927
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Mitigation of Biodynamic Feedthrough for Touchscreens on the Flight Deck

& ORCID Icon

References

  • Ahmad, B. I., Langdon, P. M., & Godsill, S. J. (2018). Stabilising touch interactions in cockpits, aerospace, and vibrating environments. In M. Antona & C. Stephanidis (Eds.), Universal access in human-computer interaction. methods, technologies, and users (pp. 133–145). Cham. Springer International Publishing.
  • Airbus (2019). Airbus begins deliveries of first A350s with touchscreen cockpit displays option to customers. Airbus S.A.S. https://www.airbus.com/newsroom/press-releases/en/2019/12/airbus-begins-deliveries-of-first-a350s-with-touchscreen-cockpit-displays-option-to-customers.html
  • Alapetite, A., Fogh, R., Zammit-Mangion, D., Zammit, C., Agius, I., Fabbri, M., Pregnolato, M., & Becouarn, L. (2012). Direct tactile manipulation of the flight plan in a modern aircraft cockpit. Proceedings of HCI Aero, 2–5.
  • Allen, R. W., Jex, H. R., & Magdaleno, R. E. (1973). Manual control performance and dynamic response during sinusoidal vibration. Technical report, System Technology Inc.
  • Avsar, H. (2017). Exploring potential benefits and challenges of touch screens on the flight deck. [PhD thesis, University of Nottingham].
  • Banerjee, D., Jordan, L. M., & Rosen, M. J. (1996). Modeling the effects of inertial reactions on occupants of moving power wheelchairs. Proceedings of the Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America Conference (RESNA), 220–222.
  • Bauersfeld, K. G. (1992). Effects of turbulence and activation method on touchscreen perfor- mance in aviation environments. [Master’s thesis, San Jose State University].
  • Cockburn, A., Gutwin, C., Palanque, P., Deleris, Y., Trask, C., Coveney, A., Yung, M., & MacLean, K. (2017). Turbulent touch: Touchscreen input for cockpit flight displays. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ‘17, (pp. 6742–6753). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
  • Cockburn, A., Masson, D., Gutwin, C., Palanque, P., Goguey, A., Yung, M., Gris, C., & Trask, C. (2019). Design and evaluation of braced touch for touchscreen input stabilisation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 122, 21–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.08.005
  • Damveld, H. J., Abbink, D. A., Mulder, M., Mulder, M., Van Paassen, M. M., Van Der Helm, F. C. T., & Hosman, R. (2013). Identification of the Feedback Components of the Neuromuscular System in a Pitch Control Task. AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, Reston, Virigina: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
  • Damveld, H. J., Beerens, G. C., Van Paassen, M. M., & Mulder, M. (2010). Design of forcing functions for the identification of human control behavior. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 33(4), 1064–1081. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/1.47730
  • Dodd, S., Lancaster, J., Miranda, A., Grothe, S., DeMers, B., & Rogers, B. (2014). Touch screens on the Flight Deck: The impact of touch target size, spacing, touch technology and turbulence on pilot performance. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 58(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931214581002
  • FAA (2011). Advisory circular 20-175: Controls for flight deck systems. Technical report, Federal Aviation Administration.
  • Gauci, J., Cauchi, N., Theuma, K., Zammit-Mangion, D., & Muscat, A. (2015). Design and evaluation of a touch screen concept for pilot interaction with avionic systems. 2015 IEEE/AIAA 34th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC).
  • Gillespie, R. B., Hasser, C., & Tang, P. (1999). Cancellation of feedthrough dynamics using a force-reflecting joystick. Proc. ASME Dynamic Systems and Controls Division, 319–326.
  • Griffin, M. J. (2001). The validation of biodynamic models. Clinical Biomechanics, 16, S81–S92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00101-7
  • Hourlier, S., Guérard, S., & Servantie, X. (2019). Avionics touch screen in turbulence: Simulator design and selected human–machine interface metrics. In Michael A. Vidulich, & Pamela S. Tsang (Eds.), Improving aviation performance through applying engineering psychology: Advances in aviation psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 53–75). CRC Press.
  • Humphreys, H. C., Book, W. J., & Huggins, J. D. (2010). Modeling of biodynamic feedthrough in backhoe operation. Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference 2009, DSCC2009, 969–976.
  • Jex, H. R. (1972). Problems in modeling man-machine control behavior in biodynamic environments. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference on Manual Control, 3–13.
  • Kaminani, S. (2011). Human computer interaction issues with touch screen interfaces in the flight deck. Proceedings of the AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference, Seattle (WA).
  • Kingsley-Jones, M. (2018). Airbus aims for airliner cockpit-touchscreen first with A350. DVV Media International Ltd. https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/airbus-aims-for-airliner-cockpit-touchscreen-first-449481/
  • Lancaster, J., Mers, B., Rogers, B., Smart, A., & Whitlow, S. (2011). 57.3: The effect of touch screen hand stability method on performance & subjective preference in turbulence. SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, 42(1), 841–844. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1889/1.3621464
  • Masarati, P., Quaranta, G., Bernardini, A., & Guglieri, G. (2015). Voluntary pilot action through biodynamics for helicopter flight dynamics simulation. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 38(3), 431–441. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000837
  • Mayo, J. R. (1989). The involuntary participation of a human pilot in a helicopter. In 15th Eur. Rotorcraft Forum (pp. 81–100). Amsterdam.
