References
- Abrams, R. A., & Christ, S. E. (2003). Motion onset captures attention. Psychological Science, 14(5), 427–432. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.01458
- Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01029.x
- Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2005). The split-attention principle in multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 135–146). Cambridge University Press.
- Baker, C. (2010). The impact of instructor immediacy and presence for online student affective learning, cognition, and motivation. The Journal of Educators Online, 7(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2010.1.2
- Bauhoff, V., Huff, M., & Schwan, S. (2012). Distance matters: Spatial contiguity effects as trade-off between gaze switches and memory load. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(6), 863–871. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2887
- Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive domain. McKay.
- Brooker, A., Corrin, L., De Barba, P., Lodge, J., & Kennedy, G. (2018). A tale of two MOOCs: How student motivation and participation predict learning outcomes in different MOOCs. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3237
- Catrysse, L., Gijbels, D., Donche, V., De Maeyer, S., Lesterhuis, M., & Van den Bossche, P. (2018). How are learning strategies reflected in the eyes? Combining results from self-reports and eye-tracking. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 118–137. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12181
- Cegala, D. J. (1981). Interaction involvement: A cognitive dimension of communicative competence. Communication Education, 30(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528109378460
- Chan, A. H. S., & Lee, P. S. K. (2005). Effect of display factors on Chinese reading times, comprehension scores and preferences. Behaviour & Information Technology, 24(2), 81–91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929042000267073
- Chatti, M. A., Marinov, M., Sabov, O., Laksono, R., Sofyan, Z., Yousef, A. M. F., & Schroeder, U. (2016). Video annotation and analytics in CourseMapper. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1), 10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-016-0035-1
- Chávez, J., Montaño, R., & Barrera, R. (2016). Structure and content of messages in an online environment: An approach from participation. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 560–568. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.046
- Chen, Y., Gao, Q., & Rau, P.-L. P. (2017). Watching a movie alone yet together: Understanding reasons for watching danmaku videos. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 33(9), 731–743. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1282187
- Chen, Y., Gao, Q., Yuan, Q., & Tang, Y. (2019). Facilitating students’ interaction in MOOCs through timeline-anchored discussion. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 35(19) , 1781–1799. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1574056
- Chiu, K. F. T., & Hew, K. F. T. (2018). Factors influencing peer learning and performance in MOOC asynchronous online discussion forum. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 16–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3240
- Chun, M. M., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2007). Interactions between attention and memory. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 17(2), 177–184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2007.03.005
- De Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M., & Paas, F. (2010). Learning by generating vs. receiving instructional explanations: Two approaches to enhance attention cueing in animations. Computers & Education, 55(2), 681–691. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.027
- Dinsmore, D. L., & Alexander, P. A. (2016). A multidimensional investigation of deep-level and surface-level processing. The Journal of Experimental Education, 84(2), 213–244. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2014.979126
- Dolmans, D. H., Loyens, S. M., Marcq, H., & Gijbels, D. (2016). Deep and surface learning in problem-based learning: A review of the literature. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 21(5), 1087–1112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-015-9645-6
- Eilertsen, T. V., & Valdermo, O. (2000). Open-Book assessment: A contribution to improved learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 26(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-491X(00)00010-9
- Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E. M., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112(4), 777. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.777
- Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001
- Ginns, P. (2006). Integrating information: A meta-analysis of the spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity effects. Learning and Instruction, 16(6), 511–525. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.10.001
- Hara, N., Bonk, C. J., & Angeli, C. (2000). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science, 28(2), 115–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003764722829
- Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in Psychology, 52, 139–183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9
- Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. Collaborative learning through computer conferencing (pp. 117–136). Springer.
