21, p. 11). Bonn, Germany: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1613858.1613886
   Google Scholar
• Russo, A., & Peacock, D. (2009). Great expectations: Sustaining participation in social media spaces. In Museums and the Web 2009 (23–36). Archives & Museum Informatics.
   Google Scholar
• Schoggen, P. (1989). Behavior settings: A revision and extension of Roger G. Barker’s ecological psychology. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. (2006). Uses of heritage. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Swords, J., Nally, C., Rogage, K., Watson, R., Charlton, J., & Kirk, D. (2020). Colliding epistemologies, productive tensions and usable pasts in the generation of heritage-led immersive experiences. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 1–14. https://doi.org.uk/10.1080/13527258.2020.1780462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, N., Cheverst, K., Fitton, D., Race, N. J., Rouncefield, M., & Graham, C. (2007). Probing communities: Study of a village photo display. In Proceedings of the 19th Australasian conference on computer-human interaction: Entertaining user interfaces (OzCHI) (pp. 17–24). Adelaide, Australia: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1324892.1324896
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, A. (2013). Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a New Utopia. W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Tsenova, V., Wood, G., Dolfini, A., Tindley, A., & Kirk, D. (2020). Un-authorised view: Leveraging volunteer expertise in heritage. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ’20)(pp. 1–14). Honolulu, HI: ACM. https://doi.org/https://:doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376558
   Google Scholar
• Tyne and Wear Archives and Museums. (2020). Tyne and Wear Museums. https://www.twmuseums.org.uk/.
   Google Scholar
• Vines, J., Clarke, R., Wright, P., McCarthy, J., & Olivier, P. (2013). Configuring participation: On how we involve people in design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 429–438). Paris, France: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470716
   Google Scholar
• Vlahakis, V., Ioannidis, M., Karigiannis, J., Tsotros, M., Gounaris, M., Stricker, D., & Almeida, L. (2002). Archeoguide: An augmented reality guide for archaeological sites. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 22(5), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2002.1028726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weltevreden, J. W. J., & Atzema, O. A. L. C. (2006). Cyberspace meets high street: Adoption of click–and–mortar strategies by retail outlets in city centers. Urban Geography, 27(7), p. 628–650. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272–3638.27.7.628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, K., & Aurigi, A. (2018). Digital and smart cities. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, A., Tewdwr-Jones, M., & Comber, R. (2017). Urban planning, public participation and digital technology: App development as a method of generating citizen involvement in local planning processes. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(2), 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2399808317712515.
   Google Scholar
• Wojciechowski, R., Walczak, K., White, M., & Cellary, W. (2004). Building virtual and augmented reality museum exhibitions. In Proceedings of the ninth international conference on 3D Web technology (pp. 135–144). Monterey, CA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/985040.985060
   Google Scholar