  • McRuer, D. T., & Jex, H. R. (1967). A review of quasi-linear pilot models. IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, HFE-8(3), 231–249. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/THFE.1967.234304
  • Mertens, M. M., Damveld, H. J., & Borst, C. (2012). An avionics touch screen-based control display concept. In Peter L. Marasco, Paul R. Havig II, Daniel D. Desjardins, & Kalluri R. Sarma (Eds.), Head- and helmet-mounted displays XVII; and display technologies and applications for defense, security, and avionics VI (Vol. 8383). SPIE. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1117/12.919217
  • Mobertz, X., Pool, D. M., Van Paassen, M. M., & Mulder, M. (2018). A cybernetic analysis of biodynamic effects in touchscreen operation in turbulence. 2018 AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, AIAA SciTech Forum. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
  • Mulder, M., Pool, D. M., Abbink, D. A., Boer, E. R., Zaal, P. M. T., Drop, F. M., Van Der El, K., & Van Paassen, M. M. (2018). Manual control cybernetics: State-of-the-art and current trends. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 48(5), 468–485. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2017.2761342
  • Olivari, M., Nieuwenhuizen, F. M., Bülthoff, H. H., & Pollini, L. (2014). Identifying timevarying neuromuscular system with a recursive least-squares algorithm: A monte-carlo simulation study. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, (pp. 3573–3578). San Diego (CA).
  • Plaetinck, W., Pool, D. M., Van Paassen, M. M., & Mulder, M. (2019). Online identification of pilot adaptation to sudden degradations in vehicle stability. In Proceedings of the 2nd IFAC Conference on Cyber-Physical & Human-Systems, (pp. 347–352). Miami (FL), IFAC-PapersOnLine. 51.
  • Pool, D. M., Zaal, P. M. T., Van Paassen, M. M., & Mulder, M. (2011). Identification of multimodal pilot models using ramp target and multisine disturbance signals. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 34(1), 86–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/1.50612
  • Robinson, T., Grabski, G., Green, J., Jacobson, M., Byrne, C., & Harper, D. (2014). P-171: Physical touch aspects of the touch interface for flight deck applications. SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, 45(1), 1618–1621. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-0159.2014.tb00432.x
  • Rouwhorst, W., Verhoeven, R., Suijkerbuijk, M., Bos, T., Maij, A., Vermaat, M., & Arents, R. (2017). Use of touch screen display applications for aircraft flight control. 2017 IEEE/AIAA 36th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), (pp. 1–10). IEEE.
  • SAE International. (2019). Touch interactive display systems: Human factors considerations, system design and performance guidelines. SAE International. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4271/ARP60494.
  • Sirouspour, M. R., & Salcudean, S. E. (2003). Suppressing operator-induced oscillations in manual control systems with movable bases. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 11(4), 448–459. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2003.813386
  • Sövényi, S., & Gillespie, R. B. (2007). Cancellation of biodynamic feedthrough in vehicle control tasks. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 15(6), 1018–1029. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2007.899679
  • Stuyven, G., Damveld, H. J., & Borst, C. (2012). Concept for an avionics multi touch Flight Deck. SAE International Journal of Aerospace, 5(1), 164–171. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-2120
  • Trimble, S. (2016). Boeing selects Rockwell Collins for 777X touchscreens. DVV Media International Ltd. https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/boeing-selects-rockwell-collins-for-777x-touchscreen-429565/
  • Van Paassen, M. M., & Mulder, M. (2006). Identification of human control behavior. In Waldemar Karwowski (Eds.), International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors (pp. 400–407). CRC Press.
  • Venrooij, J. (2014). Measuring, modeling and mitigating biodynamic feedthrough. [PhD thesis,Delft University of Technology].
  • Venrooij, J., Mulder, M., Abbink, D. A., Van Paassen, M. M., Van Der Helm, F. C. T., Bülthoff, H. H., & Mulder, M. (2013). A new view on biodynamic feedthrough analysis: Unifying the effects on forces and positions. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 43(1), 129–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCB.2012.2200972
  • Venrooij, J., Mulder, M., Van Paassen, M. M., Abbink, D. A., Bülthoff, H. H., & Mulder, M. (2011). Cancelling biodynamic feedthrough requires a subject and task dependent approach. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1670–1675.
  • Venrooij, J., Mulder, M., Van Paassen, M. M., Mulder, M., & Abbink, D. A. (2010). A review of biodynamic feedthrough mitigation techniques. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, (pp. 316–321). Elsevier. 43.
  • Vrouwenvelder, S., Postema, F. M., & Pool, D. M. (2021). Measuring the drag latency of touchscreen displays for human-in-the-loop simulator experiments. In Proceedings of the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, Nashville (TN), Under review.
  • Watkins, C. B., Nilson, C., Taylor, S., Medin, K. B., Kuljanin, I., & Nguyen, H. B. (2018). Development of touchscreen displays for the Gulfstream G500 and G600 symmetryTM flight deck. 2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), (pp. 1–10). IEEE.
  • Zaal, P. M. T., Pool, D. M., Bruin, J. D., Mulder, M., & Van Paassen, M. M. (2009). Use of pitch and heave motion cues in a pitch control task. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 32(2), 366–377. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/1.39953