- Hsu, Y., & Schwen, T. M. (2003). The effects of structural cues from multiple metaphors on computer users’ information search performance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(02)00125-8
- Jamet, E., Gonthier, C., Cojean, S., Colliot, T., & Erhel, S. (2020). Does multitasking in the classroom affect learning outcomes? A naturalistic study. Computers in Human Behavior, 106, 106264. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106264
- Jamet, E. (2014). An eye-tracking study of cueing effects in multimedia learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 47–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.11.013
- Johnson, C. I., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). An eye movement analysis of the spatial contiguity effect in multimedia learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18(2), 178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026923
- Johnson, D. (2013). Polyphonic/Pseudo-synchronic: Animated writing in the comment feed of Nicovideo. Japanese Studies, 33(3), 297–313. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10371397.2013.859982
- Joksimović, S., Dowell, N., Gašević, D., Mirriahi, N., Dawson, S., & Graesser, A. C. (2019). Linguistic characteristics of reflective states in video annotations under different instructional conditions. Computers in Human Behavior, 96, 211–222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.003
- Jung, Y., & Lee, J. (2018). Learning engagement and persistence in massive open online courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education, 122, 9–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.013
- Ke, F., & Kwak, D. (2013). Online learning across ethnicity and age: A study on learning interaction participation, perception, and learning satisfaction. Computers & Education, 61, 43–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.09.003
- Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
- Krejtz, K., Duchowski, A. T., Krejtz, I., Kopacz, A., & Chrząstowski-Wachtel, P. (2016 Gaze transitions when learning with multimedia). Journal of Eye Movement Research 9(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.9.1.5
- Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory, modality of presentation and the transient information effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(6), 943–951. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1787
- Lee, Y.-C., Lin, W.-C., Cherng, F.-Y., Wang, H.-C., Sung, C.-Y., & King, J.-T. (2015). Using time-anchored peer comments to enhance social interaction in online educational videos. Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 689–698). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702349
- Leng, J., Zhu, J., Wang, X., & Gu, X. (2016). Identifying the potential of Danmaku video from eye gaze data. Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2016 IEEE 16th international conference on (pp. 288–292). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7756979/
- Li, C., & Lalani, F. (2020, April 29). The COVID-19 pandemic has changed education forever. This is how. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/04/coronavirus-education-global-covid19-online-digital-learning/
- Li, L.-Y., Chen, G.-D., & Yang, S.-J. (2013). Construction of cognitive maps to improve e-book reading and navigation. Computers & Education, 60(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.010
- Lin, X., Huang, M., & Cordie, L. (2018). An exploratory study: Using Danmaku in online video-based lectures. Educational Media International, 55(3), 273–286. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1512447
- Lindquist, S. I., & McLean, J. P. (2011). Daydreaming and its correlates in an educational environment. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(2), 158–167. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.12.006
- Lockhart, R. S., & Craik, F. I. (1990). Levels of processing: A retrospective commentary on a framework for memory research. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne De Psychologie, 44(1), 87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084237
- Loh, K. K., Tan, B. Z. H., & Lim, S. W. H. (2016). Media multitasking predicts video-recorded lecture learning performance through mind wandering tendencies. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 943–947. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.030
- Lu, Z., Heo, S., & Wigdor, D. J. (2018). StreamWiki: Enabling viewers of knowledge sharing live streams to collaboratively generate archival documentation for effective in-stream and Post Hoc learning. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction, 2 (CSCW) (pp. 112).
- Ma, X., & Cao, N. (2017). Video-based evanescent, anonymous, asynchronous social interaction: Motivation and adaption to medium. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing (pp. 770–782).
- Makransky, G., Terkildsen, T. S., & Mayer, R. E. (2019). Role of subjective and objective measures of cognitive processing during learning in explaining the spatial contiguity effect. Learning and Instruction, 61, 23–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.12.001
- Mason, L., Pluchino, P., & Tornatora, M. C. (2013). Effects of picture labeling on science text processing and learning: Evidence from eye movements. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(2), 199–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.41
- Mason, L., Tornatora, M. C., & Pluchino, P. (2015). Integrative processing of verbal and graphical information during re-reading predicts learning from illustrated text: An eye-movement study. Reading and Writing, 28(6), 851–872. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9552-5
- Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press New York.
- Mcmillan, R., Kaufman, S., & Singer, L. J. (2013). Ode to positive constructive daydreaming. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 626. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00626
- McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2010). Does mind wandering reflect executive function or executive failure? Comment on Smallwood and Schooler (2006) and Watkins (2008). Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 188–197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018298
- Nuthmann, A., Smith, T. J., Engbert, R., & Henderson, J. M. (2010). CRISP: A computational model of fixation durations in scene viewing. Psychological Review, 117(2), 382. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018924
- O’Keefe, P. A., Letourneau, S. M., Homer, B. D., Schwartz, R. N., & Plass, J. L. (2014). Learning from multiple representations: An examination of fixation patterns in a science simulation. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 234–242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.040
- Offir, B., Lev, Y., & Bezalel, R. (2008). Surface and deep learning processes in distance education: Synchronous versus asynchronous systems. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1172–1183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.10.009
- Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2003). Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: Measures of effect size for some common research designs. Psychological Methods, 8(4), 434. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.4.434
- Pashler, H. (1988). Cross-dimensional interaction and texture segregation. Perception & Psychophysics, 43(4), 307–318. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208800
- Peng, Q., Qie, N., Yuan, L., Chen, Y., & Gao, Q. (2019). Design of an online education evaluation system based on multimodal data of learners. International conference on cross-cultural design. In press.
- Reichle, E. D., Reineberg, A. E., & Schooler, J. W. (2010). Eye movements during mindless reading. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1300–1310. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610378686
- Risko, E. F., Anderson, N., Sarwal, A., Engelhardt, M., & Kingstone, A. (2012). Everyday attention: Variation in mind wandering and memory in a lecture. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(2), 234–242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1814
- Rovai, A. P. (2002). Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(4), 319–332. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00130-6
- Salvucci, D. D., Taatgen, N. A., & Borst, J. P. (2009). Toward a unified theory of the multitasking continuum: From concurrent performance to task switching, interruption, and resumption. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1819–1828).
