Trust in AI and Its Role in the Acceptance of AI Technologies

References

• AI HLEG (2019). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. European Commission. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2759/346720
   Google Scholar
• Barredo Arrieta, A., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., Garcia, S., Gil-Lopez, S., Molina, D., Benjamins, R., Chatila, R., & Herrera, F. (2020). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Information Fusion, 58, 82–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beldad, A. D., & Hegner, S. M. (2018). Expanding the technology acceptance model with the inclusion of trust, social influence, and health valuation to determine the predictors of German users’ willingness to continue using a fitness app: A structural equation modeling approach. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(9), 882–893. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1403220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calhoun, C. S., Bobko, P., Gallimore, J. J., & Lyons, J. B. (2019). Linking precursors of interpersonal trust to human-automation trust: An expanded typology and exploratory experiment. Journal of Trust Research, 9(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2019.1579730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. K., & Ji, Y. G. (2015). Investigating the importance of trust on adopting an autonomous vehicle. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(10), 692–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1070549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Visser, E. J., Monfort, S. S., McKendrick, R., Smith, M. A. B., McKnight, P. E., Krueger, F., & Parasuraman, R. (2016). Almost human: Anthropomorphism increases trust resilience in cognitive agents. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 22(3), 331–349. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman (2021). Edelman trust barometer 2021 (Annual Edelman Trust Barometer, p. 58). https://www.edelman.com/sites/g/files/aatuss191/files/2021-03/2021%20Edelman%20Trust%20Barometer.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Erebak, S., & Turgut, T. (2019). Caregivers’ attitudes toward potential robot coworkers in elder care. Cognition, Technology & Work, 21(2), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0512-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaudiello, I., Zibetti, E., Lefort, S., Chetouani, M., & Ivaldi, S. (2016). Trust as indicator of robot functional and social acceptance. An experimental study on user conformation to iCub answers. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 633–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillath, O., Ai, T., Branicky, M. S., Keshmiri, S., Davison, R. B., & Spaulding, R. (2021). Attachment and trust in artificial intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020). Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 627–660. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorwa, R., Binns, R., & Katzenbach, C. (2020). Algorithmic content moderation: Technical and political challenges in the automation of platform governance. Big Data & Society, 7(1), 205395171989794. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719897945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagendorff, T. (2020). The ethics of AI ethics: An evaluation of guidelines. Minds and Machines, 30(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09517-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., Billings, D. R., Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y. C., de Visser, E. J., & Parasuraman, R. (2011). A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Human Factors, 53(5), 517–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811417254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoff, K. A., & Bashir, M. (2015). Trust in automation: Integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust. Human Factors, 57(3), 407–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814547570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. B. (2012). An empirical study on consumer first purchase intention in online shopping: Integrating initial trust and TAM. Electronic Commerce Research, 12(2), 125–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-012-9089-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K., Boelling, L., Haesler, S., Bailenson, J., Bruder, G., & Welch, G. F. (2018). Does a digital assistant need a body? The influence of visual embodiment and social behavior on the perception of intelligent virtual agents in AR. In 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR) (pp. 105–114). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2018.00039
   Google Scholar
• Krafft, P. M., Young, M., Katell, M., Huang, K., & Bugingo, G. (2020). Defining AI in policy versus practice. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (pp. 72–78). https://doi.org/10.1145/3375627.3375835
   Google Scholar
• Lankton, N., McKnight, D. H., & Tripp, J. (2015). Technology, humanness, and trust: Rethinking trust in technology. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16(10), 880–918. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46(1), 50–80. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. K. (2018). Understanding perception of algorithmic decisions: Fairness, trust, and emotion in response to algorithmic management. Big Data & Society, 5(1), 205395171875668. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718756684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. K., & Rich, K. (2021). Who is included in human perceptions of AI?: Trust and perceived fairness around healthcare AI and cultural mistrust [Paper presentation] (p. 14). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445570
   Google Scholar
• Lockey, S., Gillespie, N., Holm, D., & Someh, I. A. (2021). A review of trust in artificial intelligence: Challenges, vulnerabilities and future directions. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2021.664
   Google Scholar
• Madhavan, P., & Wiegmann, D. A. (2007). Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems. Human Factors, 49(5), 773–785. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872007X230154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: A literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcknight, D. H., Carter, M., Thatcher, J. B., & Clay, P. F. (2011). Trust in a specific technology: An investigation of its components and measures. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 2(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/1985347.1985353
