Effects of Presence and Physical Activity on Player Well-being in Augmented Reality Games: A Diary Study

References

• Alha, K., Koskinen, E., Paavilainen, J., & Hamari, J. (2019). Why do people play location-based augmented reality games: A study on Pokémon GO. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 114–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Althoff, T., White, R. W., & Horvitz, E. (2016). Influence of Pokémon GO on physical activity: Study and implications. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(12), e315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddle, S. J., & Mutrie, N. (2007). Psychology of physical activity: Determinants, well-being and interventions. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blum, L., Wetzel, R., McCall, R., Oppermann, L., & Broll, W. (2012). The final TimeWarp: Using form and content to support player experience and presence when designing location-aware mobile augmented reality games. In Proceedings of the designing interactive systems conference (pp. 711–720). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 579–616. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonus, J. A., Peebles, A., Mares, M. L., & Sarmiento, I. G. (2018). Look on the bright side (of media effects): Pokémon GO as a catalyst for positive life experiences. Media Psychology, 21(2), 263–287. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1305280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockmyer, J. H., Fox, C. M., Curtiss, K. A., McBroom, E., Burkhart, K. M., & Pidruzny, J. N. (2009). The development of the game engagement questionnaire: A measure of engagement in video game-playing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 624–634. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broom, D. R., & Flint, S. W. (2018). Gotta catch ‘em all: Impact of Pokémon GO on physical activity, sitting time, and perceptions of physical activity and health at baseline and three-month follow-up. Games for Health Journal, 7(6), 401–408. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2018.0002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caci, B., Scrima, F., Tabacchi, M. E., & Cardaci, M. (2019). The reciprocal influences among motivation, personality traits, and game habits for playing Pokémon GO. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(14), 1303–1311. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1519167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2020). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. Hachette UK.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, J. J., & Bailenson, J. N. (2016). How immersive is enough? A meta-analysis of the effect of immersive technology on user presence. Media Psychology, 19(2), 272–309. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2015.1015740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drolet, A. L., & Morrison, D. G. (2001). Do we really need multiple-item measures in service research? Journal of Service Research, 3(3), 196–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050133001
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J., Gilbert, M., & Tang, W. Y. (2018). Player experiences in a massively multiplayer online game: A diary study of performance, motivation, and social interaction. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4056–4073. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818767102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiou, Y., & Kyza, E. A. (2017). The development and validation of the ARI questionnaire: An instrument for measuring immersion in location-based augmented reality settings. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 98, 24–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamari, J., Malik, A., Koski, J., & Johri, A. (2019). Uses and gratifications of Pokémon GO: Why do people play mobile location-based augmented reality games? International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(9), 804–819. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1497115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, S., Stach, T., Procyk, J., & Zammitto, V. (2016). Diary methods in AAA games user research. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1879–1885). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Iacovides, I., Cox, A. L., McAndrew, P., Aczel, J., & Scanlon, E. (2015). Game-play breakdowns and breakthroughs: Exploring the relationship between action, understanding, and involvement. Human–computer Interaction, 30(3–4), 202–231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2014.987347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingress Wiki. (2019, December 27). Ingress. Retrieved April 17, 2020, from https://ingress.fandom.com/wiki/Ingress
   Google Scholar
• Jin, S. A. A. (2012). “Toward integrative models of flow”: Effects of performance, skill, challenge, playfulness, and presence on flow in video games. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.678516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D., Wyeth, P., & Sweetser, P. (2013). The people-game-play model for understanding videogames’ impact on wellbeing In 2013 IEEE International Games Innovation Conference (IGIC) (pp. 85–88). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Kaczmarek, L. D., Misiak, M., Behnke, M., Dziekan, M., & Guzik, P. (2017). The Pikachu effect: Social and health gaming motivations lead to greater benefits of Pokémon GO use. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 356–363. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, A. S., Ratan, R., & Williams, D. (2014). Why we distort in self-report: Predictors of self-report errors in video game play. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(4), 1010–1023. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kari, T. (2016). Pokémon GO 2016: Exploring situational contexts of critical incidents in augmented reality. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 9(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4101/jvwr.v9i3.7239
   Google Scholar
• Kari, T., Arjoranta, J., & Salo, M. (2017). Behavior change types with Pokémon GO In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on the foundations of digital games (pp. 1–10). https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/https://doi.org/10.1145/3102071.3102074
