References
- Allan, G. (2003). A critique of using grounded theory as a research method. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 2(1), 1–10.
- Alt, F., Schneegaß, S., Schmidt, A., Müller, J., & Memarovic, N. (2012). How to evaluate public displays. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (pp. 17:1–17:6). ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2307798.2307815
- Alves, V., Niu, N., Alves, C., & Valençac, G. (2010). Requirements engineering for software product lines: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 52(8), 806–820. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2010.03.014
- Ardito, C., Buono, P., Costabile, M. F., & Desolda, G. (2015). Interaction with large displays: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 47(3), 1–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2682623
- Bedu, L., Tinh, O., & Petrillo, F. (2019). A tertiary systematic literature review on software visualization. In 2019 Working Conference on Software Visualization (vissoft) (pp. 33–44). IEEE. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/VISSOFT.2019.00013
- Biehl, J. T., Czerwinski, M., Smith, G., & Robertson, G. G. (2007). Fastdash: A visual dashboard for fostering awareness in software teams. In Proceedings of the Sigchi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1313–1322). ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240823
- Bjørn, P., & Boulus-Rødje, N. (2015). Studying technologies in practice: “bounding practices” when investigating socially embedded technologies. In V. Wulf, K. Schmidt, & D. Randall (Eds.), Designing socially embedded technologies in the real-world (pp. 341–356). Springer.
- Boeije, H. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality & Quantity, 36(4), 391–409. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020909529486
- Börner, D., Kalz, M., & Specht, M. (2013). Closer to you: Reviewing the application, design, and evaluation of ambient displays. International Journal of Ambient Computing and Intelligence, 5(3), 16–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4018/ijaci.2013070102
- Brignull, H., & Rogers, Y. (2003). Enticing people to interact with large public displays in public spaces. In Human-computer Interaction Interact ‘03: IFIP TC13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 17–24). IOS Press.
- Brown, B., Bødker, S., & Höök, K. (2017). Does hci scale? Scale hacking and the relevance of hci. Interactions, 24(5), 28–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3125387
- Bryant, A. (2009). Grounded theory and pragmatism: The curious case of anselm strauss. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10(3), Art. 2. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-10.3.1358
- Colley, A., Häkkilä, J., Forsman, M.-T., Pfleging, B., & Alt, F. (2018). Car exterior surface displays: Exploration in a real-world context. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3205873.3205880
- Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Crabtree, A., Hemmings, T., & Rodden, T. (2003). The social construction of displays. In K. O’Hara, M. Perry, E. Churchill, & D. Russell (Eds.), Public and situated displays: Social and interactional aspects of shared display technologies (pp. 170–190). Springer.
- Diel, S. (2007). Software visualization: Visualizing the structure, behaviour, and evolution of software. Springer.
- Dingsøyr, T., Fægri, T. E., & Itkonen, J. (2014). What is large in large-scale? A taxonomy of scale for agile software development. Andreas, J., Pasi, K., Marco, K., Tomi, M., Jürgen, M., and Mikko, R. eds. In Product-focused software process improvement (pp. 273–276). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13835-0_20
- Dingsøyr, T., Moe, N. B., Fægri, T. E., & Seim, E. A. (2018). Exploring software development at the very large-scale: A revelatory case study and research agenda for agile method adaptation. Empirical Software Engineering, 23(1), 490–520. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-017-9524-2
- Du, G., Degbelo, A., & Kray, C. (2017). Public displays for public participation in urban settings: A survey. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (pp. 1–9). ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3078810.3078825
- Dybå, T., & Dingsøyr, T. (2008). Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review. Information and Software Technology, 50(9–10), 833–859. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.01.006
- Elhart, I., Mikusz, M., Mora, C. G., Langheinrich, M., & Davies, N. (2017). Audience monitor: An open source tool for tracking audience mobility in front of pervasive displays. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (pp. 1–8). ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3078810.3078823
- Gallacher, S., O’Connor, J., Bird, J., Rogers, Y., Capra, L., Harrison, D., & Marshall, P. (2015). Mood squeezer: Lightening up the workplace through playful and lightweight interactions. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 891–902). ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675170
- Ghare, M., Pafla, M., Wong, C., Wallace, J. R., & Scott, S. D. (2018). Increasing passersby engagement with public large interactive displays: A study of proxemics and conation. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces (pp. 19–32). ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3279778.3279789
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. AldineTransaction.
- Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Sociology Press.
- Glaser, B. G. (1992). Emergence versus forcing: Basics of grounded theory analysis. Sociology Press.
- Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Sociology Press.
- Glaser, B. G. (2008). Doing quantitative grounded theory. Sociology Press.
- Grix, J. (2010). The foundations of research (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Gross, T., Stary, C., & Totter, A. (2005). User-centered awareness in computer-supported cooperative work-systems: Structured embedding of findings from social sciences. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 18(3), 323–360. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc1803_5
- Gutwin, C., Greenberg, S., & Roseman, M. (1996). Workspace awareness in real-time distributed groupware: Framework, widgets, and evaluation. Martina, A. S., Jim Cunningham, R., and Winder, R. L. eds. In People and computers xi (pp. 281–298). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3588-3_18
- Hazlewood, W. R., Stolterman, E., & Connelly, K. (2011). Issues in evaluating ambient displays in the wild: Two case studies. In Proceedings of the Sigchi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 877–886). ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979071
- Huang, E. M., Mynatt, E. D., Russell, D. M., & Sue, A. E. (2006). Secrets to success and fatal flaws: The design of large-display groupware. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 26(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2006.21
- Jakobsen, M. R., Fernandez, R., Czerwinski, M., Inkpen, K., Kulyk, O., & Robertson, G. G. (2009). Wipdash: Work item and people dashboard for software development teams. Tom, G., Jan, G., Paula, K., Lars, O., Philippe, P., Raquel, O. P., and Marco, W. eds. In Human-computer interaction – Interact 2009 (pp. 791–804). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03658-3_83
- Jurmu, M., Ventä-Olkkonen, L., Lanamäki, A., Kukka, H., Iivari, N., & Kuutti, K. (2016). Emergent practice as a methodological lens for public displays in-the-wild. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (pp. 124–131). ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2914920.2915007
- Keskinen, T., Hakulinen, J., Heimonen, T., Turunen, M., Sharma, S., Miettinen, T., & Luhtala, M. (2013). Evaluating the experiential user experience of public display applications in the wild. In Proceedings of the 12th international Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (pp. 7:1–7:10). ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2541831.2541840
- Koch, M., Ott, F., & Richter, A. (2014). Sociotechnically integrated access to virtual communities with communitymirrors. In J. M. Leimeister & B. Rajagopalan (Eds.), Virtual communities (pp. 145–161). Routledge.
- Koch, M., von Luck, K., Schwarzer, J., & Draheim, S. (2018). The novelty effect in large display deployments – Experiences and lessons-learned for evaluating prototypes. In Proceedings of 16th European Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work - exploratory Papers. European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18420/ecscw2018_3
- Mäkelä, V., Heimonen, T., & Turunen, M. (2018). Semi-automated, large-scale evaluation of public displays. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(6), 491–505. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1367905
- Mäkelä, V., Radiah, R., Alsherif, S., Khamis, M., Xiao, C., Borchert, L., … Alt, F. (2020). Virtual field studies: Conducting studies on public displays in virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 2020 Chi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–15). ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376796.
- Mäkelä, V., Sharma, S., Hakulinen, J., Heimonen, T., & Turunen, M. (2017). Challenges in public display deployments: A taxonomy of external factors. In Proceedings of the 2017 Chi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3426–3475). ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025798
- Mankoff, J., Dey, A. K., Hsieh, G., Kientz, J., Lederer, S., & Ames, M. (2003). Heuristic evaluation of ambient displays. In Proceedings of the Sigchi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 169–176). ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642642
- Markopoulos, P. (2009). A design framework for awareness systems. In P. Markopoulos, B. De Ruyter, & W. Mackay (Eds.), Awareness systems: Advances in theory, methodology and design (pp. 49–72). Springer.
- Marquardt, N., & Greenberg, S. (2015). Proxemic interactions: From theory to practice. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
- Mattila, A.-L., Ihantola, P., Kilamo, T., Luoto, A., Nurminen, M., & Väätäjä, H. (2016). Software visualization today: Systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the 20th International Academic Mindtrek Conference (pp. 262–271). ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2994310.2994327
- Merino, L., Ghafari, M., Anslow, C., & Nierstrasz, O. (2018). A systematic literature review of software visualization evaluation. Journal of Systems and Software, 144, 165–180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.06.027
- Michelis, D., & Müller, J. (2011). The audience funnel: Observations of gesture based interaction with multiple large displays in a city center. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 27(6), 562–579. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2011.555299
- Morse, J. M., Stern, P. N., Corbin, J., Bowers, B., Clarke, A. E., & Charmaz, K. (2009). Developing grounded theory: The second generation. Routledge.
- Müller, J., Wilmsmann, D., Exeler, J., Buzeck, M., Schmidt, A., Jay, T., & Krüger, A. (2009). Display blindness: The effect of expectations on attention towards digital signage. Hideyuki, T., Michael, B., Adrian, F., Bernheim Brush, A. J., and Yoshito, T. eds. In Pervasive computing (pp. 1–8). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01516-8_1
- Muller, M. (2014). Curiosity, creativity, and surprise as analytic tools: Grounded theory method. In J. S. Olson, and W. A. Kellogg (Eds.), Ways of knowing in HCI (pp. 25–48). Springer.
- Nord, R. L., Ozkaya, I., & Kruchten, P. (2014). Agile in distress: Architecture to the rescue. Dingsøyr, T., Moe, N. B., Tonelli, R., Counsell, S., Gencel, C., & Petersen, K. eds. In Agile methods. large-scale development, refactoring, testing, and estimation (pp. 43–57). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14358-3_5
- Nunamaker, J. F., Briggs, R. O., Derrick, D. C., & Schwabe, G. (2015). The last research mile: Achieving both rigor and relevance in information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(3), 10–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2015.1094961
- Ojala, T., Kostakos, V., Kukka, H., Heikkinen, T., Linden, T., Jurmu, M., Hosio, S., Kruger, F., & Zanni, D. (2012). Multipurpose interactive public displays in the wild: Three years later. Computer, 45(5), 42–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2012.115
- Ott, F., & Koch, M. (2012). Social software beyond the desktop – Ambient awareness and ubiquitous activity streaming. IT - Information Technology, 54(5), 243–252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1524/itit.2012.0687.
- Paasivaara, M., Lassenius, C., & Heikkilä, V. T. (2012). Inter-team coordination in largescale globally distributed scrum: Do scrum-of-scrums really work? In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (pp. 235–238). ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2372251.2372294
- Paredes, J., Anslow, C., & Maurer, F. (2014). Information visualization for agile software development. In 2014 Second IEEE Working Conference on Software Visualization (pp. 157–166). IEEE. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/VISSOFT.2014.32
- Parker, C., Tomitsch, M., Davies, N., Valkanova, N., & Kay, J. (2020). Foundations for designing public interactive displays that provide value to users. In Proceedings of the 2020 Chi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–12). ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376532
- Parker, C., Tomitsch, M., & Kay, J. (2018). Does the public still look at public displays? A field observation of public displays in the wild. Proc.edings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 2(2), Art. 73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3214276
- Parnin, C., Görg, C., & Rugaber, S. (2010). Codepad: Interactive spaces for maintaining concentration in programming environments. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Software Visualization (pp. 15–24). ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1879211.1879217
- Pousman, Z., & Stasko, J. (2006). A taxonomy of ambient information systems: Four patterns of design. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (pp. 67–74). ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1133265.1133277
- Preim, B., Ropinski, T., & Isenberg, P. (2018). A critical analysis of the evaluation practice in medical visualization. In Eurographics Workshop on Visual Computing for Biology and Medicine (pp. 45–56). Eurographics Association. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2312/vcbm.20181228
- Rittenbruch, M. (2016). Cubit: Design and evaluation of a collaboration-tool for large interactive wall surfaces. In C. Anslow, P. Campos, & J. Jorge (Eds.), Collaboration meets interactive spaces (pp. 125–152). Springer.
- Rolland, K. H. (2016). Scaling across knowledge boundaries: A case study of a large-scale agile software development project. In Proceedings of the Scientific Workshop Proceedings of XP2016 (pp. 5:1–5:5). ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2962695.2962700
- Rubegni, E., Memarovic, N., & Langheinrich, M. (2011). Talking to strangers: Using large public displays to facilitate social interaction. Marcus, A. ed. In Design, user experience, and usability. theory, methods, tools and practice (pp. 195–204). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21708-1_23
- Schwaber, K., & Beedle, M. (2001). Agile software development with scrum. Prentice Hall.
