Game.UP: Gamified Urban Planning Participation Enhancing Exploration, Motivation, and Interactions

References

• Adams, E., & Rollings, A. (2006). Fundamentals of game design (game design and development series). Prentice-Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, M., Regenbrecht, H., & Abbott, M. (2011). Smart-phone augmented reality for public participation in urban planning. In Proceedings of the 23rd australian computer-human interaction conference (pp. 11–20).
   Google Scholar
• Apperley, T., & Clemens, J. (2015). The biopolitics of gaming: Avatar-player self-reflexivity in Assassin’s Creed II. The play versus story divide in game studies critical essays (pp. 110–124). McFarland & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartle, R. A. (2004). Designing virtual worlds. New Riders.
   Google Scholar
• Bartle, R. (1996). Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: Players who suit muds. Journal of MUD Research, 1(1), 19. ISBN-13: 978-0131018167
   Google Scholar
• Bastianello, D. (2009). Drei bücher über den bauprozess. Vdf Hochschulverlag AG.
   Google Scholar
• Bogost, I. (2013). Exploitationware. In R. Colby, M.S.S. Johnson, R. S. Colby (Eds.), Rhetoric/composition/play through video games. Palgrave Macmillan’s Digital Education and Learning (pp. 139–147). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bogost, I. (2015). Why gamification is bullshit. The Gameful World: Approaches, Issues, Applications part ”I: Approaches”, chapter ”2: Why Gamification is Bullshit (pp. 65-80). https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9788.003.0005
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., Van Ryzin, G. G., Loeffler, E., & Parrado, S. (2015). Activating citizens to participate in collective co-production of public services. Journal of Social Policy, 44(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279414000567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, B., Elmqvist, N., & Jankun-Kelly, T. (2012). Toward visualization for games: Theory, design space, and patterns. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18(11), 1956–1968. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2012.77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brabham, D. C. (2009). Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects. Planning Theory, 8(3), 242–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095209104824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brettschneider, F. (2011). Kommunikation und meinungsbildung bei großprojekten. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 61(44–45), 40–47. ISSN: 2194-3621
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Quick, K. S., Slotterback, C. S., & Crosby, B. C. (2013). Designing public participation processes. Public Administration Review, 73(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02678.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, J., DeWille, T., Exton, C., Exton, G., & Murray, L. (2018). A gamification–motivation design framework for educational software developers. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 47(1), 101–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239518783153
   Google Scholar
• Carozza, L., Tingdahl, D., Bosché, F., & Van Gool, L. (2014). Markerless vision-based augmented reality for urban planning. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 29(1), 2–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2012.00798.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. (2014). Democratic play: crowd-sourcing through games for architectural design [ Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Chou, Y.-K. (2019). Actionable gamification: Beyond points, badges, and leaderboards. Packt Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Clements-Croome, D. (2012). Intelligent sustainable liveable cities. In 2012 eighth international conference on intelligent environments (pp. 1–9).
   Google Scholar
• Debus, M. S. (2019). Unifying game ontology: A faceted classification of game elements [ Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. IT-Universitetet i København.
   Google Scholar
• Deterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L., O’Hara, K., & Dixon, D. (2011). Gamification. using game- design elements in non-gaming contexts. In Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems - CHI EA ’11. ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2F1979742.1979575
   Google Scholar
• Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., & Angelova, G. (2015). Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 75–88. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.18.3.75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of political action in a democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 65(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1086/257897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, G., Kray, C., & Degbelo, A. (2020). Interactive immersive public displays as facilitators for deeper participation in urban planning. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1606476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eiben, C. B., Siegel, J. B., Bale, J. B., Cooper, S., Khatib, F., Shen, B. W., Players, F., Stoddard, B. L., Popovic, Z., & Baker, D. (2012). Increased diels-alderase activity through backbone remodeling guided by foldit players. Nature Biotechnology, 30(2), 190. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Förster, A. (2014). Planungsprozesse wirkungsvoller gestalten [ Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Technische Universität München.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, M., Fizek, S., Ruffino, P., & Schrape, N. (2015). Rethinking gamification. Meson press.
   Google Scholar
• Fullerton, T., Swain, C., & Hoffman, S. (2004). Game design workshop: Designing, prototyping, & playtesting games. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, B. (2019). The smart enough city: Putting technology in its place to reclaim our urban future. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., & Blanchard, C. (2000). On the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The situational motivation scale (sims). Motivation and Emotion, 24(3), 175–213. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005614228250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work?-a literature review of empirical studies on gamification. 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 14, 3025–3034. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377
   Google Scholar
• Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiatt, J. (2006). Adkar: A model for change in business, government, and our community. Prosci.
   Google Scholar
• Hosio, S., Goncalves, J., Kostakos, V., & Riekki, J. (2015). Crowdsourcing public opinion using urban pervasive technologies: Lessons from real-life experiments in oulu. Policy & Internet, 7(2), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunicke, R., LeBlanc, M., & Zubek, R. (2004). Mda: A formal approach to game design and game research. In Proceedings of the AAAI workshop on challenges in game AI (Vol. 4, p. 1722).
   Google Scholar
• Hyrynsalmi, S., Smed, J., & Kimppa, K. (2017). The dark side of gamification: How we should stop worrying and study also the negative impacts of bringing game design elements to everywhere. Proceedings of the 1st International GamiFIN Conference, Gamifin (pp. 96–104). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1857/gamifin17_p13.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jenney, S. L., Jung, H., Seif, H., & Petzold, F. (2020). Gamification as a means to improve stakeholder management in urban planning participation. In T. Koehler, E. Schoop, & N. Kahnwald (Eds.), Communities in new media from hybrid r e alities to hybrid communities (pp. 90–98). TUDPress.
   Google Scholar
• Jenney, S. L., & Petzold, F. (2017). Question of perspective: Information visualisation in games and its possible application in planning communication. In Future trajectories of computation in design–proceedings of the 17th international conference on computer aided architectural design futures (pp. 66–83).
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D., Deterding, S., Kuhn, K.-A., Staneva, A., Stoyanov, S., & Hides, L. (2016). Gamification for health and wellbeing: A systematic review of the literature. Internet Interventions, 6, 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2016.10.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kazhamiakin, R., Marconi, A., Martinelli, A., Pistore, M., & Valetto, G. (2016). A gamification framework for the long-term engagement of smart citizens. In 2016 IEEE international smart cities conference (ISC2) (pp. 1–7).
   Google Scholar
• Khatib, F., DiMaio, F., Cooper, S., Kazmierczyk, M., Gilski, M., Krzywda, S., Zabranska, H., Pichova, I., Thompson, J., Popović, Z., Jaskolski, M., & Baker, D. (2011). Crystal structure of a monomeric retroviral protease solved by protein folding game players. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 18(10), 1175–1177. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivisto, J., & Hamari, J. (2019, April). The rise of motivational information systems: A review of gamification research. International Journal of Information Management, 45, 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laureyssens, T., Coenen, T., Claeys, L., Mechant, P., Criel, J., & Vande Moere, A. (2014). Zwerm: A modular component network approach for an urban participation game. In Proceedings of the sigchi conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 3259–3268).
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, B. (2007). Language of space. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leitner, M., & Sachs, M. (2018). Digitale bürgerbeteiligung. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lokaiczyk, R., Klug, T., Meyer, M., & Steinmetz, R. (2010). E-partizipation 2.0 gegenwärtige politische meinungsbildung im web 2.0 [Tech. Rep]. TU Darmstadt.
   Google Scholar
• Looyestyn, J., Kernot, J., Boshoff, K., Ryan, J., Edney, S., & Maher, C. (2017). Does gamification increase engagement with online programs? A systematic review. PloS One, 12(3), e0173403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marczewski, A. (2015). Even ninja monkeys like to play. CreateSpace Indep. Publish Platform, Charleston, Chapter User Types (pp. 69–84). London: Blurb Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, M. R., Jun, H., Herrera, F., Yu Villa, J., Welch, G., & Bailenson, J. N. (2019). Social interaction in augmented reality. PloS One, 14(5), e0216290. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mora, A., Riera, D., Gonzalez, C., & Arnedo-Moreno, J. (2015). A literature review of gamification design frameworks. In 2015 7th international conference on games and virtual worlds for serious applications (vs-games) (pp. 1–8).
   Google Scholar
• Morschheuser, B., Hamari, J., & Koivisto, J. (2016). Gamification in crowdsourcing: A review. In 2016 49th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS) (pp. 4375–4384).
   Google Scholar
• Müller-Pfaffenstiel, K. (2014). Handbuch für eine gute bürgerbeteiligung-planung von großvorhaben im verkehrssektor (Tech. Rep). Technical report. Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung.
   Google Scholar
• Handbuch zur partizipation. (n.d.). Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung und Umwelt Berlin. Retrieved January 21, 2021, from https://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/soziale_stadt/partizipation/download/Handbuch_Partizipation.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Traffic agent. (n.d.). Retrieved February 14, 2020, from https://www.trafikkagenten.no
   Google Scholar
• Nacke, L. E., Bateman, C., & Mandryk, R. L. (2014). Brainhex: A neurobiological gamer typology survey. Entertainment Computing, 5(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2013.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, P., Duarte, E., Rebelo, F., & Noriega, P. (2014). A review of gamification for health- related contexts. In International conference of design, user experience, and usability (pp. 742–753).
   Google Scholar
• Poplin, A. (2014). Digital serious game for urban planning:“b3—design your marketplace! Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 41(3), 493–511. https://doi.org/10.1068/b39032
   Google Scholar
• Rambow, R. (2000). Experten-laien-kommunikation in der architektur. Waxmann Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., & Sickenius, B. (1994). Development and validation of a brief measure of the three psychological needs underlying intrinsic motivation: The afs scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54(2), 506–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164494054002025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, B., & Read, J. L. (2009). Total engagement: How games and virtual worlds are changing the way people work and businesses compete. Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W. (2013). Thinking design: Transdisziplinäre konzepte für planer und entwerfer. Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2000). Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, technology, & human values, 25(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390002500101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., Rigby, C. S., & Przybylski, A. (2006). The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and Emotion, 30(4), 344–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9051-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sailer, M. (2016). Die wirkung von gamification auf motivation und leistung. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Salen, K., Tekinbaş, K. S., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Savov, A., Buckton, B., & Tessmann, O. (2016). 20,000 blocks: Can gameplay be used to guide non-expert groups in creating architecture? ACADIA // 2016: POSTHUMAN FRONTIERS: Data, Designers, and Cognitive Machines [Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA). Ann Arbor, 27-29 October, (pp. 24-33).
   Google Scholar
• Schacht, S., & Maedche, A. (2015). Project knowledge management while simply playing! Gaming mechanics in project knowledge management systems. In T. Reiners & L. C. Wood. Eds., Gamification in education and business 593–614. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10208-5_30
   Google Scholar
• Schell, J. (2019). The art of game design: A book of lenses. AK Peters/CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidiger, M., Kovacic, I., Petzold, F., & Volm, J. M. (2017). Digitalisierungsbarometer 2017: die immobilienbranche im digitalen wandel. IFZ-Hochschule Luzern.
   Google Scholar
• Schoßböck, J., Rinnerbauer, B., & Parycek, P. (2018). Digitale bürgerbeteiligung und elektronische demokratie. Verlag IFZ-Hochschule Luzern. In M. Leitner (Ed.), Digitale bürgerbeteiligung (pp. 11–40). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Selle, K. (2005). Planen, steuern, entwickeln: Über den beitrag öffentlicher akteure zur entwicklung von stadt und land. Dortmunder Vertrieb für Bau-und Planungsliteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Shabtai, E. (n.d.). Waze mobile ltd. Retrieved June 4, 2020, from https://www.waze.com
   Google Scholar
• Stockinger, T., Koelle, M., Lindemann, P., Kranz, M., Diewald, S., Möller, A., & Roalter, L. (2014, October). Towards leveraging behavioral economics in mobile application design In Gamification in education and business (pp. 105-131). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10208-5_6
   Google Scholar
• Tan, E. (2014). Negotiation and design for the self-organizing city: Gaming as a method for urban design. TU Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Ten Have, S., Ten Have, W., Huijsmans, A.-B., & Otto, M. (2016). Reconsidering change management: Applying evidence-based insights in change management practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thiel, S.-K., Fröhlich, P., & Sackl, A. (2018). Nutzerorientierte gestaltung von interaktiver e-partizipation. In M. Leitner. Ed., Digitale bürgerbeteiligung: Forschung und praxis – chancen und herausforderungen der elektronischen partizipation 127–161. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21621-4_6
   Google Scholar
• Tondello, G. F., Wehbe, R. R., Diamond, L., Busch, M., Marczewski, A., & Nacke, L. E. (2016). The gamification user types hexad scale. In Proceedings of the 2016 annual symposium on computer-human interaction in play (pp. 229–243).
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, A., & Tully, J. (2004). Modernising planning: Public participation in the uk planning system. Series/Report no.: 44th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: “Regions and Fiscal Federalism”, 25th - 29th August 2004, Porto, Portugal. European Regional Science Association (ERSA), Louvain-la-Neuve. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/116953
   Google Scholar
• Tsigilis, N., & Theodosiou, A. (2003). Temporal stability of the intrinsic motivation inventory. Perceptual and motor skills. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 97(1), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2003.97.1.271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werbach, K., & Hunter, D. (2015). The gamification toolkit: Dynamics, mechanics, and components for the win. Wharton School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zichermann, G., & Cunningham, C. (2011). Gamification by design: Implementing game mechanics in web and mobile apps. O’Reilly Media, Inc.
   Google Scholar