   Google Scholar
• Karpashevich, P., Hornecker, E., Dankwa, N. K., Hanafy, M., & Fietkau, J. (2016). Blurring boundaries between everyday life and pervasive gaming: An interview study of ingress. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on mobile and ubiquitous multimedia (pp. 217–228). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kasapakis, V., & Gavalas, D. (2015). Pervasive gaming: Status, trends and design principles. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 55, 213–236. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2015.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalis, A., & Mikami, A. Y. (2018). Who’s gotta catch’em all?: Individual differences in Pokèmon Go gameplay behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 124, 35–38. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886917307067?via%3Dihub
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, D., Delfabbro, P., & Griffiths, M. (2009). The psychological study of video game players: Methodological challenges and practical advice. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 7(4), 555. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-009-9198-0
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, M., & Iloreta, J. (2013). Diary studies: A method for games user research “in the wild”. In Extended proceedings of the conference on computer human interaction. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Koivisto, J., Malik, A., Gurkan, B., & Hamari, J. (2019). Getting healthy by catching them all: A study on the relationship between player orientations and health benefits in an augmented reality game. In Proceedings of the 52nd annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS) Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. fhttps://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10125/59440
   Google Scholar
• Kosa, M., & Uysal, A. (2020a). Four pillars of healthy escapism in games: Emotion regulation, mood management, coping, and recovery. In B. Bostan (Ed.), Game user experience and player-centered design (pp. 63–76). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37643-7_4
   Google Scholar
• Kosa, M., & Uysal, A. (2020b). The role of need satisfaction in explaining intentions to purchase and play in Pokémon GO and the moderating role of prior experience. Psychology of Popular Media. Advance online publication. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2020-23064-001
   Google Scholar
• Kosa, M., Uysal, A., & Eren, P. E. (2020c). Acceptance of virtual reality games: A multi-theory approach. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations (IJGCMS), 12(1), 43–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGCMS.2020010103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagace, M. (2020, January 15). Ingress prime is now available as a free update. Android Central. Retrieved April 17, 2020, from https://www.androidcentral.com/ingress
   Google Scholar
• Laine, T. H., & Sedano, C. I. (2015). Distributed pervasive worlds: The case of exergames. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(1), 50–66. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.18.1.50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazar, J., Feng, J. H., & Hochheiser, H. (2017). Research methods in human-computer interaction. Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. H., Chiang, H. S., & Hsiao, K. L. (2018). What drives stickiness in location-based AR games? An examination of flow and satisfaction. Telematics and Informatics, 35(7), 1958–1970. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 3(2), JCMC321. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x
   Google Scholar
• Lowry, P. B., Gaskin, J., Twyman, N., Hammer, B., & Roberts, T. (2012). Taking ‘fun and games’ seriously: Proposing the hedonic-motivation system adoption model (HMSAM). Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(11), 617–671. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCall, R., Wetzel, R., Löschner, J., & Braun, A. K. (2011). Using presence to evaluate an augmented reality location aware game. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 15(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-010-0306-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, E. F., & Munson, J. M. (1992). A revised product involvement inventory: Improved usability and validity. ACR North American Advances.
   Google Scholar
• Mekler, E. D., Bopp, J. A., Tuch, A. N., & Opwis, K. (2014a). A systematic review of quantitative studies on the enjoyment of digital entertainment games. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 927–936). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Mekler, E. D., Tuch, A. N., Martig, A. L., & Opwis, K. (2014b). A diary study exploring game completion and player experience. In Proceedings of the first ACM SIGCHI annual symposium on computer-human interaction in play (pp. 433–434). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. D., Pater, J., & Mynatt, E. D. (2013). Design strategies for youth-focused pervasive social health games. In 2013 7th international conference on pervasive computing technologies for healthcare and workshops (pp. 9–16). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Morschheuser, B., Riar, M., Hamari, J., & Maedche, A. (2017). How games induce cooperation? A study on the relationship between game features and we-intentions in an augmented reality game. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 169–183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy, M. S. (2002). Using a single-item approach to measure facet job satisfaction. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1348/096317902167658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nezlek, J. B., Newman, D. B., & Thrash, T. M. (2017). A daily diary study of relationships between feelings of gratitude and well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(4), 323–332. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1198923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niantic. (2013). Ingress.
