References
- Blomberg, R. D., Bishop, E. W., & Hamilton, J. W. (1995). Evaluation of prototype air carrier instrument approach procedure charts (DOT/FAA/95/44, DOT-VNTSC-FAA-95-24). Federal Aviation Administration.
- Butchibabu, A., & Hansman, R. J. (2012). Evaluating the depiction of complex RNAV/RNP Procedures and analyzing a potential de-cluttering technique [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/76094
- Hansman, R., & Mykityshyn, M. (1995, March). An exploratory survey of information requirements for instrument approach charts. DOT/FAA/AAR-95/2. https://ntl.bts.gov/lib/33000/33500/33500/33500.pdf
- Hofer, E. F., Palen, L. A., & Possolo, A. (1993). Flight deck information management: An experimental study of functional integration of approach data. Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on aviation psychology. Department of Aviation, Ohio State University.
- Moacdieh, N., & Sarter, N. (2015). Data density and poor organization: Analyzing the performance and Attentional effects of two aspects of display clutter. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 59(1), 1336–1340. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931215591221
- Multer, J., Warner, M., Disario, R., & Huntley, M. (1991). Design considerations for IAP charts: Approach course track and communication frequencies (DOT/FAA/RD-91/19). US DOT Federal Aviation Administration. http://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/8699
- Osborne, D. W., & Huntley, M. S. (1992). Design of instrument approach procedure charts: Comprehension speed of missed approach instructions coded in text or icons (DOT/FAA/RD-92/3). US DOT Federal Aviation Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/8637
- Osborne, D. W., Huntley, M. S., Jr., Turner, J. W., & Donovan, C. M. (1995). The effect of instrument approach procedure chart design on pilot search speed and response accuracy: Flight test results (DOT/FAA/AR-95/8, DOT-VNTSCS-FAA-95-13). US DOT Federal Aviation Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/8650.
- Pepitone, D., Ball, J., & Letsu-Dake, E. (2014). NextGen flight deck information displays: Recommendations for managing display complexity with electronic chart information version 2. Honeywell. http://www.hf.faa.gov/FAAAJP61/Honeywell%20Report%20on%20Electronic%20Charts%20Feb%202014%20Rev%202.0.pdf
- SAE Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) 5621. (2011, January 17). Electronic display of aeronautical information (Charts).
- Schvaneveldt, R. W., Beringer, D. B., & Lamonica, J. A. (2001). Priority and organization of information accessed by pilots in various phases of flight. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 11(3), 253–280. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327108IJAP1103_02
- Stewart, M., Laraway, S., Jordan, K., & Feary, M. S. (2017). Simplified Approach Charts Improve Data Retrieval Performance. Journal of cognitive engineering and decision making, 11(2), 166–183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343416675556
- Teichner, W. H., & Mocharnuk, J. B. (1979). Visual search for complex targets. Human Factors, 21(3), 259–275. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/001872087902100302
- Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth bartlett memorial lecture. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A(2), 201–237. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02724988843000104
- Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5
- Yantis, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(5), 156–161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768973
- Yeh, M., & Chandra, D. C. (2003). Air transport pilots’ information priorities for surface moving map displays. Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 47th annual meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.