- Schwarzer, J., Draheim, S., von Luck, K., Wang, Q., Casaseca, P., & Grecos, C. (2016). Ambient surfaces: Interactive displays in the informative workspace of co-located scrum teams. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 69:1–69:4). ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2971493
- Schwarzer, J., Draheim, S., von Luck, K., Wang, Q., & Grecos, C. (2021). Supplementary material to the ambient surfaces field deployment study (2014–2019). Mendeley Data, V1. Retrieved July 2, 2021, from https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/mbzgcrz4zy.1
- Schwarzer, J., Von Luck, K., Draheim, S., & Koch, M. (2019). Towards methodological guidance for longitudinal ambient display in situ research. In Proceedings of 17th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work - Exploratory Papers. European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18420/ecscw2019_ep07
- Scott-Hill, B., Anslow, C., Ferreira, J., Kropp, M., Mateescu, M., & Meier, A. (2020). Visualizing progress tracking for software teams on large collaborative touch displays. In 2020 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) (pp. 1–5). IEEE. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/VL/HCC50065.2020.9127286
- Sharma, V. S., Mehra, R., Kaulgud, V., & Podder, S. (2019). An extended reality approach for creating immersive software project workspaces. In 2019 IEEE/ACM 12th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (chase) (pp. 27–30). IEEE. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/CHASE.2019.00013
- Shelton, B., Nesbitt, K., Thorpe, A., & Eidels, A. (2020). Gauging the utility of ambient displays by measuring cognitive load. Cognition, Technology & Work, 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-020-00639-8
- Shelton, B., & Nesbitt, K. (2016). The aesthetic awareness display: A new design pattern for ambient information systems. In Proceedings of the Australasian Computer Science Week Multiconference (pp. 50:1–50:10). ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2843043.2843371
- Shelton, B., & Nesbitt, K. (2017). Evaluating wavewatch: An ambient display of web traffic. In Proceedings of the Australasian Computer Science Week Multiconference(pp. 9:1–9:9). ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3014812.3014821
- Shelton, B. (2020). Defining, classifying and evaluating ambient display [doctoral dissertation]. University of Newcastle. http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1418427
- Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C., Cohen, M., Jacobs, S., Elmqvist, N., & Diakopoulos, N. (2016). Grand challenges for hci researchers. Interactions, 23(5), 24–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2977645
- Shneiderman, B. (1996). The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In Proceedings 1996 Ieee Symposium on Visual Languages (pp. 336–343). IEEE. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/VL.1996.545307
- Siek, K. A., Hayes, G. R., Newman, M. W., & Tang, J. C. (2014). Field deployments: Knowing from using in context. In J. S. Olson & W. A. Kellogg (Eds.), Ways of knowing in hci (pp. 119–142). Springer.
- Stephanidis, C., Salvendy, G., of The Group Margherita Antona, M., Chen, J. Y. C., Dong, J., Duffy, V. G., Fang, X., Fidopiastis, C., Fragomeni, G., Fu, L. P., Guo, Y., Harris, D., Ioannou, A., Jeong, K. A. (., Konomi, S., Krömker, H., Kurosu, M., Lewis, J. R., Marcus, A., Moallem, A., … Zhou, J. (2019). Seven hci grand challenges. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(14), 1229–1269. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1619259
- Stol, K.-J., Ralph, P., & Fitzgerald, B. (2016). Grounded theory in software engineering research: A critical review and guidelines. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering (pp. 120–131). ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2884781.2884833
- Torrance, H. (2012). Triangulation, respondent validation, and democratic participation in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437185
- Walsh, I. (2015). Using quantitative data in mixed-design grounded theory studies: An enhanced path to formal grounded theory in information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(5), 531–557. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.23
- Weiser, M., & Brown, J. S. (1995). Designing calm technology. Retrieved March 9, 2021, from https://calmtech.com/papers/designing-calm-technology.html
- Williamson, J. R., & Williamson, J. (2014). Analysing pedestrian traffic around public displays. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (pp. 13–18). ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2611009.2611022
- Williamson, J. R., & Williamson, J. (2017). Understanding public evaluation: Quantifying experimenter intervention. In Proceedings of the 2017 Chi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3414–3425). ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025598
- Ye, E., Ye, X., & Liu, C. (2018). Teamwatch: Visualizing development activities using a 3-d city metaphor to improve conflict detection and team awareness. PLoS ONE, 13(3), 1–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193562