Haptic Zoom: An Interaction Model for Desktop Haptic Devices with Limited Workspace

References

• Burdea, G. C. (2000). Haptics issues in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the Computer Graphics International (pp. 295–302). https://doi.org/10.1109/CGI.2000.852345
   Google Scholar
• Chouvardas, V. G., Miliou, A. N., & Hatalis, M. K. (2008). Tactile displays: Overview and recent advances. Displays, 29(3), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2007.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conti, F., & Khatib, O. (2005). Spanning large workspaces using small haptic devices. In Proceedings of the First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (pp. 183–188). https://doi.org/10.1109/WHC.2005.118
   Google Scholar
• Dominjon, L., Lecuyer, A., Burkhardt, J.-M., Andrade-Barroso, G., & Richir, S. (2005). The “bubble” technique: Interacting with large virtual environments using haptic devices with limited workspace. In Eurohaptics Conference, 2005 and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 2005. World Haptics 2005, First Joint (pp. 639–640).
   Google Scholar
• Dominjon, L., Perret, J., & Lécuyer, A. (2007). Novel devices and interaction techniques for human-scale haptics. The Visual Computer, 23(4), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-007-0100-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, A., & Vance, J. M. (2003). Phantom haptic device implemented in a projection screen virtual environment [Paper presentation]. The Workshop, In Proceedings of on Virtual Environments 2003 (pp. 225–229), New York, NY, USA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Force Dimensions. (n.d.). Force Dimension Omega Haptics. https://www.forcedimension.com/products.
   Google Scholar
• Giri, G. S., Maddahi, Y., & Zareinia, K. (2021). An application-based review of haptics technology. Robotics, 10(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics10010029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, X., Zhang, Y., Sun, W., Bian, Y., Zhou, D., & Kristensson, P. O. (2016). Dexmo: An inexpensive and lightweight mechanical exoskeleton for motion capture and force feedback in VR. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1991–1995). https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858487
   Google Scholar
• Gutierrez-Fernandez, A., Fernandez-Llamas, C., Esteban, G., & Conde, M. A. (2022). Haptic Zoom: An interaction model for desktop haptic devices with limited workspace: Evaluation data [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5950721.
   Google Scholar
• Gutierrez-Fernandez, A., Fernandez-Llamas, C., Esteban, G., Conde, M. A. (2020). Haptic Zoom interaction technique implementation for unity. https://github.com/uleroboticsgroup/haptic-zoom.
   Google Scholar
• Moog. (n.d.). HelpMeSee Eye Surgery Simulator. https://www.moog.com/content/sites/global/en/markets/medical-dental-simulation/eye-surgery-simulator.html.
   Google Scholar
• Hirzinger, G., Brunner, B., Dietrich, J., & Heindl, J. (1993). Sensor-based space robotics-Rotex and its telerobotic features. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 9(5), 649–663. https://doi.org/10.1109/70.258056
   Google Scholar
• Hollis, R. L., & Salcudean, S. E. (1993). Lorentz levitation technology: A new approach to fine motion robotics, teleoperation, haptic interfaces, and vibration isolation. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Robotics Research (pp. 1–18). https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.41.4270&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hou, I. A., & Srinivasan, M. A. (1998). Multimodal virtual environments: MAGIC toolkit and visual-haptic interaction paradigms (Technical Report No. 8 – RLE TR-620). Touch Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchenham, B. A., Budgen, D., & Brereton, P. (2015). Evidence-based software engineering and systematic reviews (Vol. 4). CRC press.
   Google Scholar
• Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47(260), 583–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., Akkil, D., & Raisamo, R. (2019). Gaze augmented hand-based kinesthetic interaction: What you see is what you feel. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 12(2), 114–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, L., Liu, G., Zhang, Y., Wang, D. (2014). A modified motion mapping method for haptic device based space teleoperation [Paper presentation]. In 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Edinburgh, UK, (pp. 449–453).
   Google Scholar
• Loomis, J. M., & Lederman, S. J. (1986). Tactual perception. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, and J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of Perception and Human Performances (vol. 2, pp. 1–41). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, A. M. (2001). Measuring usability with the USE questionnaire. Usability Interface, 8(2), 3–6. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Arnold-Lund/publication/230786746_Measuring_Usability_with_the_USE_Questionnaire/links/56e5a90e08ae98445c21561c/Measuring-Usability-with-the-USE-Questionnaire.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Magnuson, C., & Rassmus-Gröhn, K. (2003). Non-visual zoom and scrolling operations in a virtual haptic environment. In Proceedings of Eurohaptics. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.5.2485&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Massie, T. H., & Salisbury, J. K. (1994). The phantom haptic interface: A device for probing virtual objects. In Proceedings of the ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (Vol. 55, pp. 295–300). http://ai.stanford.edu/∼jks/pubs/1994-Massie-salisbury-asme-sohi.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Minamizawa, K., Kamuro, S., Fukamachi, S., Kawakami, N., & Tachi, S. (2008). Ghostglove: Haptic existence of the virtual world. In Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH ‘08: Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques Conference (pp. 181). https://doi.org/10.1145/1401615.1401633
   Google Scholar
• Nissin-Dental. (n.d.). Simodont dental simulator. http://www.nissin-dental.net/products/DentalTrainingProducts/DentalSimulator/simodont/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Pacchierotti, C., Sinclair, S., Solazzi, M., Frisoli, A., Hayward, V., & Prattichizzo, D. (2017). Wearable haptic systems for the fingertip and the hand: taxonomy, review, and perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 10(4), 580–600. https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2017.2689006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlik, R. A., Vance, J. M., & Luecke, G. R. (2013). Interacting with a large virtual environment by combining a ground-based haptic device and a mobile robot base [Paper presentation]. In Proceedings of the ASME 2013 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (Vol. 55867, p. 1–9). https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2013-13441
   Google Scholar
• Rastogi, R., & Pawluk, D. T. (2013). Toward an improved haptic zooming algorithm for graphical information accessed by individuals who are blind and visually impaired. Assistive Technology, 25(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2012.680659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard, G., Pietrzak, T., Argelaguet, F., Lécuyer, A., & Casiez, G. (2021). Studying the role of haptic feedback on virtual embodiment in a drawing task. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 1, 28. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2020.573167
   Google Scholar
• Riener, R., & Harders, M. (2012). Haptic aspects. In Virtual Reality in Medicine (pp. 79–129). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, J.-L., Velázquez, R., Del-Valle-Soto, C., Gutiérrez, S., Varona, J., & Enríquez-Zarate, J. (2019). Active and passive haptic perception of shape: Passive haptics can support navigation. Electronics, 8(3), 355. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8030355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, O., MacLean, K., Swindells, C., & Booth, K. (2017). Haptic experience design: What hapticians do and where they need help. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 107, 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, M. A., & Basdogan, C. (1997). Haptics in virtual environments: Taxonomy, research status, and challenges. Computers & Graphics, 21(4), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0097-8493(97)00030-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlachos, K., & Papadopoulos, E. (2006). Transparency maximization methodology for haptic devices. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 11(3), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2006.875561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziat, M., Gapenne, O., Stewart, J., Lenay, C., Bausse, J. (2007). Design of a haptic zoom: Levels and steps. In Proceedings of the Second Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (WHC’07) (pp. 102–108). https://doi.org/10.1109/WHC.2007.36
   Google Scholar