- Scheiter, K., & Eitel, A. (2015). Signals foster multimedia learning by supporting integration of highlighted text and diagram elements. Learning and Instruction, 36, 11–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.11.002
- Scheiter, K., & Eitel, A. (2017). The use of eye tracking as a research and instructional tool in multimedia learning. In Was, C., Sansosti, F., and Morris, B. (Eds.). Eye-tracking technology applications in educational research (pp. 143–164). IGI Global.
- Schmidt-Weigand, F., Kohnert, A., & Glowalla, U. (2010). A closer look at split visual attention in system-and self-paced instruction in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 100–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.011
- Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00017-8
- Schooler, J. W., Reichle, E. D., & Halpern, D. V. (2004). Zoning out while reading: Evidence for dissociations between experience and metaconsciousness. In Levin, D. T. (Ed.). Thinking and seeing: Visual metacognition in adults and children (pp. 203). The MIT Press.
- Shin, H., Ko, E.-Y., Williams, J. J., & Kim, J. (2018). Understanding the effect of In-Video prompting on learners and instructors. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 319).
- Shu, H., Zhou, W., Yan, M., & Kliegl, R. (2011). Font size modulates saccade-target selection in Chinese reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(2), 482–490. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-010-0029-y
- Singh, A.-M., Marcus, N., & Ayres, P. (2012). The transient information effect: Investigating the impact of segmentation on spoken and written text. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(6), 848–853. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2885
- Sins, P. H., Van Joolingen, W. R., Savelsbergh, E. R., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. (2008). Motivation and performance within a collaborative computer-based modeling task: Relations between students’ achievement goal orientation, self-efficacy, cognitive processing, and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(1), 58–77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.12.004
- Smallwood, J., McSpadden, M., & Schooler, J. W. (2008). When attention matters: The curious incident of the wandering mind. Memory & Cognition, 36(6), 1144–1150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.6.1144
- Smallwood, J. (2010). Why the global availability of mind wandering necessitates resource competition: Reply to McVay and Kane. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 202–207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018673
- Sorden, S. D. (2005). A cognitive approach to instructional design for multimedia learning. Informing Science Journal, 8, 263–279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28945/498
- Sung, C.-Y., Huang, X.-Y., Shen, Y., Cherng, F.-Y., Lin, W.-C., & Wang, H.-C. (2016). ToPIN: A visual analysis tool for time-anchored comments in online educational videos. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2185–2191). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892327
- Sung, C.-Y., Huang, X.-Y., Shen, Y., Cherng, F.-Y., Lin, W.-C., & Wang, H.-C. (2017). Exploring online learners’ interactive dynamics by visually analyzing their time-anchored comments. Computer Graphics Forum, 36(7), 145–155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13280
- Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In J. P. Mestre & B. H. Ross (Eds.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 55, pp. 37–76). Academic Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8
- Szpunar, K. K., Khan, N. Y., & Schacter, D. L. (2013). Interpolated memory tests reduce mind wandering and improve learning of online lectures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(16), 6313–6317. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221764110
- Szpunar, K. K., Moulton, S. T., & Schacter, D. L. (2013). Mind wandering and education: From the classroom to online learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00495
- Uetsuki, M., Watanabe, J., Ando, H., & Maruya, K. (2017). Reading traits for dynamically presented texts: Comparison of the optimum reading rates of dynamic text presentation and the reading rates of static text presentation. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01390
- Uzzaman, S., & Joordens, S. (2011). The eyes know what you are thinking: Eye movements as an objective measure of mind wandering. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(4), 1882–1886. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.09.010
- Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.246
- Vermunt, J. D., & Vermetten, Y. J. (2004). Patterns in student learning: Relationships between learning strategies, conceptions of learning, and learning orientations. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 359–384. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0005-y
- Weinstein, Y. (2017). Mind-wandering, how do I measure thee with probes? Let me count the ways. Behavior research methods 50(2), 642–661. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0891-9
- Wickens, C. D., & McCarley, J. S. (2007). Applied attention theory. CRC Press.
- Wise, A. F., & Cui, Y. (2018). Unpacking the relationship between discussion forum participation and learning in MOOCs: Content is key. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 330–339).
- Yao, Y., Bort, J., & Huang, Y. (2017). Understanding Danmaku’s potential in online video learning. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 3034–3040). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3053258
- Yardi, S. (2006). The role of the backchannel in collaborative learning environments. The International Conference of the Learning Sciences. Bloomington, Indiana, USA. 2, 852–858. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1150034.1150158
- Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., Schroeder, U., & Wosnitza, M. (2015). A usability evaluation of a blended MOOC environment: An experimental case study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(2), 69–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i2.2032
- Zhu, W., Zang, J., & Tobita, H. (2020). Wordy: Interactive word cloud to summarize and browse online videos to enhance eLearning. 2020 IEEE/SICE international Symposium on System Integration (SII) (pp. 879–884). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/SII46433.2020.9026306