   Google Scholar
• McLean, G., Osei-Frimpong, K. (2019). Hey Alexa … examine the variables influencing the use of artificial intelligent in-home voice assistants. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (2019). Artificial intelligence in society. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eedfee77-en
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, B., & Nass, C. I. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places (1. paperback ed.). CSLI Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Rheu, M., Shin, J. Y., Peng, W., & Huh-Yoo, J. (2021). Systematic review: Trust-building factors and implications for conversational agent design. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1807710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, S. J., Norvig, P., Davis, E., & Edwards, D. (2016). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (3rd ed., Global ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, P., Biessmann, F., & Teubner, T. (2020). Transparency and trust in artificial intelligence systems. Journal of Decision Systems, 29(4), 260–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2020.1819094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, D. (2020a). How do users interact with algorithm recommender systems? The interaction of users, algorithms, and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 109, 106344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, D. (2020b). User perceptions of algorithmic decisions in the personalized AI system: Perceptual evaluation of fairness, accountability, transparency, and explainability. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 64(4), 541–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2020.1843357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, D. (2020c). Expanding the role of trust in the experience of algorithmic journalism: User sensemaking of algorithmic heuristics in Korean users. Journalism Practice, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1841018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, D. (2021a). Embodying algorithms, enactive artificial intelligence and the extended cognition: You can see as much as you know about algorithm. Journal of Information Science, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551520985495
   Google Scholar
• Shin, D. (2021b). The effects of explainability and causability on perception, trust, and acceptance: Implications for explainable AI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 146, 102551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, D. (2021c). The perception of humanness in conversational journalism: An algorithmic information-processing perspective. New Media & Society, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444821993801
   Google Scholar
• Shin, D. (2021d). Why does explainability matter in news analytic systems? Proposing explainable analytic journalism. Journalism Studies, 22(8), 1047–1065. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1916984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, D. (2022). How do people judge the credibility of algorithmic sources? Ai & Society, 37, 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01158-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, D., & Park, Y. J. (2019). Role of fairness, accountability, and transparency in algorithmic affordance. Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sledgianowski, D., & Kulviwat, S. (2009). Using social networking sites: The effects of playfulness, critical mass and trust in a hedonic context. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49(4), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2009.11645342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söllner, M., Hoffmann, A., & Leimeister, J. M. (2016). Why different trust relationships matter for information systems users. European Journal of Information Systems, 25(3), 274–287. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2015.17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, B., & Han, I. (2002). Effect of trust on customer acceptance of Internet banking. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 1(3–4), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1567-4223(02)00017-0
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., Jung, E. H., Waddell, T. F., & Kim, K. J. (2017). Cheery companions or serious assistants? Role and demeanor congruity as predictors of robot attraction and use intentions among senior citizens. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 97, 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terzopoulos, G., & Satratzemi, M. (2020). Voice assistants and smart speakers in everyday life and in education. Informatics in Education, 19(3), 473–490. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2020.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiebes, S., Lins, S., & Sunyaev, A. (2021). Trustworthy artificial intelligence. Electronic Markets, 31, 447–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-020-00441-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tung, F., Chang, S., & Chou, C. (2008). An extension of trust and TAM model with IDT in the adoption of the electronic logistics information system in HIS in the medical industry. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77(5), 324–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D. (2019). The rhetoric and reality of anthropomorphism in artificial intelligence. Minds and Machines, 29(3), 417–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-019-09506-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waytz, A., Heafner, J., & Epley, N. (2014). The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, I.-L., & Chen, J.-L. (2005). An extension of trust and TAM model with TPB in the initial adoption of on-line tax: An empirical study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62(6), 784–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., & Liu, D. (2007). Please note that there is no doi associated with this paper: The effects of trust and enjoyment on intention to play online games. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 8(2), 128–140.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, K., Zhao, Y., Zhu, Q., Tan, X., & Zheng, H. (2011). A meta-analysis of the impact of trust on technology acceptance model: Investigation of moderating influence of subject and context type. International Journal of Information Management, 31(6), 572–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar