Flying by Feeling: Communicating Flight Envelope Protection through Haptic Feedback

References

• Abbink, D. A., Carlson, T., Mulder, M., de Winter, J. C. F., Aminravan, F., Gibo, T. L., & Boer, E. R. (2018). A topology of shared control systems: Finding common ground in diversity. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 48(5), 509–525. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2018.2791570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbink, D. A., Mulder, M., & Boer, E. R. (2012). Haptic shared control: Smoothly shifting control authority. Cognition, Technology and Work, 14(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-011-0192-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackerman, K. A., Talleur, D. A., Carbonari, R. S., Xargay, E., Seefeldt, B. D., Kirlik, A., … Trujillo, A. C. (2017). Automation situation awareness display for a flight envelope protection system. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 40(4), 964–980. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Airbus. (2003). A319/A320/A321 Flight Crew Operating Manual (Tech. Rep. No. 36). Author.
   Google Scholar
• Belcastro, C. M., & Foster, J. V. (2010). Aircraft Loss-of-Control Accident Analysis. In Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Toronto (CA) (p. 39). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-8004
   Google Scholar
• Biondi, F., Alvarez, I., & Jeong, K.-A. (2019). Human–vehicle cooperation in automated driving: A multidisciplinary review and appraisal. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(11), 932–946. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1561792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bureau d’Enquêtes et d’Analyses pour la sécurité de l’aviation Civile. (2012). Final report on the accident on 1st June 2009 to the Airbus A330-203 registered F-GZCP operated by Air France flight AF 447 Rio de Janeiro – Paris (English courtesy translation) (Tech. Rep. No. June 2009). Author.
   Google Scholar
• Chatrenet, D. (1995). Les qualités de Vol des Avions de Transport Civil à Commandes de Vol Électriques. In Active control technology: Applications and lesson learned (pp. 5). AGARD. https://www.sto.nato.int/publications/AGARD/Forms/AGARD%20Document%20Set/docsethomepage.aspx?ID=8184&FolderCTID=0x0120D5200078F9E87043356C409A0D30823AFA16F60B00B8BCE98BB37EB24A8258823D6B11F157&List=03e8ea21-64e6-4d37-8235-04fb61e122e9&RootFolder=%2Fpublications%2FAGARD%2FAGARD%2DCP%2D560
   Google Scholar
• Comerford, D., Brandt, S. L., Lachter, J., Wu, S.-C., Mogford, R., Battiste, V., & Johnson, W. W. (2013). NASA’s single-pilot operations technical interchange meeting: Proceedings and findings (Tech. Rep.). NASA.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, R. H. (1965). An automatic stall prevention control for supersonic fighter aircraft. Journal of Aircraft, 2(3), 171–175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/3.43636
   Google Scholar
• EASA. (2019). EASA annual safety review (Tech. Rep.). European Aviation Environmental Report. https://www.easa.europa.eu/eaer/
   Google Scholar
• Favre, C. (1994). Fly-by-wire for commercial aircraft: The airbus experience. International Journal of Control, 59(1), 139–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207179408923072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, E., & Harris, D. (1998). A comparative survey of the utility of cross-cockpit linkages and autoflight systems’ backfeed to the control inceptors of commercial aircraft. Ergonomics, 41(10), 1462–1477. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/001401398186216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Z., Wu, Y., & Liu, J. (2015). Research on effects of pattern, amplitude and frequency of pulse steering torque warnings for lane departure. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 31, 67–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IATA. (2018). IATA safety report 2017 (Tech. Rep.). International Air Transport Association. https://aviation-safety.net/airlinesafety/industry/reports/IATA-safety-report-2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Klyde, D. H., Lampton, A. K., Alvarez, D. J., Richards, N., & Cogan, B. (2014). Flight test evaluation of the safe-cue system for loss of control mitigation. In Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, National Harbor, (MD) (p. 19). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-0447
   Google Scholar
• Klyde, D. H., Richards, N., & Cogan, B. (2011). Mitigating unfavorable pilot interactions with adaptive controllers in the presence of failures/damage. In Proceedings of the AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Portland (OR) (p. 17). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2011-6538
   Google Scholar
• Kochan, J. A., Greiter, E. G., & Jentsch, F. (2004). Surprise and unexpectedness in flying: Database reviews and analyses. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 48(3), 335–339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120404800313
   Google Scholar
• Komite Nasional Keselamatan Transportasi. (2015). Aircraft accident investigation report, PT. Indonesia Air Asia, Airbus A320-216, PK-AXC (Tech. Rep. No. December 2015). Author.
