Accessible Digital Musical Instruments in Special Educational Needs Schools – Design Considerations Based on 16 Qualitative Interviews with Music Teachers

References

• Anastasiou, D., & Kauffman, J. M. (2013). The social model of disability: Dichotomy between impairment and disability. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 38(4), 441–459. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jht026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergsland, A., & Wechsler, R. (2016). Turning movement into music: Issues and applications of the motioncomposer, a therapeutic device for persons with different abilities. SoundEffects, 6(1), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.7146/se.v6i1.24911
   Google Scholar
• Cook, A. M., & Polgar, J. M. (2015). Assistive technologies: principles and practice (4th ed.). Elsevier/Mosby.
   Google Scholar
• Creative United. (2022a). Creative United – education program. https://www.creativeunited.org.uk/creative-united-launches-disability-awareness-training-for-music-retailers/. (Accessed 2022 January 17)
   Google Scholar
• Creative United. (2022b). Creative United – take it away. www.creativeunited.org.uk/services/takeitaway. (Accessed 2022 January 17)
   Google Scholar
• Drake Music. (n.d). Accessible musical instrument collection homepage. https://www.drakemusic.org/technology/accessible-musical-instrument-collection/. (Accessed 2022 January 17)
   Google Scholar
• Drossel, K., Eickelmann, B., Schaumburg, H., Labusch, A., et al. (2019). Nutzung digitaler Medien und Prädiktoren aus der Perspektive der Lehrerinnen und Lehrer im internationalen Vergleich. In B. Eickelmann (Eds.), Computer- und informationsbezogene Kompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im zweiten internationalen Vergleich und Kompetenzen im Bereich Computational Thinking – ICILS 2018 #Deutschland (pp. 205–240). Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Farrimond, B., Gillard, D., Bott, D., Lonie, D. (2011). Engagement with technology in special educational & disabled music settings. https://network.youthmusic.org.uk/file/5694/download?token=I-1K0qhQ. Youth Music. (Accessed 2021 July 22).
   Google Scholar
• Finch, C. (2013). Why using people-first language to describe disabled people doesn’t work. https://aanm.ca/why-using-people-first-language-to-describe-disabled-people-doesnt-work/. (Accessed 2021 July 22).
   Google Scholar
• Förster, A. (2021). Teilhabe durch digitale Musikinstrumente? Eine narrative Übersichtsarbeit zu Chancen und Problemen digitaler Musikinstrumente im sonderpädagogischen Kontext in Deutschland. Sonderpädagogische Förderung Heute, 66(4), 435–449. https://doi.org/10.3262/SZ2104435
   Google Scholar
• Förster, A., Komesker, M. (2021). Loopblocks: Design and preliminary evaluation of an accessible tangible musical step sequencer. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. https://www.nime.org/archives/
   Google Scholar
• Förster, A., Komesker, C., Schnell, N. (2020). Snoesky and sonicdive - design and evaluation of two accessible digital musical instruments for a Sen school. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 83–88). Birmingham City University. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4813243.
   Google Scholar
• Frid, E. (2019). Accessible digital musical instruments – a review of musical interfaces in inclusive music practice. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 3(3), 57–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti3030057
   Google Scholar
• Graham-Knight, K., Tzanetakis, G. (2015). Adaptive music technology: History and future perspectives. In International Computer Music Conference Proceedings (pp. 416–419). University of North Texas. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/i/icmc/bbp2372.2015.087/1/–adaptive-music-technology-history-and-future-perspectives?page=root;size=150;view=text
   Google Scholar
• Imui. (n.d). imui e.V. homepage. https://www.imui.org. (Accessed 2022 January 17).
   Google Scholar
• Jewell, S., Atkin, R. (2013). Enabling technology. The Helen Hamlyn Centre for DesignRoyal College of Art. http://rossatkin.com/docs/Enabling_Technology_lo_res%20FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kuckartz, U., & Rädiker, S. (2019). Analyzing qualitative data with MAXQDA: Text, audio, and video. Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, A., Harrison, J., Schroeder, F., Ortiz, M. (2021). Cross-pollinating ecological perspectives in admi design and evaluation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. https://doi.org/10.21428/92fbeb44.ff09de34
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, A., Ortiz, M., Schroeder, F. (2020). The longevity of bespoke, accessible music technology: A case for community. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 243–248). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4813338
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, A., Schroeder, F., & Ortiz, M. (2021). Enabling communities of practice surrounding the design and use of custom accessible music technology. Computer Music Journal, 44(2–3), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1162/comj_a_00567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MBMM. (n.d). My breath my music – magic flute homepage. https://mybreathmymusic.com/de/magic-flute. (Accessed 2021 July 22).
   Google Scholar
• Miranda, E. R., & Wanderley, M. M. (2006). New digital musical instruments: Control and interaction beyond the keyboard. A-R Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Morreale, F., Angeli, A. D., O’Modhrain, S. (2014). Musical interface design: An experience-oriented framework. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 467–472). University of London. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1178879
   Google Scholar
• O’Modhrain, S. (2011). A framework for the evaluation of digital musical instruments. Computer Music Journal, 35(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1162/COMJ_a_00038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plos, O., Buisine, S., Aoussat, A., Mantelet, F., & Dumas, C. (2012). A universalist strategy for the design of assistive technology. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 42(6), 533–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2012.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, P. (2013). Teaching, learning, and living with ipads. Music Educators Journal, 100(1), 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432113489152
   Google Scholar
• Rokeby, D. (1995). Transforming mirrors: Subjectivity and control in interactive media. In S. Penny (Ed.), Critical issues in electronic media (pp. 133–158). State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, K. (2019). The drake music project Northern Ireland: Providing access to music technology for individuals with unique abilities. Social Inclusion, 7(1), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v7i1.1706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels, K., & Schroeder, F. (2019). Performance without barriers: Improvising with inclusive and accessible digital musical instruments. Contemporary Music Review, 38(5), 476–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/07494467.2019.1684061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SB. (2021). The Soundbeam Project Ltd homepage. https://www.soundbeam.co.uk. (Accessed 2021 July 22).
   Google Scholar
• Shamrock, M. (1997). Orff-Schulwerk: An integrated foundation. Music Educators Journal, 83(6), 41–44. https://doi.org/10.2307/3399024
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J. (1999). Why I dislike “Person First” language. http://www.larry-arnold.net/Autonomy/index.php/autonomy/article/view/OP1/pdf (Accessed 2021 July 05)
   Google Scholar
• Snow, K. (2009). To ensure Inclusion, Freedom, And Respect for all, it’s time to embrace people first language. http://www.inclusioncollaborative.org/docs/Person-First-Language-Article_Kathie_Snow.pdf. (Accessed 2021 July 22).
   Google Scholar
• Wanderley, M. M., & Orio, N. (2002). Evaluation of input devices for musical expression: Borrowing tools from HCI. Computer Music Journal, 26(3), 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1162/014892602320582981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, A., Davis, T., & Bevan, A. (2019). Music technology and alternate controllers for clients with complex needs. Music Therapy Perspectives, 37(2), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/mtp/miz006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, A., Woodbury, L., Davis, T. (2017). Design considerations for instruments for users with complex needs in sen settings. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 216–221). Aalborg University Copenhagen. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1176226
   Google Scholar
• Witzel, A. (2000). The problem-centered interview [26 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(1), Art. 22, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0001228
   Google Scholar
• Wright, J. (2020). The appropriation and utility of constrained admis. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 564–569). Birmingham City University. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4813194
   Google Scholar
• Wright, J., Dooley, J. J. (2019). On the inclusivity of constraint: Creative appropriation in instruments for neurodiverse children and young people. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 162–167). UFRGS. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3672908
   Google Scholar