References
- Arvola, M., & Artman, H. (2008). Studio life: The construction of digital design competence. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 3(2), 78–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2008-02-02
- Batagoda, M. (2017, December 27). Interaction design and the five pillars. UX Planet. https://uxplanet.org/interaction-design-and-the-five-pillars-ad319bd82f1
- Bertelsen, O. (1998). Elements of a theory of design artefacts: A contribution to critical systems development research [PhD thesis]. Aarhus University Library. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7146/dpb.v27i531.7060
- Blomkvist, J. K., Persson, J., & Åberg, J. (2015). Communication through boundary objects in distributed agile teams. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’15, 2015-April (pp. 1875–1884). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702366
- Blomquist, Å., & Arvola, M. (2002). Personas in action: Ethnography in an interaction design team. In Proceedings of the Second Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction - NordiCHI ’02 (Vol. 31, p. 197). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/572020.572044
- Bozic Lenard, D., & Pintarić, L. (2018). Comparison of employers’ and students’ perceptions regarding communication skills. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 6(1), 063. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP1801063B
- Brandt, C. B., Cennamo, K., Douglas, S., Vernon, M., McGrath, M., & Reimer, Y. (2013). A theoretical framework for the studio as a learning environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(2), 329–348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9181-5
- Brown, T. (2005, June 1). Strategy by design. Fast Company.
- Chang, Y., Lim, Y., & Stolterman, E. (2008). Personas: From theory to practices. In Proceedings of the 5th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction Building Bridges - NordiCHI ’08 (Vol. 358, p. 439). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1463160.1463214
- Chiu, M.-L. (2002). An organizational view of design communication in design collaboration. Design Studies, 23(2), 187–210. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00019-9
- Churchill, E. F., Bowser, A., & Preece, J. (2016). The future of HCI education. Interactions, 23(2), 70–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2888574
- Collins, A. (1988). Cognitive apprenticeship and instructional technology (Technical Report 6899). BBN Labs, Inc.
- Collins, D. (2017). Why UX professionals must be good communicators - UX mastery. UX Mastery. https://uxmastery.com/communication-for-ux-professionals/
- Dalsgaard, P., Halskov, K., & Basballe, D. A. (2014). Emergent boundary objects and boundary zones in collaborative design research projects. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems - DIS ’14 (pp. 745–754). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2600878
- DiMicco, J. M., & Mann, N. (2016). User research to inform product design: Turning failure into small successes. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA ’16, 07-12-May- (pp. 872–879). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2851606
- Donnell, J. A., Aller, B. M., Alley, M., & Kedrowicz, A. A. (2011). Why industry says that engineering graduates have poor communication skills: What the literature says. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. American Society for Engineering Education. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2–18809
- Dotan, A., Maiden, N., Lichtner, V., & Germanovich, L. (2009). Designing with only four people in mind? - A case study of using personas to redesign a work-integrated learning support system. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 5727 LNCS (( PART 2), pp. 497–509). International Federation for Information Processing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03658-3_54
- Faily, S., & Flechais, I. (2011). Persona cases: A technique for grounding personas. In Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’11 (p. 2267). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.5555/1050231.1050282
- Fass, J., & Groves, E. (2019). Global HCI curricula: The case for creativity. EduCHI 2019: Global Perspectives on HCI Education. https://educhi2019.hcilivingcurriculum.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/p06-Global-HCI-Curricula-The-Case-for-Creativity.pdf
- Fernandez, J. D. (2004). A paradigm for community-based human computer interaction education. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 19(4), 329–334. https://doi.org/10.5555/1050231.1050282
- Friess, E. (2012). Personas and decision making in the design process: An ethnographic case study. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’12 (p. 1209). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208572
- Furniss, D., Blandford, A., & Curzon, P. (2008). Usability work in professional website design: Insights from practitioners’ perspectives. In E. L.-C. Law, E. Hvannberg, & G. Cockton (Eds.), Maturing usability (pp. 144–167). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-941-5_7
- Garrett, J. J. (2002). The elements of user experience: User-centered design for the web. New Riders Publishing. http://www.jjg.net/elements/
- Getto, G., & Beecher, F. (2016). Toward a model of UX education: Training UX designers within the academy. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 59(2), 153–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2016.2561139
- Goodman, E. (2013). Delivering design: performance and materiality in professional interaction design [PhD thesis]. University of California.
- Goodman, E., Stolterman, E., & Wakkary, R. (2011). Understanding interaction design practices. In Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’11 (p. 1061). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979100
- Gray, C. M. (2014). Evolution of design competence in UX practice. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’14 (pp. 1645–1654). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557264
- Gray, C. M. (2016). “It’s more of a mindset than a method”: UX practitioners’ conception of design methods. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 4044–4055). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858410
- Gray, C. M., & Boling, E. (2018). Designers’ articulation and activation of instrumental design judgements in cross-cultural user research. CoDesign, 14(2), 79–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2017.1393546
- Gray, C. M., Toombs, A. L., & Gross, S. (2015). Flow of competence in UX design practice. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI’15 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vol. 1, pp. 3285–3294). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702579
- Greever, T. (2020). Articulating design decisions: Communicate with stakeholders, keep your sanity, and deliver the best user experience (2nd ed.). O’Reilly Media.
- Hill, A. M., & Smith, H. A. (2005). Research in purpose and value for the study of technology in secondary schools: A theory of authentic learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-004-6195-2
- Høegh, R. T., Nielsen, C. M., Overgaard, M., Pedersen, M. B., & Stage, J. (2006). The impact of usability reports and user test observations on developers’ understanding of usability data: An exploratory study. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 21(2), 173–196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc2102_4
- Jianming, D., Kelkar, K., & Braun, K. (2007). Getting the most out of personas for product usability enhancements. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 4559 LNCS (( PART 1), pp. 291–296). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73287-7_36
- Judge, T., Matthews, T., & Whittaker, S. (2012). Comparing collaboration and individual personas for the design and evaluation of collaboration software. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’12 (p. 1997). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208344
- Jung, H., & Srivastava, A. (2020). New old design education: expanding design knowledge to UX practice. In EduCHI 2020: 2nd Annual Symposium on HCI Education. https://educhi2020.hcilivingcurriculum.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/educhi2020-final27.pdf
- Koutsabasis, P., & Vosinakis, S. (2012). Rethinking HCI education for design: Problem-based learning and virtual worlds at an HCI design studio. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28(8), 485–499. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2012.687664
- Krippendorff, K. (1989). Content analysis. In E. Barnouw, G. Gerbner, W. Schramm, T. L. Worth, & L. Gross (Eds.), International encyclopedia of communication (Vol. 1, pp. 403–407). Oxford University Press. https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/226
- Lallemand, C. (2021). Creative pedagogical activities for user evaluation methods courses. In EduCHI 2021: 3rd Annual Symposium on HCI Education. https://educhi2021.hcilivingcurriculum.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/educhi2021-final76.pdf
- Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
- Lauff, C. A., Knight, D., Kotys-Schwartz, D., & Rentschler, M. E. (2020). The role of prototypes in communication between stakeholders. Design Studies, 66, 1–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.11.007
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
- Lazar, J. (2011). Using community-based service projects to enhance undergraduate HCI education. In Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA ’11 (p. 581). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979653
- Leshed, G. (2019). Scaling student-Run workshops in an advanced HCI course. EduCHI 2019: Global Perspectives on HCI Education. https://educhi2019.hcilivingcurriculum.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/p08-Scaling-Student-Run-Workshops-in-an-Advanced-HCI-Course.pdf
- Lougmani, C. (2018). Communication layers you need to know about in UX leadership. Prototypr.Io. https://blog.prototypr.io/communication-layers-you-need-to-know-about-ux-leadership-55fd05f23f62
- MacDonald, C. M., & Rozaklis, L. (2017). Assessing the implementation of authentic, client‐facing student projects in user experience (UX) education: Insights from multiple stakeholders. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 54(1), 268–278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401030
- Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17169/FQS-1.2.1089
- McCormick, R. (2004). Issues of learning and knowledge in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ITDE.0000007359.81781.7c
- McGinn, J. (Jen), & Kotamraju, N. (2008). Data-driven persona development. In Proceeding of the Twenty-Sixth Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’08 (p. 1521). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357292
- Meyer, M. W., & Norman, D. (2020). Changing design education for the 21st century. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 6(1), 13–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.12.002
- Mitchell, V., Wilson, G. T., Mackley, K. L., Jewitt, C., Golmohammadi, L., Atkinson, D., & Price, S. (2019). Digital touch experiences: Educating the designers. EduCHI 2019: Global Perspectives on HCI Education. https://educhi2019.hcilivingcurriculum.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/p05-Digital-Touch-Experiences-Educating-the-Designers.pdf
- Murdoch-Kitt, K., Gray, C. M., Parsons, P., Toombs, A. L., Louw, M., & Van Gent, E. (2019). Developing students’ instrumental judgment capacity for design research methods. In K. Murdoch-Kitt, O. Sosa-Tzec, & W. Wilkes-Krier (Eds.), Dialogue: Proceedings of the 2018 AIGA design educators community conferences (Vol. 1, pp. 109–115). AIGA.
- Musabirov, I., Suvorova, A., Bulygin, D., & Okopnyi, P. (2020). Co-aligning UX & development courses: The case of MSc in information systems and HCI. In EduCHI 2020: 2nd Annual Symposium on HCI Education. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/nnnnnnn.nnnnnnn
- Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2012). The design way (2nd ed.). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9188.001.0001
- Neuendorf, K. A. (2019). Content analysis and thematic analysis. In P. Brough (Ed.), Advanced research methods for applied psychology: Design, analysis and reporting (pp. 211–223). Routledge.
- Nielsen, L., & Storgaard Hansen, K. (2014). Personas is applicable: A study on the use of personas in Denmark. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’14 (pp. 1665–1674). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557080
- Oguamanam, V., Lee, T., McKlin, T., Cochran, Z., Abowd, G., & DiSalvo, B. (2020). Cultural clash: Exploring how studio-based pedagogy impacts learning for students in HCI classrooms. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (pp. 1131–1142). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395544
- Pandeliev, V. (2020). Ungrading themes for upgrading UXD assignments. In EduCHI 2020: 2nd Annual Symposium on HCI Education. https://educhi2020.hcilivingcurriculum.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/educhi2020-final99.pdf
- Parsons, P., Rasche, N., Gray, C. M., & Toombs, A. L. (2020). Vertical integration in UX design studios. In EduCHI 2020: 2nd Annual Symposium on HCI Education. https://educhi2020.hcilivingcurriculum.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/educhi2020-final49.pdf
- Perry, M., & Sanderson, D. (1998). Coordinating joint design work: The role of communication and artefacts. Design Studies, 19(3), 273–288. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00008-8
- Potter, P., & France, B. (2018). Informing a pedagogy for design and problem-solving in hard materials by theorising technologists’ learning experiences. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9376-x
- Pruitt, J., & Grudin, J. (2003). Personas: Practice and theory. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Designing for User Experiences - DUX ’03 (p. 1). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/997078.997089
- Putnam, C., Dahman, M., Rose, E. J., Cheng, J., & Bradford, G. (2016). Best practices for teaching accessibility in university classrooms: Cultivating awareness, understanding, and appreciation for diverse users. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, 8(4), 1–26.https://www.wiete.com.au/journals/GJEE/Publish/vol11no1/Riemer.pdf(noDOI)
- Putnam, C., Reiner, A., Ryou, E., Caputo, M., Cheng, J., Allen, M., & Singamaneni, R. (2016). Human-centered design in practice: Roles, definitions, and communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(4), 446–470. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281616653491
- Reimer, M. J. (2007). Communication skills for the 21st century engineer. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 11(1), 89–100. http://www.wiete.com.au/journals/GJEE/Publish/vol11no1/Riemer.pdf
- Rönkkö, K., Hellman, M., Kilander, B., & Dittrich, Y. (2004). Personas is not applicable: Local remedies interpreted in a wider context. In Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Participatory Design Artful Integration: Interweaving Media, Materials and Practices - PDC 04 (Vol. 1, p. 112). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1011870.1011884
- Rose, E. J., Putnam, C., & MacDonald, C. M. (2020). Preparing future UX professionals: Human skills, technical skills, and dispositions. In Proceedings of the 38th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication (pp. 1–8). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3380851.3416774
- Rose, E. J., & Tenenberg, J. (2016). Arguing about design. In Proceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication - SIGDOC ’16 (pp. 1–10). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2987592.2987608
- Rose, E. J., & Tenenberg, J. (2017). Making practice-level struggles visible. Communication Design Quarterly, 5(1), 89–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3090152.3090160
- Rule, A. C. (2006). The components of authentic learning. Journal of Authentic Learning, 3(1), 1–10. https://dspace.sunyconnect.suny.edu/handle/1951/35263
- Salminen, J., Jansen, B. J., An, J., Kwak, H., & Jung, S. (2018). Are personas done? Evaluating their usefulness in the age of digital analytics. Persona Studies, 4(2), 47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21153/psj2018vol4no2art737
- Self, J. A. (2019). Communication through design sketches: Implications for stakeholder interpretation during concept design. Design Studies, 63, 1–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.02.003
- Shaffer, D. W., & Resnick, M. (1999). “Thick” authenticity: New media and authentic learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 10(2), 195–215.
- Shneiderman, B., Bishop, A., Friedman, B., Lazar, J., Marsden, G., & Nass, C. (2006). Making a difference: Integrating socially relevant projects into HCI teaching. In CHI ’06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA ’06 (pp. 41–44). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1125451.1125463
- Slavina, A., & Gilbert, S. B. (2021). Perspectives in HCI: A course integrating diverse viewpoints. In EduCHI 2021: 3rd Annual Symposium on HCI Education. https://educhi2021.hcilivingcurriculum.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/educhi2021-final46.pdf
- Slegers, K., De Rooij, A., Van Enschot, R., Elloumi, L., Van Der Laan, N., & De Wit, J. (2019). Academic challenges in HCI education - The new media design bachelor and master programs. In EduCHI 2019: Global Perspectives on HCI Education. https://educhi2019.hcilivingcurriculum.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/p07-Academic-Challenges-in-HCI-Education-–The-New-Media-Design-Bachelor-and-Master-Programs.pdf
- Steane, J., Briggs, J., & Yee, J. (2020). T-shifting identities and practices: Interaction designers in the fourth industrial age. International Journal of Design, 14(3), 85–96. http://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/3728/926
- Subrahmaniyan, N., Higginbotham, D. J., & Bisantz, A. M. (2018). Using personas to support augmentative alternative communication device design: A validation and evaluation study. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 34(1), 84–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1330802
- Turnbull, W. (2002). The place of authenticity in technology in the New Zealand curriculum. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 12(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013056129283
- Turner, T., Qvarfordt, P., Biehl, J. T., Golovchinsky, G., & Back, M. (2010). Exploring the workplace communication ecology. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’10, 2(1), 841. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753449
- Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
- Vorvoreanu, M., Gray, C. M., Parsons, P., & Rasche, N. (2017). Advancing UX education: A model for integrated studio pedagogy. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’17 (pp. 1441–1446). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025726
- Wilcox, L., DiSalvo, B., Henneman, D., & Wang, Q. (2019). Design in the HCI classroom: Setting a research agenda. In DIS 2019 - Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (pp. 871–883). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322381
- Wohlrab, R., Pelliccione, P., Knauss, E., & Larsson, M. (2018). Boundary objects in Agile practices. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Software and System Process - ICSSP ’18 (Vol. 18, pp. 31–40). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3202710.3203155
- Xenos, M. (2019). Lessons learned from introducing educational novelties in a flipped classroom M.Sc. HCI-HRI course. In EduCHI 2019: Global Perspectives on HCI Education. https://educhi2019.hcilivingcurriculum.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/p01-Lessons-Learned-from-Introducing-Educational-Novelties-in-a-Flipped-Classroom-M.Sc_.-HCI-HRI-Course.pdf