   Google Scholar
• Niantic. (2016). Pokemon Go.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, C. S., Bailenson, J. N., & Welch, G. F. (2018). A systematic review of social presence: Definition, antecedents, and implications. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5, 114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orosz, G., Zsila, Á., Vallerand, R. J., & Böthe, B. (2018). On the determinants and outcomes of passion for playing Pokémon GO. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 316. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paavilainen, J., Korhonen, H., Alha, K., Stenros, J., Koskinen, E., & Mayra, F. (2017). The Pokémon GO experience: A location-based augmented reality mobile game goes mainstream. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2493–2498). https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025871
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2008). Calculation for the Sobel test: An interactive calculation tool for mediation tests [ Computer software]. Quantpsy. http://quantpsy.org/sobel/sobel.htm
   Google Scholar
• Przybylski, A. K., Rigby, C. S., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). A motivational model of video game engagement. Review of General Psychology, 14(2), 154–166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyae, A., Luimula, M., & Smed, J. (2017). Investigating players’ engagement, immersion, and experiences in playing Pokémon GO. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI conference on creativity and cognition (pp. 247–251). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Pyae, A., & Potter, L. E. (2016). A player engagement model for an augmented reality game: A case of Pokémon GO. In Proceedings of the 28th Australian conference on computer-human interaction (pp. 11–15). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Rauschnabel, P. A., Rossmann, A., & Tom Dieck, M. C. (2017). An adoption framework for mobile augmented reality games: The case of Pokémon GO. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 276–286. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revell, T. (2017, November 28). Did Pokemon Go really kill 250 people in traffic accidents? New Scientist. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2154881-did-pokemon-go-really-kill-250-people-in-traffic-accidents/
   Google Scholar
• Richey, S. (2018). Utilizing presence in augmented-reality applications to improve learning outcomes. Performance Improvement, 57(4), 10–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21773
   Google Scholar
• Riener, A., Gabbard, J., & Trivedi, M. (2019). Special issue of presence: Virtual and augmented reality virtual and augmented reality for autonomous driving and intelligent vehicles: Guest editors’ introduction. https://direct.mit.edu/pvar/article/27/1/i/96079/Special-Issue-of-Presence-Virtual-and-Augmented
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Ariza, A., Casuso, R. A., Suarez-Manzano, S., & Martínez-López, E. J. (2018). Effect of augmented reality game Pokémon GO on cognitive performance and emotional intelligence in adolescent young. Computers & Education, 116, 49–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Frederick, C. (1997). On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality, 65(3), 529–565. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00326.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., Rigby, C. S., & Przybylski, A. (2006). The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and Emotion, 30(4), 344–360. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9051-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekhavat, Y. A., & Zarei, H. (2018). Sense of immersion in computer games using single and stereoscopic augmented reality. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(2), 187–194. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1340229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selig, J. P., & Preacher, K. J. (2008). Monte Carlo method for assessing mediation: An interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects [ Computer software]. Quantpsy. http://quantpsy.org/
   Google Scholar
• Shin, D. (2019). How does immersion work in augmented reality games? A user-centric view of immersion and engagement. Information, Communication & Society, 22(9), 1212–1229. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1411519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sifonis, C. M. (2019). Examining game transfer phenomena in the hybrid reality game, Ingress. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(17), 1557–1568. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1555735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skalski, P., Tamborini, R., Shelton, A., Buncher, M., & Lindmark, P. (2011). Mapping the road to fun: Natural video game controllers, presence, and game enjoyment. New Media & Society, 13(2), 224–242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810370949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarbez, R., Brooks, J. F., & Whitton, M. C. (2017). A survey of presence and related concepts. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 50(6), 1–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3134301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. (2003). A note on presence terminology. Presence Connect, 3(3), 1–5. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.800.3452&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Slater, M., & Usoh, M. (1993). Representations systems, perceptual position, and presence in immersive virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 2(3), 221–233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1993.2.3.221
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Tamborini, R., & Skalski, P. (2006). The role of presence in the experience of electronic games. In Playing video games: Motives, responses, and consequences (pp. 225–240). https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2006-05034-016
   Google Scholar
• Vella, K., Johnson, D., & Hides, L. (2015). Playing alone, playing with others: Differences in player experience and indicators of wellbeing. In Proceedings of the 2015 annual symposium on computer-human interaction in play (pp. 3–12).
   Google Scholar
• Von der Pütten, A. M., Klatt, J., Ten Broeke, S., McCall, R., Krämer, N. C., Wetzel, R., Blum, L., Oppermann, L., & Klatt, J. (2012). Subjective and behavioral presence measurement and interactivity in the collaborative augmented reality game TimeWarp. Interacting with Computers, 24(4), 317–325. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2012.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, R. L., Babic, M. J., Parker, P. D., Lubans, D. R., Astell-Burt, T., & Lonsdale, C. (2017). Domain-specific physical activity and mental health: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 52(5), 653–666. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.12.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiese, C. W., Kuykendall, L., & Tay, L. (2018). Get active? A meta-analysis of leisure-time physical activity and subjective well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2017.1374436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirth, W., Hartmann, T., Böcking, S., Vorderer, P., Klimmt, C., Schramm, H., Laarni, J., Ravaja, N., Gouveia, F. R., Biocca, F., Sacau, A., Jäncke, L., Baumgartner, T., Jäncke, P., & Saari, T. (2007). A process model of the formation of spatial presence experiences. Media Psychology, 9(3), 493–525. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260701283079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence, 7(3), 225–240. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/105474698565686
   Google Scholar
• Wong, F. Y. (2017). Influence of Pokémon GO on physical activity levels of university players: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Health Geographics, 16(1), 8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12942-017-0080-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang, C. C., & Liu, D. (2017). Motives matter: Motives for playing Pokémon GO and implications for well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 20(1), 52–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zsila, Á., Orosz, G., Bőthe, B., Tóth-Király, I., Király, O., Griffiths, M., & Demetrovics, Z. (2018). An empirical study on the motivations underlying augmented reality games: The case of Pokémon GO during and after Pokémon fever. Personality and Individual Differences, 133, 56–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar