Plan B for Eliminating Mode Confusion: An Interpreter Display

References

• Boorman, D. J., & Mumaw, R. J. (2004). A new autoflight/FMS interface: Guiding design principles. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aeronautics, Toulouse, France.
   Google Scholar
• Brooke, J. (1986). SUS: A “quick and dirty” usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & A. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Commercial Aviation Safety Team (CAST) (2014). Airplane state awareness JSAT final report. https://www.cast-safety.org/pdf/JSAT-ASA_FinalReport_June2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Etherington, T. J., Kramer, L. J., Lake, R. C., Schnell, T., Mumaw, R. J., Sherry, L., Cover, M. B., & Evans, T. (2020). Evaluation of on-board system state and path awareness technologies during transport operations. In Proceedings of the IEEE/AIAA 39th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), Sacramento, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Feary, M., McCrobie, D., Alkin, M., Sherry., L., Polson, P., Palmer, E., & McQuinn, N. (1998). Aiding vertical guidance understanding (NASA/TM – 1998–112217). NASA Ames Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload. Advances in Psychology (Vol. 52, pp. 139–183). North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E., Hollan, J., & Norman, D. A. (1986). Direct manipulation interfaces. In A. N. Donald & S. W. Draper (Eds.), User centered system design; new perspectives on human-computer interaction (pp. 339–352). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. (1993). An integrated mode management display [Paper presentation]. The NASA-Ames Mode meeting. Moffett Field, CA: NASA-Ames Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Itoh, M., & Inagaki, T. (2004). A microworld approach to identifying issues of human-automation systems design for supporting operator’s situation awareness. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 17(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc1701_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaneshige, J., Benavides, J., Sharma, S., Martin, L., Panda, R., & Steglinski, M. (2014). Implementation of a trajectory prediction function for trajectory-based operations. In Proceedings of AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference.National Harbor, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Mumaw, R., Boorman, D., & Prada, L. R. (2006). Experimental evaluation of a new autoflight interface. Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aeronautics, Seattle.
   Google Scholar
• Mumaw, R. J. (2020). Addressing mode confusion using an interpreter display. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324573753_Addressing_mode_confusion_using_an_interpreter_display
   Google Scholar
• Riley, V., DeMers, B., Misiak, C., & Schmalz, B. (1999). Cockpit control language: A pilot-centered avionics interface. Air & Space Europe, 1(1), 48–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1290-0958(99)80038-0
   Google Scholar
• Sarter, N. B., & Woods, D. D. (1995). How in the world did we ever get into that mode? Mode error and awareness in supervisory control. Human Factors, 37(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauro, A. (2011). Practical guide to the system usability scale: Background, benchmarks & best practices. Measuring Usability.
   Google Scholar
• Sherry, L., & Polson, P. G. (1996). Annunciation and training of knowledge-based avionics (Honeywell publication no. C69-5370-003). Honeywell out of Phoenix, AZ.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. M. (1990). Situation awareness rating technique (SART): The development of a tool for aircrew systems design. In Situational Awareness in Aerospace Operations (Chapter 3). Neuilly sur-Seine, NATO-AGARD-CP–478.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, E. L. (1985). Human factors of cockpit automation: A field study of flightcrew transition (NASA Contractor Rep No. 177333). NASA Ames Research Center.
   Google Scholar