   Google Scholar
• Koolstra, H., Damveld, H. J., & Mulder, J. A. (2012). Envelope determination of damaged aircraft. In Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Minneapolis (MN) (p. 22). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-4699
   Google Scholar
• Kuiper, R. J., Heck, D. J. F., Kuling, I. A., & Abbink, D. A. (2016). Evaluation of haptic and visual cues for repulsive or attractive guidance in nonholonomic steering tasks. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 46(5), 672–683. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2016.2561625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landman, A., Groen, E. L., van Paassen, M. M., Bronkhorst, A. W., & Mulder, M. (2017). Dealing with unexpected events on the flight deck: A conceptual model of startle and surprise. Human Factors, 59(8), 1161–1172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720817723428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombaerts, T. J. J., Looye, G., Ellerbroek, J., & Rodriguez Martin, M. (2017). Design and piloted simulator evaluation of adaptive safe flight envelope protection algorithm. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 40(8), 1902–1924. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombaerts, T. J. J., Looye, G., Seefried, A., Neves, M., & Bellmann, T. (2016). Development and concept demonstration of a physics based adaptive flight envelope protection algorithm. International Federation of Automatic Control, 49(5), 248–253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.121
   Google Scholar
• Navarro, J., Mars, F., Forzy, J. F., El-Jaafari, M., & Hoc, J. M. (2010). Objective and subjective evaluation of motor priming and warning systems applied to lateral control assistance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42(3), 904–912. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.07.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niedermeier, D., & Lambregts, A. A. (2012). Fly-by-wire augmented manual control – basic design considerations. 28th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, Brisbane, 100, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Olivari, M., Nieuwenhuizen, F., Bülthoff, H., & Pollini, L. (2014). Pilot adaptation to different classes of haptic aids in tracking tasks. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 37(6), 1741–1753. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petermeijer, S. M., Abbink, D. A., Mulder, M., & De Winter, J. C. F. (2015). The effect of haptic support systems on driver performance: A literature survey. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 8(4), 467–479. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2015.2437871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reder, L., & Klatzky, R. L. (1994). The effect of context on training: Is learning situated? (Tech. Rep. No. CMU-CS-94-187). School of Computer Science.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A., Young, D. E., Swinnen, S., & Shapiro, D. C. (1989). Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: Support for the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(2), 352–359. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.2.352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt-Skipiol, F. J. J., & Hecker, P. (2015). Tactile feedback and situation awareness. In Proceedings of the 15th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, Dallas (TX) (p. 10).
   Google Scholar
• Schuet, S., Lombaerts, T. J. J., Stepanyan, V., Kaneshige, J., Hardy, G., Shish, K. H., … Rodzon, D. (2019). Piloted simulation study findings on stall recovery guidance. In Proceedings of the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, San Diego (CA) (p. 23). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-0981
   Google Scholar
• Stepanyan, V., Krishnakumar, K., Dorais, G., Reardon, S., Barlow, J., Lampton, A., & Hardy, G. (2017). Loss-of-control mitigation via predictive cuing. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 40(4), 831–846. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stimpson, A. J., Ryan, J., & Cummings, M. L. (2016). Assessing pilot workload in single-pilot operations with advanced autonomy. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 60(1), 675–679. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601155
   Google Scholar
• Uehara, A. F., & Niedermeier, D. (2013). Limited evaluation of the influence of coupled sidesticks on the pilot monitoring’s awareness during stall in cruise. In Proceedings of AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, Boston (MA) (p. 16). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-4671
   Google Scholar
• Van Baelen, D., Ellerbroek, J., van Paassen, M. M., Abbink, D. A., & Mulder, M. (2020a). Just feeling the force: Just noticeable difference for asymmetric vibrations. In Accepted to Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Human-Machine Systems, Rome (Italy) (p. 6). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHMS49158.2020.9209492
   Google Scholar
• Van Baelen, D., Ellerbroek, J., van Paassen, M. M., Abbink, D. A., & Mulder, M. (2020b). Using asymmetric vibrations for flight envelope protection. In Proceedings of the AIAA Modelling and Simulation Technology Conference, Orlando (FL) (p. 27). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-0409
   Google Scholar
• Van Baelen, D., Ellerbroek, J., van Paassen, M. M., & Mulder, M. (2019). Evaluation of a haptic feedback system for flight envelope protection. In Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, San Diego (CA). (AIAA-2019-0367)
   Google Scholar
• Van Baelen, D., Ellerbroek, J., van Paassen, M. M., & Mulder, M. (2020). Design of a haptic feedback system for flight envelope protection. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 43(4), 700–714. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G004596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Baelen, D., van Paassen, M. M., Ellerbroek, J., Abbink, D. A., & Mulder, M. (2021). Evaluating guidance haptic feedback for flight envelope protection. In Proceedings of the AIAA Modelling and Simulation Technology Conference, Nashville (TN). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-1013
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Laan, J. D., Heino, A., & De Waard, D. (1997). A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of advanced transport telematics. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-090X(96)00025-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Paassen, M. M., Boink, R. P., Abbink, D. A., Mulder, M., & Mulder, M. (2017). Four design choices for haptic shared control. In M. A. Vidulich, P. S. Tsang, & J. M. Flach (Eds.), Advances in Aviation Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 237–254). Routhledge.
   Google Scholar
• von Grünhagen, W., Müllhäuser, M., Abildgaard, M., & Lantzsch, R. (2010). Active inceptors in fhs for pilot assistance systems. In Proceedings of the 36th European Rotorcraft Forum, Paris (France) (p. 11).
   Google Scholar
• Wan, J., & Wu, C. (2018). The effects of vibration patterns of take-over request and non-driving tasks on taking-over control of automated vehicles. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(11), 987–998. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1404778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warwick, G. (2015). Active sidestick controls make commercial debut. Aviation Week & Space Technology. News article. https://aviationweek.com/aerospace/active-sidestick-controls-make-commercial-debut
   Google Scholar
• Wolfert, F., Bromfield, M. A., Stedmon, A., & Scott, S. (2019). Passive sidesticks and hard landings – Is there a link? In Proceedings of the AIAA Aviation Forum, Dallas (TX) (p. 10). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-3611 (AIAA-2019-3611)
   Google Scholar
• Zijlstra, F. R. H. (1993). Efficiency in work behaviour: A design approach for modern tools [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Delft University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Zikmund, P., Horpatzka, M., Dubnicky, L., Macik, M., & Jebacek, I. (2020). Pilot-aircraft haptic feedback tests. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 92(9), 1407–1412. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/AEAT-12-2019-0265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar