Assessing the Sub-Dimensions of Symbolism in the User Interfaces of Interactive Products

References

• Allen, M. W. (2002). Human values and product symbolism: Do consumers form product preference by comparing the human values symbolized by a product to the human values that they endorse? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(12), 2475–2501. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb02752.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, M. W. (2006). A dual-process model of the influence of human values on consumer choice. Revista Psicologia: Organizações e Trabalho, 6(1), 15–49. ‏
   Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, M. (1987). Product shape as a design innovation strategy. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4(4), 274–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.440274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of judgment of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1979)‏.
   Google Scholar
• ‏Boztepe, S. (2007). User value: Competing theories and models. International Journal of Design, 1(2), 55–63. http://designblog.uniandes.edu.co/blogs/dise2307/files/2008/08/User-Value_-Competing-Theories-and-Models.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buunk, A. P., & Gibbons, F. X. (2006). Social comparison orientation: A new perspective on those who do and those who don’t compare with others. In Guimond, S. (Ed.) Social comparison and social psychology: Understanding cognition, intergroup relations and culture (pp. 15–33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J., & Kim, S. (2016). Is the smartwatch an IT product or a fashion product? A study on factors affecting the intention to use smartwatches. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 777–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creusen, M. E., & Schoormans, J. P. (2005). The different roles of product appearance in consumer choice. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(1), 63–81. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00103.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crilly, N., Good, D., Matravers, D., & Clarkson, P. J. (2008). Design as communication: Exploring the validity and utility of relating intention to interpretation. Design Studies, 29(5), 425–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crilly, N., Moultrie, J., & Clarkson, P. J. (2004). Seeing things: Consumer response to the visual domain in product design. Design Studies, 25(6), 547–577. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. ‏ https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Saussure, F. (1974). Course in general linguistics. Peter Owen Ltd. ‏
   Google Scholar
• De Souza, C. S., & Preece, J. (2004). A framework for analyzing and understanding online communities. Interacting with Computers, 16(3), 579–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2003.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121–147. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.2.121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmet, P. (2003). A multilayered model of product emotions. The Design Journal, 6(2), 4–13. ‏ https://doi.org/10.2752/146069203789355480
   Google Scholar
• Desmet, P. M. A., & Hekkert, P. (2007). Framework of product experience. International Journal of Design, 1(1), 57–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diefenbach, S., & Hassenzahl, M. (2011). The dilemma of the hedonic–Appreciated, but hard to justify. Interacting with Computers, 23(5), 461–472. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eytam, E. (2020). Effect of visual design on the evaluation of technology-vs. design-based Novel Interactive Products. Interacting with Computers, 32(3), 296–315. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwaa021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eytam, E., Lowengart, O., & Tractinsky, N. (2021). Effects of visual simplicity in product design and individual differences in preference of interactive products. Review of Managerial Science, 15(5), 1347–1343. ‏ ‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00391-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eytam, E., Tractinsky, N., & Lowengart, O. (2017). The paradox of simplicity: Effects of role on the preference and choice of product visual simplicity level. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 105, 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forlizzi, J. (2008). The product ecology: Understanding social product use and supporting design culture. International Journal of Design, 2(1). http://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/220/143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garaus, M., & Halkias, G. (2020). One color fits all: Product category color norms and (a) typical package colors. Review of Managerial Science, 14(5), 1077–1023. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-018-0325-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gell, A. (1986). Newcomers to the world of goods: Consumption among the Muria Gonds. In A. Appadurai (Ed.), The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective (pp. 110–40). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA, US‏‏.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to face behavior. Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Govers, P. C. M., & Schoormans, J. P. L. (2005). Product personality and its influence on consumer preference. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22(4), 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760510605308
   Google Scholar
• Grgecic, D., Holten, R., & Rosenkranz, C. (2015). The impact of functional affordances and symbolic expressions on the formation of beliefs. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16(7), 580–607. ‏ https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartson, R. (2003). Cognitive, physical, sensory, and functional affordances in interaction design. Behaviour & Information Technology, 22(5), 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290310001592587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M. (2001). The effect of perceived hedonic quality on product appealingness. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 13(4), 481–499. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327590IJHC1304_07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M. (2003). The Thing and I: Understanding the relationship between user and product. Funology: from ease-of-use to enjoyment. In M. Blythe, C. Overbeeke, A. F. Monk, P. C. Wright, (Eds.), Funology: From ease-of-use to enjoyment (pp. 31–42). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M. (2004). The interplay of beauty, goodness, and ease-of-use in interactive products. Human-Computer Interaction, 19(4), 319–349. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1904_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M., & Koller, F. (2003). AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. In Mensch & computer (pp. 187–196). Vieweg + Teubner Verlag. ‏
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M., & Monk, A. (2010). The Inference of Perceived Ease-of-use From Beauty. Human-Computer Interaction, 25(3), 235–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2010.500139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M., Platz, A., Burmester, M., & Lehner, K. (2000). The SIGCHI Conference, April). Hedonic and ergonomic quality aspects determine a software's appeal. In Proceedings of on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 201–208).‏
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M., Schöbel, M., & Trautmann, T. (2008). How motivational orientation influences the evaluation and choice of hedonic and pragmatic interactive products: The role of regulatory focus. Interacting with Computers, 20(4–5), 473–479. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2008.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschheim, R., & Newman, M. (1991). Symbolism and information systems development: Myth, metaphor and magic. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 29–62. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.1.29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, M. N., & Bouwman, H. (2015). An assessment of a semiotic framework for evaluating user-intuitive Web interface signs. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(4), 563–582. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-015-0403-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, M. N., & Bouwman, H. (2016). Towards user–intuitive web interface sign design and evaluation: A semiotic framework. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 86, 121–137. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283337781_Towards_User-Intuitive_Web_Interface_Sign_Design_and_Evaluation_A_Semiotic_Framework
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199–218. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1086/376806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juul, J. (2010). A casual revolution: Reinventing video games and their players. MIT press. ‏
   Google Scholar
• Karapanos, E., Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., & Martens, J. B. (2010). Measuring the dynamics of remembered experience over time. Interacting with Computers, 22(5), 328–335. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kujala, S., & Nurkka, P. (2012). Sentence completion for evaluating symbolic meaning. International Journal of Design, 6(3), 15–25. ‏
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, T., & Tractinsky, N. (2004). Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60(3), 269–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C. H., & Kennedy, J. M. (1997). Form symbolism, analogy, and metaphor. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(4), 546–551. ‏ https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahlke, S., Lemke, I., & Thüring, M. (2007). The Diversity of Non-instrumental Qualities in Human-Technology Interaction. MMI Interaktiv - User Experience, 1(13), 55–64.
   Google Scholar
• Markus, M. L. & Silver, M. S. (2008). A foundation for the study of IT effects: A new look at DeSanctis and Poole's concepts of structural features and spirit. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(10), 609–632. ‏ https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mugge, R. (2011). The effect of a business-like personality on the perceived performance quality of products. International Journal of Design, 5(3), 366. http://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/861/366.‏
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (1999). The invisible computer: Why good products can fail, the personal computer is so complex, and information appliances are the solution. MIT Press. ‏
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Civitas Books. ‏
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (2007). Simplicity is highly overrated. Interactions, 14(2), 40–41. https://doi.org/10.1145/1229863.1229885
   Google Scholar
• ‏Orth, D., Thurgood, C., & Hoven, E. V. D. (2019). Designing meaningful products in the digital age: How users value their technological possessions. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 26(5), 1–28. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1145/3341980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paaßen, B., Morgenroth, T., & Stratemeyer, M. (2017). What is a true gamer? The male gamer stereotype and the marginalization of women in video game culture. Sex Roles, 76(7–8), 421–435. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0678-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafaeli, A., & Vilnai-Yavetz, I. (2004). Instrumentality, aesthetics and symbolism of physical artifacts as triggers of emotion. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 5(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922031000086735
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations, 5th ed. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schifferstein, H. N. (2010). From salad to bowl: The role of sensory analysis in product experience research. Food Quality and Preference, 21(8), 1059–1067. ‏‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy, J. J., Zechmeister, E. B., & Zechmeister, J. S. (2012). Observation. In J. J. Shaughnessy, E. B.   and J. S Zechmeister (Eds.). Research Methods in Psychology (9th ed., pp. 92–136). McGraw-Hill Companies.
   Google Scholar
• Thatcher, J. B., Zimmer, J. C., Gundlach, M. J., & McKnight, D. H. (2008). Internal and external dimensions of computer self-efficacy: An empirical examination. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(4), 628–644. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2008.927825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, D. V., Hamilton, R. W., & Rust, R. T. (2005). Feature fatigue: When product capabilities become too much of a good thing. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(4), 431–442. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.2005.42.4.431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tractinsky, N. (1997). March). Aesthetics and apparent usability: Empirically assessing cultural and methodological issues. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 115–122).‏
   Google Scholar
• Tractinsky, N., & Zmiri, D. (in press). Exploring attributes of skins as potential antecedents of emotion in HCI. In P. Fishwick (Ed.), Aesthetic computing. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tuch, A. N., Presslaber, E. E., StöCklin, M., Opwis, K., & Bargas-Avila, J. A. (2012). The role of visual complexity and prototypicality regarding first impression of websites: Working towards understanding aesthetic judgments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70(11), 794–811. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuerke, K. (2013). Cambodia's “lucky” cure. Research Magazine, 28(1), 18–19..
   Google Scholar
• ‏Veblen, T. (2001). The Theory of the Leisure Class., introduction by Alan Wolfe, notes by James Danly. Modern Library.‏‏.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, T., Varsaluoma, J., Kujala, S., Nurkka, P., Petrie, H., & Power, C. (2014). The 18th International Academic Mindtrek Conference, November). Axe UX: Exploring long-term user experience with iScale and AttrakDiff. In Proceedings of Media business, management, content & services (pp. 32–39).‏
   Google Scholar
• Westerlund, H. (2002). Bridging experience, action, and culture in music education. Sibelius Acad. Music Education Department. ‏
   Google Scholar
• Wroblewski, L. (2006). The complexity of simplicity. Retrieved May 27, 2022, from http://www.uxmatters.com/MT/archives/000151.php.
   Google Scholar